Tag Archives: Texas Crime

Karmelo Anthony judge recused as new trial fight moves to new judge

Karmelo Anthony case update graphic reading “Judge recused” and “New judge assigned,” with a courtroom background and judge’s gavel.
Karmelo Anthony’s post-trial case will move forward under a new judge after the judge who presided over his murder trial was recused.

Update: Judge removed from Karmelo Anthony case

Karmelo Anthony’s fight for a new trial took a major turn Wednesday after the judge who presided over his murder trial was removed from the post-trial proceedings.

Visiting Judge Sid Harle granted the defense request to recuse Collin County Judge John Roach Jr. Anthony’s attorneys argued that Roach’s public comments following the conviction raised questions about whether he could remain impartial while considering the motion for a new trial. Harle ruled that the legal standard for recusal had been met. 

Retired District Judge Michael Chitty has now been assigned to the case. He is expected to preside over Anthony’s motion for a new trial, which remains scheduled for Thursday morning despite briefly appearing as canceled on the court’s online calendar. 

Anthony has not been granted a new trial. Wednesday’s ruling only determines which judge will decide that request.

Karmelo Anthony Seeks New Trial as Judge Recusal Hearing Approaches

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Karmelo Anthony is heading back to a Collin County courtroom just months after a jury convicted him of murder.

New court records show two major hearings scheduled for next week.

First, a judge will hear Anthony’s request to remove the judge who oversaw his murder trial.

Then, the court will take up Anthony’s request for a new trial.

The hearings come after a jury sentenced Anthony to 35 years in prison for the killing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf.

Karmelo Anthony Recusal Hearing Set for August 19

Karmelo Anthony booking photo shown in an article about his upcoming recusal hearing in Collin County.
 Karmelo Anthony. Collin County court records show a hearing on his motion to recuse is set for August 19, 2026, at 9 a.m.

Collin County court records show a hearing on Anthony’s motion to recuse is set for August 19, 2026, at 9 a.m.

The hearing will take place in the 494th District Courtroom at the Collin County Courthouse.

Court records list Judge Harle as the presiding judge for the hearing.

Anthony’s murder case originally went before Judge John R. Roach Jr. in the 296th District Court.

The defense now wants Roach removed from the post-trial proceedings.

The court will consider that request before it addresses Anthony’s bid for a new trial.

Motion for New Trial Hearing Set for August 20

The next major hearing is scheduled for August 20, 2026, at 9 a.m.

That hearing will focus on Anthony’s motion for a new trial.

Court records currently list the judge and courtroom as pending.

The two hearings could play a major role in what happens next.

Anthony’s attorneys want the court to overturn his conviction and give him another trial.

Anthony Convicted in Austin Metcalf Killing

Austin Metcalf pictured in his Memorial High School football uniform with a “Justice for Austin” memorial frame.
Austin Metcalf is remembered by family, friends and the community as the Karmelo Anthony murder case continues through the Collin County court system.

The case began after a confrontation at a high school track meet in Frisco on April 2, 2025.

Anthony was 17 at the time.

Prosecutors accused him of fatally stabbing Austin Metcalf, 17, during the confrontation.

Anthony admitted that he stabbed Metcalf but argued that he acted in self-defense.

The case later went before a Collin County jury.

On June 9, 2026, jurors found Anthony guilty of murder.

The jury then sentenced him to 35 years in prison.

Court Records Show Case Is Under Appeal

The Collin County court system now lists Anthony’s case status as “Appealed.”

The case number is 296-83565-2025.

The online docket contains more than 300 case events.

Recent entries include an August 10 subpoena and the two upcoming hearings.

The appeal and new-trial effort mean the legal fight is far from over.

Why the Recusal Hearing Matters

The August 19 hearing comes first for a reason.

Anthony’s attorneys want another judge to handle the next stage of the case.

A ruling on that request could determine who hears the motion for a new trial.

That makes the recusal hearing an important step before the court considers whether Anthony should receive another trial.

Media Access Planned for August 19 Hearing

Collin County expects significant media and public interest in the hearings.

The county says only nine credentialed media seats will be available inside the courtroom for the August 19 hearing.

However, officials also plan to provide an overflow room with a video feed from the courtroom.

The county expects to release additional information about the August 20 hearing after the recusal hearing ends.

What Happens Next in the Karmelo Anthony Case?

The next two dates will be important.

August 19: Hearing on the motion to recuse.

August 20: Hearing on the motion for a new trial.

If the defense succeeds in its effort for a new trial, the case could return to a courtroom before another jury.

If the court rejects the request, Anthony can continue challenging his conviction through the appeals process.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue reviewing the court record as new filings and orders become available.

Source

Collin County District Court records and the Collin County Public Information Office.

Plan Your Texas Stay

Heading to North Texas? Compare nearby hotels and travel options through my Hotels.com link.

Travel Essentials I Use

From portable chargers to comfortable travel gear, you can shop my Amazon picks through the link below.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. I may also earn a commission from qualifying hotel bookings.

