Tag Archives: Rebecca Beard

Becky Beard was expected to testify in police misconduct trial before 1986 disappearance

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Texas DPS missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

FREEPORT, Texas — Less than a month before Rebecca “Becky” Beard disappeared in March 1986, a Harris County prosecutor contacted her about testifying in a criminal case against three Houston police officers.

Newly examined records reveal that Beard gave a sworn statement in September 1985. She described witnessing officers mistreat two women during a Houston traffic stop.

The records also include a February 5, 1986, letter from prosecutor Donald A. Smyth. He informed Beard that the officers would face trial on March 31, 1986.

Beard disappeared before that scheduled trial date.

The documents establish her potential role as a prosecution witness. However, they do not establish any connection between the criminal case and her disappearance.

Prosecutor contacted Becky Beard weeks before disappearance

February 1986 letter from Brazoria County prosecutor John B. Holmes Jr. to Becky Beard concerning her potential testimony in a police misconduct case.
A February 1986 letter from prosecutor John B. Holmes Jr. contacted Becky Beard about her potential testimony in a case involving allegations against Houston police officers, weeks before her disappearance.

Donald A. Smyth, chief of the Harris County District Attorney’s Civil Rights Division, wrote to Beard on February 5, 1986.

The letter identified three defendants: D. M. Prince, B. D. Franklin and L. J. Bradley.

Smyth described a criminal case involving the alleged beating of two young women in city jail custody on September 5, 1985.

He also identified three defense attorneys: Kent Schaffer, Wendell Odom and Reid Walker.

Smyth warned Beard that defense attorneys or private investigators might contact her about the case.

He explained that she did not have to speak with them or provide a written or recorded statement.

Smyth also asked Beard to call his office to discuss her appearance at trial.

The prosecutor thanked her for her courage and cooperation.

The letter confirms that prosecutors considered Beard an important witness. However, it does not establish whether the court formally subpoenaed her.

Becky Beard described disturbing Houston traffic stop

First page of Becky Beard's September 10, 1985, sworn affidavit describing an alleged incident of Houston police misconduct during a traffic stop.
Becky Beard gave a sworn statement on September 10, 1985, describing a Houston traffic stop involving her two friends. She alleged that officers mistreated one of the women during the encounter.

Beard provided a sworn affidavit on September 10, 1985.

She described an encounter that began after an evening with Tammy McColskey and Julie Turcola.

According to her statement, the women visited a Houston nightclub called Fizz on Richmond Avenue.

Beard said she drove because she had consumed little alcohol.

Around 1:30 a.m., the women left the nightclub. Beard drove toward Westheimer Road.

A police vehicle followed them.

Officers stopped the car near Hillcroft and Westheimer.

Beard said an officer requested her driver’s license and proof of insurance. Meanwhile, another officer questioned the passengers about drinking and drug use.

The encounter soon escalated.

Witness said officer pulled handcuffed woman from patrol car

Page two of Becky Beard's September 10, 1985, sworn affidavit describing alleged police misconduct during a Houston traffic stop.
In her sworn affidavit, Becky Beard described watching an officer pull Tammy McColskey from a car. Beard stated that McColskey fell on her face and chest, her dress slipped down, and other officers stood nearby laughing.

In her affidavit, Beard described watching an officer handcuff McColskey and place her inside a patrol car.

She said McColskey later banged on the vehicle’s window and asked the officer to loosen the handcuffs.

Beard then described what happened next.

“The white officer pulled her out of the car,” Beard stated.

According to Beard, McColskey fell face-first onto the pavement.

Beard also said the woman’s dress slipped down while officers stood nearby laughing.

“She was crying,” Beard wrote.

The officer conducting Beard’s traffic investigation instructed her to look only at him.

However, Beard said she glanced back toward the patrol vehicles.

She then saw officers move McColskey into another police car.

Beard described McColskey lying with her head on the vehicle’s floor.

Officers eventually released Beard after issuing citations for driving without proof of insurance and without her driver’s license.

Sworn statement became part of police misconduct investigation

Beard signed her two-page affidavit before a notary on September 10, 1985.

She submitted the statement to Sergeant M. Angel of the Internal Affairs Division.

Her account described what she personally witnessed during the roadside encounter.

However, Beard did not describe witnessing the alleged beating inside the city jail.

That distinction matters because the prosecutor’s letter referred to criminal charges involving the treatment of two female prisoners at the jail.

The documents establish that Beard witnessed part of the encounter that preceded the women’s detention.

They do not establish that she witnessed every incident underlying the charges.

Police officers faced scheduled March 1986 trial

The February 1986 letter placed the officers’ trial on the calendar for March 31.

Smyth asked Beard to verify her address and telephone number. He also told her that prosecutors would contact her about appearing in court.

He explained that Beard would not need to attend unless the case proceeded to trial.

The documents do not establish whether the trial began on schedule or how the criminal charges ended.

Additional court records would help clarify the outcome.

New documents add another chapter to Becky Beard investigation

Beard disappeared from the Freeport area in early March 1986. She was 22 years old.

Her remains have never been recovered.

The discovery of her sworn affidavit and the prosecutor’s letter adds another documented event to the weeks leading up to her disappearance.

The records show that Beard had reported alleged police misconduct. They also show that prosecutors expected her cooperation in a criminal proceeding.

However, the documents contain no evidence that the officers threatened Beard or played any role in her disappearance.

Investigators have pursued the Beard case for decades. Paul Taylor Jr. received a life sentence in 1995 in connection with her murder.

A recent search near a Brazoria County cemetery failed to locate her remains.

The newly examined court documents raise additional questions about Beard’s activities before she vanished. They do not establish a new motive or identify another suspect.

ChopperRose.com continues examining records and interviewing witnesses in the nearly 41-year-old case.

My new book is now available

My new  book, When Two Worlds Collide During WWII, follows two families on opposite sides of World War II and the remarkable events that eventually brought their lives together in Wisconsin.

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This comes at no additional cost to you.

Becky Beard wanted a life of her own: Witness recalls chilling warning before 1986 disappearance

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Recreation of the clothing Rebecca “Becky” Beard was reportedly wearing when she disappeared in Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.
A recreation of the outfit Rebecca “Becky” Beard was reportedly wearing when she vanished in March 1986. Her family continues searching for answers 40 years later.

FREEPORT, Texas — Weeks before Rebecca “Becky” Beard vanished in March 1986, she allegedly confided in a man who now says she feared two people were following her and intended to kill her.

In an exclusive interview with investigative reporter Tammy Rose, Barry Williams recalled an evening with Beard that ended with an unsettling request. She wanted him to remain outside her home until she safely entered and closed the door.

Williams also described a man he said had become obsessed with Beard and wanted to control her personal life.

