Tag Archives: murder conviction

Former Deputy Kent McGowen Responds to Susan White 911 Call

Watch the Full Investigation

Former Deputy Kent McGowen Responds to Susan White 911 Call, Allegations Before 1992 Shooting

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

More than three decades after the fatal shooting of Susan White, former Harris County Sheriff’s Office Deputy Kent McGowen is publicly responding to allegations White made before the shooting, including claims she voiced during calls to 911.

In an exclusive interview with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose, McGowen discussed the August 25, 1992 shooting, disputed allegations that he sexually harassed White, addressed why she repeatedly mentioned his name and shared courtroom demonstration photographs that he says support his version of events.

The interview pairs portions of White’s 911 call with McGowen’s current account, allowing readers to compare both versions of events.

Viewer Note: This story contains discussion of a fatal officer-involved shooting and includes portions of a 911 call that some readers may find disturbing.

Kent McGowen in his U.S. Air Force dress uniform before beginning his law enforcement career.
Before entering law enforcement, Kent McGowen served in the U.S. Air Force. He later worked as a Houston police officer and Harris County deputy before the Aug. 25, 1992, fatal shooting of Susan White that led to two criminal trials and his eventual conviction.

Background Before the Case

Before beginning his law enforcement career, Kent McGowen served in the United States Air Force.

After leaving the military, he joined the Houston Police Department before later serving with the Harris County Sheriff’s Office. During his career, he received commendations and officer recognition awards.

Before beginning his law enforcement career, Kent McGowen served in the United States Air Force.

After leaving the military, he joined the Houston Police Department before later serving with the Harris County Sheriff’s Office. During his career, he received commendations and officer recognition awards.

McGowen’s career changed forever on August 25, 1992, when deputies serving a felony warrant fatally shot Susan White at her home.

A jury convicted McGowen of murder in his first trial. An appellate court later overturned that conviction. A second jury convicted him in 2002. He ultimately served approximately 19 years in prison before his release in 2021.

Book About the Case

Journalist Jerry Langton later examined the case in Reasonable Doubts: How Rumor and Innuendo Convicted Deputy Kent McGowen of Murder. The book explores the investigation, the two trials and McGowen’s conviction.

Read the book on Amazon: 

Additional Case Materials

In addition to the trial record, Kent McGowen has provided investigative records and expert reports that he says support his account of the shooting.

Among the records McGowen provided is a forensic review by consulting forensic scientist Dr. Edward E. Hueske.

Hueske prepared the review during McGowen’s legal proceedings.

McGowen also provided a statement he wrote at the request of Harris County Assistant District Attorney Baldwin Chin, then chief of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office Post Conviction Integrity Review Unit, during the office’s review of his case in 2011–2012.

According to McGowen, the statement summarizes the case and his account of events as they existed during the Harris County District Attorney’s Office Post Conviction Integrity Review in 2011-2012.

Texas Department of Criminal Justice offender identification card for Joseph Kent McGowen during his incarceration.
After two criminal trials stemming from the Aug. 25, 1992, fatal shooting of Susan White, Kent McGowen was ultimately convicted of murder. He served approximately 19 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice before his release in 2021.

Watch the Full Investigation

The television report below includes exclusive interview excerpts with Kent McGowen, courtroom demonstration photographs and additional background on the Susan White case.

Listen to Susan White’s 911 Call

The audio below captures one of Susan White’s calls to 911 before deputies entered her home.

During the recording, White repeatedly asks dispatchers for help and expresses fear as deputies remain outside the residence.

The call contains emotional language and may be disturbing to some listeners.

Susan White’s 911 Call Before Deputies Entered The Home

The video and audio above include one of Susan White’s 911 calls before deputies entered the home.

During the recording, White repeatedly asks dispatchers for help while describing people outside her home.

The recording contains emotional language that some listeners may find disturbing.

McGowen Strongly Disputes White’s Allegations

Vintage photograph of Kent McGowen in a Waller County Sheriff’s Office uniform standing beside a marked patrol vehicle while serving with the department before joining the Houston Police Department.
Kent McGowen while serving with the Waller County Sheriff’s Office at age 19, before joining the Houston Police Department pending completion of his background investigation.

