Former Deputy Kent McGowen Responds to Susan White 911 Call

Watch the Full Investigation

Former Deputy Kent McGowen Responds to Susan White 911 Call, Allegations Before 1992 Shooting

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

More than three decades after the fatal shooting of Susan White, former Harris County Sheriff’s Office Deputy Kent McGowen is publicly responding to allegations White made before the shooting, including claims she voiced during calls to 911.

In an exclusive interview with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose, McGowen discussed the August 25, 1992 shooting, disputed allegations that he sexually harassed White, addressed why she repeatedly mentioned his name and shared courtroom demonstration photographs that he says support his version of events.

The interview pairs portions of White’s 911 call with McGowen’s current account, allowing readers to compare both versions of events.

Viewer Note: This story contains discussion of a fatal officer-involved shooting and includes portions of a 911 call that some readers may find disturbing.

Kent McGowen in his U.S. Air Force dress uniform before beginning his law enforcement career.
Before entering law enforcement, Kent McGowen served in the U.S. Air Force. He later worked as a Houston police officer and Harris County deputy before the Aug. 25, 1992, fatal shooting of Susan White that led to two criminal trials and his eventual conviction.

Background Before the Case

Before beginning his law enforcement career, Kent McGowen served in the United States Air Force.

After leaving the military, he joined the Houston Police Department before later serving with the Harris County Sheriff’s Office. During his career, he received commendations and officer recognition awards.

Before beginning his law enforcement career, Kent McGowen served in the United States Air Force.

After leaving the military, he joined the Houston Police Department before later serving with the Harris County Sheriff’s Office. During his career, he received commendations and officer recognition awards.

McGowen’s career changed forever on August 25, 1992, when deputies serving a felony warrant fatally shot Susan White at her home.

A jury convicted McGowen of murder in his first trial. An appellate court later overturned that conviction. A second jury convicted him in 2002. He ultimately served approximately 19 years in prison before his release in 2021.

Book About the Case

Journalist Jerry Langton later examined the case in Reasonable Doubts: How Rumor and Innuendo Convicted Deputy Kent McGowen of Murder. The book explores the investigation, the two trials and McGowen’s conviction.

Read the book on Amazon: 

Additional Case Materials

In addition to the trial record, Kent McGowen has provided investigative records and expert reports that he says support his account of the shooting.

Among the records McGowen provided is a forensic review by consulting forensic scientist Dr. Edward E. Hueske.

Hueske prepared the review during McGowen’s legal proceedings.

McGowen also provided a statement he wrote at the request of Harris County Assistant District Attorney Baldwin Chin, then chief of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office Post Conviction Integrity Review Unit, during the office’s review of his case in 2011–2012.

According to McGowen, the statement summarizes the case and his account of events as they existed during the Harris County District Attorney’s Office Post Conviction Integrity Review in 2011-2012.

Texas Department of Criminal Justice offender identification card for Joseph Kent McGowen during his incarceration.
After two criminal trials stemming from the Aug. 25, 1992, fatal shooting of Susan White, Kent McGowen was ultimately convicted of murder. He served approximately 19 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice before his release in 2021.

Watch the Full Investigation

The television report below includes exclusive interview excerpts with Kent McGowen, courtroom demonstration photographs and additional background on the Susan White case.

Listen to Susan White’s 911 Call

The audio below captures one of Susan White’s calls to 911 before deputies entered her home.

During the recording, White repeatedly asks dispatchers for help and expresses fear as deputies remain outside the residence.

The call contains emotional language and may be disturbing to some listeners.

Susan White’s 911 Call Before Deputies Entered The Home

The video and audio above include one of Susan White’s 911 calls before deputies entered the home.

During the recording, White repeatedly asks dispatchers for help while describing people outside her home.

The recording contains emotional language that some listeners may find disturbing.

McGowen Strongly Disputes White’s Allegations

Vintage photograph of Kent McGowen in a Waller County Sheriff’s Office uniform standing beside a marked patrol vehicle while serving with the department before joining the Houston Police Department.
Kent McGowen while serving with the Waller County Sheriff’s Office at age 19, before joining the Houston Police Department pending completion of his background investigation.

During his interview with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose, McGowen firmly denied White’s allegations.

According to McGowen, he never sexually harassed White, never stalked her and never had the repeated contacts she described.

“I had never pulled her over. I’d never spoken to her,” McGowen said during the interview.

McGowen believes White confused him with another deputy who previously worked in the area.

He told Tammy Rose that investigators later uncovered witness statements he believes support that explanation.

According to McGowen, White mistakenly identified him after seeing him during the arrest of her son and others connected to a burglary investigation.

Why Did White Know McGowen’s Name?

Portrait of Susan White, whose repeated references to former Harris County Precinct 4 Deputy Kent McGowen before the 1992 shooting are discussed in this section of the investigation.
Susan White. Investigators and former Deputy Kent McGowen have offered differing explanations for why White repeatedly mentioned his name before the August 25, 1992, shooting.

One of the questions surrounding the case is why White repeatedly mentioned McGowen by name before the shooting.

McGowen offered his explanation during the interview.

He said White arrived at the scene after deputies arrested her son and began asking officers who “McGowen” was.

According to McGowen, several deputies pointed in different directions while trying to identify him, causing White to approach multiple officers before eventually speaking with him.

McGowen believes that encounter explains why she later knew his name.

He disputes claims that he had an ongoing personal conflict with White before the shooting.

McGowen Says White Mistook Him for Another Deputy

McGowen also challenged allegations that he repeatedly stopped or harassed White before the shooting.

Instead, he told Tammy Rose that another deputy had previous contact with White and believes she mistakenly associated him with those earlier encounters.

McGowen said he never received phone calls from White, never contacted her outside official duties and never had a personal relationship with her.

He also pointed to subpoenaed telephone records that he says failed to show communication between them.

Those statements reflect McGowen’s account. Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose continues reviewing court records, witness statements and other documents connected to the case.

McGowen’s Description of White’s Condition

McGowen also discussed White’s condition while deputies attempted to serve the warrant.

According to McGowen, White appeared to be slurring her speech as deputies tried to communicate with her through the front door.

He told Tammy Rose he believed White was impaired and described her behavior as confused and erratic.

McGowen said those observations influenced how he interpreted her actions that morning.

His statements represent his account of the encounter and should not be interpreted as independent findings of fact.