The account comes as investigators continue examining leads in the nearly 41-year-old murder case. A recent excavation near a Brazoria County cemetery failed to locate Beard’s remains.

Barry Williams recalls Becky’s warning about two men

Williams said he met Beard through an automobile business where she worked. The two eventually went out for drinks at a Freeport-area nightclub he identified as Chevy’s.

During their evening together, Williams said Beard told him two men had followed her around the area.

She believed they intended to kill her.

Williams recalled that Beard appeared sober and serious when she described her fears.

“She wasn’t drunk talking or nothing like that,” Williams said.

He acknowledged that he did not fully appreciate the warning at the time.

Looking back, he said her expression and the seriousness of her statements have stayed with him.

Williams said he had several businesses in the community and wanted no involvement in a potentially violent confrontation.

Becky allegedly wanted freedom from a controlling man

Williams described another troubling aspect of their conversation.

According to his account, Beard believed the two men worked for a man who had become obsessed with her.

Williams said the man did not want Beard spending time with others or pursuing an independent life.

He described someone who wanted Beard available whenever he demanded her attention.

But Williams said Beard wanted to move forward with her own life.

The interview does not establish the man’s identity or verify Beard’s reported concerns. No evidence presented in the interview connects the unidentified man or the alleged followers to her murder.

Still, Williams’ recollections provide another account of Beard’s personal circumstances before she vanished.

A final ride home and an unusual request

Williams recalled taking Beard home around 1 a.m. after their evening together.

He said he pulled into her driveway and waited as she approached the house.

According to Williams, Beard specifically asked him to remain until she entered and someone closed the door.

Her sister, Carol Mize, participated in the interview and helped Williams revisit details from that evening.

Williams recalled seeing someone open the door and waiting until the women entered the house.

He said he then backed out of the driveway and left.

The request stood out because Beard appeared concerned about reaching the safety of her home.

Williams said he never saw her again.

However, the interview does not establish the precise date of that encounter. Williams’ account places it before Beard’s disappearance, rather than necessarily on the night she vanished.

Witness description raises questions about Becky Beard’s clothing

Recreation of the clothing Rebecca “Becky” Beard was reportedly wearing when she disappeared in Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.
A recreation of the outfit Rebecca “Becky” Beard was reportedly wearing when she vanished in March 1986. Her family continues searching for answers 40 years later.

During an exclusive interview, Barry Williams described the clothing he recalled Rebecca “Becky” Beard wearing when they went out together several weeks before her disappearance.

However, his description caught the attention of Beard’s sister, Carol Mize.

Mize had previously helped investigative reporter Tammy Rose recreate an image of the outfit she remembered her sister wearing the night she disappeared in March 1986.

While listening to Williams describe Beard’s clothing, they noticed that his account appeared to match the outfit Mize associated with the night her sister vanished.

The similarity stood out because Williams said he last saw Beard several weeks before her disappearance.

The apparent discrepancy raises questions about the timing of Williams’ recollection. It remains unclear why his description of an earlier encounter appeared to match the clothing Beard’s sister remembers from the night she disappeared.

Becky Beard vanished after visiting the Excalibur Club

Beard was 22 years old when she disappeared from Freeport on March 1, 1986.

She left behind a young daughter and a family that has spent four decades searching for answers.

Investigators focused on several people and locations during the original investigation.

In 1995, Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty to Beard’s murder and received a life sentence.

Despite the conviction, investigators never recovered her remains.

Taylor has provided information about possible burial locations over the years. Searches have failed to locate Beard.

Williams’ interview does not establish an alternative account of the murder. However, it adds information about what Beard allegedly feared before she disappeared.

New cemetery search ends without finding remains

Excavation crew using heavy equipment to search for possible evidence near a Brazoria County cemetery in the 1986 Rebecca Beard cold case.
Search crews excavate an area near a Brazoria County cemetery after new witness information raised questions about the possible location of Rebecca Beard’s remains.

The Williams interview follows another development in the investigation.

In October 2026, search personnel returned to an area near a Brazoria County cemetery after renewed interest in a witness’s allegations.

The woman claimed she witnessed Beard’s burial in 1986.

Investigators previously questioned her credibility because of inconsistencies in her statements.

A nearby property owner later contacted Rose about activity involving former Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office investigator John Blankenship.

Texas EquuSearch assisted with a search that lasted approximately four hours.

According to a source familiar with the operation, searchers found no remains.

The excavation did not establish the witness’s allegations or resolve the question of Beard’s burial location.

Attorney General allows investigative records to remain withheld

Public records remain another obstacle in the search for answers.

In an August 28, 2026, ruling involving the Beard investigation, the Texas Attorney General allowed Brazoria County to withhold certain investigative information under the Texas Public Information Act.

The ruling required the release of basic information.

A separate ruling dated October 29, 2026, addressed Brazoria County request 26-2686.

The Attorney General again permitted the county to withhold submitted information under Section 552.108(a)(1) of the Texas Government Code while requiring the release of basic information.

Four decades later, questions remain

Williams’ account introduces another perspective on Beard’s life before her disappearance.

His recollections include her reported fear of two men, allegations involving a controlling relationship, and an unusual request for protection when he drove her home.

The interview also raises questions about the timing of their last encounter and the clothing Williams remembers.

Those details require corroboration.

For Beard’s family, the central question remains unchanged.

Where are her remains?

Texas DPS missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

Nearly 41 years after she disappeared, investigators have yet to answer it.

Watch the exclusive interview with Barry Williams.

My new book is now available

My new  book, When Two Worlds Collide During WWII, follows two families on opposite sides of World War II and the remarkable events that eventually brought their lives together in Wisconsin.

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This comes at no additional cost to you.

No body found after four-hour excavation near cemetery in Rebecca Beard murder case

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Nearly 40 years after Rebecca Beard’s murder, a four-hour excavation near a Brazoria County cemetery ended without the discovery of her remains.

The search followed a disturbing claim from a witness who says she watched the 22-year-old woman buried alive in 1986.

While I was in Dubai, a nearby property owner contacted me about repeated visits by retired Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office investigator John Blankenship. The owner also claimed he witnessed suspicious activity in the area around the time Beard disappeared.

Shortly after Blankenship spoke with the property owner, a search took place with assistance from Texas EquuSearch.

According to a source familiar with the operation, nothing was found.

Witness claims she watched Rebecca Beard buried alive

Wooded area near a Brazoria County cemetery where a witness claims Rebecca Beard was buried in 1986.
Area near the cemetery identified as a possible burial site in the Rebecca Beard murder investigation.

In January 2026, a woman came forward with a disturbing account of what she claims happened nearly 40 years earlier.

She alleged that she was present the night Beard was killed in March 1986.

