Tag Archives: Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 in Galveston County

James Elmore Jr. appears in court during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 as Judge Signals No Continuance

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

James Elmore Jr. remains on track for an Aug. 31 trial in Galveston County.

Elmore pleaded not guilty as his case moves toward a jury. He faces several criminal cases connected to the deaths linked to the area known as the Texas Killing Fields.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller was also present in the courtroom.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller sits in the courtroom during James Elmore Jr.’s pretrial hearing ahead of the Aug. 31 trial.

During a pretrial discussion, the judge made one point especially clear. The court intends to try the case as scheduled.

“Unless there’s some medical emergency … no continuance.”

The judge told attorneys to make sure everyone understands that the case has a firm trial setting.

James Elmore Jr. Manslaughter Case Will Go First

Watch the full James Elmore Jr. pretrial hearing above, including discussion of the Aug. 31 trial date, jury selection, discovery and the other pending cases.

Elmore currently has five pending cases, according to statements made in court.

The prosecution told the judge that it plans to try the manslaughter case first on Aug. 31.

The state said it no longer plans to first try newer cases involving allegations of possession of child pornography.

The court also discussed Elmore’s other pending cases.

Prosecutors said the tampering cases could become relevant during the manslaughter trial. They argued that some of that evidence may provide context involving the victim.

If a jury finds Elmore guilty of manslaughter, prosecutors could also introduce evidence from the other pending cases during the punishment phase.

The judge explained that process in court.

If jurors find Elmore not guilty, the remaining cases would still remain pending.

Attorneys Say Discovery Is Nearly Complete

James Elmore Jr. and attorneys appear before the judge during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

Both sides told the judge that no major discovery issues remain.

Prosecutors said they still need to handle several smaller matters. Those include redactions to statements and identifying specific jail calls.

The state also has images stored on a hard drive.

Defense attorneys can review those materials at the prosecutor’s office.

Elmore’s attorney told the judge that he plans to review the material while preparing for trial.

The court also discussed a discovery compliance form. Defense counsel said he would have Elmore review and sign it.

Court Could Call More Than 200 Potential Jurors

Jury selection could become one of the biggest challenges in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

The case has received extensive media coverage.

The judge and attorneys discussed calling more than 200 prospective jurors because of the attention surrounding the case.

The court could use a larger courtroom to accommodate the panel.

Attorneys also discussed whether to use a written jury questionnaire.

A questionnaire could help identify people who already know details about the case. However, it could also delay jury selection by a day.

The judge raised another concern.

Questions asked in front of the entire panel could influence other potential jurors. The court may instead question some people individually.

The goal will be to find jurors who can decide the case based only on evidence presented in court.

Judge Expects Trial to Last About One Week

James Elmore Jr. stands with attorneys during a pretrial hearing in Galveston County ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears with attorneys during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 trial.

The attorneys told the judge they expect the manslaughter trial to last about one week.

The court discussed beginning jury selection on the afternoon of Aug. 31.

Opening statements and testimony could begin the following day.

If the court uses a jury questionnaire, the trial could run slightly longer.

The court also expects to select alternate jurors.

Other James Elmore Cases Could Follow Quickly

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Prosecutors are already looking beyond the Aug. 31 trial.

The state told the judge it wants to return to court quickly for another Elmore case.

An October trial setting came up during the discussion.

The court discussed Oct. 5 as a possible next docket setting. Attorneys also mentioned Oct. 12 as another possibility.

Those dates could change depending on how long the manslaughter trial lasts and how quickly attorneys receive the court record.

Judge Warns Elmore Against Speaking

James Elmore Jr. stands beside his attorney and a courtroom deputy during a Galveston County pretrial hearing.
James Elmore Jr. stands with his attorney during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

The judge also addressed Elmore directly.

He told Elmore that he did not have to speak in court. The judge warned that anything Elmore said could become evidence against him.

Instead, the judge encouraged Elmore to communicate with his attorney about anything he wants addressed before trial.

The judge said the court would hear necessary motions, even if attorneys file them shortly before trial.

Aug. 31 Trial Remains Firm

For now, the most important development is simple.

James Elmore Jr. remains scheduled for trial Aug. 31.

The prosecution says it will begin with the manslaughter case.

The court expects a large jury pool because of the publicity surrounding the case.

And the judge made clear that he does not expect to grant another delay without a serious emergency.

Tim Miller’s presence in the courtroom also underscored the attention surrounding the case as it moves closer to trial.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the James Elmore Jr. case and any developments before jury selection begins.

Traveling to Texas for the James Elmore Jr. Trial?

Hotel swimming pool in Galveston, Texas, for travelers visiting Galveston County.
Travelers heading to Galveston County can compare hotel options near the courthouse and surrounding area.

If you are traveling to Galveston County to follow the James Elmore Jr. trial, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Galveston, League City or the surrounding area, depending on your travel plans and court schedule.

What to Pack for a Court Trip

Long court days can mean a lot of waiting. I recommend bringing a portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and a lightweight bag for your essentials. You can find travel gear and courtroom-day basics on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Mitchell Wasek court update: new Sept. 2 pretrial date appears after Aug. 18 setting

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Mitchell Wasek mugshot in Travis County criminal case
Mitchell Wasek faces felony charges in Travis County as his defense challenges evidence and seeks dismissal of the indictment.

A new court date has appeared in the criminal case against Mitchell Wasek.

Travis County court records now show a pretrial hearing set for Sept. 2, 2026, at 1:15 p.m. in the 167th District Court.

The change comes after Wasek had been scheduled for a pretrial hearing on Aug. 18.

That Aug. 18 setting no longer appears on the public hearing list.

Court records reviewed Wednesday do not show a ruling from the Aug. 18 setting. They also do not explain why the hearing date changed.

Wasek now set for Sept. 2 pretrial hearing

The new Sept. 2 setting appears in case D-1-DC-25-500122.

