Category Archives: Paul Taylor Jr.

Texas AG rules on records in Rebecca Beard investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Texas Attorney General ruling on Rebecca “Becky” Beard investigation records, with Beard’s photo, Texas Capitol and case file graphic.
The Texas Attorney General ruled Aug. 28, 2026, that Brazoria County may withhold investigative information tied to the Rebecca “Becky” Beard case, but must release basic information.

More records in the decades-old Rebecca “Becky” Beard case will remain out of public view for now.

The Texas Attorney General issued a new ruling Aug. 28 allowing Brazoria County to withhold investigative information because authorities say it relates to an ongoing criminal case.

But the ruling comes with an important exception.

Brazoria County must release the basic information.

I have already requested it.

New ruling in the Rebecca Beard records investigation

Rebecca “Becky” Beard holding her daughter before her 1986 disappearance
Rebecca “Becky” Beard pictured with her daughter before Becky disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.

Beard was 22 when she disappeared after leaving the Excalibur Club in Freeport in March 1986.

Her body has never been recovered.

Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in 1995 in connection with her death, but questions surrounding the case have continued for decades.

My investigation has included multiple public information requests seeking Brazoria County records connected to the case.

Those requests have now resulted in another Attorney General ruling.

Brazoria County says the criminal case is ongoing

The Aug. 28 decision provides an important detail about the current status of the investigation.

According to the Attorney General, Brazoria County said a law enforcement agency objected to releasing the information because it “relates to an ongoing criminal case.”

The county argued that releasing the records could interfere with that case.

The Attorney General agreed that the investigative information may be withheld under Section 552.108(a)(1) of the Texas Government Code.

However, the ruling also says the county must release basic information under Section 552.108(c).

Eight Brazoria County records requests included in ruling

The Attorney General combined eight Brazoria County reference numbers in the decision:

26-1859, 26-1865, 26-1874, 26-1933, 26-1947, 26-1950, 26-1991 and 26-2012.

The Attorney General assigned the matter request ID 26-033498.

The Aug. 28 decision is OR2026-038106.

What will Brazoria County release?

That is now the question.

The ruling does not mean Brazoria County must turn over the entire investigative file.

It does mean the county cannot withhold everything.

I have submitted a follow-up request seeking the basic information that the Attorney General says must be released.

Once those records arrive, I will review them and report what they reveal.

After 40 years, the Rebecca Beard case continues to generate new questions — and the state now confirms that authorities still consider the matter tied to an ongoing criminal case.

Read the Attorney General ruling

I have included the Aug. 28, 2026 Texas Attorney General ruling connected to these Brazoria County records requests below.

The ruling, OR2026-038106, says the county may withhold investigative information tied to the ongoing criminal case, but must release basic information.

Texas Attorney General ruling OR2026-038106

Visiting Brazoria County?

For readers traveling to Brazoria County for court proceedings, research or other business, Hotels.com can help compare accommodations throughout the area and along the Texas Gulf Coast.

This post may contain affiliate links. I may earn a commission from qualifying bookings at no additional cost to you.

Tools for digging through public records

Public-records investigations often mean sorting through court filings, police reports, photographs and hundreds of pages of documents. Amazon has portable scanners, external drives, document organizers and other tools that can help keep large research projects organized.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold records tied to 2026 Rebecca Beard investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Rebecca Beard pictured before her disappearance in Texas in 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold Rebecca Beard records

Brazoria County prosecutors are asking the Texas Attorney General for permission to withhold records connected to the renewed investigation into the 1986 disappearance and murder of Rebecca “Becky” Beard.

The August 25 filing also reveals new details about the investigation.

Prosecutors confirmed investigators examined information involving possible additional suspects in Beard’s murder. They also confirmed investigators recently presented their findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The grand jury took no action.

Records request targeted 2026 investigation

I submitted a Texas Public Information Act request on August 10 seeking records related to the 2026 investigation.

The request focused on information provided by Cherie Starr, also known as “Rio.”

I requested interviews, statements, reports, recordings, photographs, maps and investigative notes connected to Starr’s information.

I also sought records concerning any location Starr identified as a possible site for Beard’s remains or other evidence.

The request included records involving a possible search, excavation or dig.

I also requested communications between the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office, Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office, Texas Rangers and other law enforcement agencies.

