Tag Archives: Brazoria County

Investigator Matt Wingo Responds to Roy Alan Stuart Story, Raises Questions About Prison Journals

Matt Wingo response to Roy Alan Stuart investigation showing July 2023 text messages, Kent McGowen prison diaries and Roy Alan Stuart mugshot.

Investigator Matt Wingo Raises Questions About Roy Alan Stuart Prison Journal Story

Before publishing my interview with former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen and his handwritten prison journals about convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart, I contacted investigator Matt Wingo seeking an interview and comment.

I did not receive an interview before my publication deadline.

After the story was published, Wingo text messaged and emailed me several times expressing concerns about the accuracy of information contained in McGowen’s journals. Although one of his text messages stated he did not want further contact, he continued sending additional emails outlining what he believes are significant factual problems.

Why I Reported the Story the Way I Did

The messages document that Wingo and McGowen communicated. They do not independently establish that every claim discussed in those communications is accurate.

July 13, 2023 text message exchange between investigator Matt Wingo and former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen discussing Roy Alan Stuart. The messages include discussion of an estimated homicide count and references to reviewing additional investigative records.

One issue readers should understand is the homicide count.

Before publication, I had seen a July 2023 message between Wingo and McGowen in which Wingo wrote:

“I have him killing 14 but that’s light, what we know about.”

However, because I was unable to interview Wingo before publication, I did not feel it was appropriate to publish his estimate as fact without giving him the opportunity to explain how he reached that number.

Instead, I reported what Kent McGowen told me during my interview and clearly identified him as the source of those statements. Throughout my reporting, I repeatedly noted that many of the claims contained in McGowen’s journals remain unverified.

Editor’s Note – July 10, 2026

After Investigator Matt Wingo contacted me to point out factual errors in my original article, I reexamined Kent McGowen’s original handwritten journals. During that review, I determined that I had misinterpreted several entries involving investigator communications. The journals document communications between Kent McGowen and investigators—including letters, telephone calls, emails, text messages and other correspondence. Upon reexamining the journals, I determined I had incorrectly interpreted some entries as documenting in-person meetings as I had previously interpreted.

The underlying claims in this article remain attributed to Kent McGowen’s interview and handwritten journals unless otherwise noted. As with the original publication, these allegations have not been independently verified by this news organization.

Additional Documents Reviewed

Excerpts from Kent McGowen’s original handwritten prison journals referencing communications with investigators and agencies regarding information he said Roy Alan Stuart shared while they were incarcerated together.

In addition to the handwritten journals, I also reviewed text messages, emails, and other communications exchanged between Matt Wingo and Kent McGowen regarding Roy Alan Stuart as part of this reporting.

The Questions That Remain

Several important questions remain unanswered.

Which Texas Ranger or Rangers were referenced in McGowen’s journals?

Can the journal entries regarding investigator communications be independently corroborated through public records or other witnesses?

Which portions of the journals can be independently verified?

Which claims cannot currently be verified?

Are there additional public records that support or contradict McGowen’s account?

I intend to continue reporting on these questions as more information becomes available.

More Resources

If stories about cold cases, victims, and investigative journalism matter to you, these books and reports may also be helpful.

📚 The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk

📚 While the City Slept by Eli Sanders

📰 Read my original investigation:

Exclusive: Roy Alan Stuart Prison Confessions Revealed

Why I Fight So Hard for Victims: The Story I’ve Never Shared

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through my affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent investigative journalism.

Brazoria County Seeks to Withhold Records on Outside Counsel

The requested records involve outside attorneys hired by Brazoria County in connection with the John Mendoza Jr. shooting investigation.

Public records request and Brazoria County DA letter seeking to withhold records in the John Mendoza Jr. shooting investigation.
July 2, 2026: Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office notified requester Kevin Henry that it was asking the Texas Attorney General to determine whether records related to outside legal counsel could be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.

Brazoria County DA Asks Texas Attorney General to Withhold Records on Outside Counsel Hired After John Mendoza Jr. Shooting

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Why did Brazoria County hire outside legal counsel following the fatal shooting of John Mendoza Jr., and why is the District Attorney now asking the Texas Attorney General to keep those records from the public?

Those are questions at the center of a new Texas Public Information Act dispute after podcast host Kevin Henry requested documents related to outside attorneys retained by Brazoria County following the officer-involved shooting.

The records request seeks documents that would show:

The attorney engagement letter.

The scope of legal representation.

Financial terms of the agreement.

Communications regarding hiring outside counsel.

Authority used to retain the attorneys.

Invoices and payment records.

According to the request, the records involve outside attorney Norman Giles and the law firm Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP in connection with matters involving John Mendoza Jr., John Mendoza Sr., and attorney Charles Adams.

DA Requests Attorney General Ruling

July 2, 2026 Brazoria County District Attorney letter requesting a Texas Attorney General ruling on whether records related to outside legal counsel may be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.
On July 2, 2026, the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office notified Kevin Henry that it was seeking a Texas Attorney General ruling on whether records related to outside legal counsel could be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.