The Warrant That Led to the Shooting

Composite image showing Michael Shaffer (left), Susan White (center), and Jason Aguilar, Linda White’s teenage son (right).
Left to right: Confidential informant Michael Shaffer, Susan White and Jason Aguillard, Susan White’s teenage son.

According to McGowen, deputies went to Susan White’s home to serve a felony retaliation warrant after investigators alleged she threatened a confidential informant connected to a burglary investigation.

McGowen said he first attempted to obtain the warrant during the overnight hours but claimed a judge was unavailable to sign it. He returned the following morning with the approved warrant and several deputies to serve it.

He told Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose that deputies knocked on the front door for several minutes, repeatedly identified themselves as members of the Harris County Sheriff’s Office and asked White to come outside.

According to McGowen, White refused to open the door.

McGowen said deputies eventually forced entry after obtaining permission from a supervisor.

McGowen Describes What Happened Inside

According to McGowen, deputies entered the home and began clearing rooms while searching for White.

He told Tammy Rose he saw White move through the house toward a bedroom. He followed her and said she picked up a handgun after entering the room.

McGowen said he ordered White three times to drop the weapon.

He claims White raised the handgun toward him and began placing her finger on the trigger.

Believing his life and the lives of the other deputies were in danger, McGowen fired three shots.

He has consistently maintained that he acted in self-defense.

Prosecutors disputed that version of events during both criminal trials.

Courtroom Demonstration Photos

Former deputy Kent McGowen recently provided Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose with these courtroom demonstration photographs, which he says were used during legal proceedings to illustrate his version of the Aug. 25, 1992, fatal shooting of Susan White. The images reflect McGowen’s account and are presented for context alongside court records, the 911 call, and his interview.

McGowen recently provided Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose with courtroom demonstration photographs that he says were used during legal proceedings to explain his version of the shooting.

Several photographs include handwritten descriptions showing where McGowen says he was standing, where White was positioned and where he believes the handgun came to rest after the shooting.

Other images illustrate the angle from which he says he observed White inside the bedroom.

The photographs are not crime scene photographs. Instead, they are courtroom demonstrations created to illustrate McGowen’s account during litigation.

One Issue Continues to Draw Attention

One issue discussed during Tammy Rose’s interview involved which hand White used to hold the handgun.

McGowen maintains White pointed the weapon with her right hand before he fired.

During the interview, Tammy Rose asked McGowen about reports indicating White was left-handed.

McGowen stood by his account and said the position of the handgun after the shooting matched what he remembered seeing inside the bedroom.

That issue remains one of several points that have been debated for years.

McGowen Says Jurors Never Heard Everything

During the interview, McGowen repeatedly argued that jurors never heard all of the evidence he believes supports his account.

He pointed to witness statements, subpoenaed records and other documents that he says were unavailable or never fully presented during trial.

McGowen also criticized how the case was investigated and prosecuted.

Those claims have not been independently verified by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose and remain part of McGowen’s account of the case.

Two Trials, Two Different Juries

The Susan White case was presented to two different juries.

McGowen’s first murder conviction was later overturned on appeal, resulting in a new trial.

Following that second trial, another jury convicted McGowen of murder in 2002.

He ultimately served approximately 19 years in prison before his release in 2021.

Since leaving prison, McGowen has continued speaking publicly about the shooting and maintains he acted lawfully while serving the warrant.

Why Revisit the Susan White Case Now?

More than 30 years after the shooting, Kent McGowen continues to challenge the conclusions reached during his criminal case.

Since his release from prison in 2021, he has participated in interviews, worked with author Jerry Langton on a book about his case and continues to review court records and investigative documents.

His recent interview with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose offers readers an opportunity to hear his account in his own words while comparing those statements with court records, courtroom exhibits and the 911 call placed by Susan White.

As with any decades-old criminal case, many questions remain disputed.

Tammy Rose will continue reviewing court records, witness statements and other documents connected to the investigation as additional records become available.

Editor’s Note: This article includes court records, historical documents, portions of Susan White’s 911 call, and an interview with Joseph Kent McGowen. McGowen disputes allegations made against him before the shooting. The interview is presented so readers can review his response in full.

More Kent McGowen Coverage

This interview is part of an ongoing investigative series examining Kent McGowen’s criminal case and new claims he has made since his release from prison.

Readers can also follow Tammy Rose’s continuing investigation into McGowen’s allegations involving convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart.

Related Coverage

➡️ Former Deputy Documents Alleged Roy Alan Stuart Confessions

Amazon Disclosure

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

If you’re interested in learning more about wrongful convictions, criminal investigations and true crime, these books provide additional background.

➡️ The Cadaver King and the Country Dentist

➡️ In Cold Blood by Truman Capote

About Tammy Rose Reports

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose is an independent journalist covering breaking news, aviation and long-form investigations across Texas.

If you appreciate independent journalism, consider bookmarking ChopperRose.com for continuing coverage.

Juan Laureles Cold Case: $6,000 Reward for New Tips

Juan Laureles Texas Rangers featured cold case poster for his 1996 Brown County murder

Juan Laureles Cold Case: Texas Rangers Seek New Tips 30 Years Later

Nearly 30 years after Juan Leon Laureles was found shot to death beside his burning car, Texas investigators are making a renewed push for answers.

The Texas Department of Public Safety announced that authorities are seeking new information in the Juan Laureles cold case. Laureles, 30, died in Brown County in May 1996.

Now, investigators hope someone who knows what happened will finally come forward.

Juan Laureles Found Beside Burning Car

Juan Laureles cold case graphic showing FM 2126, Texas Rangers investigation and $6,000 reward

On May 10, 1996, Brown County Sheriff’s deputies responded to a vehicle fire at about 12:30 a.m.

The fire occurred along FM 2126 near the railroad crossing and the access road to the Brownwood Rifle and Pistol Range.

When deputies arrived, they found Laureles dead next to his burning 1988 Ford Thunderbird.

Investigators determined that someone had shot Laureles in the back of the head. Someone also set his vehicle on fire.

Stolen Credit Card Used After Murder

Bealls Department Store graphic highlighting the stolen credit card clue in the 1996 Juan Laureles murder investigation.

Investigators discovered another important clue.

Someone stole Laureles’ credit card and used it at a Bealls Department Store in the area later that same day.

Authorities still want information about those transactions.

In addition, investigators want to hear from anyone who remembers seeing Laureles’ Ford Thunderbird or other vehicles near the murder scene that night.

Texas Rangers Continue Investigating Juan Laureles Cold Case

 Juan Leon Laureles photo featured in the Texas Rangers investigation into his 1996 Brown County cold case.