Importantly, the request did not seek secret grand jury testimony, deliberations, voting records or juror identities.

Brazoria County confirms responsive records exist

The District Attorney’s Office confirmed it holds records that respond to the request.

However, prosecutors want to withhold those records in their entirety.

In its August 25 letter to the Texas Attorney General, the DA’s Office cited the law-enforcement exception under Section 552.108 of the Texas Government Code.

Prosecutors argue that Beard’s murder investigation remains open because her body has never been recovered.

They contend releasing the requested records could interfere with that continuing investigation.

Filing reveals investigation of possible additional suspects

The filing provides an important glimpse into what happened during the renewed investigation.

Prosecutors wrote that their office had recently investigated “other possible actors/defendants” in Beard’s murder.

According to the filing, investigators presented those findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The DA’s Office said the grand jury took no action because investigators did not develop other credible suspects.

That disclosure provides new information about the scope of the 2026 investigation.

It shows investigators did more than simply review an old case file. They examined whether other people may have played a role in Beard’s murder and brought those findings before a grand jury.

Paul Taylor was convicted, but Becky remains missing

John Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in 1995 to murdering Beard.

Beard was 22 when she disappeared in March 1986.

Her body has never been recovered.

The DA’s filing cites that fact as one reason the murder investigation remains open. Prosecutors argue law enforcement must remain able to investigate credible new leads if they emerge.

Prosecutors also claim attorney work-product protection

The District Attorney’s Office makes another argument for withholding the records.

Prosecutors say the requested investigative notes and materials contain attorney work product.

According to the filing, a DA investigator prepared the records while working at the direction of an appointed special prosecutor.

The DA argues the documents contain investigative strategy, mental impressions and legal reasoning connected to potential criminal litigation.

For those reasons, prosecutors asked the Attorney General to allow them to withhold all of the responsive records.

The Attorney General will decide

The August 25 filing is not a final ruling on my records request.

It is Brazoria County’s argument for why the records should remain confidential.

The Texas Attorney General’s Office will now review the arguments and determine whether state law allows Brazoria County to withhold the requested material.

The decision could allow the county to withhold the records, require the release of some information, or require additional responsive material to be released.

I will continue following the records dispute and the investigation into what happened to Rebecca Beard.

The public records request and Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office filing to the Texas Attorney General are attached below.

Planning a trip to Brazoria County?

If you are traveling to Brazoria County to follow developments in the Rebecca Beard case, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Angleton, Lake Jackson, Freeport or the surrounding area, depending on your plans.

I may earn a commission from qualifying Hotels.com bookings made through my link, at no additional cost to you.

What to bring for a long reporting day

Court records, interviews and long hours on the road can mean a lot of waiting. A portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and lightweight bag can make the day easier. You can find travel gear and everyday reporting essentials on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Rebecca Beard Case: Why I’m Releasing the Rio Witness Account

Nearly 40 years after Rebecca “Becky” Beard disappeared from Freeport, Texas, her family is still searching for the answer that matters most.

Where is Becky?

Rebecca Becky Beard, whose 1986 disappearance remains the focus of an ongoing search for answers
Rebecca “Becky” Beard disappeared in March 1986. Her family continues searching for information that could help locate her remains.

Now, her family wants the public to hear information from a woman known as “Rio.” Her account includes disturbing claims about what may have happened to Becky and where someone may have taken her remains.

However, an important warning comes with Rio’s story.

According to Becky’s family, prosecutors recently presented information involving Rio to a Brazoria County grand jury. Family members say the grand jury took no action.

Becky’s family also says the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office told them investigators did not consider Rio a credible witness.

I am not presenting Rio’s statements as established facts.

Still, Becky’s family believes parts of her account could contain accurate information. They hope releasing these details reaches someone who knows what happened or where to find Becky.

Who Was Rebecca “Becky” Beard?

Rebecca “Becky” Beard holding her daughter before her 1986 disappearance
Rebecca “Becky” Beard pictured with her daughter before Becky disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.

Becky Beard was 22 years old when she disappeared after spending the night at the Excalibur Club in Freeport on March 1, 1986.

She never came home.

Investigators have never recovered her body.

Years later, Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in connection with Becky’s death. Despite that conviction, her family has spent decades trying to find her remains.

That search continues today.

Who Is the Witness Known as Rio?