Instead of immediately releasing the records, Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney Tom Selleck notified the Texas Attorney General that his office intends to seek permission to withhold portions of the requested information.

In the July 2, 2026 letter, the DA cites several exceptions under the Texas Public Information Act, including:

Confidential information

Litigation exception

Law enforcement exception

Agency memoranda

The Attorney General will ultimately determine whether those claimed exemptions apply.

Kevin Henry Challenges the County’s Position

Portrait of Kevin Henry, host of The Kevin Henry Podcast, who filed the Texas Public Information Act request seeking records related to outside legal counsel in the John Mendoza Jr. investigation.
Kevin Henry filed the public records request seeking contracts, invoices, communications, and related records concerning outside legal counsel hired by Brazoria County in connection with the John Mendoza Jr. investigation. The Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office later notified him it was seeking a Texas Attorney General ruling on whether some of those records could be withheld.

Kevin Henry argues the requested documents involve public expenditures rather than protected legal advice.

In his filing, he contends that:

Engagement letters for outside legal services are generally public records.

Financial terms of public contracts are typically subject to disclosure.

Outside counsel was retained before litigation was filed.

The public has a strong interest in understanding how taxpayer money is being spent following the fatal shooting.

Henry also argues that disclosure is particularly important because the request concerns the death of John Mendoza Jr. during an encounter with a Brazoria County Sheriff’s deputy.

Why This Matters

When government agencies retain outside attorneys, taxpayers often pay those legal expenses.

The records requested could provide additional information about:

When outside counsel was hired.

What work the attorneys were retained to perform.

How much taxpayers may ultimately pay.

The legal scope of the representation.

Whether those documents remain confidential now rests with the Texas Attorney General’s Office.

What Happens Next

The Attorney General will review both Brazoria County’s arguments for withholding the records and Kevin Henry’s response opposing those claims.

If the Attorney General orders disclosure, Brazoria County may be required to release some or all of the requested documents. If the ruling favors the county, portions of the records could remain withheld.

I’ll continue following this public records dispute and provide updates as additional filings become available.

The Texas Attorney General will now determine whether the requested records must be released or whether the county may lawfully withhold some or all of them under the Texas Public Information Act.

More John Mendoza Jr. Coverage: Follow my ongoing investigative reporting into the John Mendoza Jr. shooting, including public records requests, legal filings, the outside counsel controversy, attorney statements, and previous developments in the case.

Recommended Reporting Gear

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Every purchase made through these links helps support my independent investigative reporting and allows me to continue covering stories like this one. Thank you for your support.

Reporting Equipment I Use & Recommend:

🎤 Voice Recorder

📷 Body Camera

📻 Police Scanner

Former Deputy Documents Alleged Roy Alan Stuart Confessions

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

How An Unlikely Prison Friendship Began

Former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen says one of the most unexpected chapters of his life began while serving a prison sentence in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

McGowen was convicted in the 1992 murder of Susan White and spent 19 years in prison before he was paroled. Since his release, he has spoken publicly about his case and his time in prison, including conversations he says he had with convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart.

According to McGowen, he spent nearly two years housed near convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart, where the two developed an unlikely relationship that led to conversations about alleged unsolved murders across Southeast Texas.

McGowen says he carefully documented those conversations, typed formal reports, and later turned the information over to multiple law enforcement agencies.

I have not independently verified Stuart’s alleged prison statements or whether they resulted in any solved criminal cases.

An Unlikely Prison Conversation

McGowen told me that most inmates avoided Stuart, describing him as someone who appeared exactly how many people would imagine a serial killer.

After noticing Stewart sitting alone, McGowen said he bought him a pint of ice cream and a soft drink from the prison commissary.

According to McGowen, that simple act led Stuart to begin discussing murders he claimed to have committed throughout Texas.

“Nobody would talk to Roy,” McGowen said. “After that, he just started talking.”

McGowen said one reason he began paying close attention was because Stuart showed him what McGowen recalls was a letter that Stuart claimed had been written by attorney Tom Selleck. According to McGowen, Stuart also claimed Selleck represented him at the time. Selleck currently serves as the Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney and previously worked as an assistant district attorney before entering private practice. I have not independently verified the letter, its authenticity, or Stuart’s claim regarding the alleged legal representation.

Claims Of Additional Victims

Historical 1994 Victoria Advocate newspaper clipping reporting Roy Alan Stuart’s arrest in Brazoria County and describing his criminal history.
Historical newspaper clipping from The Victoria Advocate (May 1994) reporting Roy Alan Stuart’s arrest in Brazoria County. The article states Stuart had been investigated in multiple homicide and sexual assault cases. Included for historical context alongside Kent McGowen’s interview.

McGowen alleges Stuart described several killings that were never publicly connected to him.

Among the stories McGowen recalls were allegations involving:

A woman allegedly abducted from Houston during rodeo season.

A victim allegedly killed near a waterway in Brazoria County.

Bodies allegedly disposed of in or near the Brazos River.

Additional killings Stuart allegedly discussed involving Southeast Texas.

