Tag Archives: Chopper Rose Productions

New Records Raise Questions in Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw Case

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, two teenagers who disappeared after traveling to Galveston on August 4, 1971
Rhonda Renee Johnson, left, and Sharon Lynn Shaw disappeared after leaving Webster for a trip to Galveston on August 4, 1971. Public-domain image via Wikimedia Commons.

New Records Raise Questions About Unidentified Remains in Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw Investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

More than five decades after the murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, newly reviewed records are raising questions about additional human remains found in the area. The records also raise the possibility that investigators once considered whether another person played a role in the case.

Rhonda Johnson, 14, and Sharon Shaw, 13, disappeared from Galveston County in August 1971. Authorities later recovered their skeletal remains in and around Clear Lake along Galveston Bay.

The investigation continued for decades as detectives worked to identify remains, examine evidence and determine whether the discoveries connected to the two girls.

The records do not prove that another victim or another killer was connected to the murders. However, they show how much uncertainty investigators faced during the early stages of the case.

Remains of Sharon Shaw and Rhonda Johnson Identified

On January 3, 1972, two boys fishing in Clear Lake discovered a human skull floating in the water.

Authorities later identified the skull through dental records as belonging to Sharon Shaw. Investigators also reportedly found a crucifix around the jawbone that Sharon’s mother identified as her daughter’s.

About six weeks later, searchers recovered additional skeletal remains in a marsh near Clear Lake. Authorities identified one set of those remains as belonging to Rhonda Johnson.

The discoveries confirmed that both girls had died, but investigators could not determine their exact causes of death from the remains.

The identification resolved the girls’ missing-person cases, but other remains recovered during that period created additional questions.

Michael Lloyd Self Was Convicted

Investigators eventually focused on Michael Lloyd Self, who worked as a gas station attendant in the Webster/Clear Lake area. Authorities charged Self in connection with the murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw

A jury convicted Self of murdering Sharon Shaw and sentenced him to life in prison. The court record confirms that his conviction involved Sharon’s murder; he was not convicted of Rhonda Johnson’s murder. 

Self later said police had threatened and physically abused him until he confessed. Questions about whether investigators obtained a false or coerced confession followed the case for decades. A federal judge once recommended relief based on the confession issue, although a later appeals court decision allowed the conviction to stand. 

Edward Harold Bell Became an Alternate Suspect

Michael Lloyd Self in a Pasadena Police Department mugshot.
Michael Lloyd Self was convicted in Sharon Shaw’s murder, though questions later emerged about his confession and whether he was responsible.

In 1998, convicted killer Edward Harold Bell claimed responsibility for the murders of several young women and girls in the Galveston-area region. His statements included two girls from Webster who disappeared in August 1971, which investigators associated with Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw.

Bell became an alternate suspect in their murders, but authorities never charged him in the case. Investigators reportedly lacked physical or biological evidence that conclusively connected Bell to the girls’ deaths. 

Bell’s claims increased doubts about Self’s conviction, but they did not officially resolve who killed Rhonda and Sharon.

Questions Surrounding Other Remains

Records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose indicate authorities recovered an unidentified torso in September 1971.

Investigators reportedly found clothing or personal items with or near the remains that they believed belonged to Phillip Manning. Those items initially led authorities to consider whether the torso might be Manning’s.

Authorities later located Manning alive in Louisiana. That confirmed the torso was not his.

The discovery still raised questions about the unidentified victim’s identity and whether another victim—or possibly another killer—may have been connected to the investigation. However, the records reviewed so far do not establish that the torso was connected to the murders of Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw.

Records Detail Manning’s Background

The records also include criminal-history and case information connected to Phillip Manning. That material may help explain why investigators examined his possible connection to the case.

However, the records do not establish that Manning killed Rhonda Johnson, Sharon Shaw or anyone else. The information surrounding him remained circumstantial, and the records reviewed so far do not show that authorities filed a case against him in connection with the girls’ murders.

Investigators Faced Difficult Conditions

Galveston’s shoreline at sunset. Severe weather and shifting Gulf waters may have complicated recovery efforts and the early investigation in 1971.
Galveston shoreline and Gulf waters at sunset

The discoveries occurred during a period when severe weather affected portions of the Texas Gulf Coast.

Tropical storms Edith and Fern moved through the region in September 1971, potentially complicating searches, recovery efforts and investigators’ ability to determine where remains had originally entered the water.

Water movement, weather conditions and the passage of time may have made it more difficult to connect separate remains to specific locations or victims.

Investigators in 1971 also did not have access to the DNA testing and modern forensic databases available today.

Identifications often depended heavily on dental comparisons, physical characteristics and other available medical evidence.

Was Another Killer Suspected?

The records raise an important question: Did investigators believe the additional remains pointed to another victim—or possibly another offender operating in the area?

The documents reviewed so far do not provide a definitive answer.

They instead show that authorities were dealing with several discoveries, uncertain identifications and incomplete information during the earliest stages of the investigation.

Any suggestion that another killer was involved should be treated as a theory unless additional police reports, forensic findings or official statements support it.

Questions That Still Need Answers

Several important questions remain:

Who exactly was Phillip Manning?

Why did investigators connect his name to the torso?

Was the torso ever conclusively identified?

Did Manning have any documented connection to Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw?

What did investigators believe before the girls’ remains were fully identified?

Are additional reports or forensic records still available?

Those questions may be important in understanding not only what investigators knew, but also how the case evolved during its earliest months.

Investigation Continues to Draw Interest

Galveston beach where Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled before disappearing in August 1971
Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled from Webster to Galveston on August 4, 1971, before they disappeared.

The murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw remain among the most discussed cases connected to the Texas Gulf Coast.

Decades later, old reports, forensic findings and previously overlooked names continue to generate new questions.

The records do not yet prove that another killer was involved. But they show that the investigation may have been more complex than the public understood—and that parts of the story may still be missing.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue reviewing available records and seeking documentation that could clarify the identity of the additional remains and Phillip Manning’s possible connection to the investigation.