Cherie “Rio” Starr standing near Tammy Rose’s Jeep during the Rebecca Beard investigation
Cherie “Rio” Starr stands near Tammy Rose’s Jeep during an interview connected to the Rebecca “Becky” Beard investigation.

During my investigation, I tracked down Cherie “Rio” Starr, a woman who has provided an account of events surrounding Becky’s disappearance.

Rio made several specific and disturbing claims. Some involve what allegedly happened to Becky’s body and where people may have taken her remains.

Investigators have not established those claims as fact.

According to Becky’s family, the district attorney told them authorities did not find Rio credible.

Still, one reason the family has not completely dismissed her story is that some details appear to connect with information they already knew about Becky’s life before she disappeared.

The Galveston Weekend in Becky’s Planner

Rebecca “Becky” Beard’s personal planner documenting events before her March 1986 disappearance
Becky Beard’s personal planner contains entries documenting events and trips in the weeks before her March 1986 disappearance.

One detail deserves closer examination.

Becky kept a planner. An entry documents a weekend trip to Galveston from February 14 through February 16, 1986, just weeks before she disappeared.

Becky was dating Beaver Aplin at the time.

Rio described an incident involving Aplin during which she said he got down on his knees with a dozen roses, jewelry and bottles.

That detail caught the family’s attention because Becky’s mother, Linda Barnes, already knew about Becky’s Galveston weekend.

Linda recalled Becky returning from the trip and throwing away roses.

Her mother asked her why she was throwing them away.

According to Linda, Becky did not want to talk about it.

That does not prove Rio’s account.

It does, however, raise a question for the family: How much of Rio’s story, if any, could be independently verified?

Becky’s planner documents the Galveston weekend. Her mother remembers the roses. Rio later provided an account involving roses and the man Becky was dating.

The family believes those details are worth examining rather than ignoring.

Family Says Evidence Was Presented to a Grand Jury

Remote dirt road leading through the Brazoria National Wildlife Refuge, an area referenced in witness accounts and past searches connected to the Rebecca Beard case.
A remote dirt road in the Brazoria National Wildlife Refuge near the area where witness Cherie Lynette “Rio” Starr claims Rebecca “Becky” Beard was buried.

Becky’s family says prosecutors recently presented evidence involving Rio to a Brazoria County grand jury.

According to family members, the grand jury took no action.

They also say the district attorney told them authorities did not consider Rio a credible witness.

Those details matter.

Rio’s claims are not established facts.

I am not presenting them as proof of what happened to Becky.

Instead, the family wants to know whether someone else can independently confirm any part of her account.

Why Release Rio’s Story?

There is a simple reason.

Becky still has not been found.

Almost four decades have passed since she disappeared. People who were young adults in 1986 are now much older. Some witnesses have died. Properties have changed. Memories have faded.

That makes information from people who were there increasingly important.

The family understands authorities have questioned Rio’s credibility. They also understand that a grand jury took no action after hearing information related to her account, according to what family members say they were told.

Still, they cannot get past the possibility that one detail could be true even if other parts of a witness’s story are not.

The Galveston weekend is one reason they continue asking questions.

Someone May Remember Something

Texas DPS missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

Maybe you were at the Excalibur Club.

Maybe you knew Becky, Paul Taylor Jr., Beaver Aplin or Rio.

Maybe you remember the Galveston weekend in February 1986.

Maybe you heard a conversation afterward.

Or perhaps you know something about a location connected to the case.

The family isn’t asking people to speculate. They are looking for firsthand information that can be independently checked.

If you know something, even if it seemed insignificant at the time, consider coming forward.

After nearly 40 years, Becky’s family isn’t looking for rumors.

They are looking for Becky.

Carol Mize, sister of Rebecca “Becky” Beard, points out areas she has personally searched while continuing efforts to find her sister.
Carol Mize shows areas she has searched while continuing to look for answers in the 1986 disappearance of her sister, Rebecca “Becky” Beard.

This article is part of my continuing independent investigation into the disappearance and death of Rebecca “Becky” Beard. Statements attributed to witnesses represent their accounts unless independently corroborated. The inclusion of any person’s name does not imply criminal conduct or involvement in Becky’s death.

Related Reading

Amazon: For readers interested in investigative reporting and unresolved cases, browse true-crime and missing-person books on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Visiting Galveston?

