Category Archives: PCR

Police and court reporting (PCR) featuring criminal cases, trial recaps, legal filings, and investigative coverage of real-world crimes by Tammy Rose.

Jodi Arias PCR deadline fight reveals mystery evidence

Jodi Arias seated in an Arizona courtroom during proceedings in her murder case.
Jodi Arias appears in court during proceedings in her Arizona murder case.

Jodi Arias court fight erupts over mystery evidence and looming deadline

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

A new court fight in the Jodi Arias case centers on a looming deadline, health problems and an unidentified piece of evidence.

Arias faces a September 2, 2026 deadline to file her petition for post-conviction relief, or PCR petition.

Her attorney wants much more time.

Defense attorney Christopher Stavris asked the court to extend the Jodi Arias PCR deadline to January 29, 2027.

Prosecutors strongly oppose that request.

Now, newly reviewed court filings reveal another twist. Arias’ defense says it still awaits information about an item of evidence involving the State and/or Mesa Police Department.

The defense says it first asked about that evidence almost one year ago.

Jodi Arias PCR deadline sparks court battle

Stavris filed the extension request on June 16, 2026.

He told the court that several defense team members face significant health problems.

According to the filing, one key team member needs more than three months of surgical medical leave.

Another team member also needs surgical leave and can only work in a limited capacity.

The defense says two other team members face serious health problems that have slowed their work.

Another team member may need replacement because of ongoing medical issues.

Stavris argues those problems qualify as extraordinary circumstances under Arizona court rules.

He says his team cannot complete the necessary investigation before September 2.

Prosecutors say Arias has had enough time

Prosecutor Juan Martinez walking into court beside a witness during Jodi Arias’s resentencing proceedings.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez walks into court with a witness during Jodi Arias’s resentencing trial.

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office pushed back.

Deputy County Attorney Jordan Smith argued that Arias has already had years to prepare her petition.

Arias filed her PCR notice on February 11, 2021.

Prosecutors say the September deadline gives her more than five and a half years from that filing.

The State called the deadline realistic.

Prosecutors also argued that Arias could file her petition and seek changes later if new evidence develops.

The State took an even stronger position in its filing.

Prosecutors argued that failure to meet the September 2 deadline should support dismissal of Arias’ PCR notice.

Defense reveals unresolved evidence issue

Jodi Arias defense filing discussing ongoing PCR investigation and an unresolved item of evidence involving the State or Mesa Police Department.
In a June 25, 2026 filing, Jodi Arias’s defense said it was still waiting for a status update on an item of evidence first raised nearly a year earlier.

The defense responded on June 25.

That filing contains one of the most interesting details in the latest court battle.

Stavris says Arias still waits for a status update involving an item of evidence.

The filing does not publicly identify the evidence.

The defense says it first asked about the item almost a year ago.

Stavris also says the State and Mesa Police Department have communicated about the evidence.

However, he says the defense still does not know its status.

The defense sent another status request several weeks before filing its reply.

According to Stavris, nobody had answered that request.

Defense says records from 2021 remain outstanding

The defense also raised another issue.

Stavris says Arias submitted a public records request through the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office in 2021.

The office partially fulfilled that request.

However, the defense says some records remain outstanding.

Arias’ team submitted a narrower request in February 2026.

The defense hoped that move would speed up the process.

Stavris says prosecutors told the defense that they continue to process the request.

Those outstanding records now form part of the defense argument for more time.

Arias attorney says PCR investigation remains active

Stavris argues that post-conviction work requires more than reviewing old court transcripts.

He says PCR claims often require new investigation outside the original trial record.

That work can involve attorneys, investigators and experts.

The defense also challenged the State’s description of the affected team members.

Prosecutors referred to them as investigators.

Stavris says several of them serve as experts in specialized fields.

He argues that those experts play a critical role in developing possible PCR claims.

The defense also says it continues to conduct discovery and investigate possible claims.

Defense offers closed hearing with judge

Stavris told the court he could provide more information if the judge wants it.

