Tag Archives: Investigative Journalism

EXCLUSIVE: Roy Alan Stuart Prison Confessions Revealed in Kent McGowen’s Secret Journals

Thumbnail featuring retired deputy Kent McGowen on the left, convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart on the right, and a real handwritten prison notebook page in the center. The image promotes an exclusive interview about McGowen’s prison journals documenting alleged conversations with Stuart.
Thumbnail for the exclusive interview featuring retired deputy Kent McGowen, convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart, and a real handwritten notebook page provided by McGowen. McGowen says the journals document alleged conversations with Stuart while they were incarcerated together.

Former Deputy Documents Alleged Roy Alan Stuart Confessions in Secret Prison Journals

Former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen poses in uniform beside a sheriff’s patrol car before his 1992 conviction.
Before serving about 19 years in prison, Kent McGowen worked as a Harris County deputy. McGowen says it was during his incarceration that he met Roy Alan Stuart and began documenting the conversations that became the basis of his prison journals and investigative notes.

By Tammy Rose | Investigative Reporter

Exclusive graphic featuring Roy Alan Stuart’s mugshot with the text “Roy Alan Stuart” and “Died on May 10, 2019.

For nearly two years inside a Texas prison, former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen says he got to know convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart. What began as casual conversations became something McGowen says he could not ignore.

McGowen says Stuart described murders, body disposal sites and victims who had never been publicly connected to him. McGowen feared he would forget the details, so he secretly documented the conversations in composition notebooks, handwritten journals and investigative timelines.

The former Harris County deputy shared those journals, notebooks and supporting documents publicly for the first time.

Over the past several weeks, I interviewed former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen, reviewed hundreds of pages of handwritten prison journals and supporting documents, and examined records related to the claims discussed in this article.

Editor’s Note – July 11, 2026

After Investigator Matt Wingo contacted me to point out factual errors in my original article, I reexamined Kent McGowen’s original handwritten journals. During that review, I determined that I had misinterpreted several entries involving investigator communications. The journals document communications between Kent McGowen and investigators—including letters, telephone calls, emails, and other correspondence—but they do not establish that Investigator Matt Wingo or the other investigators personally met with Kent as I had previously interpreted. Those sections have been corrected to more accurately reflect the original handwritten journals.

The allegations and information presented throughout this article remain attributed to Kent McGowen’s interview and handwritten journals unless otherwise noted. As with the original publication, these claims have not been independently verified by this news organization.

Why McGowen Started Writing Everything Down

Former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen poses with fellow inmates during his incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. McGowen says he met convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart while they were housed in the same prison unit.
Former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen spent about 19 years in prison, where he says he lived near Roy Alan Stuart for nearly two years and began documenting the conversations that became the basis of his handwritten prison journals.

Watch my exclusive interview as Kent McGowen describes chilling details he says Roy Alan Stuart confessed to while the two were incarcerated together.

McGowen served about 19 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice after a jury convicted him in the 1992 murder of Susan White.

McGowen says he spent nearly two years housed in what he described as a converted shipping container with more than a dozen other inmates, including Stuart.

According to McGowen, most inmates avoided Stuart because of his reputation.

Exclusive graphic featuring Roy Alan Stuart’s mugshot with the text “Roy Alan Stuart” and “Died on May 10, 2019.

“If you think what a serial killer looks like, that’s the picture that pops into your mind,” McGowen told me.

Eventually, the two men started talking.

According to McGowen, those conversations changed everything.

He says Stuart described crimes, victims, locations and methods in extraordinary detail. McGowen believed much of the information had never become public.

Instead of relying on memory, McGowen quietly wrote down what Stuart told him. He used composition notebooks, handwritten journals and investigative timelines whenever he had the opportunity.

Secret Prison Journals

Close-up of a handwritten prison journal page provided by former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen documenting notes he says were taken after conversations with convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart while incarcerated.
One page from Kent McGowen’s handwritten prison journals. McGowen says he wrote many of the notes covertly while incarcerated with Roy Alan Stuart to preserve details he believed investigators should review. The handwritten entries are published as source material and have not been independently verified by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

McGowen says he often wrote the notes late at night after speaking with Stuart. Poor lighting and the need for secrecy made many pages difficult to read decades later.

He never intended to publish the journals.

Instead, McGowen says he created a personal record of conversations he hoped investigators would eventually review.

As time passed, he expanded the project. He created typed investigative summaries, organized his notes and added details as additional memories surfaced.

Original Notebook Pages

Additional Documents

During our interview, McGowen said the journals document conversations and allegations involving convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart while the two men were incarcerated together.

I am publishing the journals as source material for transparency. I have not independently verified every allegation they contain. Readers should not interpret their publication as confirmation that every claim is true.

I published the notebook pages as McGowen provided them, except for minor adjustments that improve readability.

Readers can compare the original handwritten journals with McGowen’s later typed investigative summaries to better understand the chronology he documented.

What Stuart Told McGowen

According to McGowen, Roy Alan Stuart eventually grew comfortable talking about his past. McGowen says Stuart began describing crimes he claimed to have committed.

The conversations continued for nearly two years while both men served time in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. McGowen worried he would forget important details, so he recorded the conversations in handwritten prison journals. Later, he organized the information into typed investigative summaries and timelines.

McGowen’s notes include allegations involving additional victims whom public records have never linked to Stuart.

One entry identifies Linda Kay (White) Simmons. McGowen says Stuart claimed responsibility for killing her in 1971 after prison officials released him following the killing of another victim also named Kay.

Another entry describes a woman McGowen says Stuart claimed was thrown from a bridge into Austin Bayou. McGowen writes that Stuart described the location during one of their conversations.

