Tag Archives: Chopper Rose Productions

James Elmore Jr. trial: Jurors hear Elmore in recorded interview

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Opening statements began Tuesday in the James Elmore Jr. trial in Galveston County. By midday, jurors were hearing Elmore speak in a recorded interview with the detective who helped revive the decades-old investigation into Laura Miller’s death.

Prosecutors told jurors that Elmore knew details about Laura that had never been made public. They argue those details connect him to what happened to the 16-year-old more than 40 years ago.

Elmore has pleaded not guilty to manslaughter in Laura’s death.

Prosecutors say Elmore knew details about Laura Miller

Sign marking a recovery site featuring photos of four women and Clyde Hedrick during an investigation into multiple unsolved Texas homicide cases.
Memorial sign highlighting four victims whose cases have been linked to the same recovery site during the investigation into Clyde Hedrick and several unsolved homicides.

During opening statements, prosecutors focused on what Elmore allegedly told Laura’s father, Tim Miller.

The state said Elmore contacted Miller and told him he needed to get something off his chest. Miller later met with Elmore and drove around with him.

Prosecutors said Elmore directed Miller to Calder Road. He allegedly pointed out an area where he remembered dumping trash and seeing what he thought was a mannequin.

Laura’s remains were found near Calder Road in 1986.

Prosecutors also highlighted another detail they say Elmore could not have learned from news reports.

The state said Elmore knew Laura would skip school and spend time at a cemetery. He allegedly knew where she would sit among the trees.

Prosecutors said Tim Miller knew that detail because he had caught his daughter there before.

The state argues Elmore knew things that only someone with firsthand knowledge would know.

Watch: Detective Cory Williams questions James Elmore Jr.

Jurors heard portions of a recorded interview between Detective Cory Williams and James Elmore Jr. during Tuesday’s testimony. In the video below, viewers can hear Williams question Elmore directly about information surrounding Laura Miller and the investigation.

The court video is included as part of my podcast coverage so you can hear the exchange presented to the jury for yourself.

State describes alleged party before Laura Miller’s death

Prosecutors also gave jurors their account of a party they say took place before Laura died.

According to the state, Elmore said Laura was in a room with him, Clyde Hedrick and John Gorham.

Prosecutors said Elmore described Hedrick giving Laura cocaine. Elmore allegedly believed the amount was too much for the 16-year-old.

The state said Laura soon began flailing and removing her clothes.

Prosecutors told jurors Elmore said he and others eventually left the room. The state alleges Laura died sometime afterward.

The prosecution also told jurors that Elmore later helped move items from the house. Prosecutors say he described an arm falling out while something was being carried.

The defense reserved its opening statement.

Jurors hear about remains found near Calder Road

Recovery site at the Texas Killing Fields where victims were found along Calder Road in League City, Texas
Memorial crosses mark the Calder Road area where the remains of Laura Miller and Audrey Cook were found in 1986.

The first witnesses took jurors back to the area where Laura Miller and Audrey Cook were found in February 1986.

Testimony described the largely undeveloped Calder Road area as it appeared at the time.

Jurors also heard testimony about the condition of the remains and the autopsies.

Laura’s cause of death could not be determined from her skeletal remains. Testimony also addressed the limitations investigators faced because toxicology testing could no longer determine whether drugs played a role in her death.

Detective Corey Williams takes the stand

Hitchcock Police Detective Corey Williams testifies during the James Elmore Jr. trial.
Hitchcock Police Detective Corey Williams testifies in the James Elmore Jr. trial in Galveston County.

The case then moved to Hitchcock Police Detective Corey Williams.

Williams testified that he has worked in law enforcement for about 17 years. He said investigating cold cases involving missing women became a passion alongside his regular work as a detective.

Williams eventually met Tim Miller while working on other missing-person investigations.

That connection led him to James Elmore.

Williams told jurors that he did not initially consider Elmore a suspect.

Instead, investigators believed Elmore might have information about another case.

That changed during their interview.

Elmore’s interview changes direction of investigation

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Williams testified that Elmore began talking about other cases during the interview.

Then the conversation turned to a party and Laura Miller.

Williams said Elmore’s statements caused him to start looking at Elmore differently. He testified that he began considering Elmore a possible suspect in Laura’s death.

Williams then gathered records from several law enforcement agencies and investigated information Elmore provided.

He also traveled to Louisiana, Oklahoma and other parts of Texas while investigating information connected to the cases.