Investigators have followed numerous leads during the past three decades. However, they have not made an arrest.

The Brown County Sheriff’s Office and Texas Rangers continue to actively investigate the murder.

Authorities believe people in the community may still have information that could help solve the case.

Even a detail that seemed insignificant in 1996 could potentially give investigators a new lead today.

Reward Increased to $6,000

Texas Crime Stoppers has increased the reward to up to $6,000 for information that leads to an arrest in the case.

However, the increased reward remains available only until DPS announces its next featured Texas Rangers cold case.

Anyone seeking the cash reward must submit the information through Texas Crime Stoppers.

Tipsters can call 1-800-252-TIPS (tel:1-800-252-TIPS) (8477) or submit information through the official Texas Crime Stoppers tip system.

Nearly 30 Years Without Answers

Three decades have passed since someone killed Juan Laureles.

Yet murder has no statute of limitations in Texas, and investigators have not closed the case.

The Texas Rangers continue reviewing unsolved homicides in hopes that new information, witnesses or investigative methods can provide the break detectives need.

For Laureles’ case, that break could come from someone who remembers what happened on May 10, 1996.

Anyone with information should contact Texas Crime Stoppers.

Source: Texas Department of Public Safety

The official DPS release is here: Texas DPS — Juan Laureles Cold Case⁠. DPS confirms the $6,000 enhanced reward applies if an eligible tip comes in before the next featured Texas Rangers cold case is announced.

Planning a Texas trip?

If your travels take you through Brown County or elsewhere in Texas, you can compare hotel options and rates through Hotels.com⁠.

Interested in Texas cold cases?

Readers who follow unsolved cases can browse Texas true crime books on Amazon⁠.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Why I Continue Investigating the Texas Killing Fields: Every Victim Deserves to Be Remembered

Texas Killing Fields cold case graphic featuring Laura Miller, Donna Prudhomme, Audrey Cook, Heidi Fye and Carolyn Sosa.

Why I Continue Investigating the Texas Killing Fields: Every Victim Deserves to Be Remembered

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

People often ask why I continue investigating murders that happened more than 50 years ago.

They wonder why I file public records requests. They ask why I travel hundreds of miles to interview witnesses. They also question why I keep digging into cases that many people have forgotten.

My answer is simple.

Every victim deserves to be remembered.

The Victims Were More Than Headlines

When I began researching the Texas Killing Fields, one issue quickly bothered me.

Old news reports often focused on how the victims died. Police records also placed heavy attention on their circumstances. Those accounts did not always show who the women were or how they lived.

Authorities described some victims as runaways. Others struggled with addiction or lived through difficult times. Reports also linked some women to prostitution.

Those labels often overshadowed their identities.

Investigators first viewed Laura Miller as a possible runaway. Reports also associated Carolyn Sosa and Teri McDaniel with prostitution.

Those descriptions may have been accurate, incomplete or unfair. Either way, they often became the focus of the story.

The victims deserved better.

No one should disappear from history because of a label.

Why I Keep Digging

My investigation has taken me across Texas and beyond.

I have tracked down key witnesses. I have interviewed retired investigators. I have reviewed thousands of pages of public records.

I have also examined evidence that many people have never seen.

Each interview raises another question. Every record leads to another document. One conversation can reveal a missing piece of history.

Some discoveries involve unidentified remains. Others involve witnesses who were overlooked years ago. Records may also expose decisions that still raise questions today.

That is why I keep digging.

The Public Still Cares

One thing has surprised me more than anything else.

People still care.

Readers continue to send tips. Families continue to reach out. Former investigators and witnesses still contact me with information.

Some believe their information should remain part of the public record. Others simply want someone to listen.

Their messages show that these stories still matter.

The victims have not been forgotten.

Why These Stories Matter

I do not investigate these cases to sensationalize tragedy.

I investigate because every victim mattered.

A person’s past should never decide how much effort investigators make. It should not affect whether authorities search for them or work to solve their murder.

A straight-A student had value. A runaway had value. A woman struggling with addiction had value. A person living on the streets had value.

Their circumstances did not make their lives less important.

Justice should never depend on someone’s background.

The Families Deserve Answers

The victims left behind parents, children, siblings and friends.

Many families waited decades for answers. Some died without learning what happened to their loved one.

Time does not erase that pain.

Families still deserve honest answers. They deserve access to records. They deserve to know whether investigators followed every lead.

They also deserve respect.

I’ll Keep Looking for Answers

Many questions remain in the Texas Killing Fields cases.

I will continue searching through records. I will keep interviewing witnesses. I will also share what I find.

Some mysteries may never be solved. Others may only need one person to speak up.

That is what investigative journalism means to me.

It means giving victims a voice. It means preserving history. Most of all, it means making sure they are never forgotten.

Helpful Travel and Investigation Resources

My investigations sometimes require travel across Texas and beyond. When I need a place to stay near an interview, courthouse or records office, I compare available hotels through Hotels.com.

I also rely on practical tools while reviewing old case files. A portable document scanner helps me preserve records, photographs and handwritten notes.

Portable Canon document scanner used to preserve case files, photographs and handwritten records.

This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission from qualifying bookings or purchases at no additional cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

New Records Raise Questions in Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw Case

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, two teenagers who disappeared after traveling to Galveston on August 4, 1971
Rhonda Renee Johnson, left, and Sharon Lynn Shaw disappeared after leaving Webster for a trip to Galveston on August 4, 1971. Public-domain image via Wikimedia Commons.

New Records Raise Questions About Unidentified Remains in Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw Investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

More than five decades after the murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, newly reviewed records are raising questions about additional human remains found in the area. The records also raise the possibility that investigators once considered whether another person played a role in the case.

Rhonda Johnson, 14, and Sharon Shaw, 13, disappeared from Galveston County in August 1971. Authorities later recovered their skeletal remains in and around Clear Lake along Galveston Bay.

The investigation continued for decades as detectives worked to identify remains, examine evidence and determine whether the discoveries connected to the two girls.

The records do not prove that another victim or another killer was connected to the murders. However, they show how much uncertainty investigators faced during the early stages of the case.

Remains of Sharon Shaw and Rhonda Johnson Identified

On January 3, 1972, two boys fishing in Clear Lake discovered a human skull floating in the water.

Authorities later identified the skull through dental records as belonging to Sharon Shaw. Investigators also reportedly found a crucifix around the jawbone that Sharon’s mother identified as her daughter’s.