The case remains listed as an indictment in the Travis County Odyssey Portal.

The public docket currently shows the Sept. 2 hearing as a Pre-Trial Hearing before the 167th District Court.

The online record does not show an Aug. 18 minute entry or order.

Because of that, it is not yet clear whether the court formally reset the hearing, continued it, or took up any issues during the earlier setting.

Defense wants evidence suppressed

Mitchell Wasek booking photo in Travis County criminal case
Mitchell Wasek faces felony charges in Travis County as his defense seeks to suppress evidence and dismiss the indictment.

One major defense motion remains listed on the docket.

Wasek’s attorneys filed a motion to suppress on April 14, 2026.

According to the docket description, the defense seeks to suppress evidence allegedly obtained through theft and breach of computer security.

The public case record reviewed Wednesday does not show a ruling on that motion.

Defense also seeks dismissal of indictment

Wasek’s defense filed another significant motion on June 2, 2026.

That filing asks the court to dismiss the indictment based on an expired statute of limitations.

The docket also shows several subpoena applications filed that day.

An executed subpoena involving Detective Keith McManus appears on the docket on June 5.

Again, the public record currently does not show an order granting or denying the motion to dismiss.

Separate Wasek cases also set for Sept. 2

Wasek faces several separate criminal cases in Travis County.

Cases D-1-DC-23-500314 through D-1-DC-23-500319 also remain listed as indictments.

Those older cases show writ hearings scheduled for Sept. 2 at 1:15 p.m.

The 2025 case, however, lists a pretrial hearing at that same date and time.

The older cases also show appellate activity during 2026.

What happens next

The Sept. 2 hearing could provide the next major development in the case.

For now, the public docket does not show a ruling on Wasek’s motion to suppress or his request to dismiss the indictment.

It also does not explain what happened to the previously scheduled Aug. 18 pretrial hearing.

I will continue reviewing the Travis County court record for any new orders, motions or hearing information.

Traveling to Travis County for the Wasek case

If you are traveling to Travis County for court, work or a Texas getaway, Hotels.com can help you compare hotels, prices and locations near Austin and surrounding areas.

I may earn a commission from qualifying Hotels.com bookings at no additional cost to you.

What I use for reporting and travel

From portable chargers and travel gear to notebooks, camera accessories and other reporting essentials, I keep a running list of useful items on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Kevin Tippit trial set for 2027 in John Mendoza shooting case

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Brazoria County court records show a Feb. 1, 2027 trial date in the criminal case against former deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit. Mugshot photo credit: Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

Kevin Tippit trial date set in Brazoria County

Court records show prosecutors filed the case against Tippit on Aug. 6, 2026, in Brazoria County’s 239th District Court.

The docket lists several hearings before the scheduled trial:

Sept. 29, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. — Status hearing

Oct. 28, 2026 at 9 a.m. — Pretrial hearing

Jan. 21, 2027 at 9 a.m. — Announcement hearing

Feb. 1, 2027 at 9 a.m. — Trial

The court entered an Order for Pretrial Hearing and Setting Case for Trial on Aug. 12.

The February date remains the current trial setting. Court schedules can change as the case moves forward.

Former deputy released on bond

Texas Rangers arrested Tippit on Aug. 11.

Brazoria County court records show the judge set his bond at $250,000. Tippit later posted bond and was released from jail.

The court docket lists defense attorneys Guy L. Womack and Geoff L. Womack.

John Mendoza died after June police pursuit

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood High School football uniform.
John Gabriel Mendoza Jr., 18, was a Texas State University student who died following the June 1, 2026 shooting involving former Brazoria County deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit.

The criminal case stems from the June 1, 2026 shooting of John Gabriel Mendoza Jr.

Mendoza was 18 and attended Texas State University.

The incident began with a pursuit in Lake Jackson. The chase ended when Mendoza reached his home and pulled into the garage.

Tippit fired through the driver’s side window.

Radio traffic following the shooting captured Tippit reporting an “accidental discharge.”

Mendoza later died.

The Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office fired Tippit days after the shooting.

The Texas Rangers later investigated the case.

Grand jury indicted Kevin Tippit

Mugshot of former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit.
Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit faces a charge of aggravated assault by a public servant in connection with the June 1, 2026 shooting of John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Photo credit: Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

A Brazoria County grand jury indicted Tippit on the charge of aggravated assault by a public servant.

Court records identify the charge under Texas Penal Code 22.02(b)(2)(A) and classify it as a first-degree felony.

The case number is 106968-CR.

The next hearing is currently scheduled for Sept. 29.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the case and any changes to the trial schedule.

Traveling to Brazoria County?

If you’re traveling to Brazoria County for a court hearing, trial or visit, you can compare nearby hotel options through Hotels.com. Staying close to Angleton can make early court mornings a little easier.

Beach house rental in Brazoria County, Texas, with palm trees and a raised coastal-style home.
Traveling to Brazoria County? Visitors can find hotels and vacation rentals near Angleton, Lake Jackson and the surrounding Gulf Coast area.

Hotels.com:

Disclosure: I may earn a commission if you book through this link, at no extra cost to you.

Amazon travel picks

If you’re heading to Brazoria County, a few simple travel essentials can make the trip easier. I also share useful travel gear through my Amazon affiliate links.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Texas school corporal punishment: Port Arthur case raises questions

News graphic about Port Arthur ISD’s response to a reported corporal punishment incident involving a Memorial High School student.
Port Arthur ISD says it is reviewing a reported corporal punishment incident involving a Memorial High School student and will also revisit its corporal punishment policy.

Texas schools can still paddle students — and one Port Arthur mother’s allegations raise questions

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

A Texas mother says a football coach paddled her teenage son three times at school. Photos shared online appear to show significant bruising afterward.

The allegation may shock many parents.

However, Texas school corporal punishment remains legal in 2026.

Texas law allows public school districts to adopt policies that permit paddling and other physical punishment. Parents can prohibit the punishment, but they generally must give the district written notice.