Kevin Tippit Charged in Fatal Shooting of John Mendoza Jr.

Kevin Tippit mugshot following his arrest on a first-degree felony aggravated assault charge in the fatal shooting of John Mendoza Jr.
Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit was arrested by Texas Rangers on August 11, 2026, in connection with the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Photo credit: Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

Former Brazoria County Deputy Kevin Tippit Indicted in Fatal Shooting of 18-Year-Old

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit now faces a first-degree felony charge and the possibility of decades in prison following the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr.

A Brazoria County grand jury indicted Tippit on aggravated assault by a public servant in connection with the June 1, 2026 shooting in Lake Jackson, according to the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office. Texas Rangers arrested Tippit Tuesday, August 11.

Brazoria County jail records list his bond at $250,000.

If convicted as charged, Tippit faces five to 99 years or life in prison, according to the district attorney’s office.

Pursuit Ends at John Mendoza Jr.’s Home

Home on Indian Warrior Trail in Lake Jackson where the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. occurred on June 1, 2026.
The Lake Jackson home where John Gabriel Mendoza Jr., 18, was fatally shot on June 1, 2026, after a pursuit ended at the residence. Photo by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

The shooting happened early June 1 after Tippit attempted to stop Mendoza while he was driving in Lake Jackson.

Mendoza did not immediately stop and instead drove to his father’s home in the 100 block of Indian Warrior Trail. The pursuit ended at the home, where Tippit encountered Mendoza near or inside the garage and fired his weapon. Mendoza later died from his injuries.

Mendoza was a Texas State University student who had just completed his freshman year and was home for the summer.

Grand Jury Indicts Kevin Tippit

The indictment marks a major development in the Texas Rangers’ investigation into Mendoza’s death.

Court documents allege Tippit recklessly caused serious bodily injury to Mendoza by shooting him.

That wording is significant because the charge focuses on Tippit’s alleged reckless conduct. A grand jury indictment means jurors found sufficient probable cause for the criminal case to proceed. It does not establish guilt.

Tippit remains innocent unless a court finds him guilty.

Shooting Came Within Seconds of Deputy’s Arrival, Family Attorney Says

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood football uniform with a family member before his death in Lake Jackson.
John Gabriel Mendoza Jr., 18, pictured in a Brazoswood football uniform. Mendoza was fatally shot on June 1, 2026, after a pursuit ended at his family’s Lake Jackson home. Photo courtesy of the Mendoza family.

Attorney Charles Adams, who represents Mendoza’s family, has said surveillance video shows Tippit fired within seconds of getting out of his patrol vehicle.

Adams has also said Mendoza and the other occupants were unarmed. Those details came from the family’s attorney and should not be confused with an official finding by investigators.

The Texas Rangers later obtained a search warrant as they investigated the shooting. Court documents showed investigators were examining several possible offenses, including manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide and aggravated assault by a public servant.

Brazoria County Sheriff Fired Kevin Tippit

Kevin Tippit pictured with Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman during a Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office ceremony.
Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Tippit, left, pictured with Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman during a department ceremony. Tippit was later fired following the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. in Lake Jackson.

Eight days after the shooting, Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman fired Tippit on June 9, 2026.

Stallman said an internal investigation found Tippit violated department policies involving the handling and discharge of his firearm.

The sheriff stressed that Tippit’s termination was an administrative decision separate from the criminal investigation being conducted by the Texas Rangers and Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office.

Tippit had served as a Brazoria County deputy since July 2024 after previously working as a jailer.

Kevin Tippit Faces Up to Life in Prison

Kevin Tippit mugshot following his arrest on a first-degree felony aggravated assault charge in the fatal shooting of John Mendoza Jr.
Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit was arrested by Texas Rangers on August 11, 2026, in connection with the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Photo credit: Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

The charge carries potentially severe consequences.

The Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office says aggravated assault by a public servant in this case constitutes a first-degree felony.

If convicted, Tippit could receive a sentence ranging from five to 99 years or life in prison.

A conviction and sentence are not predetermined. The prosecution must prove the criminal charge in court.

John Mendoza Jr. Case Enters New Stage

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood High School football uniform.

The criminal charge marks a significant development in a case that has drawn attention across Brazoria County since the June shooting.

Mendoza’s family has repeatedly called for transparency and accountability while the Texas Rangers investigated what happened.

Now, more than two months after Mendoza’s death, the former deputy who fired the fatal shot is facing a first-degree felony charge.

This remains a developing story. Investigator Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the criminal case and any new court filings or hearings involving Kevin Tippit.

Planning a Trip to the Texas Gulf Coast?

If you’re traveling to Lake Jackson, Brazoria County or the Houston area, you can compare nearby hotels and accommodations through Hotels.com.

Find hotels near Lake Jackson and the Texas Gulf Coast:

Hotels.com

Recommended Reading

Readers who want to better understand how investigators build criminal cases and prosecutors take them to court may find The Anatomy of Motive by John Douglas and Mark Olshaker useful.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Some travel links may also be affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

Public Records Reveal Ransom Messages Sent After Nancy Guthrie Disappeared

Black-and-white porch surveillance image showing a masked individual standing near a hanging plant at a residence connected to the Nancy Guthrie case.
Porch surveillance image released as part of the investigation into the Nancy Guthrie case.