According to the witness, she followed the suspects from the Excalibur Club in Freeport to an area near a cemetery.

There, she claims, she watched them bury Beard alive.

The witness identified a possible burial location near the cemetery.

Her allegations remain unverified. No publicly confirmed physical evidence has established that Beard was buried at that location.

Nevertheless, her account brought renewed attention to an area connected to one of Brazoria County’s longest-running murder mysteries.

District attorney’s investigators questioned witness credibility

Recreation of the clothing Rebecca Beard was reportedly wearing when she disappeared in Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.
Recreation showing Rebecca “Becky” Beard wearing clothing similar to what she reportedly wore the night she disappeared in 1986.

Beard’s family later met with representatives of the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office and investigators to discuss the witness’s allegations.

During a recorded meeting, investigators explained why they did not believe the woman’s account.

They said she had changed parts of her story.

According to investigators, those inconsistencies raised concerns about her credibility.

Despite the witness’s claims, investigators did not consider her account reliable.

However, the question of where Beard’s remains are located remains unanswered.

Property owner contacts reporter about activity near cemetery

Property near a Brazoria County cemetery where a search took place in connection with the 1986 Rebecca Beard murder investigation.
Vehicles and search personnel gather near the cemetery following renewed interest in a possible burial location for Rebecca “Becky” Beard.

While I was in Dubai in October 2026, a property owner near the cemetery contacted me about several visits by retired Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office investigator John Blankenship.

The owner said Blankenship had been looking near the area where a witness claimed Rebecca Beard was buried in 1986.

During our conversation, the owner revealed that he had witnessed suspicious activity in the same area around the time Beard disappeared.

However, he said he initially believed the activity might involve satanic rituals or the burial of animals. He had previously noticed activity in the area that led him to that suspicion.

At the time, he did not believe he had witnessed anything connected to a murder. As a result, he never contacted police.

His suspicions remain unverified, and there is no established evidence connecting satanic activity or animal burials to Beard’s murder.

Shortly after Blankenship spoke with the property owner, a search took place near the cemetery.

Four-hour excavation finds nothing

Texas EquuSearch was brought in to assist with the search near the Brazoria County cemetery.

Photographs show excavation equipment removing soil while search personnel carefully examined the ground by hand.

The search focused on an area near where a witness claimed Rebecca Beard was buried alive in 1986.

The operation lasted approximately four hours.

Despite the extensive digging, a source familiar with the search said nothing was found.

Nearly 40 years after Beard’s murder, her remains are still missing.

The latest search has not resolved the questions surrounding her disappearance or the witness’s allegations.

Rebecca Beard disappeared after visiting Freeport nightclub

Rebecca Beard was just 22 years old when she disappeared in March 1986.

She had visited the Excalibur Club in Freeport before vanishing.

Her disappearance left behind a young daughter and a family desperate for answers.

In 1995, Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty to her murder.

However, Beard’s body was never recovered.

Over the years, investigators examined evidence connected to the Excalibur Club and a residence in Clute.

Former investigators also raised questions about evidence discovered during earlier searches.

Despite those investigative efforts, Beard’s remains have never been located.

Family has searched for answers for four decades

For Beard’s mother, Linda Barnes, and sister, Carol Mize, the search has continued for nearly 40 years.

Both have spent decades trying to learn what happened to Becky and where her remains may be.

The latest excavation did not provide the answers they have sought.

Investigators have questioned the cemetery witness’s credibility. The property owner’s account of suspicious activity also remains unverified.

Still, the recent search shows that possible leads continue to emerge decades after Beard’s murder.

The latest excavation raises an important question.

If investigators did not believe the cemetery witness, what prompted renewed interest in the area?

That question remains unanswered.

For Beard’s family, the ultimate goal has not changed.

They want to find Becky and bring her home.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose continues investigating the Rebecca Beard murder through public records, interviews, and firsthand accounts. Her documentary, Finding Becky Beard, examines evidence, witness statements, and unanswered questions surrounding the 1986 case. The documentary is available on YouTube.

My new book is now available

My new book, When Two Worlds Collide During WWII, follows two families on opposite sides of World War II and the remarkable events that eventually brought their lives together in Wisconsin.

Amazon Affiliate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This comes at no additional cost to you.

Texas AG rules on records in Rebecca Beard investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Texas Attorney General ruling on Rebecca “Becky” Beard investigation records, with Beard’s photo, Texas Capitol and case file graphic.
The Texas Attorney General ruled Aug. 28, 2026, that Brazoria County may withhold investigative information tied to the Rebecca “Becky” Beard case, but must release basic information.

More records in the decades-old Rebecca “Becky” Beard case will remain out of public view for now.

The Texas Attorney General issued a new ruling Aug. 28 allowing Brazoria County to withhold investigative information because authorities say it relates to an ongoing criminal case.

But the ruling comes with an important exception.

Brazoria County must release the basic information.

I have already requested it.

New ruling in the Rebecca Beard records investigation

Rebecca “Becky” Beard holding her daughter before her 1986 disappearance
Rebecca “Becky” Beard pictured with her daughter before Becky disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.

Beard was 22 when she disappeared after leaving the Excalibur Club in Freeport in March 1986.

Her body has never been recovered.

Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in 1995 in connection with her death, but questions surrounding the case have continued for decades.

My investigation has included multiple public information requests seeking Brazoria County records connected to the case.

Those requests have now resulted in another Attorney General ruling.

Brazoria County says the criminal case is ongoing

The Aug. 28 decision provides an important detail about the current status of the investigation.

According to the Attorney General, Brazoria County said a law enforcement agency objected to releasing the information because it “relates to an ongoing criminal case.”

The county argued that releasing the records could interfere with that case.

The Attorney General agreed that the investigative information may be withheld under Section 552.108(a)(1) of the Texas Government Code.

However, the ruling also says the county must release basic information under Section 552.108(c).

Eight Brazoria County records requests included in ruling

The Attorney General combined eight Brazoria County reference numbers in the decision:

26-1859, 26-1865, 26-1874, 26-1933, 26-1947, 26-1950, 26-1991 and 26-2012.

The Attorney General assigned the matter request ID 26-033498.

The Aug. 28 decision is OR2026-038106.

What will Brazoria County release?

That is now the question.

The ruling does not mean Brazoria County must turn over the entire investigative file.

It does mean the county cannot withhold everything.

I have submitted a follow-up request seeking the basic information that the Attorney General says must be released.

Once those records arrive, I will review them and report what they reveal.

After 40 years, the Rebecca Beard case continues to generate new questions — and the state now confirms that authorities still consider the matter tied to an ongoing criminal case.

Read the Attorney General ruling

I have included the Aug. 28, 2026 Texas Attorney General ruling connected to these Brazoria County records requests below.