The Port Arthur case now raises a larger question.

Where does school discipline end and physical injury begin?

Mother says football coach paddled her son

Grizzy’s Hood News reported the allegations Sunday after speaking with the student’s mother.

The mother said her son attends Memorial High School in Port Arthur.

According to the post, the teenager missed football practice Friday. His mother said she had recently suffered injuries in a serious car crash and could not provide transportation.

She said her son explained the situation to his coaches.

The mother alleges several adults later stood inside an office while her son bent over a table. She says a football coach then struck him three times.

She also alleges coaches cited other issues. Those included communication problems and wearing the wrong color football pants.

The mother says her son did not know someone planned to strike him.

A photograph published with the report shows dark discoloration and bruising on the student’s body.

Grizzy’s Hood News reported that the mother contacted police and filed a report.

The coach and Port Arthur Independent School District had not provided their accounts when the story appeared. No criminal charges had been announced.

The allegations have not yet received independent confirmation.

Texas law still allows corporal punishment in schools

This is the part that may surprise Texas parents.

State law specifically allows school districts to authorize corporal punishment.

The Texas Education Code defines corporal punishment as deliberately causing physical pain through actions such as hitting, paddling, spanking or slapping for discipline.

However, a school cannot simply decide on its own to start paddling students.

The district’s board of trustees must adopt a policy allowing corporal punishment.

Parents also have the right to stop a district from using corporal punishment on their child.

But Texas uses what amounts to an opt-out system.

A parent or guardian can submit a signed written statement prohibiting corporal punishment. The prohibition applies during that school year unless the parent later revokes it.

That distinction matters in the Port Arthur case.

The mother’s claim that she never signed a consent form does not automatically prove the school violated Texas law.

The bigger question involves Port Arthur ISD’s own policy.

What does Port Arthur ISD allow?

Memorial High School belongs to Port Arthur Independent School District. It serves as the district’s high school.

The district directs students and parents to a Student Code of Conduct for discipline rules. Memorial’s school pages also explain that the code follows Chapter 37 of the Texas Education Code. (Memorial 9th Grade Academy)

What if a parent caused the same bruising?

The case also highlights an uncomfortable comparison.

Texas allows parents to use reasonable physical force to discipline their children.

Texas Penal Code Section 9.61 says a parent, stepparent or person acting in the role of a parent may use non-deadly force when that person reasonably believes the force is necessary to discipline the child or protect the child’s welfare.

That does not give parents unlimited authority to hurt a child.

Police can investigate physical discipline when officers believe the force may have crossed the line into criminal conduct.

Bruising alone does not automatically prove a crime. The child’s age, amount of force, circumstances and extent of any injury can all matter.

The same basic question should matter when an adult at a school uses physical punishment.

How much force is too much?

Paddling remains controversial in Texas

Texas has debated ending corporal punishment in public schools for years.

A Texas Tribune investigation previously found that nearly 13,000 Texas students received corporal punishment during the 2017-18 school year. The report also found that Black students and students with disabilities received corporal punishment at disproportionate rates.

Lawmakers have introduced proposals to restrict or eliminate the practice.

Still, Texas law continues to allow school boards to authorize it.

That means a practice many parents associate with another generation can still happen inside a Texas public school today.

Port Arthur ISD responds to corporal punishment controversy

Port Arthur ISD statement dated August 18, 2026, addressing concerns over reported corporal punishment involving a Memorial High School student and announcing a district review.
Port Arthur ISD released this statement on August 18, 2026, responding to concerns about reported corporal punishment involving a Memorial High School student.

Port Arthur ISD responded to the controversy on Aug. 18, saying the district is reviewing the reported use of corporal punishment involving a Memorial High School student.

The district said corporal punishment is currently an authorized discipline technique under its Board-approved policy and Student Code of Conduct.

Under that policy, PAISD said parents do not have to give written permission before corporal punishment can be used. Instead, a parent who does not want corporal punishment used on their child must submit a signed written statement to the campus principal prohibiting it for that school year.

PAISD said it is reviewing the reported incident to determine what happened and whether district policies and procedures were followed.

The district also acknowledged concerns surrounding corporal punishment and said the Board of Trustees will revisit the policy to determine whether changes or additional procedures are appropriate.

Superintendent Dr. Mark Porterie said the district remains committed to student safety and to ensuring discipline is administered fairly and consistently.

The district’s statement did not announce any disciplinary action against the coach or any criminal charges related to the reported incident.

Should hitting students with a paddle still have a place in Texas public schools in 2026?

Planning a trip to Houston?

If you’re traveling to Houston for court, business or a weekend visit, you can compare hotels near downtown, the Harris County Criminal Justice Center and other Houston attractions through Hotels.com.

Gear I use for reporting and travel

 Court records, breaking news and long reporting days mean I spend plenty of time working from my phone and laptop. I keep a few travel and reporting essentials with me, including portable chargers, phone accessories and compact gear that fits easily in my bag.

VIEW ON AMAZON

GoPro action camera used for travel and reporting
GoPro camera I use for travel, field reporting and capturing video on the go.

Shop my travel and reporting picks on Amazon:

Disclosure: This post may contain affiliate links, including Amazon and Hotels.com. I may earn a commission if you make a purchase or booking through these links, at no additional cost to you.

Jodi Arias PCR deadline fight reveals mystery evidence

Jodi Arias seated in an Arizona courtroom during proceedings in her murder case.
Jodi Arias appears in court during proceedings in her Arizona murder case.

Jodi Arias court fight erupts over mystery evidence and looming deadline

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

A new court fight in the Jodi Arias case centers on a looming deadline, health problems and an unidentified piece of evidence.

Arias faces a September 2, 2026 deadline to file her petition for post-conviction relief, or PCR petition.

Her attorney wants much more time.

Defense attorney Christopher Stavris asked the court to extend the Jodi Arias PCR deadline to January 29, 2027.