Jurors hear James Elmore in his own words

James Elmore Jr. in a Galveston County courtroom ahead of his manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court ahead of his scheduled manslaughter trial in Galveston County.

Prosecutors then played Williams’ recorded interview with Elmore for the jury.

It marked a significant moment in the trial. Jurors could now hear Elmore describe events in his own voice.

During the recording, Elmore talks about the party where Laura was present.

He discusses drugs and describes Laura removing her clothes.

Investigators repeatedly question him about who remained in the room and what happened next.

Elmore says there were parts of the night he did not witness. He also says he did not see Laura being killed.

The interview then moves to what allegedly happened afterward.

Elmore talks about helping move items from a house. During one exchange, he describes an arm falling out of something being moved.

Investigators press him for more details about what he saw, who was there and where items were taken.

Elmore also discusses the Calder Road area and tells investigators he could show them the general location.

Recorded statements become key evidence

James Elmore Jr. appears in recorded video evidence shown during his trial in Galveston County.
Jurors watched recorded footage of James Elmore Jr. as prosecutors presented statements they say became key evidence in the Laura Miller case.

Williams testified that Elmore’s statements changed the course of his investigation.

Prosecutors are using Elmore’s own words to support their argument that he had knowledge about Laura, the party and events surrounding her death that he should not otherwise have known.

Elmore also denies witnessing Laura’s death during the recording and repeatedly tells investigators that he does not know exactly what happened during portions of the night.

Jurors will have to weigh those statements along with the physical evidence and testimony from other witnesses.

The James Elmore Jr. trial continues in Galveston County.

When Two Worlds Collide During WWII: My New Book Is Now Available

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Some stories refuse to let you go.

This one has followed me for more than two decades—from Wisconsin to Germany, through old photographs, family memories, forgotten records and a documentary that took me back to my family’s home in Berlitt.

I’ve walked where they walked and stood inside the home where part of this story began. For years, I’ve tried to understand what happened to the people in those fading photographs. Their lives, separated by an ocean, would eventually become connected by war.

Now, their story is finally a book.

When Two Worlds Collide During WWII is finally here.

This is more than a World War II story to me. It is the story of two families—one in Germany and one in Wisconsin—whose lives unfolded thousands of miles apart as war changed everything around them.

And somehow, their worlds would eventually collide.

A World War II story inspired by my own family history

Young Octavia “Tudy” Riley, who was born without her left arm
Octavia “Tudy” Riley as a young child. Born without her left arm, she would grow up refusing to let it define what she could accomplish.

When Two Worlds Collide During WWII blends documented family history, real people and real events with dramatized scenes that bring their experiences to life.

The story begins in the 1930s and follows two families on opposite sides of the Atlantic.

In Wisconsin, a young woman born without her left arm refuses to allow the expectations of the era to determine the life she will lead.

In Germany, the Pein family watches the world around them transform under Hitler, war and eventually the Soviet advance.

There are marriages and separations, soldiers and civilians, impossible choices, lost homes and a family struggling to survive the aftermath of a war that changed Europe forever.

At its heart, though, this is a story about family, survival and the extraordinary chain of events that ultimately connected two worlds.

The real people behind the story

Pein family gathered for their last Christmas together in their Berlitt home in Germany
The Pein family gathered for their last Christmas together in their Berlitt home before war, loss and displacement changed their lives forever.

One of the most meaningful parts of writing this book was being able to use real family photographs.

These aren’t actors.

They aren’t AI recreations.

They are the actual people whose lives inspired the story.

Some of their experiences survived through documents and photographs. Others survived because family members kept telling the stories.

I spent countless hours trying to piece those fragments together.

There were moments when one photograph, one record or one remembered detail suddenly connected pieces of the story that had been separated for decades.

That became one of my favorite parts of this journey.

From Germany to Wisconsin

Flying Tiger Line passenger manifest showing the Rose family’s 1957 immigration to the United States
Flying Tiger Line passenger manifest documenting the Rose family’s journey to the United States in 1957.

The book travels from a small German village to wartime Europe, postwar refugee life and eventually Wisconsin.

The war didn’t simply end for families when the fighting stopped.

Homes were lost. Borders changed. Families were separated. People who had survived the war still had to figure out how to survive the peace that followed it.

For one branch of my family, that journey eventually led across the Atlantic and to a completely new life in America.

Knowing where that journey ultimately led made writing its beginning even more powerful for me.