McGowen says Stuart showed no remorse while recounting the alleged crimes.

Documenting Every Conversation

Rather than relying on memory, McGowen says he immediately began documenting the conversations.

He kept handwritten notes while incarcerated before later typing formal reports describing what Stuart allegedly told him.

McGowen says he eventually forwarded those reports to multiple law enforcement agencies, including investigators in several Texas counties.

“I wanted to document everything while it was still fresh,” McGowen said.

Investigators Later Contacted Him

According to McGowen, investigators later reached out requesting copies of his notes.

He says an FBI agent also contacted him after learning about the reports and asked to review the journals because they reflected his contemporaneous observations while Stuart was allegedly making the statements.

McGowen says he continues to maintain copies of those writings today.

Questions Still Remain

Whether Stuart’s alleged prison statements can ever be verified remains unknown.

At this time, I have not found any publicly available records that independently confirm the additional alleged victims described by McGowen.

However, McGowen believes investigators considered the information important enough to request his documentation years after the conversations took place.

As part of my continuing coverage, I am preparing additional public records requests to determine what investigative steps, if any, followed McGowen’s submissions.

This remains an active reporting project. If you have firsthand knowledge related to Roy Alan Stuart or the investigations discussed in this article, contact me through ChopperRose.com

Related Coverage

Convicted Former Deputy Says He Was Framed — But Key Questions Remain (coming soon)

Rebecca Beard Investigation: Exclusive Interviews And Court Records

Texas Killing Fields: Continuing Coverage

Amazon Recommendations

Books About Serial Killers

Whoever Fights Monsters by Robert K. Ressler

Mindhunter by John E. Douglas

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Why I Released the Exclusive 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

Why I Released the 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

As an investigative reporter, I often have to make difficult decisions.

One of the hardest was deciding whether to release the 2002 family mediation recording involving Paul Taylor Jr. and Rebecca Beard’s family.

When I first obtained an exclusive copy of the recording from Rebecca Beard’s family, I wasn’t sure if I would ever make it public.

For months, I listened to the recording while reviewing court records, investigative documents, and interviewing Rebecca’s family. The more I reported on the case, the more I believed the recording added important context to an investigation that still raises questions nearly four decades later.

Rather than relying on summaries or secondhand accounts, I wanted people to hear Paul Taylor Jr.’s own words for themselves.

This article isn’t about telling anyone what to believe.

It’s about explaining why I decided to release the recording and why I believe it is an important part of my ongoing investigation.

“Rather than relying on summaries or secondhand accounts, I wanted people to hear Paul Taylor Jr.’s own words and decide for themselves.”

Watch the Exclusive 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

The full 30-minute recording is embedded below. I encourage you to listen to it in its entirety before drawing your own conclusions.

Why the recording stood out

As I compared the mediation recording with other records I reviewed during my investigation, several things caught my attention.

One involves the events after Rebecca Beard disappeared.

During the mediation, Paul Taylor Jr. appears unable to remember getting his vehicle stuck in a ditch near his home or the tow truck driver who reportedly helped pull him out. Yet in other parts of the recording, he recalls details surrounding the case.

That difference raised questions for me.

Another involves the weapon.

While reviewing investigative records, I came across a sealed document containing entries that reference a Remington shotgun and what appears to be human remains.

Those entries stood out because they raise questions when compared with portions of the mediation recording.

I encourage viewers to listen to the recording, review the available information, and draw their own conclusions.

Why I chose to publish it

Investigative reporting isn’t about deciding a case.

It’s about asking questions, reviewing records, interviewing the people closest to the investigation, and presenting information as fairly and accurately as possible.

Over the past several months, I’ve interviewed Rebecca Beard’s family, reviewed numerous court records and investigative documents, and continued asking questions about a case that still has many unanswered ones.

After months of reporting, I believed it was time to let the public hear this recording in its entirety.

This article serves as an introduction to that recording.

I encourage you to listen to the complete mediation audio in context and compare what is said with the records discussed throughout my investigation.

Sometimes the biggest questions aren’t about what someone remembers.

They’re about what they don’t.

Thank you for taking the time to follow my reporting.

Related Rebecca Beard Coverage

Continue following my investigation with these related reports:

Exclusive: Rebecca Beard’s Daughter Speaks Out Nearly 40 Years After Her Mother’s Disappearance

Questions for Arch Aplin and John Cohn in the Rebecca Beard Case

What the Sealed Documents Reveal in the Rebecca Beard Investigation

How I Reported This Investigation

This investigation took months of research, interviews, reviewing court records, and comparing documents with the 2002 mediation recording. These are some of the tools I use while reporting stories like this.

Shure MV88+ Microphone – Used for interviews and recording clear audio in the field.

GoPro Camera – Captures behind-the-scenes footage and field reporting.

iPhone 16 Accessories – Tripods, mounts, and mobile reporting gear.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through the links on this page, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent investigative journalism.

Inside Paul Taylor Jr.’s Prison Letters About the Rebecca Beard Investigation

Newly obtained prison messages from Paul Taylor Jr. discuss the Rebecca Beard investigation, prison life and his perspective decades after the case.