Related Products

Waterproof Document Organizer

When reviewing decades-old police reports, newspaper clippings and case files, a waterproof document organizer can help protect important records from spills, moisture and damage.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Portable Document Scanner

A portable scanner can make it easier to digitize old reports, photographs and handwritten notes while researching historical cases.

Planning a Trip to Galveston?

Visitors researching Galveston County history or spending time along the Texas Gulf Coast can compare hotels and available accommodations through Hotels.com.

Disclosure: I may earn a commission from eligible bookings at no additional cost to you.

Related Coverage

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw: 55 Years Later

A closer look at the disappearance and murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, the recovery of their remains and the questions that continue decades later.

Texas Killing Fields: James Elmore Jr. Trial Approaches

James Elmore Jr. is scheduled to face trial as investigators continue examining cases connected to the Texas Killing Fields.

55 Years Later: The Disappearance of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw Still Haunts Galveston County

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, the two teenagers who disappeared after traveling to Galveston on August 4, 1971
Rhonda Renee Johnson, left, and Sharon Lynn Shaw disappeared after traveling from Webster to Galveston on August 4, 1971.

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Two teenage friends left Webster for a summer day in Galveston on August 4, 1971. They never returned home.

Nearly 55 years later, the deaths of Rhonda Renee Johnson and Sharon Lynn Shaw remain surrounded by painful questions, a controversial confession and competing claims about who was responsible.

Rhonda was 14 years old. Sharon was 13 and just days away from her 14th birthday.

Their case became one of the earliest and most troubling mysteries associated with a series of young women and girls who disappeared across the Houston-Galveston region during the 1970s.

A Summer Trip to Galveston

Galveston beach where Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled before disappearing in August 1971
Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled from Webster to Galveston on August 4, 1971, before they disappeared.

According to federal court records, Sharon and Rhonda were last seen on August 4, 1971, after leaving Webster for a day trip to Galveston, about 25 miles away.

The two friends reportedly spent time near the beach and Galveston Seawall. However, they did not make it home that evening.

Their disappearance launched a search that continued for months.

Their Remains Were Found Months Later

On January 3, 1972, human remains were discovered in the Clear Lake area.

Additional remains were found several weeks later. Authorities identified the victims as Sharon Shaw and Rhonda Johnson.

The medical examiner could not determine the cause of their deaths because there was no identifiable damage to the bones or skulls, according to the federal appellate record.

The discovery confirmed the families’ worst fears. However, determining who killed the girls would become far more complicated.

Michael Lloyd Self Was Convicted

Galveston beach connected to the Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw case involving Michael Lloyd Self.
Michael Lloyd Self was convicted in Sharon Shaw’s death after the teenagers disappeared following a trip to Galveston in August 1971. This Galveston beach image is illustrative.

Investigators eventually focused on Michael Lloyd Self, a Galveston-area gas station attendant.

Self signed a confession after being questioned by police. He later withdrew it and claimed officers had threatened and physically abused him until he confessed.

Self was prosecuted for Sharon Shaw’s murder and received a life sentence. His conviction was upheld by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

Questions about the confession followed the case for decades.

In 1991, a federal district court granted Self’s request for habeas relief after finding that his confession had been obtained in violation of his constitutional rights. However, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals later reversed that decision and allowed the conviction to stand.

Self maintained his innocence and died in prison in 2000.

A Second Man Claimed Responsibility

Edward Harold Bell in a 1978 Pasadena Police Department booking photograph
Edward Harold Bell in a 1978 Pasadena Police Department mugshot. Bell later claimed responsibility for several killings in Southeast Texas, but he was never charged in the deaths of Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw. Image credited to the Pasadena Police Department; source copy via Wikipedia/Houston Chronicle.

Years later, convicted murderer Edward Harold Bell claimed he had killed several girls across Southeast Texas during the 1970s.

Bell referred to the victims as the “Eleven that went to Heaven.” His claims reportedly included two girls from Webster who disappeared after visiting Galveston in 1971.

Those details were believed to refer to Sharon and Rhonda.

Investigators familiar with Bell’s statements said portions of his accounts appeared to match information from several cases. However, Bell was never charged with killing Sharon or Rhonda.

Bell was serving a prison sentence for the 1978 murder of Larry Dickens when he died in 2019.

Families Were Left Without Definitive Answers

The conviction of Michael Self remained legally intact. Still, some investigators and members of the victims’ families came to believe Bell may have been responsible.

That leaves a difficult conflict at the center of the case.

One man was convicted based largely on a confession he said was forced. Another man later claimed responsibility but was never prosecuted in connection with the girls’ deaths.

No DNA evidence or weapon publicly connected Bell to the murders. His death ended any possibility that he-would face a trial or further questioning in court.

Remembering Rhonda and Sharon

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, two teenagers who disappeared after traveling to Galveston on August 4, 1971
Rhonda Renee Johnson, left, and Sharon Lynn Shaw disappeared after leaving Webster for a trip to Galveston on August 4, 1971. Public-domain image via Wikimedia Commons.

The competing accusations can easily overshadow the two young victims.

Rhonda and Sharon were teenage friends enjoying the final weeks of summer. Their families expected them to return home after a day at the beach.

Instead, August 4 became an anniversary marked by loss and unanswered questions.

As the 55th anniversary approaches, the most important part of this story remains the lives that were taken.

Rhonda Renee Johnson and Sharon Lynn Shaw should be remembered by their names—not simply as entries on a list of Texas cold cases.

Their families deserved clear answers then. They still deserve them today.

Related Texas Killing Fields Coverage

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

The questions surrounding Sharon and Rhonda are part of a much larger history of disappearances and deaths along the Interstate 45 corridor between Houston and Galveston.

The upcoming trial of James Elmore Jr. is also expected to renew attention on the Calder Road area known as the Texas Killing Fields.

Elmore is charged in connection with the death of Laura Miller and allegations involving the movement of human remains. His jury trial is currently scheduled to begin August 31 in Galveston County’s 122nd District Court.