McGowen also documented allegations involving a constable he says Stuart claimed to have killed. During my interview with McGowen, he said Stuart identified the person as a law enforcement officer who later used a wheelchair.

Close-up of a handwritten notebook page provided by Kent McGowen containing numbered investigative notes. Entries appear to reference a junkyard, an “ex constable,” and the Alvin area between 1982 and 1984. Portions of the handwriting are difficult to decipher.
Copy of a handwritten notebook page provided by Kent McGowen. Entries appear to reference a junkyard, an “ex constable,” and the Alvin area between 1982 and 1984. Portions of the handwriting are difficult to decipher.

One handwritten notebook page also appears to reference a junkyard, an “ex constable,” and the Alvin area between 1982 and 1984, although portions of the handwriting are difficult to decipher. McGowen says he later shared this information with retired Brazoria County investigator Matt Wingo and referenced additional details involving Austin Bayou in his prison notes.

Screenshot of a text message exchange between former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen and retired TDCJ investigator Matt Wingo discussing McGowen’s prison notes about Roy Alan Stuart, including Wingo’s response that investigators should review the notes to verify additional information and his belief that not all victims had been found.
Screenshot of a July 2023 text conversation in which retired veteran investigator Matt Wingo discusses reviewing Kent McGowen’s prison notes related to convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart. The exchange is published as source material. Its contents have not been independently verified by me.

Additional Allegations Documented in McGowen’s Notes

According to McGowen’s handwritten notes and his 2023 correspondence with retired investigator Matt Wingo, Stuart allegedly described numerous additional crimes during nearly two years of conversations in prison. They include:

McGowen’s notes state that Stuart claimed his first killing occurred when he was about 10 years old. According to the notes, Stuart alleged his father restrained Stuart’s paternal uncle and ordered him to beat the man to death with a baseball bat.

The notes also describe an allegation that Stuart murdered a nun in Potter County and concealed her body beneath a cattle water trough.

Another allegation in McGowen’s notes is that Stuart claimed he kidnapped a woman in Tomball.

The notes also reference additional alleged homicide victims, body disposal locations, and other crimes Stuart reportedly described during nearly two years of conversations in prison.

The allegations above have not been independently verified by me. They are published because they appear in McGowen’s contemporaneous notes and correspondence, which investigators previously acknowledged reviewing.

Could Terri Denise McDaniels Be One of the Cases?

Terri Denise McDaniels was found murdered in Pearland on Oct. 31, 1986. Her homicide remains unsolved.

McGowen’s notes include an allegation that Roy Alan Stuart claimed he murdered a young girl in Brazoria County after allegedly being paid approximately $3,000 by the victim’s mother for life insurance proceeds.

At this time, I have not identified any public records linking Roy Alan Stuart to McDaniels’ homicide, and no official connection has been established.

While researching the case, I found online discussions in which some members of the public have speculated that Stuart could have been responsible for McDaniels’ unsolved killing. Those online discussions are not evidence and do not establish a connection.

Because McDaniels’ homicide remains unsolved and McGowen’s notes describe an alleged unidentified victim in Brazoria County, I am continuing to examine whether any records or witnesses support—or refute—a possible connection.

Investigators Acknowledged Receiving the Information

Additional notebook entries reference unidentified victims, possible body disposal sites and locations McGowen believed investigators should review.

No public records confirm Stuart’s involvement in these additional cases.

I included the material because it appears throughout McGowen’s handwritten journals, investigative summaries and supporting documents.

Efforts to Alert Investigators

McGowen says he never intended for the prison journals to remain hidden.

After leaving prison, he organized his handwritten notes into typed investigative summaries. He says he shared portions of that material with investigators in hopes they would examine the information further.

The emails, text messages and documents included in this article show McGowen’s efforts to preserve the information and seek additional review. They do not independently verify the allegations themselves.

State Records Confirm Roy Alan Stuart Died in Prison

Official Record: The Texas Attorney General Custodial Death Report below confirms Roy Alan Stuart died on May 10, 2019, while in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The report lists his manner of death as natural and identifies lung cancer as the medical cause of death.

While reviewing McGowen’s records, I also obtained an official Texas Attorney General Custodial Death Report confirming Roy Alan Stuart died on May 10, 2019, while in the custody of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

The report states Stuart was 71 years old. He died while receiving hospice care at the Michael Unit in Anderson County. It lists lung cancer as the medical cause of death and classifies the manner of death as natural.

McGowen told me Stuart appeared to disappear from the public TDCJ inmate roster after he began providing information to investigators in 2019. According to McGowen, Stuart later appeared under a different unit assignment before state records ultimately confirmed his death.

What Remains Unverified

Many of the allegations contained in McGowen’s journals and investigative summaries have never been independently verified.

Some involve crimes for which Stuart was never charged, while others identify alleged victims, disposal sites or additional homicides that are not reflected in publicly available court records.

Throughout this investigation, I have distinguished between information supported by public records and allegations McGowen attributes to Stuart during their time incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

Readers should not interpret publication of these documents as confirmation that every allegation is true. Instead, the records are being published so readers can examine the original material alongside the reporting as this investigation continues.

Investigation Continues

Over the coming weeks, I will continue reviewing prison journals, handwritten notes, investigative timelines and correspondence provided by McGowen.

Public records requests remain pending. I also continue seeking comment from current and former law enforcement officials mentioned throughout this investigation.

The records are being published so readers can examine the original material.

McGowen believes the journals preserve years of conversations investigators should examine. Time will determine whether those allegations lead to new evidence or simply become part of the historical record.

Do You Have Information?

Do you have information related to Roy Alan Stuart or any case discussed in this investigation?