Why I wrote When Two Worlds Collide During WWII

Richard and Helene Pein with their children in Berlitt, Germany, before World War II
Richard and Helene Pein with their children at the family home in Berlitt, Germany, before World War II changed their lives.

I wanted to preserve these stories before more of them disappeared.

Family history has a way of becoming smaller with every generation. A story that one person remembers vividly becomes a sentence told by the next generation—and eventually it can disappear altogether.

I didn’t want that to happen to this one.

As a reporter, I’m accustomed to searching for records, questioning details and trying to determine what can actually be documented.

As a writer, I wanted to do something different with those discoveries.

I wanted readers to feel as though they were there.

Because some conversations and moments from nearly a century ago can never be known, portions of the book are dramatized. I explain that distinction for readers in the book while preserving the real names, family history and historical foundation behind the story.

Take When Two Worlds Collide During WWII on your next trip

There is something fitting about reading a story that crosses the Atlantic while traveling yourself.

Whether you’re heading to Germany, Italy or somewhere completely different, this is the kind of book you can tuck into your carry-on and disappear into during a long flight.

If this story inspires a trip of your own, you can search Hotels.com for hotels and places to stay throughout Europe and beyond.

Disclosure: I may earn a commission from qualifying Hotels.com bookings made through links on this website, at no additional cost to you.

Order When Two Worlds Collide During WWII on Amazon

After spending so much time with these people, their photographs and their stories, seeing this book become something readers can actually hold is difficult to put into words.

I hope you fall in love with these families.

I hope parts of their story surprise you.

Most of all, I hope it makes you think about the stories hidden inside your own family—and the people who lived extraordinary lives long before we were here to hear about them.

When Two Worlds Collide During WWII is available now on Amazon.

👉 [ORDER THE BOOK ON AMAZON]

Thank you to everyone who followed along while I researched, wrote, rewrote, edited and finally sent this story out into the world.

Now it’s yours to read.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

James Elmore Jr. trial: Tim Miller expected to testify

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Tim Miller, father of Laura Miller and founder of Texas EquuSearch, shown in a Galveston County courtroom.
Tim Miller, father of Laura Miller and founder of Texas EquuSearch, shown in a Galveston County courtroom.

The James Elmore Jr. trial moves into testimony Tuesday in Galveston County.

The court released Tuesday’s schedule.

Prosecutors expect Tim Miller to testify. Miller is Laura Miller’s father and the founder of Texas EquuSearch.

His testimony could become one of the most closely watched moments of the trial.

Tim Miller expected to take the stand

Tim Miller, father of Laura Miller and founder of Texas EquuSearch, speaking during an interview.
Tim Miller has spent decades searching for answers in the death of his daughter, Laura Miller. He is expected to be the prosecution’s first witness in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

Miller spent years searching for answers about his daughter’s death.

More recently, he had repeated contact with Elmore.

Miller has said he met privately with Elmore dozens of times after Elmore approached him with information about Laura’s death. Those conversations eventually became part of the renewed investigation. 

Prosecutors expect Miller to testify about those contacts with Elmore.

Elmore faces a manslaughter charge in Laura Miller’s death.

He pleaded not guilty. 

Opening statements expected Tuesday

James Elmore Jr. in a Galveston County courtroom ahead of his manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court ahead of his scheduled manslaughter trial in Galveston County.

Proceedings are scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 1.

The court will formally read the charge before opening statements.

Assistant District Attorney Katelyn Willis will give the prosecution’s opening statement. Willis leads the Violence Against Women Division.

ADA Adam Poole also represents the state. He leads the Felony Division but will not give an opening statement.

Defense attorney William “Bill” Agnew is not expected to give an opening statement immediately after the prosecution, according to the current schedule.

Manslaughter case goes before jury first

James Elmore Jr. stands with attorneys before Judge Jeth Jones in the 122nd District Court in Galveston County.
James Elmore Jr. appears in the 122nd District Court ahead of his manslaughter trial in the death of Laura Miller.

Elmore is charged with manslaughter in connection with Laura Miller’s death and with two counts of tampering with evidence involving the remains of Laura Miller and Audrey Cook.

He has pleaded not guilty and is presumed innocent unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Trial expected to continue through Friday

James Elmore Jr. stands in the 122nd District Court with attorneys ahead of his manslaughter trial in Galveston County.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court as proceedings move toward testimony in the manslaughter case involving Laura Miller’s death.