About six weeks later, searchers recovered additional skeletal remains in a marsh near Clear Lake. Authorities identified one set of those remains as belonging to Rhonda Johnson.

The discoveries confirmed that both girls had died, but investigators could not determine their exact causes of death from the remains.

The identification resolved the girls’ missing-person cases, but other remains recovered during that period created additional questions.

Michael Lloyd Self Was Convicted

Investigators eventually focused on Michael Lloyd Self, who worked as a gas station attendant in the Webster/Clear Lake area. Authorities charged Self in connection with the murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw

A jury convicted Self of murdering Sharon Shaw and sentenced him to life in prison. The court record confirms that his conviction involved Sharon’s murder; he was not convicted of Rhonda Johnson’s murder. 

Self later said police had threatened and physically abused him until he confessed. Questions about whether investigators obtained a false or coerced confession followed the case for decades. A federal judge once recommended relief based on the confession issue, although a later appeals court decision allowed the conviction to stand. 

Edward Harold Bell Became an Alternate Suspect

Michael Lloyd Self in a Pasadena Police Department mugshot.
Michael Lloyd Self was convicted in Sharon Shaw’s murder, though questions later emerged about his confession and whether he was responsible.

In 1998, convicted killer Edward Harold Bell claimed responsibility for the murders of several young women and girls in the Galveston-area region. His statements included two girls from Webster who disappeared in August 1971, which investigators associated with Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw.

Bell became an alternate suspect in their murders, but authorities never charged him in the case. Investigators reportedly lacked physical or biological evidence that conclusively connected Bell to the girls’ deaths. 

Bell’s claims increased doubts about Self’s conviction, but they did not officially resolve who killed Rhonda and Sharon.

Questions Surrounding Other Remains

Records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose indicate authorities recovered an unidentified torso in September 1971.

Investigators reportedly found clothing or personal items with or near the remains that they believed belonged to Phillip Manning. Those items initially led authorities to consider whether the torso might be Manning’s.

Authorities later located Manning alive in Louisiana. That confirmed the torso was not his.

The discovery still raised questions about the unidentified victim’s identity and whether another victim—or possibly another killer—may have been connected to the investigation. However, the records reviewed so far do not establish that the torso was connected to the murders of Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw.

Records Detail Manning’s Background

The records also include criminal-history and case information connected to Phillip Manning. That material may help explain why investigators examined his possible connection to the case.

However, the records do not establish that Manning killed Rhonda Johnson, Sharon Shaw or anyone else. The information surrounding him remained circumstantial, and the records reviewed so far do not show that authorities filed a case against him in connection with the girls’ murders.

Investigators Faced Difficult Conditions

Galveston’s shoreline at sunset. Severe weather and shifting Gulf waters may have complicated recovery efforts and the early investigation in 1971.
Galveston shoreline and Gulf waters at sunset

The discoveries occurred during a period when severe weather affected portions of the Texas Gulf Coast.

Tropical storms Edith and Fern moved through the region in September 1971, potentially complicating searches, recovery efforts and investigators’ ability to determine where remains had originally entered the water.

Water movement, weather conditions and the passage of time may have made it more difficult to connect separate remains to specific locations or victims.

Investigators in 1971 also did not have access to the DNA testing and modern forensic databases available today.

Identifications often depended heavily on dental comparisons, physical characteristics and other available medical evidence.

Was Another Killer Suspected?

The records raise an important question: Did investigators believe the additional remains pointed to another victim—or possibly another offender operating in the area?

The documents reviewed so far do not provide a definitive answer.

They instead show that authorities were dealing with several discoveries, uncertain identifications and incomplete information during the earliest stages of the investigation.

Any suggestion that another killer was involved should be treated as a theory unless additional police reports, forensic findings or official statements support it.

Questions That Still Need Answers

Several important questions remain:

Who exactly was Phillip Manning?

Why did investigators connect his name to the torso?

Was the torso ever conclusively identified?

Did Manning have any documented connection to Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw?

What did investigators believe before the girls’ remains were fully identified?

Are additional reports or forensic records still available?

Those questions may be important in understanding not only what investigators knew, but also how the case evolved during its earliest months.

Investigation Continues to Draw Interest

Galveston beach where Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled before disappearing in August 1971
Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled from Webster to Galveston on August 4, 1971, before they disappeared.

The murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw remain among the most discussed cases connected to the Texas Gulf Coast.

Decades later, old reports, forensic findings and previously overlooked names continue to generate new questions.

The records do not yet prove that another killer was involved. But they show that the investigation may have been more complex than the public understood—and that parts of the story may still be missing.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue reviewing available records and seeking documentation that could clarify the identity of the additional remains and Phillip Manning’s possible connection to the investigation.

Related Products

Waterproof Document Organizer

When reviewing decades-old police reports, newspaper clippings and case files, a waterproof document organizer can help protect important records from spills, moisture and damage.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Portable Document Scanner

A portable scanner can make it easier to digitize old reports, photographs and handwritten notes while researching historical cases.

Planning a Trip to Galveston?

Visitors researching Galveston County history or spending time along the Texas Gulf Coast can compare hotels and available accommodations through Hotels.com.

Disclosure: I may earn a commission from eligible bookings at no additional cost to you.

Related Coverage

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw: 55 Years Later

A closer look at the disappearance and murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, the recovery of their remains and the questions that continue decades later.

Texas Killing Fields: James Elmore Jr. Trial Approaches

James Elmore Jr. is scheduled to face trial as investigators continue examining cases connected to the Texas Killing Fields.

Public Records Reveal Ransom Messages Sent After Nancy Guthrie Disappeared

Black-and-white porch surveillance image showing a masked individual standing near a hanging plant at a residence connected to the Nancy Guthrie case.
Porch surveillance image released as part of the investigation into the Nancy Guthrie case.

Public Records Reveal Ransom Messages Sent After Nancy Guthrie Disappeared

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Nancy Guthrie disappeared from her home in the Catalina Foothills near Tucson, Arizona, during the early morning hours of February 1, 2026. Six months later, publicly released investigative records continue to provide insight into one of the most unusual aspects of the case.

Among the documents released are messages that appeared to demand a ransom and later claimed Nancy Guthrie had died. The messages became part of the investigation and remain included in the publicly released records.

Ransom Message Demanded Bitcoin

Redacted copies of documents described as ransom notes released as evidence in the Nancy Guthrie case.
Redacted ransom note documents included in the investigative records for the Nancy Guthrie case.