Send documentation, photographs, court records or firsthand information that could help verify or refute claims in McGowen’s journals.

Email Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose at chopperrose@msn.com

Editor’s Note: This article contains allegations documented in Kent McGowen’s prison journals, handwritten notes and correspondence. Unless otherwise noted, these allegations have not been independently verified by me and should not be interpreted as established fact.

If you’re interested in learning more about Roy Alan Stuart and other notorious Texas crime cases, browse my recommended true crime books in my Amazon storefront.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Related Coverage: Former Deputy Documents Alleged Roy Alan Stuart Confessions.

Investigator Matt Wingo Responds to Roy Alan Stuart Story, Raises Questions About Prison Journals

Matt Wingo response to Roy Alan Stuart investigation showing July 2023 text messages, Kent McGowen prison diaries and Roy Alan Stuart mugshot.

Investigator Matt Wingo Raises Questions About Roy Alan Stuart Prison Journal Story

Before publishing my interview with former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen and his handwritten prison journals about convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart, I contacted investigator Matt Wingo seeking an interview and comment.

I did not receive an interview before my publication deadline.

After the story was published, Wingo text messaged and emailed me several times expressing concerns about the accuracy of information contained in McGowen’s journals. Although one of his text messages stated he did not want further contact, he continued sending additional emails outlining what he believes are significant factual problems.

Why I Reported the Story the Way I Did

The messages document that Wingo and McGowen communicated. They do not independently establish that every claim discussed in those communications is accurate.

July 13, 2023 text message exchange between investigator Matt Wingo and former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen discussing Roy Alan Stuart. The messages include discussion of an estimated homicide count and references to reviewing additional investigative records.

One issue readers should understand is the homicide count.

Before publication, I had seen a July 2023 message between Wingo and McGowen in which Wingo wrote:

“I have him killing 14 but that’s light, what we know about.”

However, because I was unable to interview Wingo before publication, I did not feel it was appropriate to publish his estimate as fact without giving him the opportunity to explain how he reached that number.

Instead, I reported what Kent McGowen told me during my interview and clearly identified him as the source of those statements. Throughout my reporting, I repeatedly noted that many of the claims contained in McGowen’s journals remain unverified.

Editor’s Note – July 10, 2026

After Investigator Matt Wingo contacted me to point out factual errors in my original article, I reexamined Kent McGowen’s original handwritten journals. During that review, I determined that I had misinterpreted several entries involving investigator communications. The journals document communications between Kent McGowen and investigators—including letters, telephone calls, emails, text messages and other correspondence. Upon reexamining the journals, I determined I had incorrectly interpreted some entries as documenting in-person meetings as I had previously interpreted.

The underlying claims in this article remain attributed to Kent McGowen’s interview and handwritten journals unless otherwise noted. As with the original publication, these allegations have not been independently verified by this news organization.

Additional Documents Reviewed

Excerpts from Kent McGowen’s original handwritten prison journals referencing communications with investigators and agencies regarding information he said Roy Alan Stuart shared while they were incarcerated together.

In addition to the handwritten journals, I also reviewed text messages, emails, and other communications exchanged between Matt Wingo and Kent McGowen regarding Roy Alan Stuart as part of this reporting.

The Questions That Remain

Several important questions remain unanswered.

Which Texas Ranger or Rangers were referenced in McGowen’s journals?

Can the journal entries regarding investigator communications be independently corroborated through public records or other witnesses?

Which portions of the journals can be independently verified?

Which claims cannot currently be verified?

Are there additional public records that support or contradict McGowen’s account?

I intend to continue reporting on these questions as more information becomes available.

More Resources

If stories about cold cases, victims, and investigative journalism matter to you, these books and reports may also be helpful.

📚 The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk

📚 While the City Slept by Eli Sanders

📰 Read my original investigation:

Exclusive: Roy Alan Stuart Prison Confessions Revealed

Why I Fight So Hard for Victims: The Story I’ve Never Shared

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through my affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent investigative journalism.

Roy Alan Stuart Investigator Messages Revealed

Matt Wingo response to Roy Alan Stuart investigation showing July 2023 text messages, Kent McGowen prison diaries and Roy Alan Stuart mugshot.

New Messages Show Multiple Law Enforcement Officials Responded to Kent McGowen Regarding Roy Alan Stuart Information.

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Additional text messages obtained during my investigation into Roy Alan Stuart show Kent McGowen exchanged text messages with multiple law enforcement officials after providing information from his prison journals.

The messages do not verify the allegations contained in McGowen’s journals. However, they do document that officials from multiple agencies acknowledged receiving or discussing the information and, in some cases, indicated they intended to review the material.

FBI Safe Streets Task Force Acknowledged the Request

In a text message dated January 5, 2023, FBI Safe Streets Task Force Lt. Tommy Hansen responded to McGowen regarding the Roy Alan Stuart journals.

Hansen wrote:

Screenshot of a January 5, 2023 text message from FBI Safe Streets Task Force Lt. Tommy Hansen acknowledging Kent McGowen’s request to review Roy Alan Stuart prison journal notes.
A January 5, 2023 text message from FBI Safe Streets Task Force Lt. Tommy Hansen acknowledges Kent McGowen’s request to review his Roy Alan Stuart prison journals. Personal phone number has been redacted.

“Myself nor Agent Brown have forgot about request to meet with us and review your diary notes ref Roy Alan Stewart.”

He continued by explaining that both investigators were handling several major cases before adding:

“We both have a number of major ongoing cases. We will reach in few weeks to meet.”

The message documents that McGowen’s request remained under consideration while investigators focused on other active investigations.

John Blankenship Responded to McGowen’s Information

On May 2, 2023, McGowen received another text message from John Blankenship after sending additional information.