Nearly four decades after Rebecca Beard disappeared, new prison messages from convicted killer Paul Taylor Jr. are offering another glimpse into how he views the investigation today.

The messages, shared with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose by a longtime correspondent who asked to remain anonymous, cover much more than the Rebecca Beard case. Taylor discusses prison life, his health, his faith, investigators, and why he believes renewed attention is being focused on his case.

While many of his statements reflect his personal opinions and allegations, they provide insight into his current mindset as interest in the Rebecca Beard investigation continues.

Taylor questions renewed interest in the Rebecca Beard case

In several messages, Taylor repeatedly asks why people are suddenly interested in his case after so many years.

He questions why the victim’s family has continued speaking publicly and wonders what new information investigators may have uncovered.

Taylor also asks whether new evidence has surfaced and repeatedly requests updates from outside prison.

His questions come as the Rebecca Beard investigation has received renewed attention following exclusive interviews, court records, and additional reporting into the 1986 disappearance.

Paul Taylor Jr. comments on investigators

Throughout the messages, Taylor criticizes investigators and the criminal justice system.

He claims authorities mishandled evidence and writes that people should question official accounts of the investigation.

These statements represent Taylor’s personal opinions and have not been independently verified.

Despite his criticism, Taylor continues asking for information about developments in the case.

Faith remains a central theme

Religion appears throughout nearly every message.

Taylor writes about reading the Bible each morning, praying daily, and believing God has guided him throughout his years in prison.

He frequently ends his messages with blessings and encourages others to pray.

The repeated references suggest his Christian faith continues to play a significant role in his daily life behind bars.

Life inside a Texas prison

The letters also describe Taylor’s daily routine inside prison.

He discusses prison conditions, medical treatment following the removal of basal cell carcinoma, communication through the Securus messaging system, and the challenges of staying connected with the outside world.

Taylor says receiving letters helps him remain informed about events beyond prison walls.

Taylor notices new reporting

One of the more interesting portions of the correspondence comes when Taylor references recent reporting.

He asks whether Tammy Rose is writing articles and later questions why her name briefly appeared in his contact list before disappearing.

The messages suggest Taylor is aware that new reporting and renewed public interest continue surrounding the Rebecca Beard investigation.

Investigation continues

Rebecca Beard disappeared in 1986 and her body has never been found.

Although Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in connection with her death, questions remain about where Rebecca’s remains may be located.

Investigators have conducted multiple searches over the years, while Rebecca’s family continues asking authorities to pursue additional leads.

The newly shared prison messages do not establish new evidence in the case. Instead, they provide additional insight into Taylor’s thoughts as the investigation continues decades later.

Editor’s Note: The prison messages contain Taylor’s personal opinions and allegations regarding investigators and the criminal justice system. Those statements have not been independently verified and are presented to accurately reflect the contents of the correspondence.

Recommended Reading

If you’re interested in the Rebecca Beard investigation and other Texas cold cases, these books provide additional background and context. Purchasing through the links below helps support my independent reporting at no additional cost to you.

Recommended Reading: Rebecca Beard & Texas True Crime

The Killing Fields

Deliver Us by Kathryn Casey

Let’s Kill Mom: Four Texas Teens and a Horrifying Murder

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent journalism and investigative reporting.

Scanner Audio Raises New Questions After Release of Texas Ranger Affidavit

A comparison graphic highlights questions raised after Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose compared scanner audio obtained shortly after the June 1 officer-involved shooting with a recently released Texas Ranger affidavit. The article includes the affidavit and scanner audio so readers can review the evidence themselves.

Scanner Audio Raises New Questions After Release of Texas Ranger Affidavit

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Scanner audio obtained by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose shortly after the June 1 officer-involved shooting is raising new questions after being compared with a recently released Texas Ranger search warrant affidavit.

The affidavit states investigators reviewed Deputy Kevin Tippit’s dash camera and body camera before preparing the search warrant. According to the document, the pursuit reached speeds of approximately 120 mph after Tippit activated his emergency lights and siren.

However, after reviewing all scanner traffic I was able to obtain beginning at midnight on June 1, the first pursuit-related radio traffic I located begins at approximately 12:08 a.m.

The scanner audio and the affidavit are both included below so readers can review the evidence for themselves.

What the Scanner Audio Reveals

The scanner traffic begins with officers discussing a pursuit involving a Dodge Challenger.

During the transmissions, officers can be heard reporting speeds of about 60 mph. Later, as the pursuit entered a residential neighborhood, officers reported speeds closer to 30 mph.

The scanner audio also captures Deputy Tippit reporting what he described as an “accidental discharge.”

Moments later, dispatch clarified there was a gunshot victim. Emergency crews requested a trauma kit and a tourniquet before CPR efforts began.

What the Texas Ranger Affidavit Says

The Texas Ranger affidavit describes a different timeline.