However, he asked to present those details during a sealed, ex parte hearing.

That type of hearing could allow the defense to discuss sensitive investigative information without publicly revealing its strategy.

The filing does not disclose what claims Arias may eventually raise in her PCR petition.

State asks for oral argument

Maricopa County prosecutors’ June 26, 2026 filing requesting oral argument on Jodi Arias’s PCR deadline extension.
In a June 26, 2026 filing, prosecutors asked Judge Aryeh Schwartz to schedule oral argument on Jodi Arias’s request for more time, with any argument set for July 23 or later.

The fight did not end with the defense reply.

On June 26, prosecutors asked the judge to hold oral arguments about the requested extension.

The State said it needs time to contact next of kin who may want to address the court.

Prosecutors cited victims’ rights to a prompt and final conclusion of the case.

The State asked the court to schedule any argument for July 23, 2026 or later.

The filing says the prosecutor assigned to the matter planned to return from vacation on July 23.

Will Jodi Arias get more time?

The filings reviewed for this story show both sides digging in.

The defense wants until January 29, 2027.

The State wants the September 2 deadline to remain in place.

The defense points to serious medical problems, unfinished investigative work, outstanding records and unresolved evidence.

Prosecutors point to the amount of time Arias has already had.

The biggest unanswered question now centers on the judge.

These filings do not include a final ruling on the extension request.

That ruling could determine whether Arias must file her long-awaited PCR petition within weeks or gets several more months to prepare it.

The mystery surrounding the unidentified evidence also adds a new question to one of Arizona’s most closely watched criminal cases.

No ruling yet on Jodi Arias PCR deadline request

As of August 17, 2026, the Maricopa County Clerk of the Superior Court says there is no minute entry or court order yet ruling on Jodi Arias’s request to extend her September 2, 2026 PCR filing deadline.

A court operations specialist told Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose that she had sent everything currently in the case and did not see a minute entry or order addressing the extension request.

That means the September 2 deadline remains the current filing date unless Judge Aryeh Schwartz issues a new order.

Read the court filings: Below are the June 2026 filings in State v. Jodi Arias, including the defense motion for more time, the State’s response, the defense reply and the State’s request for oral argument.

Traveling to Arizona?

If you’re planning a trip to Arizona, you can search for hotels near Phoenix, Scottsdale and other destinations through Hotels.com here: Hotels.com.

Affiliate disclosure: I may earn a commission if you book through this link, at no additional cost to you.

Shop my Amazon picks

Looking for travel essentials or items for your next trip? You can browse my Amazon recommendations here:

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Using these links may earn me a commission at no additional cost to you.

Juan Martinez Disciplinary Hearing: My Story as a Key Witness

This story is long overdue. I am speaking publicly because I was a key witness in the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing. My decision to come forward helped expose misconduct that ultimately ended his career as a prosecutor.

How I Discovered the Misconduct

Flying in SkyEye 13!
Journalist Tammy Rose

Covering the Jodi Arias Sentencing Retrial

 I was covering the Jodi Arias case when I noticed troubling behavior by then‑prosecutor Juan Martinez. It crossed ethical lines.

One of the most disturbing revelations was the leak of Juror 17’s identity to the public. The information did not come from the court; it came from within the prosecution itself, passed via a media intermediary.

When a juror’s identity becomes public, it puts them at serious risk. In this case, that juror later received threats to their safety.

That moment marked a turning point for me. What began as reporting became a matter of public responsibility. I realized I needed to document and report what I had uncovered.

I provided investigators with records and testimony about how the leak happened, knowing it could affect my career and reputation. Still, I chose to act ethically and tell the truth.

The investigation confirmed that protected information had been improperly shared and that this conduct was part of a broader pattern of ethical violations.

Prosecutor Juan Martinez walking into court with a key witness during Jodi Arias' sentencing retrial

My Role in the Disciplinary Hearing

I gave testimony and submitted evidence detailing the leaks and unethical conduct. My goal was never to attack individuals unnecessarily, but to ensure accountability and integrity in the justice system.