Read more: James Elmore Jr. Trial Scheduled in Texas Killing Fields Case

This story is based on available court records and previously published reporting. Some allegations were never proven in court. Edward Harold Bell was never charged with the deaths of Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw.

Planning a Galveston Visit?

Many people visit Galveston to explore its history, beaches and landmarks. Travelers looking for a place to stay can compare Galveston hotels, prices and availability through Hotels.com before planning their trip.

I may earn a commission if you book through Hotels.com, at no additional cost to you.

Recommended True-Crime Reading

Readers interested in researching historic cases may find a Texas road atlas helpful for understanding the distance between Webster, Galveston, Clear Lake and other locations connected to the investigation.

A portable document organizer can also help keep court records, timelines, printed articles and handwritten notes arranged while researching a complicated cold case.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Related Coverage

The approaching 55th anniversary comes as another Galveston County case is preparing to return to court. Read more about the upcoming James Elmore Jr. trial and the Calder Road investigation.

You can also read my examination of prison confessions compared with public records in the Roy Alan Stuart investigation, another case involving decades of questions and disputed claims.

Paul Taylor Claimed Texas Unfairly Kept Him Behind Bars in 2007 Parole Fight

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. prison mugshot
Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995 and received a life sentence.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Paul Gayland Taylor Jr. filed a writ of habeas corpus in 2007 after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles denied him release.

Taylor challenged his parole denial, not his conviction

The filing did not challenge his murder conviction.

Instead, Taylor argued that the parole board unfairly relied on his crime and past conduct. He claimed the board ignored his prison record, education and other accomplishments.

Taylor pleaded guilty to murder in Brazoria County in 1995. A judge sentenced him to life in prison.

Taylor said the filing was about parole

The writ form asked whether Taylor had previously challenged his conviction.

Taylor marked “no.”

He also wrote:

“Not challenging the conviction. This is a parole related issue.”

That statement is important. This filing did not claim that Taylor was innocent. It also did not ask the court to overturn his guilty plea.

Taylor focused his arguments on the parole process.

Paul Taylor 2007 writ stating he was not challenging his murder conviction
In his 2007 writ application, Paul Taylor wrote that he was not challenging his conviction and described the matter as a parole-related issue.

The writ listed his conviction and sentence

The application identified Taylor’s criminal case as Cause No. 27,636 in the 23rd Judicial District Court of Brazoria County.

The document listed:

Judgment date: May 30, 1995
Offense: Murder
Plea: Guilty
Sentence: Life
Punishment assessed by: Judge

Taylor also stated that he did not have a jury trial. He indicated that he did not appeal the judgment.

Paul Taylor writ listing 1995 murder conviction and life sentence
Taylor’s writ application lists his 1995 guilty plea to murder and his life sentence.

Taylor had been eligible for parole since 1997

Taylor wrote that he had been eligible for parole since February 2, 1997.

According to his filing, the parole board denied him release again on January 12, 2007. The board then gave him a three-year setoff before his next review.

Taylor said the board had denied him parole for about 13 years, including the period between his eligibility date and his next review.

The filing quotes the board’s reason for denial. It referred to the violent nature of the offense, the use of a weapon and a threat to public safety.

The quoted language also stated that the offense showed brutality, violence or the selection of a vulnerable victim.

Taylor argued that these factors came from the crime itself. He said he could never change the past.

Paul Taylor’s 2007 writ memorandum outlining his parole history and denial
Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor raised five arguments

1. The parole board abused its discretion

Taylor claimed the board denied parole for the same conduct that led to his conviction and sentence.

He argued that the board created an “impossible obstacle” because he could not change the crime.

Taylor also said the board failed to give enough weight to his prison accomplishments.

2. The parole process violated due process

Taylor argued that the board did not explain how it decided he remained a future threat.

He claimed the board should have told him what method it used to assess that risk.

Taylor suggested that he could have submitted more information if he had known what evidence the board wanted.

3. The process violated equal protection

Taylor claimed the board released other people with similar or worse criminal records.

He argued that the board treated him differently without a valid reason.

The filing does not include the names or full records of those other prisoners in the pages reviewed.

4. Repeated parole denials amounted to cruel punishment

Taylor argued that repeated denials violated the Eighth Amendment.

He claimed the board continued to deny him for the same unchangeable reasons.

He also accused the board of ignoring his conduct while incarcerated.

5. A Texas life sentence carried an expectation of parole

Taylor argued that Texas did not have a life-without-parole sentence for his case.

Therefore, he claimed that a life sentence carried an expectation of eventual release.

For the first four claims, Taylor asked for a new parole hearing.

However, under his fifth claim, he argued that parole should become mandatory.

These were Taylor’s legal arguments. The filing does not show that a court accepted them.

Taylor’s memorandum states that the parole board relied on the violent nature of the offense when it denied his release.

Taylor highlighted his prison record

Taylor wrote that he earned a bachelor’s degree from Sam Houston State University while incarcerated.

He also said he had never received a disciplinary infraction.

In addition, Taylor said he worked in a prison craft shop. He claimed that the work helped him support himself and assist his family.

However, the filing only reflects Taylor’s account. It does not independently verify every statement about his prison history.

What this document does not say

The writ does not claim that Taylor was innocent.

It does not challenge his guilty plea or murder conviction.

The filing also does not present new evidence about Rebecca “Becky” Beard’s disappearance or the location of her remains.

Instead, Taylor challenged the parole board’s review process.

Therefore, this document focuses on parole. It does not attempt to overturn the murder conviction.

Read the full writ and court decision

The complete 2007 filing appears below, along with the court document showing the outcome.

Taylor challenged the parole process, not his murder conviction. However, the court denied his request for relief

Related coverage

Read Rebecca Beard Part 3: How Witness Statements Changed for a closer look at how accounts in the case evolved over time.

You can also read Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports to review what investigators documented during the first days of the investigation.

Tools for reviewing public records

Court records and police files can contain hundreds of pages. A portable document scanner can make it easier to save, organize and review records while working away from home.