During his interview with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose, McGowen firmly denied White’s allegations.

According to McGowen, he never sexually harassed White, never stalked her and never had the repeated contacts she described.

“I had never pulled her over. I’d never spoken to her,” McGowen said during the interview.

McGowen believes White confused him with another deputy who previously worked in the area.

He told Tammy Rose that investigators later uncovered witness statements he believes support that explanation.

According to McGowen, White mistakenly identified him after seeing him during the arrest of her son and others connected to a burglary investigation.

Why Did White Know McGowen’s Name?

Portrait of Susan White, whose repeated references to former Harris County Precinct 4 Deputy Kent McGowen before the 1992 shooting are discussed in this section of the investigation.
Susan White. Investigators and former Deputy Kent McGowen have offered differing explanations for why White repeatedly mentioned his name before the August 25, 1992, shooting.

One of the questions surrounding the case is why White repeatedly mentioned McGowen by name before the shooting.

McGowen offered his explanation during the interview.

He said White arrived at the scene after deputies arrested her son and began asking officers who “McGowen” was.

According to McGowen, several deputies pointed in different directions while trying to identify him, causing White to approach multiple officers before eventually speaking with him.

McGowen believes that encounter explains why she later knew his name.

He disputes claims that he had an ongoing personal conflict with White before the shooting.

McGowen Says White Mistook Him for Another Deputy

McGowen also challenged allegations that he repeatedly stopped or harassed White before the shooting.

Instead, he told Tammy Rose that another deputy had previous contact with White and believes she mistakenly associated him with those earlier encounters.

McGowen said he never received phone calls from White, never contacted her outside official duties and never had a personal relationship with her.

He also pointed to subpoenaed telephone records that he says failed to show communication between them.

Those statements reflect McGowen’s account. Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose continues reviewing court records, witness statements and other documents connected to the case.

McGowen’s Description of White’s Condition

McGowen also discussed White’s condition while deputies attempted to serve the warrant.

According to McGowen, White appeared to be slurring her speech as deputies tried to communicate with her through the front door.

He told Tammy Rose he believed White was impaired and described her behavior as confused and erratic.

McGowen said those observations influenced how he interpreted her actions that morning.

His statements represent his account of the encounter and should not be interpreted as independent findings of fact.

The Warrant That Led to the Shooting

Composite image showing Michael Shaffer (left), Susan White (center), and Jason Aguilar, Linda White’s teenage son (right).
Left to right: Confidential informant Michael Shaffer, Susan White and Jason Aguillard, Susan White’s teenage son.

According to McGowen, deputies went to Susan White’s home to serve a felony retaliation warrant after investigators alleged she threatened a confidential informant connected to a burglary investigation.

McGowen said he first attempted to obtain the warrant during the overnight hours but claimed a judge was unavailable to sign it. He returned the following morning with the approved warrant and several deputies to serve it.

He told Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose that deputies knocked on the front door for several minutes, repeatedly identified themselves as members of the Harris County Sheriff’s Office and asked White to come outside.

According to McGowen, White refused to open the door.

McGowen said deputies eventually forced entry after obtaining permission from a supervisor.

McGowen Describes What Happened Inside

According to McGowen, deputies entered the home and began clearing rooms while searching for White.

He told Tammy Rose he saw White move through the house toward a bedroom. He followed her and said she picked up a handgun after entering the room.

McGowen said he ordered White three times to drop the weapon.

He claims White raised the handgun toward him and began placing her finger on the trigger.

Believing his life and the lives of the other deputies were in danger, McGowen fired three shots.

He has consistently maintained that he acted in self-defense.

Prosecutors disputed that version of events during both criminal trials.

Courtroom Demonstration Photos

Former deputy Kent McGowen recently provided Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose with these courtroom demonstration photographs, which he says were used during legal proceedings to illustrate his version of the Aug. 25, 1992, fatal shooting of Susan White. The images reflect McGowen’s account and are presented for context alongside court records, the 911 call, and his interview.