Screenshot of a May 2, 2023 text message from John Blankenship discussing Kent McGowen’s Roy Alan Stuart information and referencing a Texas Ranger.
In a May 2, 2023 text message, John Blankenship told Kent McGowen he had discussed the Roy Alan Stuart information with his supervisor and that a Texas Ranger would work on the matter.

Blankenship wrote:

“I ran our conversation by my boss… he wants our new Texas Ranger to work on this.”

He added that he would contact McGowen again once they had a plan in place.

The message indicates McGowen’s information was discussed internally and that a Texas Ranger was expected to become involved.

Texas Ranger Contact

Contact screen identifying Texas Ranger Lieutenant Jeff Wolf, provided by Kent McGowen as part of his Roy Alan Stuart investigation materials. Phone number has been redacted.
Kent McGowen provided this contact entry identifying Texas Ranger Lieutenant Jeff Wolf while documenting his efforts to share information related to Roy Alan Stuart with law enforcement. The phone number has been redacted for privacy.

McGowen also provided a contact entry identifying Texas Ranger Lieutenant Jeff Wolf.

While a contact listing alone does not establish what communications occurred, it is consistent with McGowen’s account that he attempted to provide his journals to multiple law enforcement agencies.

What the Messages Show

The text messages do not establish that Roy Alan Stuart’s alleged confessions were verified.

They also do not confirm that investigators concluded Stuart committed the crimes described in McGowen’s journals.

What they do show is that officials representing multiple agencies acknowledged receiving or discussing McGowen’s information and communicated with him regarding his request to have the material reviewed.

Those communications provide additional documentation supporting McGowen’s longstanding claim that he repeatedly attempted to bring the information to law enforcement after documenting his conversations with Stuart in prison.

Continuing Investigation

I continue to review prison journals, text messages, official records, and other documents related to Roy Alan Stuart.

If you have firsthand information regarding Roy Alan Stuart, the prison journals, or any of the cases discussed, you can contact me confidentially.

As with all of my reporting, allegations contained in the journals remain unverified unless supported by independent evidence or official records.

Recommended Reading

📚 The Stranger Beside Me by Ann Rule

The Stronger Beside Me

📚 Mindhunter by John E. Douglas and Mark Olshaker

Mindhunter

Related Investigations

Related Coverage

Former Harris County Deputy Kent McGowen Shares Chilling Roy Alan Stuart Prison Confessions

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through my affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my investigative journalism.

Why I Fight So Hard for Victims: The Story I’ve Never Shared

Tammy Rose hiking with a friend before sharing the personal story that inspired her investigative reporting and advocacy for crime victims.
Tammy Rose shares the personal journey that inspired her lifelong commitment to fighting for victims.

Why I Fight So Hard for Victims: The Story I’ve Never Shared

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Why I’m Sharing This Now

People often ask why I spend so much time filing public records requests, interviewing grieving families, and refusing to give up on cold cases.

The answer isn’t found in a newsroom.

It’s found in one of the most painful chapters of my own life.

Long before I became an investigative reporter, I became a victim.

For years, I kept this story private because of the shame, embarrassment, and fear that followed.

Today, I’m sharing it because I hope it helps others understand why I fight so hard for victims.

I Didn’t Want to Report the Crime

The person who sexually assaulted me wasn’t a stranger.

He was someone my family knew and trusted.

After it happened, I didn’t want to report the crime.

I was embarrassed.

I was ashamed.

Like many victims, I blamed myself.

I wanted to pretend it had never happened.

It was my former husband who convinced me to go to law enforcement. He told me that if I didn’t report the crime, he would.

Looking back, I’m grateful he encouraged me to speak up.

At the time, it felt impossible.

The Trial Changed My Family Forever

Going through the criminal justice system was one of the hardest experiences of my life.

During the trial, I learned the defendant had previously been convicted in another sexual assault case involving a child under the age of 14 and had served a much shorter sentence.

That realization was heartbreaking.

The case also divided my family.

One of the most painful moments was watching my own sister testify for the defense.

My father blamed me for what had happened.

Losing the support of people I loved was devastating.

The verdict ended the criminal case.

It did not end the pain.

The Papers I Never Threw Away

Wisconsin court records and victim notification documents preserved by Tammy Rose years after her criminal case, illustrating the lasting impact of surviving sexual assault.
Court records and victim notification letters I kept for years—documents that reminded me the criminal case ended, but the journey as a victim did not.

Recently, I opened a folder I hadn’t looked at in years.

Inside were Wisconsin court records, sentencing documents, and a Wisconsin Department of Corrections victim notification letter informing me the offender would one day be released from prison.

Holding those papers again reminded me that victims often carry a case long after the courtroom is empty.

The documents aren’t just legal records.

For me, they represent years of healing.

Years Later, I Had to Defend My Truth Again

Courthouse walkway during the Jodi Arias sentencing retrial where testimony related to the State Bar proceedings was taking place.
Courthouse during the Jodi Arias sentencing retrial, where my reporting ultimately led to State Bar proceedings that resulted in my deposition years after my own criminal case had ended.

Years after my criminal case ended, I was covering the Jodi Arias sentencing retrial as a reporter.

During my reporting, I uncovered information that led me to file a complaint with the State Bar of Arizona regarding prosecutor Juan Martinez.

As part of that disciplinary process, I was deposed.

During that process, records from my own criminal case became part of the deposition and were made public. As a victim, it was devastating to see deeply personal parts of my past become public record years after I believed I had finally moved forward.

I never imagined my own past would become part of those proceedings.