The court currently expects testimony to continue through Friday, Sept. 4.

Proceedings are scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. each day and conclude around 5 p.m.

The schedule could change depending on testimony and other issues that arise during the trial.

I will continue following the James Elmore Jr. trial and will report new developments as they happen.

Traveling to Galveston County?

Visitors following the trial can compare lodging options through Hotels.com.

Long courthouse days can also mean keeping phones and reporting equipment charged. Courtroom and travel essentials are available through Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Earlier coverage: Read what happened during Elmore’s pretrial hearing and why the judge said the Aug. 31 setting would remain firm.

James Elmore Jr. trial begins Monday in Galveston County

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

James Elmore Jr. in a Galveston County courtroom ahead of his manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears in court ahead of his scheduled manslaughter trial in Galveston County.

The James Elmore Jr. trial is set to begin Monday in Galveston County.

Elmore faces a manslaughter charge in connection with the death of Laura Miller.

The case is scheduled in the 122nd District Court.

The court has already warned attorneys that it does not expect another delay without a serious emergency. 

Jury selection could draw a large crowd

Jury selection may become one of the first major hurdles in the case.

During an earlier pretrial hearing, the judge and attorneys discussed calling more than 200 prospective jurors because of the publicity surrounding the case. 

The court also discussed using a larger courtroom.

Attorneys considered a written jury questionnaire and individual questioning for some prospective jurors. The goal is to determine whether jurors can decide the case only on evidence presented in court. 

Manslaughter case will go first

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Prosecutors previously told the judge they plan to try the manslaughter case first.

Elmore has several other criminal cases pending.

The state has said evidence connected to some of those cases could become relevant during the manslaughter trial. If Elmore is convicted, prosecutors could also seek to introduce additional evidence during the punishment phase. 

Watch the pretrial hearing

I previously covered Elmore’s Aug. 21 pretrial hearing, where the judge and attorneys discussed jury selection, outstanding discovery and how the manslaughter case would move forward.

Watch my full video from the hearing below for more context before Monday’s trial.

When testimony could begin

The court previously discussed beginning jury selection Monday afternoon.

Opening statements and testimony could begin Tuesday if a jury is seated in time. Attorneys have estimated the trial could last about one week. 

That timeline could change depending on how long jury selection takes.

What to watch Monday

The biggest questions heading into court are how large the jury pool will be, whether attorneys use questionnaires and how quickly they can seat a jury.

There could also be last-minute motions before testimony begins.

Chopper Rose Productions will be at the courthouse following developments as the case moves toward trial.

Traveling to Galveston County?

Visitors following the trial can compare lodging options through Hotels.com.

Long courthouse days can also mean keeping phones and reporting equipment charged. Courtroom and travel essentials are available through Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Earlier coverage: Read what happened during Elmore’s pretrial hearing and why the judge said the Aug. 31 setting would remain firm.

Jodi Arias PCR deadline moved to 2027 after judge grants extension

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

A judge has given Jodi Arias nearly five more months to prepare her post-conviction relief petition.

The court moved the Jodi Arias PCR deadline from Sept. 2, 2026, to Jan. 29, 2027.

The decision ends weeks of uncertainty over whether Arias would have to file her long-awaited petition within days.

Her defense had argued that medical problems, unfinished investigative work and unresolved evidence made the September deadline impossible to meet.

Prosecutors opposed the request.

Judge grants Jodi Arias more time

Defense attorney Christopher Stavris asked for the extension in June.

He told the court that several members of the defense team faced serious medical issues.

Those problems included surgeries, extended medical leave and limited work schedules.

The defense argued that those circumstances slowed its investigation and preparation.

The judge ultimately agreed to give the team more time.

Arias now has until Jan. 29, 2027, to file her PCR petition.

What the extension does — and does not do

The ruling does not overturn Arias’ conviction.

It does not grant her a new trial.

It also does not reduce her sentence.

The order only gives her defense team additional time to prepare the petition.

That petition is expected to outline the legal grounds Arias plans to use to challenge her conviction or sentence.

Mystery evidence could still become important

One unanswered issue involves an unidentified piece of evidence.

Defense filings say the issue involves the State, the Mesa Police Department or both.

The filings do not publicly identify the evidence.

They also do not explain whether the item still exists or what information it may contain.

The defense says it requested information about the evidence months ago.

That issue could become more important once the PCR petition is filed.