White Canon portable document scanner used to scan court records and public documents

A digital voice recorder can also help reporters preserve interviews, notes and important details while researching a case.

PLAUD AI digital voice recorder shown with its mobile transcription app

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports Reveal the First Days of the Investigation

Featured image for “Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports Reveal the First Days of the Investigation,” highlighting conflicting timelines involving Arch Aplin, police reports, an investigative synopsis, Rebecca Beard’s 1986 planner, and Paul Taylor’s former home.
Early police records reveal conflicting timelines in the Rebecca Beard investigation. This graphic compares witness statements, investigative documents, and Rebecca’s personal planner to examine how the investigation evolved during its first days. Reporting by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

Rebecca Beard Part 2: Early Police Reports Show How the Investigation Evolved

Rebecca Beard disappeared during the early morning hours of March 2, 1986, after spending the previous evening at the Excalibur Club in Freeport, Texas. During the first days of the investigation, detectives worked to reconstruct her final hours by interviewing friends, coworkers, club patrons, and anyone who may have seen her before she vanished.

The earliest police reports provide a snapshot of where the investigation began. At that stage, detectives had not narrowed their focus to one individual. Instead, they documented numerous interviews, followed multiple leads, and worked to establish Rebecca’s last known movements.

Nearly four decades later, those reports remain important because they show how the investigation developed over time.

Detectives Worked to Build Rebecca Beard’s Timeline

Present-day view of the former Excalibur Club building in Freeport, Texas, showing the storefront with boarded windows and the location where Rebecca Beard was last reported seen before her disappearance in 1986.
The former Excalibur Club in Freeport, Texas, as it appears today. Investigators interviewed witnesses who were at the nightclub as they worked to reconstruct Rebecca Beard’s movements during the early days of the 1986 investigation.

One of the first priorities involved determining Rebecca’s movements after she left the Excalibur Club.

Investigators interviewed witnesses who had been with Rebecca that evening or reported seeing her during the early morning hours. Detectives compared those statements in an effort to establish a reliable timeline.

The reports also reference a gold Chevrolet Camaro Z-28. Detectives attempted to identify the vehicle, determine who owned it, and learn whether it played a role in Rebecca’s disappearance.

Those early efforts demonstrate how investigators attempted to preserve every possible lead.

Arch “Beaver” Aplin Was Among the First Witnesses Interviewed

Arch “Beaver” Aplin III speaks during the Buc-ee’s grand opening in Goodyear, Arizona, wearing a white cowboy hat, glasses, and a gray sport coat.
Arch “Beaver” Aplin III at the Buc-ee’s grand opening in Goodyear, Arizona. This image was captured by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose. Aplin was interviewed by investigators on March 5, 1986, during the early stages of the Rebecca Beard investigation.

After Rebecca Beard disappeared, investigators interviewed Arch “Beaver” Aplin on March 5, 1986.

According to the police report, Aplin told detectives the last time he saw Rebecca was the weekend of February 14, when they had dinner together in Galveston. He also said he had called her several times afterward but never reached her.

At that point in the investigation, detectives documented Aplin’s account as one of many witness statements they were using to reconstruct Rebecca’s final movements.

Later Records Raised New Timeline Questions

Investigative synopsis from the Rebecca Beard case showing the section summarizing Tina’s witness statement, including references to Kevin King, Arch “Beaver” Aplin, Bill Russell, Jack Hamilton, and other individuals reportedly at the Excalibur Club on the night Rebecca Beard disappeared.
This investigative synopsis includes a summary of Tina’s witness statement. According to the document, Tina reported seeing Kevin King leave the Excalibur Club with Rebecca Beard before he returned without her. The synopsis also lists Arch “Beaver” Aplin, Bill Russell, and Jack Hamilton as being at the club that night, raising additional questions about the investigation’s timeline.

This is where the investigation becomes more complicated.

A later investigative synopsis documents witness Tina’s account of the night Rebecca disappeared.

According to that synopsis, Tina told investigators Kevin King walked out of the Excalibur Club with Rebecca about 30 minutes before closing and returned approximately two minutes later without her.

The same synopsis also lists Kevin King, Bill Russell, Arch “Beaver” Aplin and Jack Hamilton as being at Excalibur that night.

When compared with Aplin’s March 5 statement that he had not seen Rebecca since February 14, the two records appear to present different timelines.

The investigative records reviewed for this series do not explain how detectives reconciled those accounts.

Arch “Beaver” Aplin Remained in Contact With Investigators

Graphic featuring Arch “Beaver” Aplin III alongside the headline “Arch Aplin Remained in Contact With Investigators” over a background of original Rebecca Beard police records and the former Excalibur Club.
This graphic highlights original police records documenting that Arch “Beaver” Aplin remained in contact with investigators after Rebecca Beard disappeared. The records show detectives continued communicating with Aplin as they worked to reconstruct Rebecca’s final known movements during the 1986 investigation.

The early investigative records also document repeated contact between detectives and Arch “Beaver” Aplin, who had been at the Excalibur Club around the time Rebecca Beard disappeared.

Rather than disappearing from the investigation after giving an initial statement, the reports show Aplin continued communicating with law enforcement in the days and weeks that followed.

According to the investigative notes, Aplin contacted detectives seeking updates on the investigation and asked whether he could publicly offer a $10,000 reward for information leading to Rebecca’s whereabouts.

The records indicate detectives discussed the proposed reward with Aplin while continuing to investigate numerous leads.

Those contacts are significant because they demonstrate that investigators maintained communication with Aplin throughout the early stages of the case. The reports do not indicate that detectives viewed him as someone who had withdrawn from the investigation. Instead, the documented contacts suggest he remained interested in learning whether investigators had developed new information.

The investigative files also reflect that detectives continued interviewing numerous witnesses during this same period, including Rebecca’s friends, coworkers, and individuals believed to have seen her during the weekend she disappeared.