According to publicly released records, one message claimed Nancy Guthrie had been kidnapped and demanded a multi-million-dollar Bitcoin payment in exchange for her safe return.

The message included a deadline, threatened harm if payment was not made, and referenced details about Nancy Guthrie’s home. Investigators documented the message as part of the case.

At the time, there was no public confirmation that the claims made in the message were true.

Second Message Claimed Nancy Guthrie Died

Portrait of Nancy Guthrie smiling in a blue jacket in an undated family photograph.
Nancy Guthrie in an undated family photo provided as part of case coverage.

A second message later claimed Nancy Guthrie had died shortly after being taken.

The message stated that her death was not intentional and expressed sympathy to her family. It also claimed she had been buried in a natural area.

Authorities included the message in the investigative file that was later released as a public record.

Investigators Examined the Messages

Law enforcement reviewed the messages as part of the investigation into Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance.

Publicly released records show the communications were preserved as evidence, but investigators have not publicly confirmed who authored the messages or whether any of the claims contained in them were accurate.

As with many criminal investigations, detectives examined numerous leads while working to determine what happened.

Why These Records Matter

The release of investigative records provides the public with a better understanding of the evidence reviewed during the case.

While the messages generated significant attention, they represent only one part of the overall investigation. Any conclusions about who sent them or why should be based on official investigative findings rather than speculation.

As additional records become public, they may continue to provide new details about the investigation.

If you have information related to the case, contact the investigating law enforcement agency.

Home Security Camera (Indoor/Outdoor) – If you’re interested in true crime or home security, a smart security camera is one of the best ways to monitor your property and record suspicious activity.

Reolink home security camera system with four surveillance cameras, network video recorder, and 2TB hard drive.

Fingerprint Door Lock – Upgrade your home’s security with a keyless smart lock featuring fingerprint access, passcodes, and mobile app control.

Philips smart fingerprint door lock with touchscreen keypad, interior deadbolt, and smartphone app connectivity.

Related Coverage

Read more of my coverage on the James Elmore Jr. investigation:

Read my latest coverage on the Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw investigation:

Hotels.com

Planning to visit Texas for court proceedings, historical research, or to explore the areas connected to this case? Find hotels that fit your budget through my Hotels.com affiliate link.

Amazon Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you shop through my affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent journalism.

Hotels.com Disclosure

If you book a hotel through my Hotels.com affiliate links, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for helping support my reporting and website.

55 Years Later: The Disappearance of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw Still Haunts Galveston County

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, the two teenagers who disappeared after traveling to Galveston on August 4, 1971
Rhonda Renee Johnson, left, and Sharon Lynn Shaw disappeared after traveling from Webster to Galveston on August 4, 1971.

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Two teenage friends left Webster for a summer day in Galveston on August 4, 1971. They never returned home.

Nearly 55 years later, the deaths of Rhonda Renee Johnson and Sharon Lynn Shaw remain surrounded by painful questions, a controversial confession and competing claims about who was responsible.

Rhonda was 14 years old. Sharon was 13 and just days away from her 14th birthday.

Their case became one of the earliest and most troubling mysteries associated with a series of young women and girls who disappeared across the Houston-Galveston region during the 1970s.

A Summer Trip to Galveston

Galveston beach where Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled before disappearing in August 1971
Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled from Webster to Galveston on August 4, 1971, before they disappeared.

According to federal court records, Sharon and Rhonda were last seen on August 4, 1971, after leaving Webster for a day trip to Galveston, about 25 miles away.

The two friends reportedly spent time near the beach and Galveston Seawall. However, they did not make it home that evening.

Their disappearance launched a search that continued for months.

Their Remains Were Found Months Later

On January 3, 1972, human remains were discovered in the Clear Lake area.

Additional remains were found several weeks later. Authorities identified the victims as Sharon Shaw and Rhonda Johnson.

The medical examiner could not determine the cause of their deaths because there was no identifiable damage to the bones or skulls, according to the federal appellate record.

The discovery confirmed the families’ worst fears. However, determining who killed the girls would become far more complicated.

Michael Lloyd Self Was Convicted

Galveston beach connected to the Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw case involving Michael Lloyd Self.
Michael Lloyd Self was convicted in Sharon Shaw’s death after the teenagers disappeared following a trip to Galveston in August 1971. This Galveston beach image is illustrative.

Investigators eventually focused on Michael Lloyd Self, a Galveston-area gas station attendant.

Self signed a confession after being questioned by police. He later withdrew it and claimed officers had threatened and physically abused him until he confessed.

Self was prosecuted for Sharon Shaw’s murder and received a life sentence. His conviction was upheld by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

Questions about the confession followed the case for decades.

In 1991, a federal district court granted Self’s request for habeas relief after finding that his confession had been obtained in violation of his constitutional rights. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals later reversed that decision and allowed the conviction to stand.

Self maintained his innocence and died in prison in 2000.

A Second Man Claimed Responsibility

Edward Harold Bell in a 1978 Pasadena Police Department booking photograph
Edward Harold Bell in a 1978 Pasadena Police Department mugshot. Bell later claimed responsibility for several killings in Southeast Texas, but he was never charged in the deaths of Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw. Image credited to the Pasadena Police Department; source copy via Wikipedia/Houston Chronicle.

Years later, convicted murderer Edward Harold Bell claimed he had killed several girls across Southeast Texas during the 1970s.

Bell referred to the victims as the “Eleven that went to Heaven.” His claims reportedly included two girls from Webster who disappeared after visiting Galveston in 1971.

Those details were believed to refer to Sharon and Rhonda.

Investigators familiar with Bell’s statements said portions of his accounts appeared to match information from several cases. However, Bell was never charged with killing Sharon or Rhonda.

Bell was serving a prison sentence for the 1978 murder of Larry Dickens when he died in 2019.

Families Were Left Without Definitive Answers

The conviction of Michael Self remained legally intact. Still, some investigators and members of the victims’ families came to believe Bell may have been responsible.

That leaves a difficult conflict at the center of the case.

One man was convicted based largely on a confession he said was forced. Another man later claimed responsibility but was never prosecuted in connection with the girls’ deaths.

No DNA evidence or weapon publicly connected Bell to the murders. His death ended any possibility that he-would face a trial or further questioning in court.

Remembering Rhonda and Sharon

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, two teenagers who disappeared after traveling to Galveston on August 4, 1971
Rhonda Renee Johnson, left, and Sharon Lynn Shaw disappeared after leaving Webster for a trip to Galveston on August 4, 1971. Public-domain image via Wikimedia Commons.