Prosecutors wanted the September deadline to stay

Prosecutor Juan Martinez walking into court beside a witness during Jodi Arias’s resentencing proceedings.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez walks into court with a witness during Jodi Arias’s resentencing trial.

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office opposed giving Arias additional time.

Prosecutors argued that she had already received years to prepare her petition.

Arias filed her PCR notice in February 2021.

The State also argued that the defense could file the petition by the existing deadline and later seek permission to amend it.

The court rejected that position and granted the extension.

What happens next in the Jodi Arias case?

Jodi Arias seated in an Arizona courtroom during proceedings in her murder case.
Jodi Arias appears in court during proceedings in her Arizona murder case.

The next major deadline is now Jan. 29, 2027.

That is when Arias must file her PCR petition unless the court changes the schedule again.

Once that petition is filed, the public may finally learn which claims her defense plans to raise.

It could also provide more information about the unidentified evidence mentioned in earlier court filings.

Arias was convicted in 2013 of killing Travis Alexander in his Mesa home.

She is serving a natural-life sentence without the possibility of release.

For now, the conviction remains in place.

The next major development will likely come from the PCR petition itself or another court order before the January deadline.

Follow the Jodi Arias case

Chopper Rose Productions will continue tracking new court filings and developments in the Jodi Arias post-conviction case.

Planning a trip?

If your travels take you to Phoenix or elsewhere, compare available rooms and rates through Hotels.com.

Affiliate disclosure: I may earn a commission if you book through this link, at no additional cost to you.

Shop related books

Book cover for Conviction by Juan Martinez about the Jodi Arias murder trial.
Conviction by former prosecutor Juan Martinez examines the Jodi Arias murder case and trial.

Explore books about the Jodi Arias case, courtroom trials and true crime through Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Jodi Arias gets more time to file post-conviction challenge

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Jodi Arias will not have to file her long-awaited post-conviction relief petition next week.

A judge has granted Arias more time to prepare the petition challenging her murder conviction. The new order moves the Jodi Arias PCR deadline from September 2, 2026, to January 29, 2027.

The ruling gives Arias and her defense team nearly five additional months. Prosecutors had strongly opposed the extension.

Judge extends Jodi Arias PCR deadline

Defense attorney Christopher Stavris requested the extension in June.

He told the court that serious medical problems had disrupted the defense team’s work. One key team member needs more than three months of leave for surgery. Another team member also needs surgery and can only work in a limited role.

Two other team members face significant health problems. The defense may also need to replace another member because of continuing medical issues.

Stavris argued that those problems created extraordinary circumstances. He said the team could not complete its investigation before September 2.

The judge has now given the defense until January 29, 2027, to file Arias’ PCR petition.

Mystery evidence remains unresolved

The defense also says it still awaits information about an unidentified piece of evidence.

Court filings do not publicly describe that item. However, the defense says the issue involves the State, the Mesa Police Department or both.

Arias’ attorneys say they first requested information about the evidence nearly one year ago. They argue that they need answers before completing the PCR petition.

The filings do not explain whether the evidence still exists, what it may contain or how it could affect Arias’ claims.

Those questions remain unresolved.

Prosecutors fought the extension

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office urged the judge to keep the September deadline.

Prosecutors argued that Arias has already received years to prepare her petition. She filed her PCR notice on February 11, 2021.

The State said the September deadline gave her more than five and a half years to finish the filing. Prosecutors also argued that Arias could file the petition and request permission to amend it later.

The State took an even stronger position in its response. Prosecutors argued that missing the September deadline could support dismissal of Arias’ PCR notice.

Despite those objections, the court gave the defense more time.

What happens next in the Jodi Arias case?

Arias must now file her PCR petition by January 29, 2027.

That petition should identify the legal grounds she plans to use to challenge her conviction or sentence. It may also reveal more about the mystery evidence mentioned in recent court filings.

Arias was convicted in 2013 of murdering Travis Alexander inside his Mesa home. She is serving a natural-life sentence with no possibility of release.

The new order does not overturn her conviction or grant her a new trial. It only gives her defense team more time to file the petition seeking post-conviction relief.

For now, the biggest questions remain unanswered.

What is the unidentified evidence? What happened to it? And how does the defense believe it could affect one of Arizona’s most closely watched murder cases?

Planning a trip?

If your travels take you to Phoenix or anywhere else, compare available rooms and rates through Hotels.com.