Another Witness Reported Seeing Rebecca Beard at a Surfside Beach Party

Graphic comparing Paula’s witness statement with images of the former Excalibur Club and Surfside Beach. The graphic highlights a police report stating Paula told investigators she saw Rebecca Beard at a Surfside beach party on March 2, 1986.
This graphic highlights Paula’s statement documented in the original police investigation. According to the police report, Paula told investigators she saw Rebecca Beard at a Surfside beach party on March 2, 1986. Her account added another reported timeline for detectives to evaluate as they worked to reconstruct Rebecca’s final known movements.

The original police investigation also documented a statement from another witness, Paula, who told investigators she saw Rebecca Beard at a Surfside beach party on the morning of March 2, 1986.

According to the police report, Paula said she recognized Becky and saw her with two males at the gathering. If her recollection was accurate, it could place Rebecca alive after the time she was believed to have left Excalibur, adding another timeline investigators had to evaluate.

Paula’s account does not prove what happened to Rebecca. However, it is one of several witness statements included in the original case file. When viewed alongside other reported sightings and witness interviews, it illustrates the challenges investigators faced while trying to reconstruct Rebecca’s final known movements.

More than 40 years later, these differing witness accounts continue to raise questions about Rebecca Beard’s disappearance and whether every lead documented in the original investigation was fully reconciled.

The Investigation Was Still Taking Shape

Reading the reports chronologically shows detectives working through dozens of leads while trying to establish Rebecca’s final movements.

Several witnesses interviewed in March 1986 told investigators they did not know Paul Taylor or had never heard Rebecca mention his name. At the same time, detectives continued following information involving several other individuals connected to the case.

These reports should be viewed as a snapshot of the investigation during its earliest weeks. Criminal investigations often evolve as detectives conduct additional interviews, gather new evidence, and revisit earlier leads.

The progression of the Rebecca Beard investigation reflects that process.

Coming in Part 3

The earliest police reports reveal how detectives began piecing together Rebecca Beard’s final known movements through witness interviews, follow-up leads, and investigative records. As the investigation continued, additional witness statements and investigative summaries documented new information and raised further questions.

In Part 3, I examine those later records, including additional witness statements, documented timeline discrepancies, and what they may reveal about the Rebecca Beard investigation nearly four decades later.

Research Tools for Investigative Journalists

Every long-term investigation benefits from careful note-taking. A quality investigator’s notebook or case journal provides a simple way to organize timelines, document interviews, and track developing leads while reviewing historical records.

Related Articles

Sheriff Department Scam Call: I Almost Fell for It

Sheriff Department Scam Call: I Almost Fell for It

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

I receive unusual phone calls almost every day as a reporter. Most are tips, questions, or requests for information.

But one phone call caught me completely off guard.

Someone claiming to be with a sheriff’s department called and said I had missed a federal grand jury summons. The caller sounded calm, professional, and convincing. They provided a name and a badge number, then even transferred me to what appeared to be the sheriff’s office.

For a moment, I believed it.

In fact, I drove to the sheriff’s office to find out what was going on.

That’s when I learned the call wasn’t legitimate.

They Called Again

This week, I received two more calls that appeared to be from the same scam.

This time, I didn’t answer.

Instead, I let the calls go to voicemail because I immediately recognized the warning signs from my previous experience.

The voicemail claimed to be from someone identifying themselves as:

“Anthony Little, badge number 5254…”

The recording was difficult to understand, but it was enough to remind me how convincing these scams can sound.

(Listen to the voicemail below.)

Why This Scam Is So Effective

The people behind these calls know exactly how to create panic.

They often claim you’ve:

Missed jury duty.

Missed a federal grand jury summons.

Have an outstanding warrant.

Must respond immediately to avoid arrest.

The goal is simple: convince you to act before you have time to think.

Fortunately, I already knew something wasn’t right because I had experienced a similar scam before.

What Should You Do?

If you receive a call claiming to be from a sheriff’s office or another law enforcement agency:

Stay calm.

Do not provide personal information.

Never send money or gift cards.

Do not follow payment instructions given over the phone.

Hang up and contact the agency using its publicly listed phone number.

Legitimate law enforcement agencies do not typically demand immediate payment over the phone or threaten arrest unless you act immediately.

One Lesson I Won’t Forget

Looking back, I don’t mind admitting that I almost believed the first call.

That’s exactly why these scams continue to work.

If someone who spends a career asking questions can momentarily wonder whether a call is real, imagine how convincing these callers can sound to someone who has never encountered this type of scam before.

The experience reminded me that it’s always better to verify information through official channels than to react out of fear.

Have You Received One?

Have you received a similar phone call claiming to be from a sheriff’s office or another law enforcement agency?

Tell me what happened in the comments below. Your experience could help warn someone else before they become the next victim.

If these scammers call me again, I may answer—not because I believe them, but because I want to expose exactly how these scams work and share that information with you.

Products That Can Help Reduce Scam Calls

Receiving repeated scam calls is frustrating, but there are products that may help protect your personal information and reduce unwanted calls.

Below are a few items I recommend. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Your support helps fund my independent investigative reporting.

📱 Call-Blocking Phone

🛡️ Identity Theft Protection Book

Tammy Rose:

For more breaking news, visit my Breaking News section

Why I Released the Exclusive 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

Why I Released the 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

As an investigative reporter, I often have to make difficult decisions.

One of the hardest was deciding whether to release the 2002 family mediation recording involving Paul Taylor Jr. and Rebecca Beard’s family.

When I first obtained an exclusive copy of the recording from Rebecca Beard’s family, I wasn’t sure if I would ever make it public.

For months, I listened to the recording while reviewing court records, investigative documents, and interviewing Rebecca’s family. The more I reported on the case, the more I believed the recording added important context to an investigation that still raises questions nearly four decades later.

Rather than relying on summaries or secondhand accounts, I wanted people to hear Paul Taylor Jr.’s own words for themselves.

This article isn’t about telling anyone what to believe.

It’s about explaining why I decided to release the recording and why I believe it is an important part of my ongoing investigation.

“Rather than relying on summaries or secondhand accounts, I wanted people to hear Paul Taylor Jr.’s own words and decide for themselves.”