Public Records Reveal Ransom Messages Sent After Nancy Guthrie Disappeared

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Nancy Guthrie disappeared from her home in the Catalina Foothills near Tucson, Arizona, during the early morning hours of February 1, 2026. Six months later, publicly released investigative records continue to provide insight into one of the most unusual aspects of the case.

Among the documents released are messages that appeared to demand a ransom and later claimed Nancy Guthrie had died. The messages became part of the investigation and remain included in the publicly released records.

Ransom Message Demanded Bitcoin

Redacted copies of documents described as ransom notes released as evidence in the Nancy Guthrie case.
Redacted ransom note documents included in the investigative records for the Nancy Guthrie case.

According to publicly released records, one message claimed Nancy Guthrie had been kidnapped and demanded a multi-million-dollar Bitcoin payment in exchange for her safe return.

The message included a deadline, threatened harm if payment was not made, and referenced details about Nancy Guthrie’s home. Investigators documented the message as part of the case.

At the time, there was no public confirmation that the claims made in the message were true.

Second Message Claimed Nancy Guthrie Died

Portrait of Nancy Guthrie smiling in a blue jacket in an undated family photograph.
Nancy Guthrie in an undated family photo provided as part of case coverage.

A second message later claimed Nancy Guthrie had died shortly after being taken.

The message stated that her death was not intentional and expressed sympathy to her family. It also claimed she had been buried in a natural area.

Authorities included the message in the investigative file that was later released as a public record.

Investigators Examined the Messages

Law enforcement reviewed the messages as part of the investigation into Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance.

Publicly released records show the communications were preserved as evidence, but investigators have not publicly confirmed who authored the messages or whether any of the claims contained in them were accurate.

As with many criminal investigations, detectives examined numerous leads while working to determine what happened.

Why These Records Matter

The release of investigative records provides the public with a better understanding of the evidence reviewed during the case.

While the messages generated significant attention, they represent only one part of the overall investigation. Any conclusions about who sent them or why should be based on official investigative findings rather than speculation.

As additional records become public, they may continue to provide new details about the investigation.

If you have information related to the case, contact the investigating law enforcement agency.

Home Security Camera (Indoor/Outdoor) – If you’re interested in true crime or home security, a smart security camera is one of the best ways to monitor your property and record suspicious activity.

Reolink home security camera system with four surveillance cameras, network video recorder, and 2TB hard drive.

Fingerprint Door Lock – Upgrade your home’s security with a keyless smart lock featuring fingerprint access, passcodes, and mobile app control.

Philips smart fingerprint door lock with touchscreen keypad, interior deadbolt, and smartphone app connectivity.

Related Coverage

Read more of my coverage on the James Elmore Jr. investigation:

Read my latest coverage on the Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw investigation:

Hotels.com

Planning to visit Texas for court proceedings, historical research, or to explore the areas connected to this case? Find hotels that fit your budget through my Hotels.com affiliate link.

Amazon Disclosure

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you shop through my affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent journalism.

Hotels.com Disclosure

If you book a hotel through my Hotels.com affiliate links, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for helping support my reporting and website.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set as Calder Road Victims’ Families Hope for Justice Nearly 40 Years Later

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Moves Forward

Nearly four decades after several young women were found murdered and their bodies abandoned near Calder Road in Galveston County, the case against James Elmore Jr. continues moving toward trial.

For many victims’ families, the upcoming court proceedings represent another chance to finally see justice.

After checking the Galveston County court docket, I confirmed the case is still moving forward.

According to the current schedule:

Discovery Conference: August 10, 2026

Pretrial Conference: August 21, 2026

Jury Trial: August 31, 2026

The trial is scheduled in the 122nd District Court before Judge Jeth Jones.

If the schedule remains unchanged, I plan to attend the trial and provide updates from the courtroom.

Laura Miller’s Family Has Waited Decades for Answers

Tim Miller, founder of Texas EquuSearch, photographed during a search effort related to a missing persons investigation.
Tim Miller, founder of Texas EquuSearch, has assisted in hundreds of missing persons cases across Texas and the United States.

Laura Miller was last seen on September 10, 1984, after stopping at a convenience store in League City to use a pay phone. Her mother had dropped her off because the family’s phone had not yet been connected after they moved into the area.

Laura never returned home.

Sign marking a recovery site featuring photos of four women and Clyde Hedrick during an investigation into multiple unsolved Texas homicide cases.
Memorial sign highlighting four victims whose cases have been linked to the same recovery site during the investigation into Clyde Hedrick and several unsolved homicides.

Nearly 17 months later, on February 2, 1986, her remains were discovered in a wooded area near Calder Road. During that same search, investigators also found the remains of Audrey Cook.

For both families, the upcoming trial comes after decades of unanswered questions.