The ruling, OR2026-038106, says the county may withhold investigative information tied to the ongoing criminal case, but must release basic information.

Texas Attorney General ruling OR2026-038106

Visiting Brazoria County?

For readers traveling to Brazoria County for court proceedings, research or other business, Hotels.com can help compare accommodations throughout the area and along the Texas Gulf Coast.

This post may contain affiliate links. I may earn a commission from qualifying bookings at no additional cost to you.

Tools for digging through public records

Public-records investigations often mean sorting through court filings, police reports, photographs and hundreds of pages of documents. Amazon has portable scanners, external drives, document organizers and other tools that can help keep large research projects organized.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold records tied to 2026 Rebecca Beard investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Rebecca Beard pictured before her disappearance in Texas in 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold Rebecca Beard records

Brazoria County prosecutors are asking the Texas Attorney General for permission to withhold records connected to the renewed investigation into the 1986 disappearance and murder of Rebecca “Becky” Beard.

The August 25 filing also reveals new details about the investigation.

Prosecutors confirmed investigators examined information involving possible additional suspects in Beard’s murder. They also confirmed investigators recently presented their findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The grand jury took no action.

Records request targeted 2026 investigation

I submitted a Texas Public Information Act request on August 10 seeking records related to the 2026 investigation.

The request focused on information provided by Cherie Starr, also known as “Rio.”

I requested interviews, statements, reports, recordings, photographs, maps and investigative notes connected to Starr’s information.

I also sought records concerning any location Starr identified as a possible site for Beard’s remains or other evidence.

The request included records involving a possible search, excavation or dig.

I also requested communications between the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office, Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office, Texas Rangers and other law enforcement agencies.

Importantly, the request did not seek secret grand jury testimony, deliberations, voting records or juror identities.

Brazoria County confirms responsive records exist

The District Attorney’s Office confirmed it holds records that respond to the request.

However, prosecutors want to withhold those records in their entirety.

In its August 25 letter to the Texas Attorney General, the DA’s Office cited the law-enforcement exception under Section 552.108 of the Texas Government Code.

Prosecutors argue that Beard’s murder investigation remains open because her body has never been recovered.

They contend releasing the requested records could interfere with that continuing investigation.

Filing reveals investigation of possible additional suspects

The filing provides an important glimpse into what happened during the renewed investigation.

Prosecutors wrote that their office had recently investigated “other possible actors/defendants” in Beard’s murder.

According to the filing, investigators presented those findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The DA’s Office said the grand jury took no action because investigators did not develop other credible suspects.

That disclosure provides new information about the scope of the 2026 investigation.

It shows investigators did more than simply review an old case file. They examined whether other people may have played a role in Beard’s murder and brought those findings before a grand jury.

Paul Taylor was convicted, but Becky remains missing

John Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in 1995 to murdering Beard.

Beard was 22 when she disappeared in March 1986.

Her body has never been recovered.

The DA’s filing cites that fact as one reason the murder investigation remains open. Prosecutors argue law enforcement must remain able to investigate credible new leads if they emerge.

Prosecutors also claim attorney work-product protection

The District Attorney’s Office makes another argument for withholding the records.

Prosecutors say the requested investigative notes and materials contain attorney work product.

According to the filing, a DA investigator prepared the records while working at the direction of an appointed special prosecutor.

The DA argues the documents contain investigative strategy, mental impressions and legal reasoning connected to potential criminal litigation.

For those reasons, prosecutors asked the Attorney General to allow them to withhold all of the responsive records.

The Attorney General will decide

The August 25 filing is not a final ruling on my records request.

It is Brazoria County’s argument for why the records should remain confidential.

The Texas Attorney General’s Office will now review the arguments and determine whether state law allows Brazoria County to withhold the requested material.

The decision could allow the county to withhold the records, require the release of some information, or require additional responsive material to be released.

I will continue following the records dispute and the investigation into what happened to Rebecca Beard.

The public records request and Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office filing to the Texas Attorney General are attached below.

Planning a trip to Brazoria County?

If you are traveling to Brazoria County to follow developments in the Rebecca Beard case, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Angleton, Lake Jackson, Freeport or the surrounding area, depending on your plans.

I may earn a commission from qualifying Hotels.com bookings made through my link, at no additional cost to you.

What to bring for a long reporting day

Court records, interviews and long hours on the road can mean a lot of waiting. A portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and lightweight bag can make the day easier. You can find travel gear and everyday reporting essentials on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Buc-ee’s Co-Founder’s Son Fights Felony Case as New Court Hearing Nears

Mitchell Wasek mugshot in Travis County criminal case
Mitchell Wasek faces felony charges in Travis County as his defense challenges evidence and seeks dismissal of the indictment.

Buc-ee’s Co-Founder’s Son Fights Felony Case as New Court Hearing Nears

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

The criminal case against the son of a Buc-ee’s co-founder is heading back to court.

Mitchell Wasek now wants a judge to suppress evidence in his felony child pornography case. His defense also wants the indictment dismissed.

Court records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose show a pretrial hearing set for August 18, 2026, at 1:15 p.m. in Travis County’s 167th District Court.

The latest filings reveal a significant new legal fight.

Mitchell Wasek Case Update: Defense Challenges Evidence

Wasek faces a felony charge of possession of child pornography in Travis County.

The current court docket lists the offense as a second-degree felony.

His attorney filed a motion to suppress on April 14, 2026.

The docket describes the filing as a:

“Motion to suppress evidence obtained by theft and breach of computer security.”

The wording raises a major question.

What evidence does the defense want thrown out, and how was it obtained?

The court docket does not answer that question by itself.

The actual motion could provide those details.

Defense Also Wants Indictment Dismissed

Another filing could have an even bigger impact on the case.

On June 2, 2026, Wasek’s defense filed a motion asking the court to dismiss the indictment.

The stated reason:

An expired statute of limitations.

The judge has not dismissed the case based on the docket reviewed for this report.

The State also requested several subpoenas that same day.

One went to Detective Keith McManus.

Court records show that subpoena was executed on June 5.

Pretrial Hearing Set for August 18

The next scheduled hearing could determine what happens with those defense challenges.

The Travis County Odyssey Portal lists a:

Pretrial Hearing
August 18, 2026
1:15 p.m.
167th District Court

The hearing could bring new arguments over the evidence and the defense request to dismiss the indictment.

It could also provide the clearest update yet on where the case stands.

Wasek Also Faces 21 Invasive Recording Counts

Mitchell Wasek booking photo in Travis County criminal case
Mitchell Wasek faces felony charges in Travis County as his defense seeks to suppress evidence and dismiss the indictment.

The child pornography case came after an earlier investigation involving allegations of secret recordings.