According to the affidavit, Deputy Tippit observed the Challenger around 12:06 a.m. on FM 2004. After activating his emergency lights and siren, investigators say the Challenger accelerated and reached approximately 120 mph while running six red lights.

The affidavit states the pursuit ended at a home on Indian Warrior Trail. Deputy Tippit entered the garage, discharged his firearm, and later radioed dispatch reporting an accidental discharge before rendering aid.

Why the Timeline Matters

The scanner audio reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose does not include pursuit traffic before approximately 12:08 a.m.

That does not necessarily mean the affidavit is incorrect.

Instead, it raises several important questions.

Additional radio traffic may have occurred on another channel that was not included in the scanner recordings available for review.

The times listed in the affidavit may also be approximate.

It is also possible investigators reconstructed the timeline using dash camera and body camera footage instead of scanner traffic.

How Was 120 MPH Determined?

Another unanswered question involves the reported speed.

The affidavit states investigators observed the pursuit on dash camera video. However, the document does not explain how the 120 mph figure was determined.

It is unclear whether investigators relied on the patrol vehicle’s speedometer, video analysis, onboard vehicle data, or another investigative method.

Additional records may answer that question in the future.

Read the Documents and Listen to the Audio

For transparency, I have included both the Texas Ranger affidavit and the scanner audio below.

I encourage readers to review both pieces of evidence and draw their own conclusions.

As more records become public, including dash camera video, body camera footage, dispatch logs, CAD records, and forensic reports, they may provide additional context about the timeline and the reported speeds.

Editor’s Note: The scanner audio included below reflects the recordings Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose was able to obtain. Additional law enforcement communications or evidence not included in those recordings may exist and could provide additional context.

Related Coverage

DA Seeks to Withhold Records in John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Shooting Case

Deputy Kevin Tippit fired after fatal Lake Jackson shooting

Related Reading: Want to learn more about law enforcement investigations and use-of-force cases? Browse these books available on Amazon.

Police Use of Force by Seth Stoughton

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting independent journalism.

Rebecca Beard Investigation: New Documents and Paul Taylor Jr.’s Interview Raise Unanswered Questions

Rebecca Beard investigation thumbnail showing Linda Barnes, Paul Taylor Jr. and police evidence documents reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

Rebecca Beard Investigation: New Documents and Paul Taylor Jr.’s Interview Raise Unanswered Questions

Nearly 40 years after 22-year-old Rebecca “Becky” Beard disappeared after leaving a Freeport nightclub with Paul Taylor Jr., questions about the case remain.

Paul Taylor Jr. later pleaded guilty, but Becky’s body has never been officially recovered.

Now, Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose has reviewed court records, police photographs and a recorded interview between Taylor and Becky’s mother, Linda Barnes. Together, those records raise new questions about the evidence, the murder weapon and other details of the Rebecca Beard investigation.

Signed promotional photo of Rebecca “Becky” Beard inscribed, “To John, Love Always, Becky, 1985.”
A signed 1985 promotional photograph of Rebecca “Becky” Beard addressed “To John.” The image is among personal items reviewed during Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose’s ongoing Rebecca Beard investigation.

Linda Barnes Refused to Let the Case Go Cold

Rebecca disappeared after leaving the Excalibur nightclub with Paul Taylor Jr. in March 1986.

For years, Becky’s mother, Linda Barnes, refused to give up. She searched for answers, gathered records and pushed investigators to keep working the case.

Her persistence paid off. A Brazoria County grand jury indicted Paul Taylor Jr. in 1994—eight years after Becky’s disappearance.

Taylor later pleaded guilty, but Becky’s body has never been officially recovered.

Taylor Describes the Night Becky Disappeared

In a recorded interview with Linda Barnes, Taylor claimed Becky voluntarily left the nightclub with him and went to his home.

He said they argued after he failed to obtain cocaine.

Taylor claimed he tried to scare Becky with a firearm before shooting her.

He told Barnes he wrapped Becky in orange sheets secured with duct tape before disposing of her body.

He also claimed he threw the weapon into a bayou. However, a Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office evidence sheet reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose lists a Remington Model 1100 shotgun and a brown gun case as evidence in the case.

Because Taylor described the firearm only as “the weapon” during the interview, the apparent difference between his account and the evidence sheet raises additional questions.

A Shotgun Appears on the Evidence List

One document reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose is a Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office evidence sheet.

Among the listed evidence is a Remington Model 1100 shotgun and a brown gun case.

During his interview with Barnes, Taylor never identified the firearm by type. Instead, he repeatedly referred only to “the weapon.”

The records reviewed do not explain when the shotgun was recovered, where it was recovered or whether it was ultimately identified as the murder weapon.

Police Photographs Show Two Holes in the Bedroom Wall

Police crime scene photograph showing two holes in a bedroom wall inside Paul Taylor Jr.’s Clute home during the Rebecca Beard investigation.
A police crime scene photograph documents two holes in a bedroom wall inside Paul Taylor Jr.’s home. During his recorded interview with Linda Barnes, Taylor described firing a single fatal shot. The records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose do not explain the presence of the second hole.