In an earlier interview, Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller discussed Laura Miller’s disappearance, the years of searching, and why the case has remained so important to investigators and her family.

Watch: Tim Miller Discusses Laura Miller’s Disappearance

Charges Against James Elmore Jr.

Mugshot of James Elmore Jr., whose trial is scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. He is scheduled to stand trial beginning Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

James Elmore Jr. remains jailed while awaiting trial.

According to jail records, he faces the following charges:

Manslaughter

Two counts of tampering with physical evidence involving a human corpse

Possession of visual material depicting sexual assault

Possession of child sexual abuse material

His total bond is listed at $4.5 million.

As with all criminal cases, these charges are allegations, and James Elmore Jr. is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.

Clyde Hedrick Died Before Additional Charges Could Be Filed

Portrait of Clyde Hedrick, who was convicted in the 1984 murder of Ellen Beason and later became a suspect in additional cold case investigations.
Clyde Hedrick was convicted in the murder of Ellen Beason. Investigators were preparing to charge him in additional cases before his death in March 2026.

The upcoming trial follows the death of Clyde Hedrick, who for years had been publicly linked to several Texas Killing Fields investigations.

Authorities were reportedly preparing additional charges against Hedrick. However, on March 21, 2026, Hedrick removed his breathing tube and died before those charges could be filed.

Hedrick was convicted only in the death of Ellen Beason. He served prison time for that case and was on parole when he died.

Trial Could Bring Long-Awaited Answers

Whether new evidence or testimony emerges during the trial remains to be seen.

However, for the families of Laura Miller, Audrey Cook, Donna Prudhomme, Heidi Fye, and others connected to the Calder Road investigations, the upcoming proceedings represent another opportunity to seek answers after nearly 40 years.

I’ll continue monitoring the Galveston County court docket and, if the trial remains on schedule, will be in the courtroom beginning August 31 to provide updates.

Related Coverage

TIM MILLER: JAMES ELMORE JR. REPEATEDLY CLAIMED THERE WAS ‘ANOTHER GIRL’ IN TEXAS KILLING FIELDS INVESTIGATION

Planning a Trip to Galveston County?

Whether you’re traveling to attend court proceedings or visiting Galveston Island, you can compare hotels throughout Galveston County before your trip.

Browse Hotels in Galveston County

Disclosure: If you book through this link, I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

BOBLOV Body Camera

As I continue covering cold cases and court proceedings, a reliable body camera is an important part of documenting interactions in the field. This is similar to the type of equipment many journalists and investigators use.

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through my links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you.

Carolyn Sosa’s Daughter Speaks Out as New Documents and Roy Alan Stuart Prison Confession Claims Renew Calls for Review

Carolyn Sosa portrait in a decorative silver frame shared by her family as part of the investigation into her 1987 murder.

For nearly 40 years, Donna Sanchez has searched for answers about what happened to her mother, Carolyn Sosa.

After Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose reached out during an ongoing investigation into former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen’s prison diaries and Roy Alan Stuart’s alleged prison confessions, Donna shared family memories, court records and historical documents she hopes could help bring renewed attention to her mother’s unsolved murder.

“I was seven years old when my mother died,” Donna said. “She was strangled and thrown into Bastrop Bayou.”

Carolyn Sosa holding her young daughter Donna Sanchez in a family photograph taken before Carolyn’s 1987 disappearance.

Carolyn Sosa Case

After speaking with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose, Donna Sanchez shared family memories, court records, historical documents, newspaper articles, and text messages related to the Carolyn Sosa investigation.

Donna believes Roy Alan Stuart murdered her mother, Carolyn Sosa, and hopes the records contribute to another review of the case.

Some of the historical records overlap with information gathered during this investigation, including details Kent McGowen says Roy Alan Stuart shared while the two were incarcerated together. Readers can review the original source documents below and draw their own conclusions.

Who Was Carolyn Sosa?

Carolyn Sosa in a red blouse in a family photograph taken before her disappearance in March 1987.

Carolyn Sosa was 33 years old when she disappeared in March 1987. Investigators believe she was last seen leaving Houston’s LaMonte Hotel.

Her body was later found in shallow water near Bastrop Bayou off FM 2004.

Investigators also believed Carolyn had information about the earlier killing of Terri Denise McDaniels.

Historical investigative records state investigators found Carolyn Sosa’s fingerprints and hair inside Roy Alan Stuart’s vehicle.

Historical Court Records

The gallery below contains historical court records, newspaper articles, and investigative documents related to the Carolyn Sosa homicide investigation and Roy Alan Stuart. Readers can review the original source material and examine the records in their historical context.

Donna Sanchez shared court records showing Roy Alan Stuart was arrested in Carolyn Sosa’s murder. The murder charge was later dismissed.

Donna said investigators told her family they collected fingerprints, hair evidence, blood evidence, and skin reportedly found beneath Carolyn Sosa’s fingernails.

“My mom was small, but she was a fighter,” Donna told Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

Donna hopes someone will finally answer what happened to her mother.