The Travis County District Attorney’s Office announced in May 2024 that a grand jury returned six indictments against Wasek.

Those indictments contained 21 counts of invasive visual recording involving 13 alleged victims.

Prosecutors said the alleged recordings occurred over roughly two years in Travis County.

Those cases also remain listed in Travis County court records.

Wasek has not been convicted of the allegations discussed in this report. He remains presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court.

Why the Buc-ee’s Name Draws Attention

Arch Aplin timeline graphic about his contact with investigators in the Rebecca Beard case.
Arch Aplin remained in contact with investigators as questions continued about the Rebecca Beard case timeline.

Mitchell Wasek is the son of Buc-ee’s co-founder Don Wasek.

That connection has pushed the criminal case into headlines across Texas.

It also creates an unusual overlap with another story I have covered extensively.

Not because the criminal cases have anything to do with each other.

They do not.

The connection is the Buc-ee’s name.

Related Coverage: Buc-ee’s Founder Arch “Beaver” Aplin and the Rebecca Beard Investigation

Arch Aplin answers a question about Rebecca Beard during the grand opening of Arizona’s first Buc-ee’s location in Goodyear, Arizona.

My ongoing investigation into the 1986 disappearance and murder of Rebecca “Becky” Beard has also involved a Buc-ee’s founder.

Arch “Beaver” Aplin III knew Becky before she disappeared.

Historical police records reviewed during my investigation document detectives interviewing Aplin after Becky vanished.

I later traveled to Arizona and questioned Aplin directly during the opening of a Buc-ee’s location there.

Aplin briefly addressed Becky’s case and expressed sympathy for her family.

My reporting has also examined conflicting information in historical records about when Aplin last saw Becky and who investigators reported seeing at the Excalibur Club around the time of her disappearance.

Again, there is no known connection between Mitchell Wasek’s criminal case and Rebecca Beard’s murder case.

The common thread is that both stories involve members of the families behind one of Texas’ most recognizable brands.

Related Rebecca Beard Coverage

Exclusive: Arch Aplin Responds to Rebecca Beard Question

I traveled to Arizona to ask Buc-ee’s founder Arch “Beaver” Aplin about Rebecca Beard and references to him in historical investigative records.

Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports Show How the Investigation Evolved

The records document early witness interviews and conflicting accounts surrounding Becky’s final hours.

Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed During the Investigation

The investigation examines how witness accounts and the case timeline evolved over time.

What Happens Next?

The August 18 pretrial hearing could become an important turning point.

The defense wants evidence suppressed.

It also wants the indictment dismissed.

Prosecutors are preparing witnesses.

Now a judge will have to address the legal fight playing out behind the allegations.

I will continue reviewing the court records and follow what happens next.

All charges are allegations. Mitchell Wasek is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.

Amazon

Following the Rebecca Beard investigation? Browse true-crime books and investigative reporting essentials on Amazon while you catch up on the case.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Hotels.com

Heading to Galveston or the Texas Gulf Coast? Compare hotels, locations and current rates through Hotels.com before you book.

I may earn a commission from eligible http://Hotels.com bookings at no additional cost to you.

Rebecca Beard Case: Why I’m Releasing the Rio Witness Account

Nearly 40 years after Rebecca “Becky” Beard disappeared from Freeport, Texas, her family is still searching for the answer that matters most.

Where is Becky?

Rebecca Becky Beard, whose 1986 disappearance remains the focus of an ongoing search for answers
Rebecca “Becky” Beard disappeared in March 1986. Her family continues searching for information that could help locate her remains.

Now, her family wants the public to hear information from a woman known as “Rio.” Her account includes disturbing claims about what may have happened to Becky and where someone may have taken her remains.

However, an important warning comes with Rio’s story.

According to Becky’s family, prosecutors recently presented information involving Rio to a Brazoria County grand jury. Family members say the grand jury took no action.

Becky’s family also says the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office told them investigators did not consider Rio a credible witness.

I am not presenting Rio’s statements as established facts.

Still, Becky’s family believes parts of her account could contain accurate information. They hope releasing these details reaches someone who knows what happened or where to find Becky.

Who Was Rebecca “Becky” Beard?

Rebecca “Becky” Beard holding her daughter before her 1986 disappearance
Rebecca “Becky” Beard pictured with her daughter before Becky disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.

Becky Beard was 22 years old when she disappeared after spending the night at the Excalibur Club in Freeport on March 1, 1986.

She never came home.

Investigators have never recovered her body.

Years later, Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in connection with Becky’s death. Despite that conviction, her family has spent decades trying to find her remains.

That search continues today.

Who Is the Witness Known as Rio?

Cherie “Rio” Starr standing near Tammy Rose’s Jeep during the Rebecca Beard investigation
Cherie “Rio” Starr stands near Tammy Rose’s Jeep during an interview connected to the Rebecca “Becky” Beard investigation.

During my investigation, I tracked down Cherie “Rio” Starr, a woman who has provided an account of events surrounding Becky’s disappearance.

Rio made several specific and disturbing claims. Some involve what allegedly happened to Becky’s body and where people may have taken her remains.

Investigators have not established those claims as fact.

According to Becky’s family, the district attorney told them authorities did not find Rio credible.

Still, one reason the family has not completely dismissed her story is that some details appear to connect with information they already knew about Becky’s life before she disappeared.

The Galveston Weekend in Becky’s Planner

Rebecca “Becky” Beard’s personal planner documenting events before her March 1986 disappearance
Becky Beard’s personal planner contains entries documenting events and trips in the weeks before her March 1986 disappearance.

One detail deserves closer examination.

Becky kept a planner. An entry documents a weekend trip to Galveston from February 14 through February 16, 1986, just weeks before she disappeared.

Becky was dating Beaver Aplin at the time.

Rio described an incident involving Aplin during which she said he got down on his knees with a dozen roses, jewelry and bottles.

That detail caught the family’s attention because Becky’s mother, Linda Barnes, already knew about Becky’s Galveston weekend.

Linda recalled Becky returning from the trip and throwing away roses.

Her mother asked her why she was throwing them away.

According to Linda, Becky did not want to talk about it.

That does not prove Rio’s account.

It does, however, raise a question for the family: How much of Rio’s story, if any, could be independently verified?

Becky’s planner documents the Galveston weekend. Her mother remembers the roses. Rio later provided an account involving roses and the man Becky was dating.

The family believes those details are worth examining rather than ignoring.

Family Says Evidence Was Presented to a Grand Jury

Remote dirt road leading through the Brazoria National Wildlife Refuge, an area referenced in witness accounts and past searches connected to the Rebecca Beard case.
A remote dirt road in the Brazoria National Wildlife Refuge near the area where witness Cherie Lynette “Rio” Starr claims Rebecca “Becky” Beard was buried.