Becky’s story has deep connections to Galveston and Brazoria counties. If you’re planning a trip to Galveston, you can compare hotels and accommodations Hotels.com

Why I Continue Investigating the Texas Killing Fields: Every Victim Deserves to Be Remembered

Texas Killing Fields cold case graphic featuring Laura Miller, Donna Prudhomme, Audrey Cook, Heidi Fye and Carolyn Sosa.

Why I Continue Investigating the Texas Killing Fields: Every Victim Deserves to Be Remembered

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

People often ask why I continue investigating murders that happened more than 50 years ago.

They wonder why I file public records requests. They ask why I travel hundreds of miles to interview witnesses. They also question why I keep digging into cases that many people have forgotten.

My answer is simple.

Every victim deserves to be remembered.

The Victims Were More Than Headlines

When I began researching the Texas Killing Fields, one issue quickly bothered me.

Old news reports often focused on how the victims died. Police records also placed heavy attention on their circumstances. Those accounts did not always show who the women were or how they lived.

Authorities described some victims as runaways. Others struggled with addiction or lived through difficult times. Reports also linked some women to prostitution.

Those labels often overshadowed their identities.

Investigators first viewed Laura Miller as a possible runaway. Reports also associated Carolyn Sosa and Teri McDaniel with prostitution.

Those descriptions may have been accurate, incomplete or unfair. Either way, they often became the focus of the story.

The victims deserved better.

No one should disappear from history because of a label.

Why I Keep Digging

My investigation has taken me across Texas and beyond.

I have tracked down key witnesses. I have interviewed retired investigators. I have reviewed thousands of pages of public records.

I have also examined evidence that many people have never seen.

Each interview raises another question. Every record leads to another document. One conversation can reveal a missing piece of history.

Some discoveries involve unidentified remains. Others involve witnesses who were overlooked years ago. Records may also expose decisions that still raise questions today.

That is why I keep digging.

The Public Still Cares

One thing has surprised me more than anything else.

People still care.

Readers continue to send tips. Families continue to reach out. Former investigators and witnesses still contact me with information.

Some believe their information should remain part of the public record. Others simply want someone to listen.

Their messages show that these stories still matter.

The victims have not been forgotten.

Why These Stories Matter

I do not investigate these cases to sensationalize tragedy.

I investigate because every victim mattered.

A person’s past should never decide how much effort investigators make. It should not affect whether authorities search for them or work to solve their murder.

A straight-A student had value. A runaway had value. A woman struggling with addiction had value. A person living on the streets had value.

Their circumstances did not make their lives less important.

Justice should never depend on someone’s background.

The Families Deserve Answers

The victims left behind parents, children, siblings and friends.

Many families waited decades for answers. Some died without learning what happened to their loved one.

Time does not erase that pain.

Families still deserve honest answers. They deserve access to records. They deserve to know whether investigators followed every lead.

They also deserve respect.

I’ll Keep Looking for Answers

Many questions remain in the Texas Killing Fields cases.

I will continue searching through records. I will keep interviewing witnesses. I will also share what I find.

Some mysteries may never be solved. Others may only need one person to speak up.

That is what investigative journalism means to me.

It means giving victims a voice. It means preserving history. Most of all, it means making sure they are never forgotten.

Helpful Travel and Investigation Resources

My investigations sometimes require travel across Texas and beyond. When I need a place to stay near an interview, courthouse or records office, I compare available hotels through Hotels.com.

I also rely on practical tools while reviewing old case files. A portable document scanner helps me preserve records, photographs and handwritten notes.

Portable Canon document scanner used to preserve case files, photographs and handwritten records.

This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission from qualifying bookings or purchases at no additional cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Paul Taylor Claimed Texas Unfairly Kept Him Behind Bars in 2007 Parole Fight

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. prison mugshot
Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995 and received a life sentence.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. filed a writ of habeas corpus in 2007 after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles denied him release.

Taylor challenged his parole denial, not his conviction

The filing did not challenge his murder conviction.

Instead, Taylor argued that the parole board unfairly relied on his crime and past conduct. He claimed the board ignored his prison record, education and other accomplishments.

Taylor pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995. A judge sentenced him to life in prison.

Taylor said the filing was about parole

The writ form asked whether Taylor had previously challenged his conviction.

Taylor marked “no.”