Matt Wingo’s Text Messages About Carolyn Sosa

Screenshot of a July 13, 2023 text message from former Brazoria County investigator Matt Wingo discussing Roy Alan Stuart and historical investigative details.

Former Brazoria County investigator Matt Wingo exchanged text messages with Kent McGowen in July 2023.

One message states Carolyn Sosa fought Roy Alan Stuart during the attack.

Wingo wrote investigators built a homicide case using fingerprints, hair, and blood evidence.

He also wrote the murder case was dismissed after an HPD officer allegedly assaulted Stuart during his arrest.

Another message states Wingo believed Roy Alan Stuart could be connected to at least 14 killings.

Wingo also wrote then-Brazoria County District Attorney Tom Selleck wanted investigators to review Kent McGowen’s records.

These statements reflect Wingo’s account. Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose has not independently verified every statement beyond available court records.

Kent McGowen Says Roy Alan Stuart Confessed

Exclusive graphic featuring Roy Alan Stuart’s mugshot with the text “Roy Alan Stuart” and “Died on May 10, 2019.

Former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen met Roy Alan Stuart while both were incarcerated at the Duncan Unit.

McGowen said Stuart openly discussed kidnapping and murdering women.

He said Stuart described picking up a Black woman near Telephone Road during rodeo season.

McGowen said Stuart claimed he tried to strangle her with a seat belt before shooting her twice with a .22-caliber pistol.

McGowen also said Stuart claimed a fisherman witnessed the killing from a nearby boat.

After reviewing historical records, McGowen believed Stuart was describing Carolyn Sosa’s murder.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose has not independently verified McGowen’s account.

Roy Alan Stuart Died Before the Investigation Was Complete

McGowen said he documented Stuart’s statements while they were incarcerated together and later prepared formal reports detailing the alleged confessions.

According to McGowen, he submitted those reports in 2019 to multiple agencies, including the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office, Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office, Galveston County District Attorney’s Office, Harris County Sheriff’s Office, Houston Police Department and the FBI.

Roy Alan Stuart died on May 10, 2019, while serving a life sentence in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

His death came shortly after McGowen said he had notified multiple law enforcement agencies about Stuart’s alleged confessions.

Can the Carolyn Sosa Case Be Reopened?

Yes.

Under Texas law, there is no statute of limitations for murder.

Although Roy Alan Stuart is deceased and can no longer be prosecuted, investigators may reopen a homicide investigation if new evidence, witnesses, historical documents or advances in forensic science justify another review.

A reopened investigation could include re-examining physical evidence using modern DNA testing, interviewing surviving witnesses, reviewing investigative files, or comparing historical evidence with newly discovered information.

If investigators conclude the evidence supports it, they can publicly identify a deceased suspect as responsible for a homicide even though criminal prosecution is no longer possible.

What’s Next in the Carolyn Sosa Case?

Nearly 40 years after Carolyn Sosa’s murder, her family continues searching for answers.

Whether the Carolyn Sosa investigation is officially reopened will ultimately be decided by law enforcement.

However, newly shared family records, historical court documents, Matt Wingo’s text messages, Kent McGowen’s prison interview and previously submitted investigative reports have renewed attention on one of the Gulf Coast’s long-unsolved homicide investigations.

Editor’s Note: This article includes newly obtained court records, historical investigative documents, text messages, and interviews gathered during an ongoing investigation by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose. Statements attributed to former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen are based on his interview and prison diaries describing alleged confessions made by Roy Alan Stuart while the two were incarcerated together. Statements attributed to former investigator Matt Wingo are based on text messages reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose. Court records confirm Roy Alan Stuart was arrested in Carolyn Sosa’s homicide before the charge was dismissed. Some claims discussed in this article remain unverified or disputed. The purpose of this report is to present the available records, document new information provided by Carolyn Sosa’s family, and examine whether the case merits renewed investigative review.

Recommended Reading

The Cases That Haunt Us: From Jack the Ripper to JonBenét Ramsey

I’ll Be Gone in the Dark: One Woman’s Obsessive Search for the Golden State Killer

Related Investigation

Related: Former Harris County Deputy Kent McGowen’s Prison Diaries and Roy Alan Stuart’s Alleged Prison Confessions

Amazon Disclosure

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through my affiliate links, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you.

Investigator Matt Wingo Responds to Roy Alan Stuart Story, Raises Questions About Prison Journals

Matt Wingo response to Roy Alan Stuart investigation showing July 2023 text messages, Kent McGowen prison diaries and Roy Alan Stuart mugshot.

Investigator Matt Wingo Raises Questions About Roy Alan Stuart Prison Journal Story

Before publishing my interview with former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen and his handwritten prison journals about convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart, I contacted investigator Matt Wingo seeking an interview and comment.

I did not receive an interview before my publication deadline.

After the story was published, Wingo text messaged and emailed me several times expressing concerns about the accuracy of information contained in McGowen’s journals. Although one of his text messages stated he did not want further contact, he continued sending additional emails outlining what he believes are significant factual problems.