Becky’s family says prosecutors recently presented evidence involving Rio to a Brazoria County grand jury.

According to family members, the grand jury took no action.

They also say the district attorney told them authorities did not consider Rio a credible witness.

Those details matter.

Rio’s claims are not established facts.

I am not presenting them as proof of what happened to Becky.

Instead, the family wants to know whether someone else can independently confirm any part of her account.

Why Release Rio’s Story?

There is a simple reason.

Becky still has not been found.

Almost four decades have passed since she disappeared. People who were young adults in 1986 are now much older. Some witnesses have died. Properties have changed. Memories have faded.

That makes information from people who were there increasingly important.

The family understands authorities have questioned Rio’s credibility. They also understand that a grand jury took no action after hearing information related to her account, according to what family members say they were told.

Still, they cannot get past the possibility that one detail could be true even if other parts of a witness’s story are not.

The Galveston weekend is one reason they continue asking questions.

Someone May Remember Something

Texas DPS missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared from Freeport, Texas, in March 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

Maybe you were at the Excalibur Club.

Maybe you knew Becky, Paul Taylor Jr., Beaver Aplin or Rio.

Maybe you remember the Galveston weekend in February 1986.

Maybe you heard a conversation afterward.

Or perhaps you know something about a location connected to the case.

The family isn’t asking people to speculate. They are looking for firsthand information that can be independently checked.

If you know something, even if it seemed insignificant at the time, consider coming forward.

After nearly 40 years, Becky’s family isn’t looking for rumors.

They are looking for Becky.

Carol Mize, sister of Rebecca “Becky” Beard, points out areas she has personally searched while continuing efforts to find her sister.
Carol Mize shows areas she has searched while continuing to look for answers in the 1986 disappearance of her sister, Rebecca “Becky” Beard.

This article is part of my continuing independent investigation into the disappearance and death of Rebecca “Becky” Beard. Statements attributed to witnesses represent their accounts unless independently corroborated. The inclusion of any person’s name does not imply criminal conduct or involvement in Becky’s death.

Related Reading

Amazon: For readers interested in investigative reporting and unresolved cases, browse true-crime and missing-person books on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Visiting Galveston?

Becky’s story has deep connections to Galveston and Brazoria counties. If you’re planning a trip to Galveston, you can compare hotels and accommodations Hotels.com

Paul Taylor Claimed Texas Unfairly Kept Him Behind Bars in 2007 Parole Fight

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. prison mugshot
Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995 and received a life sentence.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. filed a writ of habeas corpus in 2007 after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles denied him release.

Taylor challenged his parole denial, not his conviction

The filing did not challenge his murder conviction.

Instead, Taylor argued that the parole board unfairly relied on his crime and past conduct. He claimed the board ignored his prison record, education and other accomplishments.

Taylor pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995. A judge sentenced him to life in prison.

Taylor said the filing was about parole

The writ form asked whether Taylor had previously challenged his conviction.

Taylor marked “no.”

He also wrote:

“Not challenging the conviction. This is a parole related issue.”

That statement is important. This filing did not claim that Taylor was innocent. It also did not ask the court to overturn his guilty plea.

Taylor focused his arguments on the parole process.

Paul Taylor 2007 writ stating he was not challenging his murder conviction
In his 2007 writ application, Paul Taylor wrote that he was not challenging his conviction and described the matter as a parole-related issue.

The writ listed his conviction and sentence

The application identified Taylor’s criminal case as Cause No. 27,636 in the 23rd Judicial District Court of Brazoria County.

The document listed:

Judgment date: May 30, 1995
Offense: Murder
Plea: Guilty
Sentence: Life
Punishment assessed by: Judge

Taylor also stated that he did not have a jury trial. He indicated that he did not appeal the judgment.

Paul Taylor writ listing 1995 murder conviction and life sentence
Taylor’s writ application lists his 1995 guilty plea to murder and his life sentence.

Taylor had been eligible for parole since 1997

Taylor wrote that he had been eligible for parole since February 2, 1997.

According to his filing, the parole board denied him release again on January 12, 2007. The board then gave him a three-year setoff before his next review.

Taylor said the board had denied him parole for about 13 years, including the period between his eligibility date and his next review.

The filing quotes the board’s reason for denial. It referred to the violent nature of the offense, the use of a weapon and a threat to public safety.

The quoted language also stated that the offense showed brutality, violence or the selection of a vulnerable victim.

Taylor argued that these factors came from the crime itself. He said he could never change the past.

Paul Taylor’s 2007 writ memorandum outlining his parole history and denial
Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor raised five arguments

1. The parole board abused its discretion

Taylor claimed the board denied parole for the same conduct that led to his conviction and sentence.

He argued that the board created an “impossible obstacle” because he could not change the crime.

Taylor also said the board failed to give enough weight to his prison accomplishments.

2. The parole process violated due process

Taylor argued that the board did not explain how it decided he remained a future threat.

He claimed the board should have told him what method it used to assess that risk.

Taylor suggested that he could have submitted more information if he had known what evidence the board wanted.

3. The process violated equal protection

Taylor claimed the board released other people with similar or worse criminal records.

He argued that the board treated him differently without a valid reason.

The filing does not include the names or full records of those other prisoners in the pages reviewed.

4. Repeated parole denials amounted to cruel punishment

Taylor argued that repeated denials violated the Eighth Amendment.

He claimed the board continued to deny him for the same unchangeable reasons.

He also accused the board of ignoring his conduct while incarcerated.

5. A Texas life sentence carried an expectation of parole

Taylor argued that Texas did not have a life-without-parole sentence for his case.

Therefore, he claimed that a life sentence carried an expectation of eventual release.

For the first four claims, Taylor asked for a new parole hearing.

However, under his fifth claim, he argued that parole should become mandatory.

These were Taylor’s legal arguments. The filing does not show that a court accepted them.

Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor highlighted his prison record

Taylor wrote that he earned a bachelor’s degree from Sam Houston State University while incarcerated.

He also said he had never received a disciplinary infraction.

In addition, Taylor said he worked in a prison craft shop. He claimed that the work helped him support himself and assist his family.

However, the filing only reflects Taylor’s account. It does not independently verify every statement about his prison history.

What this document does not say

The writ does not claim that Taylor was innocent.

It does not challenge his guilty plea or murder conviction.

The filing also does not present new evidence about Rebecca “Becky” Beard’s disappearance or the location of her remains.

Instead, Taylor challenged the parole board’s review process.

Therefore, this document focuses on parole. It does not attempt to overturn the murder conviction.

Read the full writ and court decision

The complete 2007 filing appears below, along with the court document showing the outcome.

Taylor challenged the parole process, not his murder conviction. However, the court denied his request for relief

Related coverage

Read Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed for a closer look at how accounts in the case evolved over time.