I acted independently and ethically, aware that speaking out could impact my professional life. But truth and public safety were my priority.

Journalist Tammy Rose traveling to court for the Jodi Arias resentencing, connected to the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing
Journalist Tammy Rose traveling to court for the Jodi Arias resentencing trial, connected to the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing

What Happened After the Investigation

After reviewing the evidence, the investigation confirmed a pattern of ethical violations, including:

• Improper communications with media members

• Leaks of protected juror information

• Conduct prejudicial to justice

As a result, Juan Martinez was terminated and later disbarred. His ability to practice law was permanently revoked.

Proseuctor Juan Martinez during the Jodi Arias resentencing trial, observed by journalist Tammy Rose

Why This Story Still Matters

Prosecutors hold immense power. When that power is abused, the entire justice system is at risk. I came forward because journalists are not above the law — and neither are prosecutors.

This story reminds us that accountability matters.

More Investigative Journalism by Tammy Rose

This story is part of my work covering the justice system and holding powerful figures accountable. You can read more of my investigative reporting here.

Could the Jodi Arias case be blown wide open in 2026?

Jodi Arias sitting in court during her murder trial in Phoenix, Arizona

Why the Jodi Arias Case Is Back in the Spotlight

Is there a real possibility the infamous Jodi Arias case could be retried due to missing evidence and alleged misconduct?

For the first time in years, Jodi Arias is publicly addressing that question herself.

Arias was convicted of murdering her ex-boyfriend, Travis Alexander, in 2008 after stabbing and shooting him in the shower. She is currently serving a life sentence. Now, more than a decade later, Arias has begun writing about her case again — and this time, her focus is not prison life, but the integrity of the investigation and prosecution that put her behind bars.

Investigative reporter Tammy Rose inside a news helicopter during coverage of the Jodi Arias case, which she reported on both from the air and on the ground.

Why a Retrial in 2026 Is Unlikely But Possible

Through her attorneys, Arias has filed a post-conviction relief request. From inside Perryville Prison, she responded to investigative reporter Tammy Rose regarding the possibility of an interview related to that filing.

What New Evidence Could Change

Until now, Arias’ “Just Jodi” prison blog has largely avoided the details of her criminal case, focusing instead on daily life behind bars.

But a new post titled “Hello, 2026” marks a significant shift. In it, Arias makes serious allegations, claims misconduct, and states she is seeking new legal counsel to pursue them.

In the post, Arias accuses investigators and prosecutors of withholding, losing, or destroying exculpatory evidence. She specifically names former lead detective Esteban Flores, now retired, and former prosecutor Juan Martinez.

“Important, exculpatory evidence in my case has been lost or destroyed,” Arias writes. “Where is my proof? I’m working on that.”

She also alleges her current legal representation has dismissed her concerns, claiming her attorneys minimize her claims while continuing to bill the county.

Adding to the controversy, both attorneys from Arias’ original trial were later disbarred. Former prosecutor Juan Martinez was disbarred for misconduct following the trial , and Arias’ defense attorney, Kirk Nurmi, was also disbarred after writing a book about his client while her case was still active — a move widely criticized as unethical.

“As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases”

Book cover of "Trapped with Ms. Arias" by L. Kirk Nurmi, featuring gold handcuffs on a black background.
Defense attorney Kirk Nurmi wrote a book about his client. #ad

Court documents also reference requests for information regarding a book Martinez allegedly began writing during Arias’ first trial, raising additional concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

Book cover of "Conviction: The Untold Story of Putting Jodi Arias Behind Bars" by Juan Martinez.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez also allegedly worked on a book related to the case during the first trial. #ad

What This Means for True Crime Watchers where should that go

So the question remains: do these claims — combined with documented misconduct surrounding key figures in the case— give Jodi Arias a legitimate path toward a new trial?