Why I Reported the Story the Way I Did

The messages document that Wingo and McGowen communicated. They do not independently establish that every claim discussed in those communications is accurate.

July 13, 2023 text message exchange between investigator Matt Wingo and former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen discussing Roy Alan Stuart. The messages include discussion of an estimated homicide count and references to reviewing additional investigative records.

One issue readers should understand is the homicide count.

Before publication, I had seen a July 2023 message between Wingo and McGowen in which Wingo wrote:

“I have him killing 14 but that’s light, what we know about.”

However, because I was unable to interview Wingo before publication, I did not feel it was appropriate to publish his estimate as fact without giving him the opportunity to explain how he reached that number.

Instead, I reported what Kent McGowen told me during my interview and clearly identified him as the source of those statements. Throughout my reporting, I repeatedly noted that many of the claims contained in McGowen’s journals remain unverified.

Editor’s Note – July 10, 2026

After Investigator Matt Wingo contacted me to point out factual errors in my original article, I reexamined Kent McGowen’s original handwritten journals. During that review, I determined that I had misinterpreted several entries involving investigator communications. The journals document communications between Kent McGowen and investigators—including letters, telephone calls, emails, text messages and other correspondence. Upon reexamining the journals, I determined I had incorrectly interpreted some entries as documenting in-person meetings as I had previously interpreted.

The underlying claims in this article remain attributed to Kent McGowen’s interview and handwritten journals unless otherwise noted. As with the original publication, these allegations have not been independently verified by this news organization.

Additional Documents Reviewed

Excerpts from Kent McGowen’s original handwritten prison journals referencing communications with investigators and agencies regarding information he said Roy Alan Stuart shared while they were incarcerated together.

In addition to the handwritten journals, I also reviewed text messages, emails, and other communications exchanged between Matt Wingo and Kent McGowen regarding Roy Alan Stuart as part of this reporting.

The Questions That Remain

Several important questions remain unanswered.

Which Texas Ranger or Rangers were referenced in McGowen’s journals?

Can the journal entries regarding investigator communications be independently corroborated through public records or other witnesses?

Which portions of the journals can be independently verified?

Which claims cannot currently be verified?

Are there additional public records that support or contradict McGowen’s account?

I intend to continue reporting on these questions as more information becomes available.

More Resources

If stories about cold cases, victims, and investigative journalism matter to you, these books and reports may also be helpful.

📚 The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk

📚 While the City Slept by Eli Sanders

📰 Read my original investigation:

Exclusive: Roy Alan Stuart Prison Confessions Revealed

Why I Fight So Hard for Victims: The Story I’ve Never Shared

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through my affiliate links, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent investigative journalism.

Former Deputy Documents Alleged Roy Alan Stuart Confessions

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

How An Unlikely Prison Friendship Began

Former Harris County deputy Kent McGowen says one of the most unexpected chapters of his life began while serving a prison sentence in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

McGowen was convicted in the 1992 murder of Susan White and spent 19 years in prison before he was paroled. Since his release, he has spoken publicly about his case and his time in prison, including conversations he says he had with convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart.

According to McGowen, he spent nearly two years housed near convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart, where the two developed an unlikely relationship that led to conversations about alleged unsolved murders across Southeast Texas.

McGowen says he carefully documented those conversations, typed formal reports, and later turned the information over to multiple law enforcement agencies.

I have not independently verified Stuart’s alleged prison statements or whether they resulted in any solved criminal cases.

An Unlikely Prison Conversation

McGowen told me that most inmates avoided Stuart, describing him as someone who appeared exactly how many people would imagine a serial killer.

After noticing Stewart sitting alone, McGowen said he bought him a pint of ice cream and a soft drink from the prison commissary.

According to McGowen, that simple act led Stuart to begin discussing murders he claimed to have committed throughout Texas.

“Nobody would talk to Roy,” McGowen said. “After that, he just started talking.”

McGowen said one reason he began paying close attention was because Stuart showed him what McGowen recalls was a letter that Stuart claimed had been written by attorney Tom Selleck. According to McGowen, Stuart also claimed Selleck represented him at the time. Selleck currently serves as the Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney and previously worked as an assistant district attorney before entering private practice. I have not independently verified the letter, its authenticity, or Stuart’s claim regarding the alleged legal representation.

Claims Of Additional Victims

Historical 1994 Victoria Advocate newspaper clipping reporting Roy Alan Stuart’s arrest in Brazoria County and describing his criminal history.
Historical newspaper clipping from The Victoria Advocate (May 1994) reporting Roy Alan Stuart’s arrest in Brazoria County. The article states Stuart had been investigated in multiple homicide and sexual assault cases. Included for historical context alongside Kent McGowen’s interview.

McGowen alleges Stuart described several killings that were never publicly connected to him.

Among the stories McGowen recalls were allegations involving:

A woman allegedly abducted from Houston during rodeo season.

A victim allegedly killed near a waterway in Brazoria County.

Bodies allegedly disposed of in or near the Brazos River.

Additional killings Stuart allegedly discussed involving Southeast Texas.