During the deposition, my background was examined, including the sexual assault case from years earlier. My credibility was challenged, and I felt as though I was once again defending one of the most painful experiences of my life.

For years, I had been afraid to speak up.

Then something changed.

I remember saying, “The judge and jury believed me. If you disagree with that, take it up with them.”

It was the first time in a long time that I truly stood up for myself.

Why I Fight So Hard for Victims

Texas Department of Public Safety Missing Persons Bulletin for Rebecca Jean Beard, issued during the investigation into her disappearance.
Official Texas DPS Missing Persons Bulletin for Rebecca Jean Beard, documenting her disappearance before Paul Taylor Jr. later pleaded guilty in the case despite her remains never being recovered.

Every records request I file…

Each family I interview…

No cold case is just another story.

Every difficult question I ask…

Is driven by one purpose: finding the truth.

I know what it feels like to wonder if anyone will believe you.

I’ve experienced losing relationships because I told the truth.

Years later, my credibility was questioned over events from my past.

Those experiences shaped the reporter I am today.

Victims deserve compassion.

Families deserve answers.

The truth deserves to be pursued—even when it’s uncomfortable.

To Every Victim Reading This

Memorial image of Terri Denise McDaniels, an unsolved homicide victim from Pearland, Texas, whose case remains unsolved.
Terri Denise McDaniels was murdered in Pearland, Texas, on October 31, 1986. Her homicide remains unsolved. Every unsolved case represents a family still waiting for answers and justice.

Maybe you’ve been afraid to report a crime.

Perhaps someone blamed you for something that wasn’t your fault.

Or maybe you’ve wondered whether anyone would believe you.

You are not alone.

Sharing this story isn’t about reliving the past.

It’s about explaining why I continue fighting for victims every single day.

I can’t change what happened to me.

But I can make sure my experiences help someone else find the courage to speak.

As long as I have a voice, I’ll keep fighting for those still searching for justice.

That’s why I fight so hard for victims.

Continue Reading

If you’d like to learn more about trauma, healing, and the importance of seeking justice for victims, you may also find these resources helpful.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Recommended Reading

The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk

The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker

More Investigations by Tammy Rose

Rebecca Beard: No Body. No Weapon. My investigation into the 1986 disappearance and the unanswered questions that remain.

Roy Alan Stuart Prison Journals: Former Harris County Deputy Kent McGowen shares chilling prison confessions that could help solve cold cases.

Brazoria County Seeks to Withhold Records on Outside Counsel

The requested records involve outside attorneys hired by Brazoria County in connection with the John Mendoza Jr. shooting investigation.

Public records request and Brazoria County DA letter seeking to withhold records in the John Mendoza Jr. shooting investigation.
July 2, 2026: Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office notified requester Kevin Henry that it was asking the Texas Attorney General to determine whether records related to outside legal counsel could be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.

Brazoria County DA Asks Texas Attorney General to Withhold Records on Outside Counsel Hired After John Mendoza Jr. Shooting

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Why did Brazoria County hire outside legal counsel following the fatal shooting of John Mendoza Jr., and why is the District Attorney now asking the Texas Attorney General to keep those records from the public?

Those are questions at the center of a new Texas Public Information Act dispute after podcast host Kevin Henry requested documents related to outside attorneys retained by Brazoria County following the officer-involved shooting.

The records request seeks documents that would show:

The attorney engagement letter.

The scope of legal representation.

Financial terms of the agreement.

Communications regarding hiring outside counsel.

Authority used to retain the attorneys.

Invoices and payment records.

According to the request, the records involve outside attorney Norman Giles and the law firm Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP in connection with matters involving John Mendoza Jr., John Mendoza Sr., and attorney Charles Adams.

DA Requests Attorney General Ruling

July 2, 2026 Brazoria County District Attorney letter requesting a Texas Attorney General ruling on whether records related to outside legal counsel may be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.
On July 2, 2026, the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office notified Kevin Henry that it was seeking a Texas Attorney General ruling on whether records related to outside legal counsel could be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.

Instead of immediately releasing the records, Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney Tom Selleck notified the Texas Attorney General that his office intends to seek permission to withhold portions of the requested information.

In the July 2, 2026 letter, the DA cites several exceptions under the Texas Public Information Act, including:

Confidential information

Litigation exception

Law enforcement exception

Agency memoranda

The Attorney General will ultimately determine whether those claimed exemptions apply.

Kevin Henry Challenges the County’s Position

Portrait of Kevin Henry, host of The Kevin Henry Podcast, who filed the Texas Public Information Act request seeking records related to outside legal counsel in the John Mendoza Jr. investigation.
Kevin Henry filed the public records request seeking contracts, invoices, communications, and related records concerning outside legal counsel hired by Brazoria County in connection with the John Mendoza Jr. investigation. The Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office later notified him it was seeking a Texas Attorney General ruling on whether some of those records could be withheld.

Kevin Henry argues the requested documents involve public expenditures rather than protected legal advice.

In his filing, he contends that:

Engagement letters for outside legal services are generally public records.

Financial terms of public contracts are typically subject to disclosure.

Outside counsel was retained before litigation was filed.

The public has a strong interest in understanding how taxpayer money is being spent following the fatal shooting.

Henry also argues that disclosure is particularly important because the request concerns the death of John Mendoza Jr. during an encounter with a Brazoria County Sheriff’s deputy.

Why This Matters

When government agencies retain outside attorneys, taxpayers often pay those legal expenses.

The records requested could provide additional information about:

When outside counsel was hired.

What work the attorneys were retained to perform.

How much taxpayers may ultimately pay.

The legal scope of the representation.

Whether those documents remain confidential now rests with the Texas Attorney General’s Office.

