Tag Archives: Body camera footage

Texas Public Information Act Request: Dash Camera Released, Body Camera Pending

Raw dash camera image released through a Texas Public Information Act request showing a Brazoria County sheriff’s deputy speaking with individuals during a May 11, 2026 encounter related to the Rebecca Beard investigation.
Screenshot from the dash camera video released by Brazoria County in response to a Texas Public Information Act request. The recording contains no audio. The requested body camera video remains pending while the Texas Attorney General reviews whether it may be withheld.

Texas Public Information Act Request Leads to Dash Camera Release While Body Camera Remains Under Review

The Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney’s Office released the dash camera recording in response to my Texas Public Information Act request. The responding deputy’s body camera recording remains under review by the Texas Attorney General.

Page one of the Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney’s Office response confirming my public information request, payment, and the release of the dash camera recording while the requested body camera recording remains under review by the Texas Attorney General.

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Transparency matters. That is why I filed a Texas Public Information Act request after an encounter with a woman connected to the Rebecca Beard investigation.

The request resulted in sheriff’s reports, dispatch records, redacted documents, and dash camera video. However, one important record remains unavailable. The Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office has asked the Texas Attorney General to decide whether the responding deputy’s body camera can be withheld.

This article explains what happened, what the released records show, and why I continue to seek the body camera recording.

Why I Went to the Property

As an investigative reporter, I believe everyone deserves an opportunity to comment before publication.

I went to Cherie “Rio” Starr’s residence to request an interview about statements she has made regarding the Rebecca Beard investigation.

She declined to comment.

According to the incident report, Starr told deputies she was a protected witness and wanted to know how I obtained her personal information.

The report also states she believed someone had sent me to her property.

I Returned to My Jeep

After Starr declined to comment, I walked back to my Jeep because I intended to leave.

According to the sheriff’s report, I told deputies that Starr and Kenneth Cadenhead prevented me from leaving the property.

The dashcam video released by Brazoria County contains no audio. Therefore, it cannot capture the conversations that occurred during the encounter.

However, the video does show Starr standing near my driver’s side while Cadenhead remained behind my Jeep during part of the incident.

According to my recollection, both were asking me to identify my confidential source.

I declined.

Why I Would Not Reveal My Source

The incident report notes that I refused to identify my source.

That decision was intentional.

Protecting confidential sources is a long-standing practice in investigative journalism. Sources often provide information only because they trust reporters to keep their identities confidential.

My purpose that day was to request an interview. It was not to disclose who provided information for my reporting.

A Detail Not Included in the Report

One part of the encounter is not reflected in the written incident report.

According to my recollection, while standing near my driver’s side door, Starr told me she would agree to an interview “when this is all over.”

She also indicated that the Rebecca Beard investigation remained an active case that had never been closed.

Because the released dashcam has no audio, viewers cannot hear that conversation.

For that reason, I continue to seek release of the responding deputy’s body camera recording.

What the Public Records Show

My Texas Public Information Act request produced several records, including:

Sheriff’s incident reports
Dispatch and CAD records
Dashcam video
Redacted documents

The only major record that has not been released is the deputy’s body camera.

The District Attorney’s Office has asked the Texas Attorney General to determine whether that recording may be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.

Receiving a request for an Attorney General ruling does not automatically mean the recording will never be released. The Attorney General will determine whether any exceptions to disclosure apply under Texas law.

How I Obtained the Records

Many people ask how to request police records in Texas.

In my case, I submitted a Texas Public Information Act request to Brazoria County.

After receiving a cost estimate, I paid the required fee at the Brazoria County Treasurer’s Office inside the courthouse.

The courthouse is beautiful, although locating the correct office can be a little confusing for first-time visitors.

After payment was processed, I went to the District Attorney’s Office to pick up the responsive records.

Everyone I dealt with during the process was courteous and helpful.

I also received more records than I expected.

Part Two Is Coming Soon

In Part Two, I will explain the Texas Public Information Act process step by step.

I will also show:

How to submit an open records request
Where to pay the required fees
How to pick up responsive records
Why some records are released immediately while others require a ruling from the Texas Attorney General

Understanding the process can help anyone request public records in Texas.

Related Investigations

Equipment I Use

For field reporting and investigative journalism, I rely on equipment that performs well in demanding conditions.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This comes at no additional cost to you.

Scanner Audio Raises New Questions After Release of Texas Ranger Affidavit

A comparison graphic highlights questions raised after Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose compared scanner audio obtained shortly after the June 1 officer-involved shooting with a recently released Texas Ranger affidavit. The article includes the affidavit and scanner audio so readers can review the evidence themselves.

Scanner Audio Raises New Questions After Release of Texas Ranger Affidavit

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Scanner audio obtained by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose shortly after the June 1 officer-involved shooting is raising new questions after being compared with a recently released Texas Ranger search warrant affidavit.

The affidavit states investigators reviewed Deputy Kevin Tippit’s dash camera and body camera before preparing the search warrant. According to the document, the pursuit reached speeds of approximately 120 mph after Tippit activated his emergency lights and siren.