McGowen says Stuart showed no remorse while recounting the alleged crimes.

Documenting Every Conversation

Rather than relying on memory, McGowen says he immediately began documenting the conversations.

He kept handwritten notes while incarcerated before later typing formal reports describing what Stuart allegedly told him.

McGowen says he eventually forwarded those reports to multiple law enforcement agencies, including investigators in several Texas counties.

“I wanted to document everything while it was still fresh,” McGowen said.

Investigators Later Contacted Him

According to McGowen, investigators later reached out requesting copies of his notes.

He says an FBI agent also contacted him after learning about the reports and asked to review the journals because they reflected his contemporaneous observations while Stuart was allegedly making the statements.

McGowen says he continues to maintain copies of those writings today.

Questions Still Remain

Whether Stuart’s alleged prison statements can ever be verified remains unknown.

At this time, I have not found any publicly available records that independently confirm the additional alleged victims described by McGowen.

However, McGowen believes investigators considered the information important enough to request his documentation years after the conversations took place.

As part of my continuing coverage, I am preparing additional public records requests to determine what investigative steps, if any, followed McGowen’s submissions.

This remains an active reporting project. If you have firsthand knowledge related to Roy Alan Stuart or the investigations discussed in this article, contact me through ChopperRose.com

Related Coverage

Convicted Former Deputy Says He Was Framed — But Key Questions Remain (coming soon)

Rebecca Beard Investigation: Exclusive Interviews And Court Records

Texas Killing Fields: Continuing Coverage

Amazon Recommendations

Books About Serial Killers

Whoever Fights Monsters by Robert K. Ressler

Mindhunter by John E. Douglas

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Why I Released the Exclusive 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

Why I Released the 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

As an investigative reporter, I often have to make difficult decisions.

One of the hardest was deciding whether to release the 2002 family mediation recording involving Paul Taylor Jr. and Rebecca Beard’s family.

When I first obtained an exclusive copy of the recording from Rebecca Beard’s family, I wasn’t sure if I would ever make it public.

For months, I listened to the recording while reviewing court records, investigative documents, and interviewing Rebecca’s family. The more I reported on the case, the more I believed the recording added important context to an investigation that still raises questions nearly four decades later.

Rather than relying on summaries or secondhand accounts, I wanted people to hear Paul Taylor Jr.’s own words for themselves.

This article isn’t about telling anyone what to believe.

It’s about explaining why I decided to release the recording and why I believe it is an important part of my ongoing investigation.

“Rather than relying on summaries or secondhand accounts, I wanted people to hear Paul Taylor Jr.’s own words and decide for themselves.”

Watch the Exclusive 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

The full 30-minute recording is embedded below. I encourage you to listen to it in its entirety before drawing your own conclusions.

Why the recording stood out

As I compared the mediation recording with other records I reviewed during my investigation, several things caught my attention.

One involves the events after Rebecca Beard disappeared.

During the mediation, Paul Taylor Jr. appears unable to remember getting his vehicle stuck in a ditch near his home or the tow truck driver who reportedly helped pull him out. Yet in other parts of the recording, he recalls details surrounding the case.

That difference raised questions for me.

Another involves the weapon.

While reviewing investigative records, I came across a sealed document containing entries that reference a Remington shotgun and what appears to be human remains.

Those entries stood out because they raise questions when compared with portions of the mediation recording.

I encourage viewers to listen to the recording, review the available information, and draw their own conclusions.

Why I chose to publish it

Investigative reporting isn’t about deciding a case.

It’s about asking questions, reviewing records, interviewing the people closest to the investigation, and presenting information as fairly and accurately as possible.

Over the past several months, I’ve interviewed Rebecca Beard’s family, reviewed numerous court records and investigative documents, and continued asking questions about a case that still has many unanswered ones.

After months of reporting, I believed it was time to let the public hear this recording in its entirety.

This article serves as an introduction to that recording.

I encourage you to listen to the complete mediation audio in context and compare what is said with the records discussed throughout my investigation.

Sometimes the biggest questions aren’t about what someone remembers.

They’re about what they don’t.

Thank you for taking the time to follow my reporting.

Related Rebecca Beard Coverage

Continue following my investigation with these related reports:

Exclusive: Rebecca Beard’s Daughter Speaks Out Nearly 40 Years After Her Mother’s Disappearance

Questions for Arch Aplin and John Cohn in the Rebecca Beard Case

What the Sealed Documents Reveal in the Rebecca Beard Investigation

How I Reported This Investigation

This investigation took months of research, interviews, reviewing court records, and comparing documents with the 2002 mediation recording. These are some of the tools I use while reporting stories like this.

Shure MV88+ Microphone – Used for interviews and recording clear audio in the field.

GoPro Camera – Captures behind-the-scenes footage and field reporting.

iPhone 16 Accessories – Tripods, mounts, and mobile reporting gear.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through the links on this page, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent investigative journalism.