Prosecutors strongly oppose that request.

Now, newly reviewed court filings reveal another twist. Arias’ defense says it still awaits information about an item of evidence involving the State and/or Mesa Police Department.

The defense says it first asked about that evidence almost one year ago.

Jodi Arias PCR deadline sparks court battle

Stavris filed the extension request on June 16, 2026.

He told the court that several defense team members face significant health problems.

According to the filing, one key team member needs more than three months of surgical medical leave.

Another team member also needs surgical leave and can only work in a limited capacity.

The defense says two other team members face serious health problems that have slowed their work.

Another team member may need replacement because of ongoing medical issues.

Stavris argues those problems qualify as extraordinary circumstances under Arizona court rules.

He says his team cannot complete the necessary investigation before September 2.

Prosecutors say Arias has had enough time

Prosecutor Juan Martinez walking into court beside a witness during Jodi Arias’s resentencing proceedings.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez walks into court with a witness during Jodi Arias’s resentencing trial.

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office pushed back.

Deputy County Attorney Jordan Smith argued that Arias has already had years to prepare her petition.

Arias filed her PCR notice on February 11, 2021.

Prosecutors say the September deadline gives her more than five and a half years from that filing.

The State called the deadline realistic.

Prosecutors also argued that Arias could file her petition and seek changes later if new evidence develops.

The State took an even stronger position in its filing.

Prosecutors argued that failure to meet the September 2 deadline should support dismissal of Arias’ PCR notice.

Defense reveals unresolved evidence issue

Jodi Arias defense filing discussing ongoing PCR investigation and an unresolved item of evidence involving the State or Mesa Police Department.
In a June 25, 2026 filing, Jodi Arias’s defense said it was still waiting for a status update on an item of evidence first raised nearly a year earlier.

The defense responded on June 25.

That filing contains one of the most interesting details in the latest court battle.

Stavris says Arias still waits for a status update involving an item of evidence.

The filing does not publicly identify the evidence.

The defense says it first asked about the item almost a year ago.

Stavris also says the State and Mesa Police Department have communicated about the evidence.

However, he says the defense still does not know its status.

The defense sent another status request several weeks before filing its reply.

According to Stavris, nobody had answered that request.

Defense says records from 2021 remain outstanding

The defense also raised another issue.

Stavris says Arias submitted a public records request through the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office in 2021.

The office partially fulfilled that request.

However, the defense says some records remain outstanding.

Arias’ team submitted a narrower request in February 2026.

The defense hoped that move would speed up the process.

Stavris says prosecutors told the defense that they continue to process the request.

Those outstanding records now form part of the defense argument for more time.

Arias attorney says PCR investigation remains active

Stavris argues that post-conviction work requires more than reviewing old court transcripts.

He says PCR claims often require new investigation outside the original trial record.

That work can involve attorneys, investigators and experts.

The defense also challenged the State’s description of the affected team members.

Prosecutors referred to them as investigators.

Stavris says several of them serve as experts in specialized fields.

He argues that those experts play a critical role in developing possible PCR claims.

The defense also says it continues to conduct discovery and investigate possible claims.

Defense offers closed hearing with judge

Stavris told the court he could provide more information if the judge wants it.

However, he asked to present those details during a sealed, ex parte hearing.

That type of hearing could allow the defense to discuss sensitive investigative information without publicly revealing its strategy.

The filing does not disclose what claims Arias may eventually raise in her PCR petition.

State asks for oral argument

Maricopa County prosecutors’ June 26, 2026 filing requesting oral argument on Jodi Arias’s PCR deadline extension.
In a June 26, 2026 filing, prosecutors asked Judge Aryeh Schwartz to schedule oral argument on Jodi Arias’s request for more time, with any argument set for July 23 or later.

The fight did not end with the defense reply.

On June 26, prosecutors asked the judge to hold oral arguments about the requested extension.

The State said it needs time to contact next of kin who may want to address the court.

Prosecutors cited victims’ rights to a prompt and final conclusion of the case.

The State asked the court to schedule any argument for July 23, 2026 or later.

The filing says the prosecutor assigned to the matter planned to return from vacation on July 23.

Will Jodi Arias get more time?

The filings reviewed for this story show both sides digging in.

The defense wants until January 29, 2027.

The State wants the September 2 deadline to remain in place.

The defense points to serious medical problems, unfinished investigative work, outstanding records and unresolved evidence.

Prosecutors point to the amount of time Arias has already had.

The biggest unanswered question now centers on the judge.

These filings do not include a final ruling on the extension request.

That ruling could determine whether Arias must file her long-awaited PCR petition within weeks or gets several more months to prepare it.

The mystery surrounding the unidentified evidence also adds a new question to one of Arizona’s most closely watched criminal cases.

No ruling yet on Jodi Arias PCR deadline request

As of August 17, 2026, the Maricopa County Clerk of the Superior Court says there is no minute entry or court order yet ruling on Jodi Arias’s request to extend her September 2, 2026 PCR filing deadline.

A court operations specialist told Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose that she had sent everything currently in the case and did not see a minute entry or order addressing the extension request.

That means the September 2 deadline remains the current filing date unless Judge Aryeh Schwartz issues a new order.

Read the court filings: Below are the June 2026 filings in State v. Jodi Arias, including the defense motion for more time, the State’s response, the defense reply and the State’s request for oral argument.

Traveling to Arizona?

If you’re planning a trip to Arizona, you can search for hotels near Phoenix, Scottsdale and other destinations through Hotels.com here: Hotels.com.

Affiliate disclosure: I may earn a commission if you book through this link, at no additional cost to you.

Shop my Amazon picks

Looking for travel essentials or items for your next trip? You can browse my Amazon recommendations here:

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Using these links may earn me a commission at no additional cost to you.