The competing accusations can easily overshadow the two young victims.

Rhonda and Sharon were teenage friends enjoying the final weeks of summer. Their families expected them to return home after a day at the beach.

Instead, August 4 became an anniversary marked by loss and unanswered questions.

As the 55th anniversary approaches, the most important part of this story remains the lives that were taken.

Rhonda Renee Johnson and Sharon Lynn Shaw should be remembered by their names—not simply as entries on a list of Texas cold cases.

Their families deserved clear answers then. They still deserve them today.

Related Texas Killing Fields Coverage

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

The questions surrounding Sharon and Rhonda are part of a much larger history of disappearances and deaths along the Interstate 45 corridor between Houston and Galveston.

The upcoming trial of James Elmore Jr. is also expected to renew attention on the Calder Road area known as the Texas Killing Fields.

Elmore is charged in connection with the death of Laura Miller and allegations involving the movement of human remains. His jury trial is currently scheduled to begin August 31 in Galveston County’s 122nd District Court.

Read more: James Elmore Jr. Trial Scheduled in Texas Killing Fields Case

This story is based on available court records and previously published reporting. Some allegations were never proven in court. Edward Harold Bell was never charged with the deaths of Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw.

Planning a Galveston Visit?

Many people visit Galveston to explore its history, beaches and landmarks. Travelers looking for a place to stay can compare Galveston hotels, prices and availability through Hotels.com before planning their trip.

I may earn a commission if you book through Hotels.com, at no additional cost to you.

Recommended True-Crime Reading

Readers interested in researching historic cases may find a Texas road atlas helpful for understanding the distance between Webster, Galveston, Clear Lake and other locations connected to the investigation.

A portable document organizer can also help keep court records, timelines, printed articles and handwritten notes arranged while researching a complicated cold case.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Related Coverage

The approaching 55th anniversary comes as another Galveston County case is preparing to return to court. Read more about the upcoming James Elmore Jr. trial and the Calder Road investigation.

You can also read my examination of prison confessions compared with public records in the Roy Alan Stuart investigation, another case involving decades of questions and disputed claims.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set as Calder Road Victims’ Families Hope for Justice Nearly 40 Years Later

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Moves Forward

Nearly four decades after several young women were found murdered and their bodies abandoned near Calder Road in Galveston County, the case against James Elmore Jr. continues moving toward trial.

For many victims’ families, the upcoming court proceedings represent another chance to finally see justice.

After checking the Galveston County court docket, I confirmed the case is still moving forward.

According to the current schedule:

Discovery Conference: August 10, 2026

Pretrial Conference: August 21, 2026

Jury Trial: August 31, 2026

The trial is scheduled in the 122nd District Court before Judge Jeth Jones.

If the schedule remains unchanged, I plan to attend the trial and provide updates from the courtroom.

Laura Miller’s Family Has Waited Decades for Answers

Tim Miller, founder of Texas EquuSearch, photographed during a search effort related to a missing persons investigation.
Tim Miller, founder of Texas EquuSearch, has assisted in hundreds of missing persons cases across Texas and the United States.

Laura Miller was last seen on September 10, 1984, after stopping at a convenience store in League City to use a pay phone. Her mother had dropped her off because the family’s phone had not yet been connected after they moved into the area.

Laura never returned home.

Sign marking a recovery site featuring photos of four women and Clyde Hedrick during an investigation into multiple unsolved Texas homicide cases.
Memorial sign highlighting four victims whose cases have been linked to the same recovery site during the investigation into Clyde Hedrick and several unsolved homicides.

Nearly 17 months later, on February 2, 1986, her remains were discovered in a wooded area near Calder Road. During that same search, investigators also found the remains of Audrey Cook.

For both families, the upcoming trial comes after decades of unanswered questions.

In an earlier interview, Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller discussed Laura Miller’s disappearance, the years of searching, and why the case has remained so important to investigators and her family.

Watch: Tim Miller Discusses Laura Miller’s Disappearance

Charges Against James Elmore Jr.

Mugshot of James Elmore Jr., whose trial is scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. He is scheduled to stand trial beginning Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

James Elmore Jr. remains jailed while awaiting trial.

According to jail records, he faces the following charges:

Manslaughter

Two counts of tampering with physical evidence involving a human corpse

Possession of visual material depicting sexual assault

Possession of child sexual abuse material

His total bond is listed at $4.5 million.

As with all criminal cases, these charges are allegations, and James Elmore Jr. is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.

Clyde Hedrick Died Before Additional Charges Could Be Filed

Portrait of Clyde Hedrick, who was convicted in the 1984 murder of Ellen Beason and later became a suspect in additional cold case investigations.
Clyde Hedrick was convicted in the murder of Ellen Beason. Investigators were preparing to charge him in additional cases before his death in March 2026.

The upcoming trial follows the death of Clyde Hedrick, who for years had been publicly linked to several Texas Killing Fields investigations.

Authorities were reportedly preparing additional charges against Hedrick. However, on March 21, 2026, Hedrick removed his breathing tube and died before those charges could be filed.

Hedrick was convicted only in the death of Ellen Beason. He served prison time for that case and was on parole when he died.

Trial Could Bring Long-Awaited Answers

Whether new evidence or testimony emerges during the trial remains to be seen.

However, for the families of Laura Miller, Audrey Cook, Donna Prudhomme, Heidi Fye, and others connected to the Calder Road investigations, the upcoming proceedings represent another opportunity to seek answers after nearly 40 years.

I’ll continue monitoring the Galveston County court docket and, if the trial remains on schedule, will be in the courtroom beginning August 31 to provide updates.

Related Coverage

TIM MILLER: JAMES ELMORE JR. REPEATEDLY CLAIMED THERE WAS ‘ANOTHER GIRL’ IN TEXAS KILLING FIELDS INVESTIGATION

Planning a Trip to Galveston County?

Whether you’re traveling to attend court proceedings or visiting Galveston Island, you can compare hotels throughout Galveston County before your trip.

Browse Hotels in Galveston County

Disclosure: If you book through this link, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

BOBLOV Body Camera

As I continue covering cold cases and court proceedings, a reliable body camera is an important part of documenting interactions in the field. This is similar to the type of equipment many journalists and investigators use.

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through my links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you.

Travel Planning Tips That Saved Me Money on My Italy Trip

Travel planning tips that saved me money on my Italy trip, including Google Flights, Booking.com, RFID wallet, MagSafe charger, and Rome attractions.