Exclusive: My Effort to Reach Paul Taylor Jr. in the Rebecca Beard Case

Paul Taylor Jr. booking photo taken during the investigation into the Rebecca Beard case.
Paul Taylor Jr. during the investigation into the 1986 disappearance and death of Rebecca Beard.

For nearly 40 years, the Rebecca Beard case has been filled with unanswered questions.

As I’ve investigated the case, I’ve interviewed Rebecca’s daughter, Brittany Pipkin. I’ve also interviewed family members, reviewed court records, obtained police reports, and spoken with others connected to the investigation. Throughout the process, I kept one goal in mind. I wanted to hear directly from Paul Taylor Jr.

Taylor pleaded guilty in connection with Rebecca Beard’s death. However, no trial ever took place. Investigators have never recovered Rebecca’s remains. Many questions still remain.

I believed it was important to give him the opportunity to tell his side of the story.

My First Attempt

My first step was sending Paul Taylor Jr. a message through the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s eMessaging system at the Alfred D. Hughes Unit, where he is currently incarcerated.

In that message, I introduced myself as an independent investigative journalist researching the Rebecca Beard case. I explained that I wanted to hear his perspective and asked whether he would be willing to discuss anything he believed had been misunderstood over the years.

Screenshot of Tammy Rose’s message sent through the Texas Department of Criminal Justice eMessaging system requesting an interview with Paul Taylor Jr. about the Rebecca Beard case.
One of several attempts I made to contact Paul Taylor Jr. while seeking an interview about the Rebecca Beard case. Communication proved difficult during the reporting process.

Hitting Roadblocks

Reaching Paul wasn’t as simple as sending one message.

I also attempted to contact him by mail, but my correspondence repeatedly failed to reach him. Despite multiple attempts, I wasn’t able to establish communication.

Like many investigations, this became another reminder that reporting often involves persistence, patience, and countless dead ends before making progress.

Screenshot of a Penmate notification indicating Tammy Rose’s letter to Paul Taylor Jr. could not be processed because required delivery information was missing.
One of several challenges I encountered while trying to contact Paul Taylor Jr. My initial letter could not be processed because additional delivery information was required.

A Breakthrough

After months of trying, a trusted friend who has asked to remain anonymous was able to establish communication with Paul Taylor Jr. and let him know I was hoping to interview him.

That effort led to something I had been working toward for months—my first direct response from Paul Taylor Jr.

In his message, Paul greeted me warmly, shared a few thoughts about life, and encouraged me to continue writing to him.

Although he did not discuss the Rebecca Beard case in that first message, it marked the beginning of direct communication after months of unsuccessful attempts.

Continuing the Conversation

I’m continuing to work toward an exclusive interview with Paul Taylor Jr.

Through subsequent communication facilitated by my anonymous source, Paul indicated that he had stopped speaking publicly for a period because of pressure from detectives. That statement reflects Paul’s account and has not been independently verified.

Whether an interview ultimately takes place remains to be seen, but I believe every person connected to this decades-old case deserves the opportunity to be heard.

For me, investigative journalism isn’t about reaching conclusions before asking questions. It’s about documenting the facts, giving people the opportunity to respond, and continuing to pursue answers—even when the process takes months.

If I am able to conduct an interview with Paul Taylor Jr., I’ll share it here on http://ChopperRose.com and on my YouTube channel.

What Would You Ask?

If an interview with Paul Taylor Jr. takes place, what question would you want answered?

Leave your question in the comments below.

Read my exclusive interview with Rebecca Beard’s daughter Brittany Pipkin

 Read Part 2: No Body, No Weapon, Sealed Documents

Interested in true  crime and cold cases? 

Crime& Justice

Readers who follow the Rebecca Beard investigation may also be interested in these books on criminal investigations, missing persons cases, and unsolved mysteries:

I’ll Be Gone in the Dark

American Predator

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Deputy Kevin Tippit Fired After Fatal Lake Jackson Shooting

Sheriff announces termination of Deputy Kevin Tippit

The Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office has terminated Deputy Kevin Tippit following an internal review related to the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. in Lake Jackson.

In a video statement released Tuesday, Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman announced the termination of Deputy Kevin Tippit for policy violations related to the handling and discharge of his firearm. Additionally, Stallman said the administrative action is separate from the ongoing criminal investigation. The Texas Rangers and the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office continue to investigate the case.

Shooting remains under investigation

The shooting happened June 1 after a pursuit ended at Mendoza’s home on Indian Warrior Trail in Lake Jackson.

Mendoza died after the encounter.

Officials have not released additional details about the policy violations that led to Tippit’s termination.

The case remains the subject of multiple investigations.

Attorney questions official account

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood High School football uniform.

Attorney Charles Adams, who represents the Mendoza family, recently released a five-page letter challenging statements made by law enforcement officials.

Adams alleges Mendoza was shot about seven seconds after the pursuit ended.

He is also calling for the release of body camera footage, dash camera video, and other evidence connected to the incident.

Adams argues key questions remain unanswered as the investigation continues.

For more breaking news, click here.

The sheriff’s video statement can be viewed on the Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office Facebook page.