For now, the courts will decide whether her allegations warrant further review. But for the first time in years, Jodi Arias is no longer avoiding the case – she’s confronting it head-on.

For more true crime stories, click here.

From Courtroom to Hardcover: Could Martinez’s Book Rewrite Arias’ Fate?

Prosector Juan Martinez walking outside the courthouse with a key witness during the Jodi Arias trial.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez enters the courtroom with a key witness during the Jodi Arias trial. Photo by Tammy Rose.

Convicted murderer Jodi Arias may be closer than ever to a second shot at freedom — and her legal team believes former prosecutor Juan Martinez’s book could be the key.

Martinez allegedly began writing Conviction: The Untold Story of Putting Jodi Arias Behind Bars while Arias was still on trial — long before it was published. Now, Arias’ attorneys are demanding business records from the literary agent Martinez originally hired, hoping those files will reveal whether he planned to profit from her case while prosecuting it.

If the records show ethical violations or conflicts of interest, her lawyers argue the trial itself may have been tainted — opening the door to post-conviction relief and a possible new path to freedom.Convicted murderer Jodi Arias may be closer than ever to a second shot at freedom — and her legal team believes former prosecutor Juan Martinez’s book could be the key. This isn’t the first controversy surrounding the Jodi Arias prosecution.

Book cover of "Conviction: The Untold Story of Putting Jodi Arias Behind Bars" by Juan Martinez.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez’ book about the Arias case.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases

Obsessed with true crime? Here’s a list of must-read book you won’t put down.

Why a Retrial in 2026 is Unlikely But Possible

A judge has given Arias until September 2, 2026 to file her post-conviction petition. That deadline matters, because courts rarely reopen cases unless new evidence proves serious misconduct.

But Arias’ legal team believes these publishing records could do exactly that. If Martinez was negotiating a book deal while prosecuting Arias, it could violate ethical rules meant to prevent prosecutors from financially benefiting from active cases.

If proven, that conflict could be powerful enough to force the court to re-examine her conviction.

When Prosector Misconduct Changes Everything

History shows that misconduct can — and does — overturn even the most settled cases.

Curtis Flowers was tried six times for the same murders. Four convictions were thrown out after appeals courts found repeated prosecutorial misconduct and racial bias in jury selection. Eventually, all charges were dropped, and Flowers walked free.

James Alan Gell spent years on death row for a crime he didn’t commit. Prosecutors withheld evidence that could have cleared him. His conviction was overturned, he was acquitted in a new trial, and he was released.

These cases prove that when misconduct is exposed, even long-standing verdicts can collapse.

What This Means for True Crime Watchers

The Arias case has captivated millions for over a decade — but this development changes the story. This isn’t about whether people believe she is guilty. It’s about whether the person who prosecuted her played by the rules.

If Martinez was building a book deal while arguing for her conviction, it raises serious questions about fairness, motive, and integrity in one of the most watched trials in modern true-crime history.

Bottom Line

With the 2026 PCR deadline approaching, Arias’ attorneys are betting that what’s buried inside those publishing records could rewrite her fate — and possibly expose one of the most controversial prosecutorial conflicts the true-crime world has ever seen.

Court filings and evidence may soon tell the story that never made it into the courtroom. Click below to read the court documents.

For more true crime stories, click here.

Jodi Arias stalls on PCR bid. Court docs uncover the hold-up.

Why the PCR Filing Is Delayed

Jodi Arias PCR filings remain delayed, and newly filed court records explain why the post-conviction relief process has stalled.

According to the court record, Arias’ attorneys requested that the court cancel scheduled oral arguments while they review business records connected to Folio Literary Management and author Steve Troha. Those records may relate to a 2016 book written by former prosecutor Juan Martinez and could impact arguments raised in Arias’ PCR case.

Until the review is complete, the court cannot move forward with the PCR process. Court documents also indicate the filing deadline has been pushed back, signaling that the case remains paused pending further review.

Want more true crime? Here’s a list of must-read books you won’t put down.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases

For more true crime stories, click here.