What Happens Next

The Attorney General will review both Brazoria County’s arguments for withholding the records and Kevin Henry’s response opposing those claims.

If the Attorney General orders disclosure, Brazoria County may be required to release some or all of the requested documents. If the ruling favors the county, portions of the records could remain withheld.

I’ll continue following this public records dispute and provide updates as additional filings become available.

The Texas Attorney General will now determine whether the requested records must be released or whether the county may lawfully withhold some or all of them under the Texas Public Information Act.

More John Mendoza Jr. Coverage: Follow my ongoing investigative reporting into the John Mendoza Jr. shooting, including public records requests, legal filings, the outside counsel controversy, attorney statements, and previous developments in the case.

Recommended Reporting Gear

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Every purchase made through these links helps support my independent investigative reporting and allows me to continue covering stories like this one. Thank you for your support.

Reporting Equipment I Use & Recommend:

🎤 Voice Recorder

📷 Body Camera

📻 Police Scanner

Former Deputy Documents Alleged Roy Alan Stuart Confessions

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

How An Unlikely Prison Friendship Began

Former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen says one of the most unexpected chapters of his life began while serving a prison sentence in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

McGowen was convicted in the 1992 murder of Susan White and spent 19 years in prison before he was paroled. Since his release, he has spoken publicly about his case and his time in prison, including conversations he says he had with convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart.

According to McGowen, he spent nearly two years housed near convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart, where the two developed an unlikely relationship that led to conversations about alleged unsolved murders across Southeast Texas.

McGowen says he carefully documented those conversations, typed formal reports, and later turned the information over to multiple law enforcement agencies.

I have not independently verified Stuart’s alleged prison statements or whether they resulted in any solved criminal cases.

An Unlikely Prison Conversation

McGowen told me that most inmates avoided Stuart, describing him as someone who appeared exactly how many people would imagine a serial killer.

After noticing Stewart sitting alone, McGowen said he bought him a pint of ice cream and a soft drink from the prison commissary.

According to McGowen, that simple act led Stuart to begin discussing murders he claimed to have committed throughout Texas.

“Nobody would talk to Roy,” McGowen said. “After that, he just started talking.”

McGowen said one reason he began paying close attention was because Stuart showed him what McGowen recalls was a letter that Stuart claimed had been written by attorney Tom Selleck. According to McGowen, Stuart also claimed Selleck represented him at the time. Selleck currently serves as the Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney and previously worked as an assistant district attorney before entering private practice. I have not independently verified the letter, its authenticity, or Stuart’s claim regarding the alleged legal representation.

Claims Of Additional Victims

Historical 1994 Victoria Advocate newspaper clipping reporting Roy Alan Stuart’s arrest in Brazoria County and describing his criminal history.
Historical newspaper clipping from The Victoria Advocate (May 1994) reporting Roy Alan Stuart’s arrest in Brazoria County. The article states Stuart had been investigated in multiple homicide and sexual assault cases. Included for historical context alongside Kent McGowen’s interview.

McGowen alleges Stuart described several killings that were never publicly connected to him.

Among the stories McGowen recalls were allegations involving:

A woman allegedly abducted from Houston during rodeo season.

A victim allegedly killed near a waterway in Brazoria County.

Bodies allegedly disposed of in or near the Brazos River.

Additional killings Stuart allegedly discussed involving Southeast Texas.

McGowen says Stuart showed no remorse while recounting the alleged crimes.

Documenting Every Conversation

Rather than relying on memory, McGowen says he immediately began documenting the conversations.

He kept handwritten notes while incarcerated before later typing formal reports describing what Stuart allegedly told him.

McGowen says he eventually forwarded those reports to multiple law enforcement agencies, including investigators in several Texas counties.

“I wanted to document everything while it was still fresh,” McGowen said.

Investigators Later Contacted Him

According to McGowen, investigators later reached out requesting copies of his notes.

He says an FBI agent also contacted him after learning about the reports and asked to review the journals because they reflected his contemporaneous observations while Stuart was allegedly making the statements.

McGowen says he continues to maintain copies of those writings today.

Questions Still Remain

Whether Stuart’s alleged prison statements can ever be verified remains unknown.

At this time, I have not found any publicly available records that independently confirm the additional alleged victims described by McGowen.

However, McGowen believes investigators considered the information important enough to request his documentation years after the conversations took place.

As part of my continuing coverage, I am preparing additional public records requests to determine what investigative steps, if any, followed McGowen’s submissions.

This remains an active reporting project. If you have firsthand knowledge related to Roy Alan Stuart or the investigations discussed in this article, contact me through ChopperRose.com

Related Coverage

Convicted Former Deputy Says He Was Framed — But Key Questions Remain (coming soon)

Rebecca Beard Investigation: Exclusive Interviews And Court Records

Texas Killing Fields: Continuing Coverage

Amazon Recommendations

Books About Serial Killers

Whoever Fights Monsters by Robert K. Ressler

Mindhunter by John E. Douglas

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Why I Released the Exclusive 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

Why I Released the 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

As an investigative reporter, I often have to make difficult decisions.

One of the hardest was deciding whether to release the 2002 family mediation recording involving Paul Taylor Jr. and Rebecca Beard’s family.

When I first obtained an exclusive copy of the recording from Rebecca Beard’s family, I wasn’t sure if I would ever make it public.

For months, I listened to the recording while reviewing court records, investigative documents, and interviewing Rebecca’s family. The more I reported on the case, the more I believed the recording added important context to an investigation that still raises questions nearly four decades later.

Rather than relying on summaries or secondhand accounts, I wanted people to hear Paul Taylor Jr.’s own words for themselves.

This article isn’t about telling anyone what to believe.