Affiliate disclosure: I may earn a commission if you book through this link, at no additional cost to you.

Shop related books

Explore books about the Jodi Arias case, courtroom trials and true crime through Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold records tied to 2026 Rebecca Beard investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Rebecca Beard pictured before her disappearance in Texas in 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold Rebecca Beard records

Brazoria County prosecutors are asking the Texas Attorney General for permission to withhold records connected to the renewed investigation into the 1986 disappearance and murder of Rebecca “Becky” Beard.

The August 25 filing also reveals new details about the investigation.

Prosecutors confirmed investigators examined information involving possible additional suspects in Beard’s murder. They also confirmed investigators recently presented their findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The grand jury took no action.

Records request targeted 2026 investigation

I submitted a Texas Public Information Act request on August 10 seeking records related to the 2026 investigation.

The request focused on information provided by Cherie Starr, also known as “Rio.”

I requested interviews, statements, reports, recordings, photographs, maps and investigative notes connected to Starr’s information.

I also sought records concerning any location Starr identified as a possible site for Beard’s remains or other evidence.

The request included records involving a possible search, excavation or dig.

I also requested communications between the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office, Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office, Texas Rangers and other law enforcement agencies.

Importantly, the request did not seek secret grand jury testimony, deliberations, voting records or juror identities.

Brazoria County confirms responsive records exist

The District Attorney’s Office confirmed it holds records that respond to the request.

However, prosecutors want to withhold those records in their entirety.

In its August 25 letter to the Texas Attorney General, the DA’s Office cited the law-enforcement exception under Section 552.108 of the Texas Government Code.

Prosecutors argue that Beard’s murder investigation remains open because her body has never been recovered.

They contend releasing the requested records could interfere with that continuing investigation.

Filing reveals investigation of possible additional suspects

The filing provides an important glimpse into what happened during the renewed investigation.

Prosecutors wrote that their office had recently investigated “other possible actors/defendants” in Beard’s murder.

According to the filing, investigators presented those findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The DA’s Office said the grand jury took no action because investigators did not develop other credible suspects.

That disclosure provides new information about the scope of the 2026 investigation.

It shows investigators did more than simply review an old case file. They examined whether other people may have played a role in Beard’s murder and brought those findings before a grand jury.

Paul Taylor was convicted, but Becky remains missing

John Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in 1995 to murdering Beard.

Beard was 22 when she disappeared in March 1986.

Her body has never been recovered.

The DA’s filing cites that fact as one reason the murder investigation remains open. Prosecutors argue law enforcement must remain able to investigate credible new leads if they emerge.

Prosecutors also claim attorney work-product protection

The District Attorney’s Office makes another argument for withholding the records.

Prosecutors say the requested investigative notes and materials contain attorney work product.

According to the filing, a DA investigator prepared the records while working at the direction of an appointed special prosecutor.

The DA argues the documents contain investigative strategy, mental impressions and legal reasoning connected to potential criminal litigation.

For those reasons, prosecutors asked the Attorney General to allow them to withhold all of the responsive records.

The Attorney General will decide

The August 25 filing is not a final ruling on my records request.

It is Brazoria County’s argument for why the records should remain confidential.

The Texas Attorney General’s Office will now review the arguments and determine whether state law allows Brazoria County to withhold the requested material.

The decision could allow the county to withhold the records, require the release of some information, or require additional responsive material to be released.

I will continue following the records dispute and the investigation into what happened to Rebecca Beard.

The public records request and Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office filing to the Texas Attorney General are attached below.

Planning a trip to Brazoria County?

If you are traveling to Brazoria County to follow developments in the Rebecca Beard case, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Angleton, Lake Jackson, Freeport or the surrounding area, depending on your plans.

I may earn a commission from qualifying Hotels.com bookings made through my link, at no additional cost to you.

What to bring for a long reporting day

Court records, interviews and long hours on the road can mean a lot of waiting. A portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and lightweight bag can make the day easier. You can find travel gear and everyday reporting essentials on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 in Galveston County

James Elmore Jr. appears in court during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 as Judge Signals No Continuance

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

James Elmore Jr. remains on track for an Aug. 31 trial in Galveston County.

Elmore pleaded not guilty as his case moves toward a jury. He faces several criminal cases connected to the deaths linked to the area known as the Texas Killing Fields.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller was also present in the courtroom.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller sits in the courtroom during James Elmore Jr.’s pretrial hearing ahead of the Aug. 31 trial.