Italy Rome and Sardinia Itinerary: Hotels, Excursions & Travel Tips

Rome and Sardinia Italy travel blog thumbnail featuring Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose in scuba gear, the Colosseum, and turquoise Mediterranean water.
Rome + Sardinia: Italy Travel Adventure with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

My Italy Adventure: Rome, Sardinia, Hotels, Excursions and Travel Essentials

Italy has been on my travel list for a long time, and this September I’m finally making the trip.

My itinerary takes me from Rome to Sardinia and back to Rome, with historic sights, beautiful beaches, boat excursions and plenty of walking along the way.

I’m sharing where I’m staying, the excursions I’m planning and some of the travel gear I’m packing in case you’re planning your own Italy adventure.

My Italy Itinerary

I arrive in Rome on September 3 and will spend several days exploring the city before heading to Sardinia.

My itinerary includes:

Rome: September 3–6
Sardinia: September 6–10
Return to Rome: September 10
Final night near Rome Fiumicino Airport before flying home

Planning a Vacation? Kathy Chrappa Can Help

I’ve worked with Kathy Chrappa at Dream Vacations, and she has more than 25 years of experience helping travelers find vacations that fit their budget and travel style. Whether you’re planning Europe, a cruise, or a tropical getaway, having someone help with the details can save time and reduce stress.

You can find Kathy on Facebook by searching for Kathy Chrappa Dream Vacations.

Where I’m Staying in Rome

Guest room at Town House Fontana di Trevi in Rome, Italy, featuring a double bed and bright modern interior.
Town House Fontana di Trevi, my Rome hotel near the Trevi Fountain.

Town House Rome Trevi Fountain

For my first stop, I’m staying at Town House Rome Trevi Fountain.

The location was a major reason I chose it. I wanted to stay close to central Rome so I could walk to restaurants, shops and major attractions without spending too much time dealing with transportation.

Staying near the Trevi Fountain also puts me in one of the most recognizable areas of Rome.

Check rates and availability for Town House Rome Trevi Fountain:

Exploring Rome

Rome is packed with history, architecture, food and famous landmarks.

I expect to do a lot of walking, so comfortable shoes will be one of the most important things in my suitcase.

My Rome Excursions

I already have several must-see Rome experiences planned for this trip.

Hop-On Hop-Off Bus Tour

I’m taking a hop-on hop-off bus tour to get a good overview of Rome and see more of the city without having to walk every mile. It will also give me the flexibility to stop at different landmarks along the way.

Vatican City

A visit to Vatican City is also on my itinerary. I’m excited to see the Vatican Museums, St. Peter’s Basilica and some of the incredible history and artwork found throughout the area.

Colosseum

No trip to Rome would feel complete without seeing the Colosseum. I’ll be visiting one of Rome’s most famous landmarks and learning more about its history while exploring the surrounding ancient ruins.

Comfortable Walking Shoes

Rome’s cobblestone streets make comfortable shoes especially important.

Amazon travel pick:


COMFORTABLE WALKING SHOES

Lightweight Travel Backpack

I also plan to bring a lightweight backpack for sightseeing days.

It will give me enough room for water, my phone, a portable charger and a few essentials without carrying a large bag around the city.

Amazon travel pick:


LIGHTWEIGHT BACKPACK

Traveling From Rome to Sardinia

After several days exploring Rome, I’m heading to Sardinia for a completely different part of the trip.

This portion will be all about beaches, the Mediterranean and time on the water.

Where I’m Staying in Sardinia

Beach at Hotel Stefania Boutique Hotel in Sardinia, Italy, with white sand, blue umbrellas and turquoise Mediterranean water.
The beach at Hotel Stefania Boutique Hotel in Sardinia, where I’ll be staying near Olbia.

Hotel Stefania Boutique Hotel by the Beach & Ristorante

For my Sardinia stay, I chose Hotel Stefania Boutique Hotel by the Beach & Ristorante in the Olbia area.

I wanted to stay somewhere close to the beach while still having access to the excursions I’m planning.

That makes this hotel a good base for exploring the northeastern side of Sardinia.

Check rates and availability for Hotel Stefania Boutique Hotel by the Beach & Ristorante:

My Sardinia Excursions

One of the biggest reasons I chose Sardinia is the water.

I’m especially excited about exploring the La Maddalena Archipelago, an area known for islands, beaches, coves and incredibly clear Mediterranean water.

La Maddalena Boat Excursion

A boat trip around La Maddalena is one of the excursions I’m looking forward to most.

The excursion should give me a chance to see parts of the islands that are much easier to experience from the water.

What I’m Packing for Sardinia

Beach and boat days require a completely different set of essentials than sightseeing in Rome.

Water Shoes

Water shoes should come in handy for rocky beaches, swimming stops and getting on and off boats.

Amazon travel pick:

WATER SHOES

Snorkel Gear

With Sardinia’s clear water, I definitely want snorkeling gear available.

Bringing my own also means I won’t have to rely on rental equipment.

Amazon travel pick:


SNORKEL GEAR

Waterproof Phone Pouch

A waterproof phone pouch is another small item that could save me a major headache around boats and beaches.

Amazon travel pick:

WATERPROOF PHONE POUCH

Returning to Rome

I return to Rome on September 10.

Instead of heading all the way back into central Rome, I plan to stay near Rome Fiumicino Airport for my final night.

That should make departure day much easier and eliminate the stress of traveling across Rome before my flight home.

My Rome Airport Hotel

Check rates and availability:

My Italy Travel Essentials

I’m trying to keep my packing practical.

I want items that work for sightseeing in Rome, walking around Sardinia and spending time on boats and beaches.

Some of my Italy travel essentials include:

Comfortable walking shoes
Lightweight backpack
Water shoes
Snorkel gear
Waterproof phone pouch
Small dry bag
Portable charger
European travel adapter
Sunglasses
Refillable water bottle

Follow My Italy Trip

I’ll be sharing more from Rome and Sardinia as I travel.

I plan to show you the hotels, excursions, beaches, food and places I visit along the way.