Watch the Exclusive 2002 Paul Taylor Jr. Confession

The full 30-minute recording is embedded below. I encourage you to listen to it in its entirety before drawing your own conclusions.

Why the recording stood out

As I compared the mediation recording with other records I reviewed during my investigation, several things caught my attention.

One involves the events after Rebecca Beard disappeared.

During the mediation, Paul Taylor Jr. appears unable to remember getting his vehicle stuck in a ditch near his home or the tow truck driver who reportedly helped pull him out. Yet in other parts of the recording, he recalls details surrounding the case.

That difference raised questions for me.

Another involves the weapon.

While reviewing investigative records, I came across a sealed document containing entries that reference a Remington shotgun and what appears to be human remains.

Those entries stood out because they raise questions when compared with portions of the mediation recording.

I encourage viewers to listen to the recording, review the available information, and draw their own conclusions.

Why I chose to publish it

Investigative reporting isn’t about deciding a case.

It’s about asking questions, reviewing records, interviewing the people closest to the investigation, and presenting information as fairly and accurately as possible.

Over the past several months, I’ve interviewed Rebecca Beard’s family, reviewed numerous court records and investigative documents, and continued asking questions about a case that still has many unanswered ones.

After months of reporting, I believed it was time to let the public hear this recording in its entirety.

This article serves as an introduction to that recording.

I encourage you to listen to the complete mediation audio in context and compare what is said with the records discussed throughout my investigation.

Sometimes the biggest questions aren’t about what someone remembers.

They’re about what they don’t.

Thank you for taking the time to follow my reporting.

Related Rebecca Beard Coverage

Continue following my investigation with these related reports:

Exclusive: Rebecca Beard’s Daughter Speaks Out Nearly 40 Years After Her Mother’s Disappearance

Questions for Arch Aplin and John Cohn in the Rebecca Beard Case

What the Sealed Documents Reveal in the Rebecca Beard Investigation

How I Reported This Investigation

This investigation took months of research, interviews, reviewing court records, and comparing documents with the 2002 mediation recording. These are some of the tools I use while reporting stories like this.

Shure MV88+ Microphone – Used for interviews and recording clear audio in the field.

GoPro Camera – Captures behind-the-scenes footage and field reporting.

iPhone 16 Accessories – Tripods, mounts, and mobile reporting gear.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through the links on this page, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent investigative journalism.

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Investigation: State Reports Raise New Questions

Featured image for an investigative news article about John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. showing his football photo alongside Texas Attorney General custodial death reports highlighting the manner of death and differing language in official records.
Newly released Texas Attorney General reports raise new questions in the investigation into the fatal shooting of John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. The Texas Rangers investigation remains ongoing.

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Investigation

The John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. investigation continues to raise new questions after newly released Texas Attorney General state reports provided additional details about the fatal June 1 shooting in Lake Jackson. The documents describe the same incident but use different wording in several key sections.

The Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office submitted both a Custodial Death Report and a Peace Officer Involved Injuries or Death Report to the Texas Attorney General. While the Texas Rangers continue investigating the John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. case, the newly released records highlight differences in how the incident was documented.

Both reports describe the same incident. However, they use different wording in several sections while the Texas Rangers continue their investigation.

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Investigation: Reports Describe the Same Incident 

Both reports identify Mendoza as the 18-year-old who died after a deputy attempted a traffic stop that ended at a residence on Indian Warrior Trail in Lake Jackson.

According to the records, Mendoza drove into a garage attached to a home after deputies attempted to stop him.

The reports state the deputy was on duty and involved in a pursuit after Mendoza allegedly failed to stop.

Custodial Death Report Lists Homicide

Texas Attorney General Custodial Death Report identifying John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. and listing the official manner and cause of death in the Lake Jackson investigation.
The Texas Attorney General Custodial Death Report identifies John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. and includes the official manner and cause of death submitted by the Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

The Custodial Death Report lists the manner of death as:

Homicide (includes Justifiable Homicide).

Medical examiners use that classification when one person causes another person’s death. The classification does not determine whether a crime occurred or whether criminal charges are appropriate.

The report lists the medical cause of death as a gunshot wound that entered through the left upper extremity into the torso.

It also identifies the weapon as a handgun.

Incident Summary Uses the Word “Discharged”

Texas Attorney General Custodial Death Report summary describing the fatal shooting of John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. and stating that the deputy’s firearm discharged while approaching the driver.
The incident summary in the Texas Attorney General Custodial Death Report states that the deputy’s firearm discharged while approaching John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. The report does not explain what caused the firearm to discharge.

One section of the Custodial Death Report states:

“When entering the garage approaching the driver, the deputy’s firearm discharged and a bullet struck the driver.”

The report does not explain why the firearm discharged or whether investigators have determined if the discharge was intentional, accidental, or the result of another circumstance.

Reports Use Different Language About a Weapon

Texas Attorney General Peace Officer Involved Injuries or Death Report stating that John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. carried, exhibited, or used a deadly weapon during the incident.
A separate Texas Attorney General report states that John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. “carried, exhibited, or used a deadly weapon.” The report does not identify the weapon or explain why this wording differs from the Custodial Death Report.

One section of the Custodial Death Report asks whether Mendoza displayed or used a weapon during the incident.

The answer listed is:

Unknown.

However, the separate Peace Officer Involved Injuries or Death Report includes a different description.

That report states the injured or deceased person:

“Carried, exhibited, or used a deadly weapon.”

Neither report explains the apparent difference in wording or identifies the weapon referenced in that section.

The records also do not describe when investigators reached those conclusions or whether additional evidence remains under review.

Deputy Was Not Responding to a Call

The Peace Officer Involved Injuries or Death Report states the deputy was not responding to a call for service when the incident began.

Instead, the report states the encounter occurred during a pursuit involving a suspect who was allegedly evading arrest or detention using a motor vehicle.

The report identifies the deputy as a 29-year-old male who was on duty at the time of the shooting.