Planning a trip can feel overwhelming. I recently planned my dream trip to Italy, and I found a few tools that made everything much easier. They also helped me save money and stay organized.

If you’re planning your next vacation, here are a few travel tips that worked well for me.

1. Use Google Flights to Find the Best Airfare

Google Flights search results comparing airfare from Houston to Rome with price tracking and multiple airline options.
I used Google Flights to compare airfare and track prices before booking my Italy trip. It helped me find the best fare before purchasing my tickets.

Before booking any flight, I always start with Google Flights.

It compares prices from multiple airlines and travel websites in one place. One of my favorite features is the price tracking tool. You can turn on alerts and Google will email you if the fare goes up or drops before you book.

This helped me keep an eye on flights until I found the best price for my trip to Rome.

Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you book through these links, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. I only recommend services I personally use or believe provide value.

2. Stay Organized with Hotels.com

One of the biggest surprises while planning my trip was how easy it was to keep my hotel reservations organized with Hotels.com. I could compare prices, read verified guest reviews, and book accommodations that fit both my itinerary and budget.

If you’re planning a trip to Italy, you can browse hotel options here:

Find Hotels in Rome

For my time in Sardinia, I’ll also be using to compare accommodations before I arrive:

Browse Hotels in Sardinia

Instead of juggling confirmations from several companies, I could keep my hotel plans in one place while still booking attractions, airport transfers, and other travel experiences separately.

Having everything organized makes traveling much less stressful.

Planning a Vacation? Kathy Chrappa Can Help

If planning an international trip feels overwhelming, consider using a travel advisor.

I’ve worked with Kathy Chrappa at Dream Vacations, and she has more than 25 years of experience helping travelers find vacations that fit their budget and travel style. Whether you’re planning Europe, a cruise, or a tropical getaway, having someone help with the details can save time and reduce stress.

You can find Kathy on Facebook by searching for Kathy Chrappa Dream Vacations.

3. Protect Your Credit Cards with an RFID Wallet

RFID-blocking wallet with AirTag holder designed to help protect credit cards and cash while traveling.
An RFID-blocking wallet can help protect your credit cards from electronic scanning and keeps your travel essentials organized in one place.

Crowded tourist areas can attract electronic pickpockets.

An RFID-blocking wallet or purse helps protect your credit cards and passport from unauthorized RFID scanning. It’s a small investment that can provide extra peace of mind while traveling.

4. Bring a MagSafe Portable Charger

MagSafe portable charger attached to an iPhone, providing convenient wireless charging while traveling.
A MagSafe portable charger kept my iPhone powered throughout the day for maps, boarding passes, photos, and navigation without searching for an outlet.

Your phone quickly becomes your camera, GPS, boarding pass, hotel key, and attraction ticket.

A MagSafe portable charger lets you recharge while walking around without carrying extra cables. It has become one of the travel items I never leave home without.

5. Book Popular Attractions Before You Leave

Many of Italy’s most popular attractions sell out weeks in advance.

For my trip, I booked:

Colosseum Arena Floor Experience

Vatican Museums & Sistine Chapel

La Maddalena Archipelago Boat Tour

Rome Big Bus Hop-On Hop-Off Tour

Booking early gave me more choices for dates and times, and it helped me build my itinerary before arriving in Italy.

Final Thoughts

A little planning goes a long way. Using Google Flights to track airfare, Hotels.com to organize reservations, and a few simple travel accessories can make your trip much smoother.

I’m excited to share photos, videos, and travel tips from Italy, so be sure to check back for updates.

For more travel stories and adventures, explore my other travel articles here.

Exploring Athens, Mykonos & Santorini, Greece!

Australian Cruise Adventure!

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you buy through my affiliate links, I may earn a small commission at no cost to you.

Paul Taylor Claimed Texas Unfairly Kept Him Behind Bars in 2007 Parole Fight

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. prison mugshot
Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995 and received a life sentence.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. filed a writ of habeas corpus in 2007 after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles denied him release.

Taylor challenged his parole denial, not his conviction

The filing did not challenge his murder conviction.

Instead, Taylor argued that the parole board unfairly relied on his crime and past conduct. He claimed the board ignored his prison record, education and other accomplishments.

Taylor pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995. A judge sentenced him to life in prison.

Taylor said the filing was about parole

The writ form asked whether Taylor had previously challenged his conviction.

Taylor marked “no.”

He also wrote:

“Not challenging the conviction. This is a parole related issue.”

That statement is important. This filing did not claim that Taylor was innocent. It also did not ask the court to overturn his guilty plea.

Taylor focused his arguments on the parole process.

Paul Taylor 2007 writ stating he was not challenging his murder conviction
In his 2007 writ application, Paul Taylor wrote that he was not challenging his conviction and described the matter as a parole-related issue.

The writ listed his conviction and sentence

The application identified Taylor’s criminal case as Cause No. 27,636 in the 23rd Judicial District Court of Brazoria County.

The document listed:

Judgment date: May 30, 1995
Offense: Murder
Plea: Guilty
Sentence: Life
Punishment assessed by: Judge

Taylor also stated that he did not have a jury trial. He indicated that he did not appeal the judgment.

Paul Taylor writ listing 1995 murder conviction and life sentence
Taylor’s writ application lists his 1995 guilty plea to murder and his life sentence.

Taylor had been eligible for parole since 1997

Taylor wrote that he had been eligible for parole since February 2, 1997.

According to his filing, the parole board denied him release again on January 12, 2007. The board then gave him a three-year setoff before his next review.

Taylor said the board had denied him parole for about 13 years, including the period between his eligibility date and his next review.

The filing quotes the board’s reason for denial. It referred to the violent nature of the offense, the use of a weapon and a threat to public safety.

The quoted language also stated that the offense showed brutality, violence or the selection of a vulnerable victim.

Taylor argued that these factors came from the crime itself. He said he could never change the past.

Paul Taylor’s 2007 writ memorandum outlining his parole history and denial
Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor raised five arguments

1. The parole board abused its discretion

Taylor claimed the board denied parole for the same conduct that led to his conviction and sentence.

He argued that the board created an “impossible obstacle” because he could not change the crime.

Taylor also said the board failed to give enough weight to his prison accomplishments.

2. The parole process violated due process

Taylor argued that the board did not explain how it decided he remained a future threat.

He claimed the board should have told him what method it used to assess that risk.

Taylor suggested that he could have submitted more information if he had known what evidence the board wanted.