It’s about explaining why I decided to release the recording and why I believe it is an important part of my ongoing investigation.

“Rather than relying on summaries or secondhand accounts, I wanted people to hear Paul Taylor Jr.’s own words and decide for themselves.”

Watch the Exclusive 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

The full 30-minute recording is embedded below. I encourage you to listen to it in its entirety before drawing your own conclusions.

Why the recording stood out

As I compared the mediation recording with other records I reviewed during my investigation, several things caught my attention.

One involves the events after Rebecca Beard disappeared.

During the mediation, Paul Taylor Jr. appears unable to remember getting his vehicle stuck in a ditch near his home or the tow truck driver who reportedly helped pull him out. Yet in other parts of the recording, he recalls details surrounding the case.

That difference raised questions for me.

Another involves the weapon.

While reviewing investigative records, I came across a sealed document containing entries that reference a Remington shotgun and what appears to be human remains.

Those entries stood out because they raise questions when compared with portions of the mediation recording.

I encourage viewers to listen to the recording, review the available information, and draw their own conclusions.

Why I chose to publish it

Investigative reporting isn’t about deciding a case.

It’s about asking questions, reviewing records, interviewing the people closest to the investigation, and presenting information as fairly and accurately as possible.

Over the past several months, I’ve interviewed Rebecca Beard’s family, reviewed numerous court records and investigative documents, and continued asking questions about a case that still has many unanswered ones.

After months of reporting, I believed it was time to let the public hear this recording in its entirety.

This article serves as an introduction to that recording.

I encourage you to listen to the complete mediation audio in context and compare what is said with the records discussed throughout my investigation.

Sometimes the biggest questions aren’t about what someone remembers.

They’re about what they don’t.

Thank you for taking the time to follow my reporting.

Related Rebecca Beard Coverage

Continue following my investigation with these related reports:

Exclusive: Rebecca Beard’s Daughter Speaks Out Nearly 40 Years After Her Mother’s Disappearance

Questions for Arch Aplin and John Cohn in the Rebecca Beard Case

What the Sealed Documents Reveal in the Rebecca Beard Investigation

How I Reported This Investigation

This investigation took months of research, interviews, reviewing court records, and comparing documents with the 2002 mediation recording. These are some of the tools I use while reporting stories like this.

Shure MV88+ Microphone – Used for interviews and recording clear audio in the field.

GoPro Camera – Captures behind-the-scenes footage and field reporting.

iPhone 16 Accessories – Tripods, mounts, and mobile reporting gear.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through the links on this page, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent investigative journalism.

Inside Paul Taylor Jr.’s Prison Letters About the Rebecca Beard Investigation

Newly obtained prison messages from Paul Taylor Jr. discuss the Rebecca Beard investigation, prison life and his perspective decades after the case.

Nearly four decades after Rebecca Beard disappeared, new prison messages from convicted killer Paul Taylor Jr. are offering another glimpse into how he views the investigation today.

The messages, shared with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose by a longtime correspondent who asked to remain anonymous, cover much more than the Rebecca Beard case. Taylor discusses prison life, his health, his faith, investigators, and why he believes renewed attention is being focused on his case.

While many of his statements reflect his personal opinions and allegations, they provide insight into his current mindset as interest in the Rebecca Beard investigation continues.

Taylor questions renewed interest in the Rebecca Beard case

In several messages, Taylor repeatedly asks why people are suddenly interested in his case after so many years.

He questions why the victim’s family has continued speaking publicly and wonders what new information investigators may have uncovered.

Taylor also asks whether new evidence has surfaced and repeatedly requests updates from outside prison.

His questions come as the Rebecca Beard investigation has received renewed attention following exclusive interviews, court records, and additional reporting into the 1986 disappearance.

Paul Taylor Jr. comments on investigators

Throughout the messages, Taylor criticizes investigators and the criminal justice system.

He claims authorities mishandled evidence and writes that people should question official accounts of the investigation.

These statements represent Taylor’s personal opinions and have not been independently verified.

Despite his criticism, Taylor continues asking for information about developments in the case.

Faith remains a central theme

Religion appears throughout nearly every message.

Taylor writes about reading the Bible each morning, praying daily, and believing God has guided him throughout his years in prison.

He frequently ends his messages with blessings and encourages others to pray.

The repeated references suggest his Christian faith continues to play a significant role in his daily life behind bars.

Life inside a Texas prison

The letters also describe Taylor’s daily routine inside prison.

He discusses prison conditions, medical treatment following the removal of basal cell carcinoma, communication through the Securus messaging system, and the challenges of staying connected with the outside world.

Taylor says receiving letters helps him remain informed about events beyond prison walls.

Taylor notices new reporting

One of the more interesting portions of the correspondence comes when Taylor references recent reporting.

He asks whether Tammy Rose is writing articles and later questions why her name briefly appeared in his contact list before disappearing.

The messages suggest Taylor is aware that new reporting and renewed public interest continue surrounding the Rebecca Beard investigation.

Investigation continues

Rebecca Beard disappeared in 1986 and her body has never been found.

Although Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in connection with her death, questions remain about where Rebecca’s remains may be located.

Investigators have conducted multiple searches over the years, while Rebecca’s family continues asking authorities to pursue additional leads.

The newly shared prison messages do not establish new evidence in the case. Instead, they provide additional insight into Taylor’s thoughts as the investigation continues decades later.

Editor’s Note: The prison messages contain Taylor’s personal opinions and allegations regarding investigators and the criminal justice system. Those statements have not been independently verified and are presented to accurately reflect the contents of the correspondence.

Recommended Reading

If you’re interested in the Rebecca Beard investigation and other Texas cold cases, these books provide additional background and context. Purchasing through the links below helps support my independent reporting at no additional cost to you.