Crime scene photographs reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose document two holes in a bedroom wall inside Taylor’s home.

During the interview, Taylor described firing a single fatal shot.

The available records reviewed do not explain whether investigators determined how the two holes were created or whether either hole was connected to the homicide.

The records also do not explain whether ballistic testing linked the recovered shotgun to the wall damage.

The Tow Truck Driver Taylor Could Not Remember

One of the most revealing exchanges involves a tow truck driver.

Barnes confronted Taylor with information that a tow truck operator reportedly pulled his vehicle from a ditch after Becky’s disappearance.

Taylor repeatedly responded that he did not remember the incident.

Barnes described details including a neighbor who reportedly witnessed the vehicle in the ditch and the driver’s recollection of the call.

The conversation highlights a pattern throughout the interview. Taylor remembered specific details such as orange sheets, duct tape and burying Becky, yet repeatedly claimed he could not remember other significant events from that same period.

Court Notes Reference Possible Remains

Handwritten court notes reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose appear to show prosecutors requested additional time to determine whether recovered remains belonged to Rebecca Beard.

The handwriting is difficult to read in places, but the notes appear to reference delaying proceedings while investigators sought positive identification of possible remains.

The records reviewed do not explain what became of those reported remains or whether they were ultimately determined to belong to someone else.

A Confidential Court Record

Confidential pre-sentence investigation file from the Paul Taylor Jr. case reviewed during Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose’s Rebecca Beard investigation.
A confidential pre-sentence investigation file prepared before Paul Taylor Jr.‘s sentencing. The court record was reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose as part of the ongoing Rebecca Beard investigation and provides additional context to the case decades after Becky’s disappearance.

Also among the records is a pre-sentence investigation stamped:

“Confidential Judicial Document — Not Open to Public Inspection.”

The document was prepared before Taylor’s sentencing and demonstrates that confidential records existed during the criminal proceedings.

Questions That Still Remain

The records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose answer some questions but leave many others unresolved.

Among them:

When was the Remington Model 1100 shotgun recovered?
Was it ever identified as the murder weapon?
Were the two holes in the bedroom wall forensically examined?
What became of the possible remains referenced in court notes?
Why do some details in Taylor’s interview differ from other investigative records?

Nearly four decades after Rebecca Beard disappeared, Linda Barnes’ determination continues to inspire efforts to better understand what happened to her daughter.

Editor’s Note

This report is based on court records, law enforcement documents, police photographs and a recorded interview reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose. Where records are incomplete or unclear, this article presents unanswered questions rather than conclusions.

Related Rebecca Beard Coverage

Read Part One: 

Read Part Two: 

More Rebecca Beard coverage:
https://www.chopperrose.com/tag/rebecca-beard/

Recommended 

True Crime Books

If you’re interested in cold cases, unsolved mysteries, and investigative reporting, these books provide insight into how complex cases are investigated and solved

 I’ll Be Gone in the Dark by Michelle McNamara
A bestselling investigation into the Golden State Killer case.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Chopper Rose earns from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through the links below, we may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. These commissions help support independent investigative journalism and cold case reporting.

Exclusive: Rebecca Beard Family Wants Answers From Key Witnesses Named In Police Reports

Brittany Pipkin poses in a police uniform during her law enforcement career. Pipkin, the daughter of Rebecca Beard, later used her investigative training to review records related to her mother’s unsolved murder case.
Rebecca Beard’s daughter, Brittany Pipkin, became a police officer and is now using those investigative skills in her search for answers about her mother’s 1986 murder. Photo courtesy of Brittany Pipkin.

Why Brittany Pipkin Questions the Original Investigation

Becky Beard’s 1986 planner with handwritten notes and calendar entries, reviewed by her daughter Brittany Pipkin during her search for answers in the decades-old case.
Becky Beard’s personal planner from 1986 remains an important piece of family history. Her daughter, Brittany Pipkin, has carefully reviewed the planner and other records while searching for answers about her mother’s disappearance and presumed murder.

BEAUMONT, Texas — More than four decades after Rebecca Beard disappeared and was later presumed murdered, her family says they are still searching for answers.

After reviewing decades of police reports, Rebecca’s daughter, Brittany Pipkin, believes there are questions that remain unanswered about several people whose names appear throughout the investigation.

Among them are businessman Arch Aplin and John Cohn.

Watch the Full Video Report

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose sat down with Brittany Pipkin to discuss why she believes additional questions should be asked about individuals named in the original investigation.

Questions About Arch Aplin

According to police reports reviewed by the family, Arch Aplin’s name appears numerous times throughout the investigation.

Pipkin says she first became aware of Aplin while reviewing records connected to her mother’s case.

“When I was younger, I was a huge fan because I saw his name in all the police reports,” Pipkin said.

According to Pipkin, reports indicate Aplin had contact with Rebecca Beard before her disappearance and later communicated frequently with investigators.

Police records also reference reward money being offered during the investigation.

“He was contacting detectives almost daily,” Pipkin said. “He’s offering rewards.”