You can also read Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports to review what investigators documented during the first days of the investigation.

Tools for reviewing public records

Court records and police files can contain hundreds of pages. A portable document scanner can make it easier to save, organize and review records while working away from home.

White Canon portable document scanner used to scan court records and public documents

A digital voice recorder can also help reporters preserve interviews, notes and important details while researching a case.

PLAUD AI digital voice recorder shown with its mobile transcription app

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Texas Public Information Act Request: Dash Camera Released, Body Camera Pending

Raw dash camera image released through a Texas Public Information Act request showing a Brazoria County sheriff’s deputy speaking with individuals during a May 11, 2026 encounter related to the Rebecca Beard investigation.
Screenshot from the dash camera video released by Brazoria County in response to a Texas Public Information Act request. The recording contains no audio. The requested body camera video remains pending while the Texas Attorney General reviews whether it may be withheld.

Texas Public Information Act Request Leads to Dash Camera Release While Body Camera Remains Under Review

The Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney’s Office released the dash camera recording in response to my Texas Public Information Act request. The responding deputy’s body camera recording remains under review by the Texas Attorney General.

Page one of the Brazoria County Criminal District Attorney’s Office response confirming my public information request, payment, and the release of the dash camera recording while the requested body camera recording remains under review by the Texas Attorney General.

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Transparency matters. That is why I filed a Texas Public Information Act request after an encounter with a woman connected to the Rebecca Beard investigation.

The request resulted in sheriff’s reports, dispatch records, redacted documents, and dash camera video. However, one important record remains unavailable. The Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office has asked the Texas Attorney General to decide whether the responding deputy’s body camera can be withheld.

This article explains what happened, what the released records show, and why I continue to seek the body camera recording.

Why I Went to the Property

As an investigative reporter, I believe everyone deserves an opportunity to comment before publication.

I went to Cherie “Rio” Starr’s residence to request an interview about statements she has made regarding the Rebecca Beard investigation.

She declined to comment.

According to the incident report, Starr told deputies she was a protected witness and wanted to know how I obtained her personal information.

The report also states she believed someone had sent me to her property.

I Returned to My Jeep

After Starr declined to comment, I walked back to my Jeep because I intended to leave.

According to the sheriff’s report, I told deputies that Starr and Kenneth Cadenhead prevented me from leaving the property.

The dashcam video released by Brazoria County contains no audio. Therefore, it cannot capture the conversations that occurred during the encounter.

However, the video does show Starr standing near my driver’s side while Cadenhead remained behind my Jeep during part of the incident.

According to my recollection, both were asking me to identify my confidential source.

I declined.

Why I Would Not Reveal My Source

The incident report notes that I refused to identify my source.

That decision was intentional.

Protecting confidential sources is a long-standing practice in investigative journalism. Sources often provide information only because they trust reporters to keep their identities confidential.

My purpose that day was to request an interview. It was not to disclose who provided information for my reporting.

A Detail Not Included in the Report

One part of the encounter is not reflected in the written incident report.

According to my recollection, while standing near my driver’s side door, Starr told me she would agree to an interview “when this is all over.”

She also indicated that the Rebecca Beard investigation remained an active case that had never been closed.

Because the released dashcam has no audio, viewers cannot hear that conversation.

For that reason, I continue to seek release of the responding deputy’s body camera recording.

What the Public Records Show

My Texas Public Information Act request produced several records, including:

Sheriff’s incident reports
Dispatch and CAD records
Dashcam video
Redacted documents

The only major record that has not been released is the deputy’s body camera.

The District Attorney’s Office has asked the Texas Attorney General to determine whether that recording may be withheld under the Texas Public Information Act.

Receiving a request for an Attorney General ruling does not automatically mean the recording will never be released. The Attorney General will determine whether any exceptions to disclosure apply under Texas law.

How I Obtained the Records

Many people ask how to request police records in Texas.

In my case, I submitted a Texas Public Information Act request to Brazoria County.

After receiving a cost estimate, I paid the required fee at the Brazoria County Treasurer’s Office inside the courthouse.

The courthouse is beautiful, although locating the correct office can be a little confusing for first-time visitors.

After payment was processed, I went to the District Attorney’s Office to pick up the responsive records.

Everyone I dealt with during the process was courteous and helpful.

I also received more records than I expected.

Part Two Is Coming Soon

In Part Two, I will explain the Texas Public Information Act process step by step.

I will also show:

How to submit an open records request
Where to pay the required fees
How to pick up responsive records
Why some records are released immediately while others require a ruling from the Texas Attorney General

Understanding the process can help anyone request public records in Texas.

⸻

Related Investigations

⸻

Equipment I Use

For field reporting and investigative journalism, I rely on equipment that performs well in demanding conditions.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. This comes at no additional cost to you.

Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed During the Investigation

Historic photograph of Paul Taylor’s former Clute home featured in Part 3 of the Rebecca Beard investigation series, examining how witness statements and investigative timelines evolved during the case.
Paul Taylor’s former Clute residence, where investigators later focused much of the Rebecca Beard investigation as witness statements and the case timeline evolved over time.

Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed During the Investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

As I continued reviewing the original investigative file in the Rebecca Beard case, one pattern became impossible to ignore.

The earliest reports tell a very different story than the theory prosecutors ultimately presented years later.

During the first weeks of the investigation, detectives documented witnesses who said they did not know Paul Taylor or had never heard Becky mention him. At the same time, investigators pursued reports that Becky was seen after leaving the Excalibur Club, including at a Surfside beach party and an after-party.

Months later, investigators had assembled a very different timeline.

The records show how that evolution occurred.

⸻

Early Witnesses Did Not Connect Becky to Paul Taylor

March 1986 police report documenting early witness interviews in the Rebecca Beard investigation, including statements from people who told investigators they did not know Paul Taylor or had never heard Becky mention him.
A March 1986 police report documents early witness interviews in the Rebecca Beard investigation. Several witnesses told detectives they did not know Paul Taylor or had never heard Becky mention him, reflecting one of the investigation’s earliest lines of inquiry.

One of the strongest themes in the March 1986 reports is how often investigators documented witnesses saying they had no connection between Becky Beard and Paul Taylor.

Among those interviewed were:

Beaver Aplin, who investigators noted never mentioned Paul Taylor, and Taylor had never mentioned Becky.


Eric Timaeus, Becky’s friend, who said he did not know Paul Taylor and never recalled Becky mentioning his name.


Misty Wiley, who said she had never heard of Paul Taylor and Becky never mentioned him.


Linda Barnes (identified in some records as Linda Limke), who said she had never heard Becky mention Paul Taylor.


Mrs. Buchanan, who also said she did not know Taylor.