Recommended Reading: Rebecca Beard & Texas True Crime

The Killing Fields

Deliver Us by Kathryn Casey

Let’s Kill Mom: Four Texas Teens and a Horrifying Murder

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent journalism and investigative reporting.

Juan Martinez Disciplinary Hearing: My Story as a Key Witness

This story is long overdue. I am speaking publicly because I was a key witness in the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing. My decision to come forward helped expose misconduct that ultimately ended his career as a prosecutor.

How I Discovered the Misconduct

Flying in SkyEye 13!
Journalist Tammy Rose

Covering the Jodi Arias Sentencing Retrial

 I was covering the Jodi Arias case when I noticed troubling behavior by then‑prosecutor Juan Martinez. It crossed ethical lines.

One of the most disturbing revelations was the leak of Juror 17’s identity to the public. The information did not come from the court; it came from within the prosecution itself, passed via a media intermediary.

When a juror’s identity becomes public, it puts them at serious risk. In this case, that juror later received threats to their safety.

That moment marked a turning point for me. What began as reporting became a matter of public responsibility. I realized I needed to document and report what I had uncovered.

I provided investigators with records and testimony about how the leak happened, knowing it could affect my career and reputation. Still, I chose to act ethically and tell the truth.

The investigation confirmed that protected information had been improperly shared and that this conduct was part of a broader pattern of ethical violations.

Prosecutor Juan Martinez walking into court with a key witness during Jodi Arias' sentencing retrial

My Role in the Disciplinary Hearing

I gave testimony and submitted evidence detailing the leaks and unethical conduct. My goal was never to attack individuals unnecessarily, but to ensure accountability and integrity in the justice system.

I acted independently and ethically, aware that speaking out could impact my professional life. But truth and public safety were my priority.

Journalist Tammy Rose traveling to court for the Jodi Arias resentencing, connected to the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing
Journalist Tammy Rose traveling to court for the Jodi Arias resentencing trial, connected to the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing

What Happened After the Investigation

After reviewing the evidence, the investigation confirmed a pattern of ethical violations, including:

• Improper communications with media members

• Leaks of protected juror information

• Conduct prejudicial to justice

As a result, Juan Martinez was terminated and later disbarred. His ability to practice law was permanently revoked.

Proseuctor Juan Martinez during the Jodi Arias resentencing trial, observed by journalist Tammy Rose

Why This Story Still Matters

Prosecutors hold immense power. When that power is abused, the entire justice system is at risk. I came forward because journalists are not above the law — and neither are prosecutors.

This story reminds us that accountability matters.

More Investigative Journalism by Tammy Rose

This story is part of my work covering the justice system and holding powerful figures accountable. You can read more of my investigative reporting here.

Could the Jodi Arias case be blown wide open in 2026?

Jodi Arias sitting in court during her murder trial in Phoenix, Arizona

Why the Jodi Arias Case Is Back in the Spotlight

Is there a real possibility the infamous Jodi Arias case could be retried due to missing evidence and alleged misconduct?

For the first time in years, Jodi Arias is publicly addressing that question herself.

Arias was convicted of murdering her ex-boyfriend, Travis Alexander, in 2008 after stabbing and shooting him in the shower. She is currently serving a life sentence. Now, more than a decade later, Arias has begun writing about her case again — and this time, her focus is not prison life, but the integrity of the investigation and prosecution that put her behind bars.

Investigative reporter Tammy Rose inside a news helicopter during coverage of the Jodi Arias case, which she reported on both from the air and on the ground.

Why a Retrial in 2026 Is Unlikely But Possible

Through her attorneys, Arias has filed a post-conviction relief request. From inside Perryville Prison, she responded to investigative reporter Tammy Rose regarding the possibility of an interview related to that filing.

What New Evidence Could Change

Until now, Arias’ “Just Jodi” prison blog has largely avoided the details of her criminal case, focusing instead on daily life behind bars.

But a new post titled “Hello, 2026” marks a significant shift. In it, Arias makes serious allegations, claims misconduct, and states she is seeking new legal counsel to pursue them.

In the post, Arias accuses investigators and prosecutors of withholding, losing, or destroying exculpatory evidence. She specifically names former lead detective Esteban Flores, now retired, and former prosecutor Juan Martinez.

“Important, exculpatory evidence in my case has been lost or destroyed,” Arias writes. “Where is my proof? I’m working on that.”

She also alleges her current legal representation has dismissed her concerns, claiming her attorneys minimize her claims while continuing to bill the county.

Adding to the controversy, both attorneys from Arias’ original trial were later disbarred. Former prosecutor Juan Martinez was disbarred for misconduct following the trial , and Arias’ defense attorney, Kirk Nurmi, was also disbarred after writing a book about his client while her case was still active — a move widely criticized as unethical.

“As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases”

Book cover of "Trapped with Ms. Arias" by L. Kirk Nurmi, featuring gold handcuffs on a black background.
Defense attorney Kirk Nurmi wrote a book about his client. #ad

Court documents also reference requests for information regarding a book Martinez allegedly began writing during Arias’ first trial, raising additional concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

Book cover of "Conviction: The Untold Story of Putting Jodi Arias Behind Bars" by Juan Martinez.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez also allegedly worked on a book related to the case during the first trial. #ad

What This Means for True Crime Watchers where should that go

So the question remains: do these claims — combined with documented misconduct surrounding key figures in the case— give Jodi Arias a legitimate path toward a new trial?

For now, the courts will decide whether her allegations warrant further review. But for the first time in years, Jodi Arias is no longer avoiding the case – she’s confronting it head-on.

For more true crime stories, click here.