Despite that involvement, Pipkin says she has never had an opportunity to speak with Aplin directly.

“I’ve sent him a few emails,” she said. “He’s never reached out to talk to us.”

Pipkin says she would like the opportunity to ask questions about Rebecca’s final days and what information he may remember from that time period.

“I would love to ask him if he knows more than what was told to investigators,” she said.

Conflicting Accounts Raise Questions

Questions Surrounding John Cohn

Pipkin also wants to speak with John Cohn, whose name appears in investigative records.

According to police reports, Cohn reportedly contacted then-Brazoria County Sheriff E.J. “Joe” King shortly after Rebecca’s murder.

The reports indicate Cohn allegedly told authorities that his friend and co-owner of a home on Third Street in Clute was responsible for Rebecca’s death.

That individual, Paul Taylor Jr., would not be charged until approximately nine years later.

Taylor eventually pleaded guilty in connection with the case.

For Pipkin, the timeline raises questions.

“What did people know, and when did they know it?” she asked.

She believes additional information may still exist regarding what occurred in the days immediately following Rebecca’s disappearance.

“I think he knows a lot more than what has been stated,” Pipkin said.

The Family Says This Is About Finding The Truth

Pipkin emphasizes that the family’s goal is not to publicly accuse anyone.

Instead, she says they are seeking answers and hoping investigators continue pursuing leads that could help locate Rebecca’s remains.

“We’re not doing this to accuse anybody,” Pipkin said.

“We just want the truth. We want to bring her home.”

More than 40 years after Rebecca Beard vanished, the family says that goal has never changed.

They want a place to visit.

A place to leave flowers.

And finally, a place to lay Rebecca Beard to rest.

Related Coverage

Read Part One:

Read Part Two:

More Rebecca Beard coverage:
https://www.chopperrose.com/tag/rebecca-beard/

Editor’s Note

The individuals named in this story have not been charged with Rebecca Beard’s murder. Statements referenced in this article are drawn from interviews, court records and police reports reviewed by the family. Investigators have not publicly announced additional suspects in the case.

Recommended True Crime Books

If you’re interested in cold cases, unsolved mysteries, and investigative reporting, these books provide insight into how complex cases are investigated and solved:

📖 I’ll Be Gone in the Dark by Michelle McNamara
A bestselling investigation into the Golden State Killer case.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Chopper Rose earns from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through the links below, we may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. These commissions help support independent investigative journalism and cold case reporting.

Exclusive: Rebecca Beard Family Says Police Records Raised New Questions

Stack of police reports, court records, and investigative documents marked with colorful tabs reviewed by Rebecca Beard’s family as they search for answers in the decades-old cold case.
Rebecca Beard’s family reviewed hundreds of pages of police reports and court records, saying the documents raised new questions about the investigation into her 1986 murder.

Exclusive: Rebecca Beard Family Says Police Records Raised New Questions

BEAUMONT, Texas — For decades, Rebecca Beard’s family believed they understood the basic facts surrounding her disappearance and murder.

That changed when they began reviewing police records.

According to Rebecca’s daughter, Brittany Pipkin, a tip received in 2021 led the family to take a deeper look into the case file.

Rebecca Beard’s daughter, Brittany Pipkin, and her father review police records and case documents while discussing new questions they say emerged from the investigation into Rebecca Beard’s 1986 murder.
Brittany Pipkin and her father examine police records and case files connected to the Rebecca Beard case, searching for answers more than 40 years after Rebecca disappeared.

Watch the Full Video Report

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose spoke with Brittany Pipkin about the documents that she says changed the family’s understanding of the case.

A Tip That Changed Everything

Pipkin says a former law enforcement officer encouraged the family to reexamine the investigation.

The family obtained records through open records requests and began reviewing decades of reports.

As they worked through the documents, one item immediately caught their attention.

The Sealed Document

According to Pipkin, the family discovered a copy of a sealed document inside the records.

The document referenced a body that investigators were reportedly waiting to identify.

“We were given a copy of a sealed document,” Pipkin said. “That document said there was a body they were waiting to identify and make sure it was my mother’s body.”

The discovery shocked the family.

For years, they believed there had never been any indication that Rebecca’s remains had been found.

“That right there was kind of a shocker to us,” Pipkin said.

New Witnesses Come Forward

Remote dirt road leading through the Brazoria National Wildlife Refuge, an area referenced in witness accounts and past searches connected to the Rebecca Beard case.
The Brazoria National Wildlife Refuge has been mentioned in witness statements and investigative leads related to the Rebecca Beard case. Family members continue to seek answers about whether additional searches should be conducted in the area.

The records review also prompted additional people to contact the family.

Pipkin says several witnesses have provided information that she believes deserves further investigation.

The family has shared information with law enforcement and continues to seek updates on the status of the investigation.

“We have had new witnesses come forward,” Pipkin said. “There have been very specific details on what happened that night.”

At this time, authorities have not publicly announced any new criminal charges connected to the case.