Investigation Continues

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. poses in his Brazoswood High School football uniform with a family member before his death.
John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. is pictured in his Brazoswood High School football uniform before the June 1, 2026, incident in Lake Jackson. The Texas Rangers continue to investigate the fatal deputy-involved shooting.

The Custodial Death Report states emergency personnel treated Mendoza before transporting him to a local hospital, where he later died.

The report also confirms that the Texas Rangers, working with the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office, continue investigating the shooting.

Neither report reaches a conclusion about criminal responsibility or explains what caused the deputy’s firearm to discharge.

As the investigation moves forward, the newly released state records answer some questions while raising others about the events inside the garage on June 1.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose contacted the Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office for comment regarding the newly released state records. No response had been received at the time of publication.

Related Coverage

Texas Rangers affidavit and scanner audio timeline

Deputy fired following policy violations

Amazon Recommendation

On Combat by Lt. Col. Dave Grossman – Understanding the psychological effects of deadly force.

Amazon Associate Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Inside Paul Taylor Jr.’s Prison Letters About the Rebecca Beard Investigation

Newly obtained prison messages from Paul Taylor Jr. discuss the Rebecca Beard investigation, prison life and his perspective decades after the case.

Nearly four decades after Rebecca Beard disappeared, new prison messages from convicted killer Paul Taylor Jr. are offering another glimpse into how he views the investigation today.

The messages, shared with Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose by a longtime correspondent who asked to remain anonymous, cover much more than the Rebecca Beard case. Taylor discusses prison life, his health, his faith, investigators, and why he believes renewed attention is being focused on his case.

While many of his statements reflect his personal opinions and allegations, they provide insight into his current mindset as interest in the Rebecca Beard investigation continues.

Taylor questions renewed interest in the Rebecca Beard case

In several messages, Taylor repeatedly asks why people are suddenly interested in his case after so many years.

He questions why the victim’s family has continued speaking publicly and wonders what new information investigators may have uncovered.

Taylor also asks whether new evidence has surfaced and repeatedly requests updates from outside prison.

His questions come as the Rebecca Beard investigation has received renewed attention following exclusive interviews, court records, and additional reporting into the 1986 disappearance.

Paul Taylor Jr. comments on investigators

Throughout the messages, Taylor criticizes investigators and the criminal justice system.

He claims authorities mishandled evidence and writes that people should question official accounts of the investigation.

These statements represent Taylor’s personal opinions and have not been independently verified.

Despite his criticism, Taylor continues asking for information about developments in the case.

Faith remains a central theme

Religion appears throughout nearly every message.

Taylor writes about reading the Bible each morning, praying daily, and believing God has guided him throughout his years in prison.

He frequently ends his messages with blessings and encourages others to pray.

The repeated references suggest his Christian faith continues to play a significant role in his daily life behind bars.

Life inside a Texas prison

The letters also describe Taylor’s daily routine inside prison.

He discusses prison conditions, medical treatment following the removal of basal cell carcinoma, communication through the Securus messaging system, and the challenges of staying connected with the outside world.

Taylor says receiving letters helps him remain informed about events beyond prison walls.

Taylor notices new reporting

One of the more interesting portions of the correspondence comes when Taylor references recent reporting.

He asks whether Tammy Rose is writing articles and later questions why her name briefly appeared in his contact list before disappearing.

The messages suggest Taylor is aware that new reporting and renewed public interest continue surrounding the Rebecca Beard investigation.

Investigation continues

Rebecca Beard disappeared in 1986 and her body has never been found.

Although Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in connection with her death, questions remain about where Rebecca’s remains may be located.

Investigators have conducted multiple searches over the years, while Rebecca’s family continues asking authorities to pursue additional leads.

The newly shared prison messages do not establish new evidence in the case. Instead, they provide additional insight into Taylor’s thoughts as the investigation continues decades later.

Editor’s Note: The prison messages contain Taylor’s personal opinions and allegations regarding investigators and the criminal justice system. Those statements have not been independently verified and are presented to accurately reflect the contents of the correspondence.

Recommended Reading

If you’re interested in the Rebecca Beard investigation and other Texas cold cases, these books provide additional background and context. Purchasing through the links below helps support my independent reporting at no additional cost to you.

Recommended Reading: Rebecca Beard & Texas True Crime

The Killing Fields

Deliver Us by Kathryn Casey

Let’s Kill Mom: Four Texas Teens and a Horrifying Murder

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting my independent journalism and investigative reporting.

Paul Taylor Jr. Sends Another Message After Rebecca Beard Blog Is Published

Another Message Surfaces

Just days after I published previously released messages from Paul Taylor Jr., another communication arrived in the recipient’s inbox.

The recipient asked to remain anonymous because of concerns about unwanted attention in Brazoria County. I reviewed the original message before publishing this report and agreed to protect the recipient’s identity.

“I’m Hoping This One Will Make You Dig Deep Again”

The latest message does not contain a confession or new details about Rebecca Beard’s disappearance. Instead, Taylor continues using spiritual language while suggesting there is more he cannot discuss.

Among the statements included in the email:

“There is so much I cannot tell you.”

“The Holy Spirit is doing unbelievable things.”

“I’m hoping this one will make you dig deep again??”

Taylor also writes that he is “going through the fire” before telling the recipient to “enjoy the ride.”

A Continuing Pattern

This message follows other communications I previously reported on involving Taylor.

While the email does not offer new evidence in the Rebecca Beard investigation, it continues a pattern of messages in which Taylor hints at information without providing specific facts.

To protect the recipient’s privacy, I redacted identifying information from the published screenshots at the recipient’s request.

Related Coverage: Read my previous reporting on the Rebecca Beard investigation and Paul Taylor Jr.’s earlier communications.

Paul Taylor Jr. Interview

Rebecca Beard Investigation

Recommended Reading: If you’re interested in unsolved Texas murder cases, these books provide additional background through my Amazon affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Rebecca Beard Investigation: New Documents and Paul Taylor Jr.’s Interview Raise Unanswered Questions

Rebecca Beard investigation thumbnail showing Linda Barnes, Paul Taylor Jr. and police evidence documents reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose.