McGowen recently provided Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose with courtroom demonstration photographs that he says were used during legal proceedings to explain his version of the shooting.

Several photographs include handwritten descriptions showing where McGowen says he was standing, where White was positioned and where he believes the handgun came to rest after the shooting.

Other images illustrate the angle from which he says he observed White inside the bedroom.

The photographs are not crime scene photographs. Instead, they are courtroom demonstrations created to illustrate McGowen’s account during litigation.

One Issue Continues to Draw Attention

One issue discussed during Tammy Rose’s interview involved which hand White used to hold the handgun.

McGowen maintains White pointed the weapon with her right hand before he fired.

During the interview, Tammy Rose asked McGowen about reports indicating White was left-handed.

McGowen stood by his account and said the position of the handgun after the shooting matched what he remembered seeing inside the bedroom.

That issue remains one of several points that have been debated for years.

McGowen Says Jurors Never Heard Everything

During the interview, McGowen repeatedly argued that jurors never heard all of the evidence he believes supports his account.

He pointed to witness statements, subpoenaed records and other documents that he says were unavailable or never fully presented during trial.

McGowen also criticized how the case was investigated and prosecuted.

Those claims have not been independently verified by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose and remain part of McGowen’s account of the case.

Two Trials, Two Different Juries

The Susan White case was presented to two different juries.

McGowen’s first murder conviction was later overturned on appeal, resulting in a new trial.

Following that second trial, another jury convicted McGowen of murder in 2002.

He ultimately served approximately 19 years in prison before his release in 2021.

Since leaving prison, McGowen has continued speaking publicly about the shooting and maintains he acted lawfully while serving the warrant.

Why Revisit the Susan White Case Now?

More than 30 years after the shooting, Kent McGowen continues to challenge the conclusions reached during his criminal case.

Since his release from prison in 2021, he has participated in interviews, worked with author Jerry Langton on a book about his case and continues to review court records and investigative documents.

His recent interview with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose offers readers an opportunity to hear his account in his own words while comparing those statements with court records, courtroom exhibits and the 911 call placed by Susan White.

As with any decades-old criminal case, many questions remain disputed.

Tammy Rose will continue reviewing court records, witness statements and other documents connected to the investigation as additional records become available.

Editor’s Note: This article includes court records, historical documents, portions of Susan White’s 911 call, and an interview with Joseph Kent McGowen. McGowen disputes allegations made against him before the shooting. The interview is presented so readers can review his response in full.

More Kent McGowen Coverage

This interview is part of an ongoing investigative series examining Kent McGowen’s criminal case and new claims he has made since his release from prison.

Readers can also follow Tammy Rose’s continuing investigation into McGowen’s allegations involving convicted serial killer Roy Alan Stuart.

Related Coverage

➡️ Former Deputy Documents Alleged Roy Alan Stuart Confessions

Amazon Disclosure

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

If you’re interested in learning more about wrongful convictions, criminal investigations and true crime, these books provide additional background.

➡️ The Cadaver King and the Country Dentist

➡️ In Cold Blood by Truman Capote

About Tammy Rose Reports

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose is an independent journalist covering breaking news, aviation and long-form investigations across Texas.

If you appreciate independent journalism, consider bookmarking ChopperRose.com for continuing coverage.

Paul Taylor Claimed Texas Unfairly Kept Him Behind Bars in 2007 Parole Fight

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. prison mugshot
Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995 and received a life sentence.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. filed a writ of habeas corpus in 2007 after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles denied him release.

Taylor challenged his parole denial, not his conviction

The filing did not challenge his murder conviction.

Instead, Taylor argued that the parole board unfairly relied on his crime and past conduct. He claimed the board ignored his prison record, education and other accomplishments.

Taylor pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995. A judge sentenced him to life in prison.

Taylor said the filing was about parole

The writ form asked whether Taylor had previously challenged his conviction.

Taylor marked “no.”

He also wrote:

“Not challenging the conviction. This is a parole related issue.”

That statement is important. This filing did not claim that Taylor was innocent. It also did not ask the court to overturn his guilty plea.

Taylor focused his arguments on the parole process.