During a pretrial discussion, the judge made one point especially clear. The court intends to try the case as scheduled.

“Unless there’s some medical emergency … no continuance.”

The judge told attorneys to make sure everyone understands that the case has a firm trial setting.

James Elmore Jr. Manslaughter Case Will Go First

Watch the full James Elmore Jr. pretrial hearing above, including discussion of the Aug. 31 trial date, jury selection, discovery and the other pending cases.

Elmore currently has five pending cases, according to statements made in court.

The prosecution told the judge that it plans to try the manslaughter case first on Aug. 31.

The state said it no longer plans to first try newer cases involving allegations of possession of child pornography.

The court also discussed Elmore’s other pending cases.

Prosecutors said the tampering cases could become relevant during the manslaughter trial. They argued that some of that evidence may provide context involving the victim.

If a jury finds Elmore guilty of manslaughter, prosecutors could also introduce evidence from the other pending cases during the punishment phase.

The judge explained that process in court.

If jurors find Elmore not guilty, the remaining cases would still remain pending.

Attorneys Say Discovery Is Nearly Complete

James Elmore Jr. and attorneys appear before the judge during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

Both sides told the judge that no major discovery issues remain.

Prosecutors said they still need to handle several smaller matters. Those include redactions to statements and identifying specific jail calls.

The state also has images stored on a hard drive.

Defense attorneys can review those materials at the prosecutor’s office.

Elmore’s attorney told the judge that he plans to review the material while preparing for trial.

The court also discussed a discovery compliance form. Defense counsel said he would have Elmore review and sign it.

Court Could Call More Than 200 Potential Jurors

Jury selection could become one of the biggest challenges in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

The case has received extensive media coverage.

The judge and attorneys discussed calling more than 200 prospective jurors because of the attention surrounding the case.

The court could use a larger courtroom to accommodate the panel.

Attorneys also discussed whether to use a written jury questionnaire.

A questionnaire could help identify people who already know details about the case. However, it could also delay jury selection by a day.

The judge raised another concern.

Questions asked in front of the entire panel could influence other potential jurors. The court may instead question some people individually.

The goal will be to find jurors who can decide the case based only on evidence presented in court.

Judge Expects Trial to Last About One Week

James Elmore Jr. stands with attorneys during a pretrial hearing in Galveston County ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears with attorneys during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 trial.

The attorneys told the judge they expect the manslaughter trial to last about one week.

The court discussed beginning jury selection on the afternoon of Aug. 31.

Opening statements and testimony could begin the following day.

If the court uses a jury questionnaire, the trial could run slightly longer.

The court also expects to select alternate jurors.

Other James Elmore Cases Could Follow Quickly

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Prosecutors are already looking beyond the Aug. 31 trial.

The state told the judge it wants to return to court quickly for another Elmore case.

An October trial setting came up during the discussion.

The court discussed Oct. 5 as a possible next docket setting. Attorneys also mentioned Oct. 12 as another possibility.

Those dates could change depending on how long the manslaughter trial lasts and how quickly attorneys receive the court record.

Judge Warns Elmore Against Speaking

James Elmore Jr. stands beside his attorney and a courtroom deputy during a Galveston County pretrial hearing.
James Elmore Jr. stands with his attorney during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

The judge also addressed Elmore directly.

He told Elmore that he did not have to speak in court. The judge warned that anything Elmore said could become evidence against him.

Instead, the judge encouraged Elmore to communicate with his attorney about anything he wants addressed before trial.

The judge said the court would hear necessary motions, even if attorneys file them shortly before trial.

Aug. 31 Trial Remains Firm

For now, the most important development is simple.

James Elmore Jr. remains scheduled for trial Aug. 31.

The prosecution says it will begin with the manslaughter case.

The court expects a large jury pool because of the publicity surrounding the case.

And the judge made clear that he does not expect to grant another delay without a serious emergency.

Tim Miller’s presence in the courtroom also underscored the attention surrounding the case as it moves closer to trial.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the James Elmore Jr. case and any developments before jury selection begins.

Traveling to Texas for the James Elmore Jr. Trial?

Hotel swimming pool in Galveston, Texas, for travelers visiting Galveston County.
Travelers heading to Galveston County can compare hotel options near the courthouse and surrounding area.

If you are traveling to Galveston County to follow the James Elmore Jr. trial, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Galveston, League City or the surrounding area, depending on your travel plans and court schedule.