Searching for Answers

Brittany Pipkin in her police officer uniform. Rebecca Beard’s daughter says her law enforcement experience helped her analyze records and investigative documents tied to her mother’s unsolved murder.
Rebecca Beard’s daughter, Brittany Pipkin, became a police officer after losing her mo

Pipkin says she understands the challenges investigators face in a case that is now more than 40 years old.

However, she believes additional work remains.

“I would love them to search all the locations,” Pipkin said.

The family says it has even offered to help locate resources for future searches if needed.

Their goal remains the same as it was decades ago.

They want answers.

Most importantly, they want to bring Rebecca Beard home.

“We just want the truth,” Pipkin said. “We want to bring her home.”

Related Coverage

Read Part One:
Read more Rebecca Beard coverage.

Learn more about missing persons investigations through the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children:
https://www.missingkids.org

Coming Next

In Part Three, Brittany Pipkin discusses questions surrounding people named in police reports, including businessman Arch Aplin and witness John Cohn, and why the family believes additional answers may still exist.

Editor’s Note: This story is Part Two of a three-part series examining Rebecca Beard’s disappearance, the unanswered questions that remain and her family’s search for answers.

AMAZON AFFILIATE PLACEMENT

Gear Used By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Rebecca Beard tag page:
https://www.chopperrose.com/tag/rebecca-beard/

National Center for Missing & Exploited Children:
https://www.missingkids.org

Deputy Fired: What’s Next in the John Mendoza Jr. Shooting Investigation?

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. poses with an adult male while wearing a Brazoswood High School football uniform.
John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. in a family photo. The 18-year-old Texas State University student died following a deputy-involved shooting in Lake Jackson on June 1, 2026.

Deputy Fired: What’s Next in the John Mendoza Jr. Shooting Investigation?

The firing of former Brazoria County Deputy Kevin Tippit has answered one question in the shooting death of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr., but many others remain.

Sheriff Bo Stallman announced June 9 that Tippit was terminated following an internal review that found policy violations related to the handling and discharge of his firearm. The decision came just days after the June 1 shooting that left Mendoza dead in Lake Jackson.

While Tippit’s employment with the sheriff’s office has ended, the criminal investigation is far from over.

Why Was Deputy Kevin Tippit Fired?

Deputy Kevin Tippit shakes hands with Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman during a law enforcement ceremony.
Deputy Kevin Tippit shakes hands with Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman during a Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office ceremony.

According to Sheriff Stallman, Tippit was fired after an internal review found violations of department policy involving the handling and discharge of his firearm.

The sheriff emphasized that the termination was an administrative decision and separate from the ongoing criminal investigation.

The firing does not determine whether any criminal charges will be filed. That decision will be made through the criminal justice process after investigators complete their work.

What Happened to John Mendoza Jr.?

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood High School football uniform.

Authorities say the incident began shortly after midnight on June 1 when a Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office deputy attempted to stop a vehicle near FM 2004 and This Way Street in Lake Jackson.

The encounter ended in the 100 block of Indian Warrior Trail, where John Gabriel Mendoza Jr., an 18-year-old Texas State University student, suffered a gunshot wound and later died.

The Texas Rangers were called in to conduct an independent investigation into the shooting.

What Are the Texas Rangers Investigating?

The Texas Rangers are responsible for reviewing all evidence connected to the shooting.

Their investigation is expected to include:

Body camera footage
Radio traffic
Witness statements
Physical evidence
Firearm evidence
Forensic testing
Autopsy results

Investigators will work to determine exactly what happened and whether any criminal laws were violated.

Once the investigation is complete, the findings will be submitted to prosecutors for review.

The Case Will Go Before a Grand Jury

Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney Tom Selleck has already confirmed the completed investigation will be presented to a grand jury.

A grand jury reviews evidence presented by prosecutors and determines whether criminal charges should be filed.

Grand jurors do not decide guilt or innocence. Instead, they decide whether sufficient evidence exists to move the case forward.

Possible outcomes include:

No criminal charges
Criminal charges filed
Requests for additional investigation

Grand jury proceedings are conducted in secret under Texas law.

How Long Could the Investigation Take?

Officials have not provided a timeline for when the investigation will be completed.

However, District Attorney Tom Selleck has indicated that forensic testing and other investigative steps could take several months.

Complex officer-involved shooting investigations often require extensive evidence review before prosecutors are prepared to present a case to a grand jury.

What Happens Next?

With Deputy Kevin Tippit no longer employed by the Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office, attention now turns to the criminal investigation.

The Texas Rangers continue gathering evidence and reviewing the circumstances surrounding the shooting death of John Mendoza Jr.

Once that process is complete, prosecutors will present the findings to a grand jury, which will determine whether criminal charges are warranted.

Until then, Mendoza’s family, investigators, and the community continue waiting for answers.

Conclusion

The firing of former Deputy Kevin Tippit marks a significant development in the John Mendoza Jr. shooting investigation, but it is not the final chapter.

The Texas Rangers investigation remains active, and the case is expected to be presented to a grand jury once investigators complete their review.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the case and provide updates as new information becomes available.

Field Equipment

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.