At this point in the investigation, detectives had not yet developed the theory that Paul Taylor was the last person with Becky.

⸻

Several Witnesses Reported Becky Alive After Leaving Excalibur

The earliest reports also show investigators pursuing multiple leads suggesting Becky continued socializing after leaving the Excalibur Club in Freeport.

Paula’s Surfside Account

One witness, Paula, told investigators she saw Becky at a Surfside beach party during the morning hours after she disappeared.

That account suggested Becky may have left the club and traveled elsewhere.

Jack Hamilton’s Statement

April 28, 1986 police report documenting witness interviews in the Rebecca Beard investigation, including statements from Jack Hamilton and dancer Mel Scroggins regarding Becky’s movements after leaving the Excalibur Club.
An April 28, 1986 police report documents interviews with Jack Hamilton and dancer Mel Scroggins. Both described seeing Becky Beard after she left the Excalibur Club, adding to the early investigative timeline detectives were working to reconstruct.

On April 28, 1986, Jack Hamilton told investigators he saw Becky outside the Excalibur Club.

Hamilton said:

Becky appeared happy.
She was not intoxicated.
The two greeted each other and hugged.
He saw an unidentified white male walk out beside Becky who appeared to be with her.
He never saw Becky get into a vehicle.

Importantly, Hamilton did not identify the man as Paul Taylor.

Hamilton also told investigators he knew Matt Cone, a longtime friend.

Dancer Reported Seeing Becky at an After-Party

March 13, 1986 police report documenting witness information in the Rebecca Beard investigation, including dancer Mel Scroggins’ account of seeing Becky at Excalibur and later at an after-party.
A March 13, 1986 police report documents dancer Mel Scroggins’ statement that he saw Becky Beard at the Excalibur Club and later at an after-party around 1:00 a.m. The report also notes Beaver Aplin contacted investigators about posting a reward.

Another witness, Mel Scroggins, also described seeing Becky after she left Excalibur.

Scroggins told investigators he saw Becky around 12:30 a.m. at Excalibur before performing his dance routine.

He then reported seeing Becky again around 1:00 a.m. at an after-party.

According to Scroggins, Becky was accompanied by:

a white male,
approximately 5’11” to 6’0”,
slim build,
no glasses,
associated with a possible silver or gold Chevrolet.

Again, the man was not identified as Paul Taylor.

Scroggins said he never saw Becky after that.

When viewed together, these reports show detectives were actively investigating the possibility that Becky continued on to other locations after leaving Excalibur.

⸻

John Cone’s Statement Became a Turning Point

Police report documenting John Cone’s statement in the Rebecca Beard investigation. The statement describes what Cone said Paul Taylor told him and also details Cone’s own observations after entering Taylor’s home, including that the mattress and carpet were missing.
Police records show John Cone told investigators that Paul Taylor admitted Becky Beard died at his home. Cone also stated he personally entered the house, observed the mattress and carpet were missing, and reported those observations to Sheriff Joe King while offering a key to the residence.

Another major development came from John Cone.

Cone told investigators Paul Taylor admitted Becky died inside his Clute home after a gun discharged during an encounter.

However, Cone’s statement did not stop with the alleged confession.

He told investigators he personally:

entered Taylor’s home,
observed the mattress missing,
observed the carpet missing,
reported those observations to Sheriff Joe King, and
even offered the sheriff a key to the residence.

Those observations were based on what Cone said he personally witnessed, not simply what Taylor allegedly told him.

⸻

Matt Cone Appears to Corroborate Parts of the Story

Composite police report pages from the Rebecca Beard investigation. The documents include witness statements from Tina, Willie Garcia, and references to Matt Cone, who is identified as John Cone’s brother, as investigators documented interviews and leads in April 1986.
April 16, 1986 police records include statements from Tina and Excalibur Club manager Willie Garcia. The documents also reference Matt Cone, John Cone’s brother, whose name appears multiple times in the investigation as detectives continued interviewing witnesses and following leads.

The records also repeatedly reference Matt Cone.

John Cone told investigators he discussed the situation with his brother, Matt Cone, and Corky Parker before going to Taylor’s house.

Jack Hamilton also identified Matt Cone as someone he knew.

If Matt Cone independently observed the missing mattress and carpet, that would provide additional corroboration of John’s observations.

Whether Matt entered the home himself or relied on John’s account remains an important question raised by the records.

⸻

Beaver Aplin Continued Contacting Investigators

Police records show Beaver Aplin remained in regular contact with investigators after Rebecca Beard disappeared. The reports document Aplin requesting case updates, asking about posting a reward, and continuing to communicate with detectives as the investigation progressed.

Another interesting pattern involves Beaver Aplin.

The investigative file documents that:

Beaver was interviewed during the early stages of the case.
Investigators noted he did not connect Becky to Paul Taylor.
He later left messages for investigators.
Months later, he again contacted police requesting an update on Becky’s case.

Those records do not suggest wrongdoing.

However, they do show Beaver remained engaged with investigators long after Becky disappeared.

⸻

The Investigation Evolved

As the investigation continued, the documentary record began shifting.

Later reports increasingly connected Becky to Paul Taylor.

Among them were statements from:

Willie Garcia,
Kevin King,
John Cone,
and other witnesses who later appeared on the prosecution’s witness list.

That witness list outlined how prosecutors intended to build their case, including testimony that Becky left with Taylor, statements that Taylor admitted killing her, and witnesses describing evidence allegedly observed inside Taylor’s home.

That later theory differs considerably from many of the earliest reports documenting possible Surfside sightings, after-party sightings, and witnesses who initially said they did not know Paul Taylor.

⸻

Questions That Remain

Reading these records chronologically reveals an investigation that changed significantly over time.

The documents show detectives initially pursued multiple leads, including reports that Becky was seen after leaving Excalibur and accounts from witnesses who did not connect her to Paul Taylor.

As additional interviews were conducted, investigators documented statements that increasingly focused on Taylor and ultimately formed the basis of the prosecution’s case.

The records do not fully explain how every conflicting witness account was evaluated before investigators settled on the final timeline presented in court.

Nearly four decades later, those documents continue to provide important insight into how the Rebecca Beard investigation developed—and why reviewing the original records remains essential.

⸻

Read More in This Series

Part 1: Rebecca Beard: John Cone’s Confession and the Early Investigation

Part 2: Rebecca Beard: Early Police Reports Reveal the First Days of the Investigation

https://www.chopperrose.com/2026/07/20/rebecca-beard-part-2-early-police-reports-reveal-the-first-days-of-the-investigation

⸻

Recommended Resources

If you’re researching cold cases or organizing public records, these are tools I use during investigations.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Your support helps fund my investigative reporting and allows me to continue researching and publishing stories like this one.