Rebecca Beard Investigation: New Documents and Paul Taylor Jr.’s Interview Raise Unanswered Questions

Nearly 40 years after 22-year-old Rebecca “Becky” Beard disappeared after leaving a Freeport nightclub with Paul Taylor Jr., questions about the case remain.

Paul Taylor Jr. later pleaded guilty, but Becky’s body has never been officially recovered.

Now, Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose has reviewed court records, police photographs and a recorded interview between Taylor and Becky’s mother, Linda Barnes. Together, those records raise new questions about the evidence, the murder weapon and other details of the Rebecca Beard investigation.

Signed promotional photo of Rebecca “Becky” Beard inscribed, “To John, Love Always, Becky, 1985.”
A signed 1985 promotional photograph of Rebecca “Becky” Beard addressed “To John.” The image is among personal items reviewed during Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose’s ongoing Rebecca Beard investigation.

Linda Barnes Refused to Let the Case Go Cold

Rebecca disappeared after leaving the Excalibur nightclub with Paul Taylor Jr. in March 1986.

For years, Becky’s mother, Linda Barnes, refused to give up. She searched for answers, gathered records and pushed investigators to keep working the case.

Her persistence paid off. A Brazoria County grand jury indicted Paul Taylor Jr. in 1994—eight years after Becky’s disappearance.

Taylor later pleaded guilty, but Becky’s body has never been officially recovered.

Taylor Describes the Night Becky Disappeared

In a recorded interview with Linda Barnes, Taylor claimed Becky voluntarily left the nightclub with him and went to his home.

He said they argued after he failed to obtain cocaine.

Taylor claimed he tried to scare Becky with a firearm before shooting her.

He told Barnes he wrapped Becky in orange sheets secured with duct tape before disposing of her body.

He also claimed he threw the weapon into a bayou. However, a Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office evidence sheet reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose lists a Remington Model 1100 shotgun and a brown gun case as evidence in the case.

Because Taylor described the firearm only as “the weapon” during the interview, the apparent difference between his account and the evidence sheet raises additional questions.

A Shotgun Appears on the Evidence List

One document reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose is a Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office evidence sheet.

Among the listed evidence is a Remington Model 1100 shotgun and a brown gun case.

During his interview with Barnes, Taylor never identified the firearm by type. Instead, he repeatedly referred only to “the weapon.”

The records reviewed do not explain when the shotgun was recovered, where it was recovered or whether it was ultimately identified as the murder weapon.

Police Photographs Show Two Holes in the Bedroom Wall

Police crime scene photograph showing two holes in a bedroom wall inside Paul Taylor Jr.’s Clute home during the Rebecca Beard investigation.
A police crime scene photograph documents two holes in a bedroom wall inside Paul Taylor Jr.’s home. During his recorded interview with Linda Barnes, Taylor described firing a single fatal shot. The records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose do not explain the presence of the second hole.

Crime scene photographs reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose document two holes in a bedroom wall inside Taylor’s home.

During the interview, Taylor described firing a single fatal shot.

The available records reviewed do not explain whether investigators determined how the two holes were created or whether either hole was connected to the homicide.

The records also do not explain whether ballistic testing linked the recovered shotgun to the wall damage.

The Tow Truck Driver Taylor Could Not Remember

One of the most revealing exchanges involves a tow truck driver.

Barnes confronted Taylor with information that a tow truck operator reportedly pulled his vehicle from a ditch after Becky’s disappearance.

Taylor repeatedly responded that he did not remember the incident.

Barnes described details including a neighbor who reportedly witnessed the vehicle in the ditch and the driver’s recollection of the call.

The conversation highlights a pattern throughout the interview. Taylor remembered specific details such as orange sheets, duct tape and burying Becky, yet repeatedly claimed he could not remember other significant events from that same period.

Court Notes Reference Possible Remains

Handwritten court notes reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose appear to show prosecutors requested additional time to determine whether recovered remains belonged to Rebecca Beard.

The handwriting is difficult to read in places, but the notes appear to reference delaying proceedings while investigators sought positive identification of possible remains.

The records reviewed do not explain what became of those reported remains or whether they were ultimately determined to belong to someone else.

A Confidential Court Record

Confidential pre-sentence investigation file from the Paul Taylor Jr. case reviewed during Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose’s Rebecca Beard investigation.
A confidential pre-sentence investigation file prepared before Paul Taylor Jr.‘s sentencing. The court record was reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose as part of the ongoing Rebecca Beard investigation and provides additional context to the case decades after Becky’s disappearance.

Also among the records is a pre-sentence investigation stamped:

“Confidential Judicial Document — Not Open to Public Inspection.”

The document was prepared before Taylor’s sentencing and demonstrates that confidential records existed during the criminal proceedings.

Questions That Still Remain

The records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose answer some questions but leave many others unresolved.

Among them:

When was the Remington Model 1100 shotgun recovered?
Was it ever identified as the murder weapon?
Were the two holes in the bedroom wall forensically examined?
What became of the possible remains referenced in court notes?
Why do some details in Taylor’s interview differ from other investigative records?

Nearly four decades after Rebecca Beard disappeared, Linda Barnes’ determination continues to inspire efforts to better understand what happened to her daughter.

Editor’s Note

This report is based on court records, law enforcement documents, police photographs and a recorded interview reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose. Where records are incomplete or unclear, this article presents unanswered questions rather than conclusions.

Related Rebecca Beard Coverage

Read Part One: 

Read Part Two: 

More Rebecca Beard coverage:
https://www.chopperrose.com/tag/rebecca-beard/

Recommended 

True Crime Books

If you’re interested in cold cases, unsolved mysteries, and investigative reporting, these books provide insight into how complex cases are investigated and solved

 I’ll Be Gone in the Dark by Michelle McNamara
A bestselling investigation into the Golden State Killer case.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Chopper Rose earns from qualifying purchases. If you purchase through the links below, we may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. These commissions help support independent investigative journalism and cold case reporting.