However, after reviewing all scanner traffic I was able to obtain beginning at midnight on June 1, the first pursuit-related radio traffic I located begins at approximately 12:08 a.m.

The scanner audio and the affidavit are both included below so readers can review the evidence for themselves.

What the Scanner Audio Reveals

The scanner traffic begins with officers discussing a pursuit involving a Dodge Challenger.

During the transmissions, officers can be heard reporting speeds of about 60 mph. Later, as the pursuit entered a residential neighborhood, officers reported speeds closer to 30 mph.

The scanner audio also captures Deputy Tippit reporting what he described as an “accidental discharge.”

Moments later, dispatch clarified there was a gunshot victim. Emergency crews requested a trauma kit and a tourniquet before CPR efforts began.

What the Texas Ranger Affidavit Says

The Texas Ranger affidavit describes a different timeline.

According to the affidavit, Deputy Tippit observed the Challenger around 12:06 a.m. on FM 2004. After activating his emergency lights and siren, investigators say the Challenger accelerated and reached approximately 120 mph while running six red lights.

The affidavit states the pursuit ended at a home on Indian Warrior Trail. Deputy Tippit entered the garage, discharged his firearm, and later radioed dispatch reporting an accidental discharge before rendering aid.

Why the Timeline Matters

The scanner audio reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose does not include pursuit traffic before approximately 12:08 a.m.

That does not necessarily mean the affidavit is incorrect.

Instead, it raises several important questions.

Additional radio traffic may have occurred on another channel that was not included in the scanner recordings available for review.

The times listed in the affidavit may also be approximate.

It is also possible investigators reconstructed the timeline using dash camera and body camera footage instead of scanner traffic.

How Was 120 MPH Determined?

Another unanswered question involves the reported speed.

The affidavit states investigators observed the pursuit on dash camera video. However, the document does not explain how the 120 mph figure was determined.

It is unclear whether investigators relied on the patrol vehicle’s speedometer, video analysis, onboard vehicle data, or another investigative method.

Additional records may answer that question in the future.

Read the Documents and Listen to the Audio

For transparency, I have included both the Texas Ranger affidavit and the scanner audio below.

I encourage readers to review both pieces of evidence and draw their own conclusions.

As more records become public, including dash camera video, body camera footage, dispatch logs, CAD records, and forensic reports, they may provide additional context about the timeline and the reported speeds.

Editor’s Note: The scanner audio included below reflects the recordings Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose was able to obtain. Additional law enforcement communications or evidence not included in those recordings may exist and could provide additional context.

Related Coverage

DA Seeks to Withhold Records in John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Shooting Case

Deputy Kevin Tippit fired after fatal Lake Jackson shooting

Related Reading: Want to learn more about law enforcement investigations and use-of-force cases? Browse these books available on Amazon.

Police Use of Force by Seth Stoughton

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting independent journalism.

DA Seeks to Withhold Records in John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Shooting Case

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood High School football uniform.

BRAZORIA COUNTY, Texas — Brazoria County prosecutors have asked the Texas Attorney General for permission to withhold records related to the fatal shooting of John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. while multiple investigations remain ongoing.

The request was submitted June 15, 2026, by the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office in response to several public information requests seeking records connected to the deputy-involved shooting.

According to the filing, county officials argue that releasing certain records could interfere with the ongoing Texas Rangers investigation into the use of deadly force. The county is also citing anticipated litigation related to the case as a reason the records should remain confidential.

What Records Are Being Sought?

The filing references requests for information that may include:

Body camera footage

Personnel records

Internal law enforcement documents

Policies and procedures related to use-of-force investigations

County officials asked the Attorney General to allow the records to be withheld under several exceptions contained in the Texas Public Information Act.

Texas Rangers Investigation Continues

In the filing, prosecutors state that the Texas Rangers continue to investigate the deputy-involved shooting involving John Gabriel Mendoza Jr.

The county argues that releasing records while the investigation remains active could interfere with law enforcement efforts and any potential criminal review.

Officials also cited anticipated litigation involving the case as an additional reason records should not be released at this time.

Attorney General Has Not Yet Ruled

The filing does not mean the records have been permanently withheld.

Instead, the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office is asking the Texas Attorney General to issue a ruling on whether the requested information can remain confidential under Texas law.

The Attorney General will review the request and determine whether some or all of the records must be released.

Public Records Requests Filed

The filing identifies multiple public information requests submitted after the shooting, including a request submitted by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

Those requests seek records connected to the investigation and the circumstances surrounding Mendoza’s death.

As of publication, the Attorney General has not issued a decision regarding the requested records.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following developments in the case and provide updates as additional information becomes available.

Attorney General Filing

Gear I Use in the Field

As an independent reporter, I often spend long hours covering breaking news, search operations, and investigations across Texas. Here are a few items I use and recommend:

SHOP MY FIELD GEAR

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through the links above, I may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting independent journalism at Chopper Rose Productions.