He also wrote:

“Not challenging the conviction. This is a parole related issue.”

That statement is important. This filing did not claim that Taylor was innocent. It also did not ask the court to overturn his guilty plea.

Taylor focused his arguments on the parole process.

Paul Taylor 2007 writ stating he was not challenging his murder conviction
In his 2007 writ application, Paul Taylor wrote that he was not challenging his conviction and described the matter as a parole-related issue.

The writ listed his conviction and sentence

The application identified Taylor’s criminal case as Cause No. 27,636 in the 23rd Judicial District Court of Brazoria County.

The document listed:

Judgment date: May 30, 1995
Offense: Murder
Plea: Guilty
Sentence: Life
Punishment assessed by: Judge

Taylor also stated that he did not have a jury trial. He indicated that he did not appeal the judgment.

Paul Taylor writ listing 1995 murder conviction and life sentence
Taylor’s writ application lists his 1995 guilty plea to murder and his life sentence.

Taylor had been eligible for parole since 1997

Taylor wrote that he had been eligible for parole since February 2, 1997.

According to his filing, the parole board denied him release again on January 12, 2007. The board then gave him a three-year setoff before his next review.

Taylor said the board had denied him parole for about 13 years, including the period between his eligibility date and his next review.

The filing quotes the board’s reason for denial. It referred to the violent nature of the offense, the use of a weapon and a threat to public safety.

The quoted language also stated that the offense showed brutality, violence or the selection of a vulnerable victim.

Taylor argued that these factors came from the crime itself. He said he could never change the past.

Paul Taylor’s 2007 writ memorandum outlining his parole history and denial
Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor raised five arguments

1. The parole board abused its discretion

Taylor claimed the board denied parole for the same conduct that led to his conviction and sentence.

He argued that the board created an “impossible obstacle” because he could not change the crime.

Taylor also said the board failed to give enough weight to his prison accomplishments.

2. The parole process violated due process

Taylor argued that the board did not explain how it decided he remained a future threat.

He claimed the board should have told him what method it used to assess that risk.

Taylor suggested that he could have submitted more information if he had known what evidence the board wanted.

3. The process violated equal protection

Taylor claimed the board released other people with similar or worse criminal records.

He argued that the board treated him differently without a valid reason.

The filing does not include the names or full records of those other prisoners in the pages reviewed.

4. Repeated parole denials amounted to cruel punishment

Taylor argued that repeated denials violated the Eighth Amendment.

He claimed the board continued to deny him for the same unchangeable reasons.

He also accused the board of ignoring his conduct while incarcerated.

5. A Texas life sentence carried an expectation of parole

Taylor argued that Texas did not have a life-without-parole sentence for his case.

Therefore, he claimed that a life sentence carried an expectation of eventual release.

For the first four claims, Taylor asked for a new parole hearing.

However, under his fifth claim, he argued that parole should become mandatory.

These were Taylor’s legal arguments. The filing does not show that a court accepted them.

Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor highlighted his prison record

Taylor wrote that he earned a bachelor’s degree from Sam Houston State University while incarcerated.

He also said he had never received a disciplinary infraction.

In addition, Taylor said he worked in a prison craft shop. He claimed that the work helped him support himself and assist his family.

However, the filing only reflects Taylor’s account. It does not independently verify every statement about his prison history.

What this document does not say

The writ does not claim that Taylor was innocent.

It does not challenge his guilty plea or murder conviction.

The filing also does not present new evidence about Rebecca “Becky” Beard’s disappearance or the location of her remains.

Instead, Taylor challenged the parole board’s review process.

Therefore, this document focuses on parole. It does not attempt to overturn the murder conviction.

Read the full writ and court decision

The complete 2007 filing appears below, along with the court document showing the outcome.

Taylor challenged the parole process, not his murder conviction. However, the court denied his request for relief

Related coverage

Read Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed for a closer look at how accounts in the case evolved over time.

You can also read Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports to review what investigators documented during the first days of the investigation.

Tools for reviewing public records

Court records and police files can contain hundreds of pages. A portable document scanner can make it easier to save, organize and review records while working away from home.

White Canon portable document scanner used to scan court records and public documents

A digital voice recorder can also help reporters preserve interviews, notes and important details while researching a case.

PLAUD AI digital voice recorder shown with its mobile transcription app

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.