Paul Taylor 2007 writ stating he was not challenging his murder conviction
In his 2007 writ application, Paul Taylor wrote that he was not challenging his conviction and described the matter as a parole-related issue.

The writ listed his conviction and sentence

The application identified Taylor’s criminal case as Cause No. 27,636 in the 23rd Judicial District Court of Brazoria County.

The document listed:

Judgment date: May 30, 1995
Offense: Murder
Plea: Guilty
Sentence: Life
Punishment assessed by: Judge

Taylor also stated that he did not have a jury trial. He indicated that he did not appeal the judgment.

Paul Taylor writ listing 1995 murder conviction and life sentence
Taylor’s writ application lists his 1995 guilty plea to murder and his life sentence.

Taylor had been eligible for parole since 1997

Taylor wrote that he had been eligible for parole since February 2, 1997.

According to his filing, the parole board denied him release again on January 12, 2007. The board then gave him a three-year setoff before his next review.

Taylor said the board had denied him parole for about 13 years, including the period between his eligibility date and his next review.

The filing quotes the board’s reason for denial. It referred to the violent nature of the offense, the use of a weapon and a threat to public safety.

The quoted language also stated that the offense showed brutality, violence or the selection of a vulnerable victim.

Taylor argued that these factors came from the crime itself. He said he could never change the past.

Paul Taylor’s 2007 writ memorandum outlining his parole history and denial
Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor raised five arguments

1. The parole board abused its discretion

Taylor claimed the board denied parole for the same conduct that led to his conviction and sentence.

He argued that the board created an “impossible obstacle” because he could not change the crime.

Taylor also said the board failed to give enough weight to his prison accomplishments.

2. The parole process violated due process

Taylor argued that the board did not explain how it decided he remained a future threat.

He claimed the board should have told him what method it used to assess that risk.

Taylor suggested that he could have submitted more information if he had known what evidence the board wanted.

3. The process violated equal protection

Taylor claimed the board released other people with similar or worse criminal records.

He argued that the board treated him differently without a valid reason.

The filing does not include the names or full records of those other prisoners in the pages reviewed.

4. Repeated parole denials amounted to cruel punishment

Taylor argued that repeated denials violated the Eighth Amendment.

He claimed the board continued to deny him for the same unchangeable reasons.

He also accused the board of ignoring his conduct while incarcerated.

5. A Texas life sentence carried an expectation of parole

Taylor argued that Texas did not have a life-without-parole sentence for his case.

Therefore, he claimed that a life sentence carried an expectation of eventual release.

For the first four claims, Taylor asked for a new parole hearing.

However, under his fifth claim, he argued that parole should become mandatory.

These were Taylor’s legal arguments. The filing does not show that a court accepted them.

Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor highlighted his prison record

Taylor wrote that he earned a bachelor’s degree from Sam Houston State University while incarcerated.

He also said he had never received a disciplinary infraction.

In addition, Taylor said he worked in a prison craft shop. He claimed that the work helped him support himself and assist his family.

However, the filing only reflects Taylor’s account. It does not independently verify every statement about his prison history.

What this document does not say

The writ does not claim that Taylor was innocent.

It does not challenge his guilty plea or murder conviction.

The filing also does not present new evidence about Rebecca “Becky” Beard’s disappearance or the location of her remains.

Instead, Taylor challenged the parole board’s review process.

Therefore, this document focuses on parole. It does not attempt to overturn the murder conviction.

Read the full writ and court decision

The complete 2007 filing appears below, along with the court document showing the outcome.

Taylor challenged the parole process, not his murder conviction. However, the court denied his request for relief

Related coverage

Read Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed for a closer look at how accounts in the case evolved over time.

You can also read Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports to review what investigators documented during the first days of the investigation.

Tools for reviewing public records

Court records and police files can contain hundreds of pages. A portable document scanner can make it easier to save, organize and review records while working away from home.

White Canon portable document scanner used to scan court records and public documents

A digital voice recorder can also help reporters preserve interviews, notes and important details while researching a case.

PLAUD AI digital voice recorder shown with its mobile transcription app

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.