I’ll also share what I loved, what I would do differently and whether the hotels and excursions were worth the money.

If you’re planning your own Italy trip, I hope my experience helps make your planning a little easier.

Affiliate Disclosure

This article contains affiliate links. I may earn a commission if you make a qualifying purchase or booking through one of these links, at no additional cost to you.

Buc-ee’s Co-Founder’s Son Fights Felony Case as New Court Hearing Nears

Mitchell Wasek mugshot in Travis County criminal case
Mitchell Wasek faces felony charges in Travis County as his defense challenges evidence and seeks dismissal of the indictment.

Buc-ee’s Co-Founder’s Son Fights Felony Case as New Court Hearing Nears

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

The criminal case against the son of a Buc-ee’s co-founder is heading back to court.

Mitchell Wasek now wants a judge to suppress evidence in his felony child pornography case. His defense also wants the indictment dismissed.

Court records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose show a pretrial hearing set for August 18, 2026, at 1:15 p.m. in Travis County’s 167th District Court.

The latest filings reveal a significant new legal fight.

Mitchell Wasek Case Update: Defense Challenges Evidence

Wasek faces a felony charge of possession of child pornography in Travis County.

The current court docket lists the offense as a second-degree felony.

His attorney filed a motion to suppress on April 14, 2026.

The docket describes the filing as a:

“Motion to suppress evidence obtained by theft and breach of computer security.”

The wording raises a major question.

What evidence does the defense want thrown out, and how was it obtained?

The court docket does not answer that question by itself.

The actual motion could provide those details.

Defense Also Wants Indictment Dismissed

Another filing could have an even bigger impact on the case.

On June 2, 2026, Wasek’s defense filed a motion asking the court to dismiss the indictment.

The stated reason:

An expired statute of limitations.

The judge has not dismissed the case based on the docket reviewed for this report.

The State also requested several subpoenas that same day.

One went to Detective Keith McManus.

Court records show that subpoena was executed on June 5.

Pretrial Hearing Set for August 18

The next scheduled hearing could determine what happens with those defense challenges.

The Travis County Odyssey Portal lists a:

Pretrial Hearing
August 18, 2026
1:15 p.m.
167th District Court

The hearing could bring new arguments over the evidence and the defense request to dismiss the indictment.

It could also provide the clearest update yet on where the case stands.

Wasek Also Faces 21 Invasive Recording Counts

Mitchell Wasek booking photo in Travis County criminal case
Mitchell Wasek faces felony charges in Travis County as his defense seeks to suppress evidence and dismiss the indictment.

The child pornography case came after an earlier investigation involving allegations of secret recordings.

The Travis County District Attorney’s Office announced in May 2024 that a grand jury returned six indictments against Wasek.

Those indictments contained 21 counts of invasive visual recording involving 13 alleged victims.

Prosecutors said the alleged recordings occurred over roughly two years in Travis County.

Those cases also remain listed in Travis County court records.

Wasek has not been convicted of the allegations discussed in this report. He remains presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.

Why the Buc-ee’s Name Draws Attention

Arch Aplin timeline graphic about his contact with investigators in the Rebecca Beard case.
Arch Aplin remained in contact with investigators as questions continued about the Rebecca Beard case timeline.

Mitchell Wasek is the son of Buc-ee’s co-founder Don Wasek.

That connection has pushed the criminal case into headlines across Texas.

It also creates an unusual overlap with another story I have covered extensively.

Not because the criminal cases have anything to do with each other.

They do not.

The connection is the Buc-ee’s name.

Related Coverage: Buc-ee’s Founder Arch “Beaver” Aplin and the Rebecca Beard Investigation

Arch Aplin answers a question about Rebecca Beard during the grand opening of Arizona’s first Buc-ee’s location in Goodyear, Arizona.

My ongoing investigation into the 1986 disappearance and murder of Rebecca “Becky” Beard has also involved a Buc-ee’s founder.

Arch “Beaver” Aplin III knew Becky before she disappeared.

Historical police records reviewed during my investigation document detectives interviewing Aplin after Becky vanished.

I later traveled to Arizona and questioned Aplin directly during the opening of a Buc-ee’s location there.

Aplin briefly addressed Becky’s case and expressed sympathy for her family.

My reporting has also examined conflicting information in historical records about when Aplin last saw Becky and who investigators reported seeing at the Excalibur Club around the time of her disappearance.

Again, there is no known connection between Mitchell Wasek’s criminal case and Rebecca Beard’s murder case.

The common thread is that both stories involve members of the families behind one of Texas’ most recognizable brands.

Related Rebecca Beard Coverage

Exclusive: Arch Aplin Responds to Rebecca Beard Question

I traveled to Arizona to ask Buc-ee’s founder Arch “Beaver” Aplin about Rebecca Beard and references to him in historical investigative records.

Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports Show How the Investigation Evolved

The records document early witness interviews and conflicting accounts surrounding Becky’s final hours.

Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed During the Investigation

The investigation examines how witness accounts and the case timeline evolved over time.

What Happens Next?

The August 18 pretrial hearing could become an important turning point.

The defense wants evidence suppressed.

It also wants the indictment dismissed.

Prosecutors are preparing witnesses.

Now a judge will have to address the legal fight playing out behind the allegations.

I will continue reviewing the court records and follow what happens next.

All charges are allegations. Mitchell Wasek is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

Amazon

Following the Rebecca Beard investigation? Browse true-crime books and investigative reporting essentials on Amazon while you catch up on the case.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Hotels.com

Heading to Galveston or the Texas Gulf Coast? Compare hotels, locations and current rates through Hotels.com before you book.

I may earn a commission from eligible http://Hotels.com bookings at no additional cost to you.

Kevin Tippit Charged in Fatal Shooting of John Mendoza Jr.

