This story is long overdue. I am speaking publicly because I was a key witness in the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing, and my decision to come forward helped expose misconduct that ultimately ended his career as a prosecutor.
I did not set out to become part of a legal ethics investigation. I was a journalist doing my job. But what I uncovered went far beyond normal reporting and raised serious concerns about the integrity of the justice system.
The Events That Led Me To Take Action
How I Discovered the Misconduct
While covering the Jodi Arias case, I became aware of behind-the-scenes conduct involving then-prosecutor Juan Martinez that crossed ethical lines. This included improper communications and the misuse of members of the media to influence public perception of an active criminal case.
What disturbed me most was learning how confidential information was being handled.
The Juror 17 Leak and Why I Came Forward
Juror 17’s name was leaked to the public. That juror later received death threats.
This was not a minor mistake. It was dangerous.
I learned that the juror’s identity had been passed through a media intermediary who had direct access to Juan Martinez. The information did not originate from the court — it came from inside the prosecution itself.
At that moment, this stopped being a story and became a matter of public safety.
That is why I turned over evidence.
My Role as a Key Witness in the Juan Martinez Disciplinary Hearing
I provided records and testimony to investigators examining Juan Martinez’s conduct. I did this knowing it could put my career and reputation at risk.
I was not aligned with any media personality or outside operation. I acted independently as a journalist and witness.
My role in the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing was to tell the truth about what I had seen and documented.
What Happened After the Investigation
The investigation confirmed a pattern of serious ethical violations, including:
• Improper relationships with members of the media
• Leaking protected information
• Conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice
Juan Martinez was later fired and disbarred, permanently ending his ability to practice law.
This outcome was not about politics or personalities. It was about accountability.
Why This Story Still Matters
Prosecutors hold immense power. When that power is abused, the entire justice system is at risk.
I came forward because journalists are not above the law — and neither are prosecutors.
Being a key witness in the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing was not something I sought. It was something I felt ethically bound to do.