3. The process violated equal protection

Taylor claimed the board released other people with similar or worse criminal records.

He argued that the board treated him differently without a valid reason.

The filing does not include the names or full records of those other prisoners in the pages reviewed.

4. Repeated parole denials amounted to cruel punishment

Taylor argued that repeated denials violated the Eighth Amendment.

He claimed the board continued to deny him for the same unchangeable reasons.

He also accused the board of ignoring his conduct while incarcerated.

5. A Texas life sentence carried an expectation of parole

Taylor argued that Texas did not have a life-without-parole sentence for his case.

Therefore, he claimed that a life sentence carried an expectation of eventual release.

For the first four claims, Taylor asked for a new parole hearing.

However, under his fifth claim, he argued that parole should become mandatory.

These were Taylor’s legal arguments. The filing does not show that a court accepted them.

Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor highlighted his prison record

Taylor wrote that he earned a bachelor’s degree from Sam Houston State University while incarcerated.

He also said he had never received a disciplinary infraction.

In addition, Taylor said he worked in a prison craft shop. He claimed that the work helped him support himself and assist his family.

However, the filing only reflects Taylor’s account. It does not independently verify every statement about his prison history.

What this document does not say

The writ does not claim that Taylor was innocent.

It does not challenge his guilty plea or murder conviction.

The filing also does not present new evidence about Rebecca “Becky” Beard’s disappearance or the location of her remains.

Instead, Taylor challenged the parole board’s review process.

Therefore, this document focuses on parole. It does not attempt to overturn the murder conviction.

Read the full writ and court decision

The complete 2007 filing appears below, along with the court document showing the outcome.

Taylor challenged the parole process, not his murder conviction. However, the court denied his request for relief

Related coverage

Read Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed for a closer look at how accounts in the case evolved over time.

You can also read Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports to review what investigators documented during the first days of the investigation.

Tools for reviewing public records

Court records and police files can contain hundreds of pages. A portable document scanner can make it easier to save, organize and review records while working away from home.

White Canon portable document scanner used to scan court records and public documents

A digital voice recorder can also help reporters preserve interviews, notes and important details while researching a case.

PLAUD AI digital voice recorder shown with its mobile transcription app

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Texas Public Information Act Request: Dash Camera Released, Body Camera Pending

Raw dash camera image released through a Texas Public Information Act request showing a Brazoria County sheriff’s deputy speaking with individuals during a May 11, 2026 encounter related to the Rebecca Beard investigation.
Screenshot from the dash camera video released by Brazoria County in response to a Texas Public Information Act request. The recording contains no audio. The requested body camera video remains pending while the Texas Attorney General reviews whether it may be withheld.

Texas Public Information Act Request Leads to Dash Camera Release While Body Camera Remains Under Review

The Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney’s Office released the dash camera recording in response to my Texas Public Information Act request. The responding deputy’s body camera recording remains under review by the Texas Attorney General.

Page one of the Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney’s Office response confirming my public information request, payment, and the release of the dash camera recording while the requested body camera recording remains under review by the Texas Attorney General.

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Transparency matters. That is why I filed a Texas Public Information Act request after an encounter with a woman connected to the Rebecca Beard investigation.

The request resulted in sheriff’s reports, dispatch records, redacted documents, and dash camera video. However, one important record remains unavailable. The Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office has asked the Texas Attorney General to decide whether the responding deputy’s body camera can be withheld.

This article explains what happened, what the released records show, and why I continue to seek the body camera recording.

Why I Went to the Property

As an investigative reporter, I believe everyone deserves an opportunity to comment before publication.

I went to Cherie “Rio” Starr’s residence to request an interview about statements she has made regarding the Rebecca Beard investigation.

She declined to comment.

According to the incident report, Starr told deputies she was a protected witness and wanted to know how I obtained her personal information.

The report also states she believed someone had sent me to her property.

I Returned to My Jeep

After Starr declined to comment, I walked back to my Jeep because I intended to leave.

According to the sheriff’s report, I told deputies that Starr and Kenneth Cadenhead prevented me from leaving the property.

The dashcam video released by Brazoria County contains no audio. Therefore, it cannot capture the conversations that occurred during the encounter.

However, the video does show Starr standing near my driver’s side while Cadenhead remained behind my Jeep during part of the incident.

According to my recollection, both were asking me to identify my confidential source.

I declined.

Why I Would Not Reveal My Source

The incident report notes that I refused to identify my source.

That decision was intentional.

Protecting confidential sources is a long-standing practice in investigative journalism. Sources often provide information only because they trust reporters to keep their identities confidential.

My purpose that day was to request an interview. It was not to disclose who provided information for my reporting.

A Detail Not Included in the Report

One part of the encounter is not reflected in the written incident report.

According to my recollection, while standing near my driver’s side door, Starr told me she would agree to an interview “when this is all over.”

She also indicated that the Rebecca Beard investigation remained an active case that had never been closed.

Because the released dashcam has no audio, viewers cannot hear that conversation.

For that reason, I continue to seek release of the responding deputy’s body camera recording.

What the Public Records Show

My Texas Public Information Act request produced several records, including:

Sheriff’s incident reports
Dispatch and CAD records
Dashcam video
Redacted documents

The only major record that has not been released is the deputy’s body camera.

The District Attorney’s Office has asked the Texas Attorney General to determine whether that recording may be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.

Receiving a request for an Attorney General ruling does not automatically mean the recording will never be released. The Attorney General will determine whether any exceptions to disclosure apply under Texas law.

How I Obtained the Records

Many people ask how to request police records in Texas.

In my case, I submitted a Texas Public Information Act request to Brazoria County.

After receiving a cost estimate, I paid the required fee at the Brazoria County Treasurer’s Office inside the courthouse.

The courthouse is beautiful, although locating the correct office can be a little confusing for first-time visitors.

After payment was processed, I went to the District Attorney’s Office to pick up the responsive records.

Everyone I dealt with during the process was courteous and helpful.

I also received more records than I expected.

Part Two Is Coming Soon

In Part Two, I will explain the Texas Public Information Act process step by step.

I will also show:

How to submit an open records request
Where to pay the required fees
How to pick up responsive records
Why some records are released immediately while others require a ruling from the Texas Attorney General

Understanding the process can help anyone request public records in Texas.

Related Investigations

Equipment I Use

For field reporting and investigative journalism, I rely on equipment that performs well in demanding conditions.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This comes at no additional cost to you.

Making memories that'll last a lifetime!