Kevin Tippit mugshot following his arrest on a first-degree felony aggravated assault charge in the fatal shooting of John Mendoza Jr.
Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit was arrested by Texas Rangers on August 11, 2026, in connection with the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Photo credit: Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

Former Brazoria County Deputy Kevin Tippit Indicted in Fatal Shooting of 18-Year-Old

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit now faces a first-degree felony charge and the possibility of decades in prison following the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr.

A Brazoria County grand jury indicted Tippit on aggravated assault by a public servant in connection with the June 1, 2026 shooting in Lake Jackson, according to the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office. Texas Rangers arrested Tippit Tuesday, August 11.

Brazoria County jail records list his bond at $250,000.

If convicted as charged, Tippit faces five to 99 years or life in prison, according to the district attorney’s office.

Pursuit Ends at John Mendoza Jr.’s Home

Home on Indian Warrior Trail in Lake Jackson where the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. occurred on June 1, 2026.
The Lake Jackson home where John Gabriel Mendoza Jr., 18, was fatally shot on June 1, 2026, after a pursuit ended at the residence. Photo by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

The shooting happened early June 1 after Tippit attempted to stop Mendoza while he was driving in Lake Jackson.

Mendoza did not immediately stop and instead drove to his father’s home in the 100 block of Indian Warrior Trail. The pursuit ended at the home, where Tippit encountered Mendoza near or inside the garage and fired his weapon. Mendoza later died from his injuries.

Mendoza was a Texas State University student who had just completed his freshman year and was home for the summer.

Grand Jury Indicts Kevin Tippit

The indictment marks a major development in the Texas Rangers’ investigation into Mendoza’s death.

Court documents allege Tippit recklessly caused serious bodily injury to Mendoza by shooting him.

That wording is significant because the charge focuses on Tippit’s alleged reckless conduct. A grand jury indictment means jurors found sufficient probable cause for the criminal case to proceed. It does not establish guilt.

Tippit remains innocent unless a court finds him guilty.

Shooting Came Within Seconds of Deputy’s Arrival, Family Attorney Says

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood football uniform with a family member before his death in Lake Jackson.
John Gabriel Mendoza Jr., 18, pictured in a Brazoswood football uniform. Mendoza was fatally shot on June 1, 2026, after a pursuit ended at his family’s Lake Jackson home. Photo courtesy of the Mendoza family.

Attorney Charles Adams, who represents Mendoza’s family, has said surveillance video shows Tippit fired within seconds of getting out of his patrol vehicle.

Adams has also said Mendoza and the other occupants were unarmed. Those details came from the family’s attorney and should not be confused with an official finding by investigators.

The Texas Rangers later obtained a search warrant as they investigated the shooting. Court documents showed investigators were examining several possible offenses, including manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide and aggravated assault by a public servant.

Brazoria County Sheriff Fired Kevin Tippit

Kevin Tippit pictured with Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman during a Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office ceremony.
Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Tippit, left, pictured with Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman during a department ceremony. Tippit was later fired following the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. in Lake Jackson.

Eight days after the shooting, Brazoria County Sheriff Bo Stallman fired Tippit on June 9, 2026.

Stallman said an internal investigation found Tippit violated department policies involving the handling and discharge of his firearm.

The sheriff stressed that Tippit’s termination was an administrative decision separate from the criminal investigation being conducted by the Texas Rangers and Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office.

Tippit had served as a Brazoria County deputy since July 2024 after previously working as a jailer.

Kevin Tippit Faces Up to Life in Prison

Kevin Tippit mugshot following his arrest on a first-degree felony aggravated assault charge in the fatal shooting of John Mendoza Jr.
Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit was arrested by Texas Rangers on August 11, 2026, in connection with the fatal shooting of 18-year-old John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Photo credit: Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

The charge carries potentially severe consequences.

The Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office says aggravated assault by a public servant in this case constitutes a first-degree felony.

If convicted, Tippit could receive a sentence ranging from five to 99 years or life in prison.

A conviction and sentence are not predetermined. The prosecution must prove the criminal charge in court.

John Mendoza Jr. Case Enters New Stage

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood High School football uniform.

The criminal charge marks a significant development in a case that has drawn attention across Brazoria County since the June shooting.

Mendoza’s family has repeatedly called for transparency and accountability while the Texas Rangers investigated what happened.

Now, more than two months after Mendoza’s death, the former deputy who fired the fatal shot is facing a first-degree felony charge.

This remains a developing story. Investigator Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the criminal case and any new court filings or hearings involving Kevin Tippit.

Planning a Trip to the Texas Gulf Coast?

If you’re traveling to Lake Jackson, Brazoria County or the Houston area, you can compare nearby hotels and accommodations through Hotels.com.

Find hotels near Lake Jackson and the Texas Gulf Coast:

Hotels.com

Recommended Reading

Readers who want to better understand how investigators build criminal cases and prosecutors take them to court may find The Anatomy of Motive by John Douglas and Mark Olshaker useful.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Some travel links may also be affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.

Juan Laureles Cold Case: $6,000 Reward for New Tips

Juan Laureles Texas Rangers featured cold case poster for his 1996 Brown County murder

Juan Laureles Cold Case: Texas Rangers Seek New Tips 30 Years Later

Nearly 30 years after Juan Leon Laureles was found shot to death beside his burning car, Texas investigators are making a renewed push for answers.

The Texas Department of Public Safety announced that authorities are seeking new information in the Juan Laureles cold case. Laureles, 30, died in Brown County in May 1996.

Now, investigators hope someone who knows what happened will finally come forward.

Juan Laureles Found Beside Burning Car

Juan Laureles cold case graphic showing FM 2126, Texas Rangers investigation and $6,000 reward

On May 10, 1996, Brown County Sheriff’s deputies responded to a vehicle fire at about 12:30 a.m.

The fire occurred along FM 2126 near the railroad crossing and the access road to the Brownwood Rifle and Pistol Range.

When deputies arrived, they found Laureles dead next to his burning 1988 Ford Thunderbird.

Investigators determined that someone had shot Laureles in the back of the head. Someone also set his vehicle on fire.

Stolen Credit Card Used After Murder

Bealls Department Store graphic highlighting the stolen credit card clue in the 1996 Juan Laureles murder investigation.

Investigators discovered another important clue.

Someone stole Laureles’ credit card and used it at a Bealls Department Store in the area later that same day.

Authorities still want information about those transactions.

In addition, investigators want to hear from anyone who remembers seeing Laureles’ Ford Thunderbird or other vehicles near the murder scene that night.

Texas Rangers Continue Investigating Juan Laureles Cold Case

 Juan Leon Laureles photo featured in the Texas Rangers investigation into his 1996 Brown County cold case.

Investigators have followed numerous leads during the past three decades. However, they have not made an arrest.

The Brown County Sheriff’s Office and Texas Rangers continue to actively investigate the murder.

Authorities believe people in the community may still have information that could help solve the case.

Even a detail that seemed insignificant in 1996 could potentially give investigators a new lead today.

Reward Increased to $6,000

Texas Crime Stoppers has increased the reward to up to $6,000 for information that leads to an arrest in the case.

However, the increased reward remains available only until DPS announces its next featured Texas Rangers cold case.

Anyone seeking the cash reward must submit the information through Texas Crime Stoppers.

Tipsters can call 1-800-252-TIPS (tel:1-800-252-TIPS) (8477) or submit information through the official Texas Crime Stoppers tip system.

Nearly 30 Years Without Answers

Three decades have passed since someone killed Juan Laureles.

Yet murder has no statute of limitations in Texas, and investigators have not closed the case.

The Texas Rangers continue reviewing unsolved homicides in hopes that new information, witnesses or investigative methods can provide the break detectives need.

For Laureles’ case, that break could come from someone who remembers what happened on May 10, 1996.

Anyone with information should contact Texas Crime Stoppers.

Source: Texas Department of Public Safety

The official DPS release is here: Texas DPS — Juan Laureles Cold Case⁠. DPS confirms the $6,000 enhanced reward applies if an eligible tip comes in before the next featured Texas Rangers cold case is announced.

Planning a Texas trip?

If your travels take you through Brown County or elsewhere in Texas, you can compare hotel options and rates through Hotels.com⁠.

Interested in Texas cold cases?

Readers who follow unsolved cases can browse Texas true crime books on Amazon⁠.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Why I Continue Investigating the Texas Killing Fields: Every Victim Deserves to Be Remembered

Texas Killing Fields cold case graphic featuring Laura Miller, Donna Prudhomme, Audrey Cook, Heidi Fye and Carolyn Sosa.

Why I Continue Investigating the Texas Killing Fields: Every Victim Deserves to Be Remembered

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

People often ask why I continue investigating murders that happened more than 50 years ago.

They wonder why I file public records requests. They ask why I travel hundreds of miles to interview witnesses. They also question why I keep digging into cases that many people have forgotten.

My answer is simple.

Every victim deserves to be remembered.

The Victims Were More Than Headlines

When I began researching the Texas Killing Fields, one issue quickly bothered me.

Old news reports often focused on how the victims died. Police records also placed heavy attention on their circumstances. Those accounts did not always show who the women were or how they lived.

Authorities described some victims as runaways. Others struggled with addiction or lived through difficult times. Reports also linked some women to prostitution.

Those labels often overshadowed their identities.

Investigators first viewed Laura Miller as a possible runaway. Reports also associated Carolyn Sosa and Teri McDaniel with prostitution.

Those descriptions may have been accurate, incomplete or unfair. Either way, they often became the focus of the story.

The victims deserved better.

No one should disappear from history because of a label.

Why I Keep Digging

My investigation has taken me across Texas and beyond.

I have tracked down key witnesses. I have interviewed retired investigators. I have reviewed thousands of pages of public records.

I have also examined evidence that many people have never seen.

Each interview raises another question. Every record leads to another document. One conversation can reveal a missing piece of history.

Some discoveries involve unidentified remains. Others involve witnesses who were overlooked years ago. Records may also expose decisions that still raise questions today.

That is why I keep digging.

The Public Still Cares

One thing has surprised me more than anything else.

People still care.

Readers continue to send tips. Families continue to reach out. Former investigators and witnesses still contact me with information.

Some believe their information should remain part of the public record. Others simply want someone to listen.

Their messages show that these stories still matter.

The victims have not been forgotten.

Why These Stories Matter

I do not investigate these cases to sensationalize tragedy.

I investigate because every victim mattered.

A person’s past should never decide how much effort investigators make. It should not affect whether authorities search for them or work to solve their murder.

A straight-A student had value. A runaway had value. A woman struggling with addiction had value. A person living on the streets had value.

Their circumstances did not make their lives less important.

Justice should never depend on someone’s background.

The Families Deserve Answers

The victims left behind parents, children, siblings and friends.

Many families waited decades for answers. Some died without learning what happened to their loved one.

Time does not erase that pain.

Families still deserve honest answers. They deserve access to records. They deserve to know whether investigators followed every lead.

They also deserve respect.

I’ll Keep Looking for Answers

Many questions remain in the Texas Killing Fields cases.

I will continue searching through records. I will keep interviewing witnesses. I will also share what I find.

Some mysteries may never be solved. Others may only need one person to speak up.

That is what investigative journalism means to me.

It means giving victims a voice. It means preserving history. Most of all, it means making sure they are never forgotten.

Helpful Travel and Investigation Resources

My investigations sometimes require travel across Texas and beyond. When I need a place to stay near an interview, courthouse or records office, I compare available hotels through Hotels.com.

I also rely on practical tools while reviewing old case files. A portable document scanner helps me preserve records, photographs and handwritten notes.

Portable Canon document scanner used to preserve case files, photographs and handwritten records.

This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a small commission from qualifying bookings or purchases at no additional cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.