What to Pack for a Court Trip

Long court days can mean a lot of waiting. I recommend bringing a portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and a lightweight bag for your essentials. You can find travel gear and courtroom-day basics on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Mitchell Wasek court update: new Sept. 2 pretrial date appears after Aug. 18 setting

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Mitchell Wasek mugshot in Travis County criminal case
Mitchell Wasek faces felony charges in Travis County as his defense challenges evidence and seeks dismissal of the indictment.

A new court date has appeared in the criminal case against Mitchell Wasek.

Travis County court records now show a pretrial hearing set for Sept. 2, 2026, at 1:15 p.m. in the 167th District Court.

The change comes after Wasek had been scheduled for a pretrial hearing on Aug. 18.

That Aug. 18 setting no longer appears on the public hearing list.

Court records reviewed Wednesday do not show a ruling from the Aug. 18 setting. They also do not explain why the hearing date changed.

Wasek now set for Sept. 2 pretrial hearing

The new Sept. 2 setting appears in case D-1-DC-25-500122.

The case remains listed as an indictment in the Travis County Odyssey Portal.

The public docket currently shows the Sept. 2 hearing as a Pre-Trial Hearing before the 167th District Court.

The online record does not show an Aug. 18 minute entry or order.

Because of that, it is not yet clear whether the court formally reset the hearing, continued it, or took up any issues during the earlier setting.

Defense wants evidence suppressed

Mitchell Wasek booking photo in Travis County criminal case
Mitchell Wasek faces felony charges in Travis County as his defense seeks to suppress evidence and dismiss the indictment.

One major defense motion remains listed on the docket.

Wasek’s attorneys filed a motion to suppress on April 14, 2026.

According to the docket description, the defense seeks to suppress evidence allegedly obtained through theft and breach of computer security.

The public case record reviewed Wednesday does not show a ruling on that motion.

Defense also seeks dismissal of indictment

Wasek’s defense filed another significant motion on June 2, 2026.

That filing asks the court to dismiss the indictment based on an expired statute of limitations.

The docket also shows several subpoena applications filed that day.

An executed subpoena involving Detective Keith McManus appears on the docket on June 5.

Again, the public record currently does not show an order granting or denying the motion to dismiss.

Separate Wasek cases also set for Sept. 2

Wasek faces several separate criminal cases in Travis County.

Cases D-1-DC-23-500314 through D-1-DC-23-500319 also remain listed as indictments.

Those older cases show writ hearings scheduled for Sept. 2 at 1:15 p.m.

The 2025 case, however, lists a pretrial hearing at that same date and time.

The older cases also show appellate activity during 2026.

What happens next

The Sept. 2 hearing could provide the next major development in the case.

For now, the public docket does not show a ruling on Wasek’s motion to suppress or his request to dismiss the indictment.

It also does not explain what happened to the previously scheduled Aug. 18 pretrial hearing.

I will continue reviewing the Travis County court record for any new orders, motions or hearing information.

Traveling to Travis County for the Wasek case

If you are traveling to Travis County for court, work or a Texas getaway, Hotels.com can help you compare hotels, prices and locations near Austin and surrounding areas.

I may earn a commission from qualifying Hotels.com bookings at no additional cost to you.

What I use for reporting and travel

From portable chargers and travel gear to notebooks, camera accessories and other reporting essentials, I keep a running list of useful items on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Karmelo Anthony judge recused as new trial fight moves to new judge

Karmelo Anthony case update graphic reading “Judge recused” and “New judge assigned,” with a courtroom background and judge’s gavel.
Karmelo Anthony’s post-trial case will move forward under a new judge after the judge who presided over his murder trial was recused.

Update: Judge removed from Karmelo Anthony case

Karmelo Anthony’s fight for a new trial took a major turn Wednesday after the judge who presided over his murder trial was removed from the post-trial proceedings.

Visiting Judge Sid Harle granted the defense request to recuse Collin County Judge John Roach Jr. Anthony’s attorneys argued that Roach’s public comments following the conviction raised questions about whether he could remain impartial while considering the motion for a new trial. Harle ruled that the legal standard for recusal had been met. 

Retired District Judge Michael Chitty has now been assigned to the case. He is expected to preside over Anthony’s motion for a new trial, which remains scheduled for Thursday morning despite briefly appearing as canceled on the court’s online calendar. 

Anthony has not been granted a new trial. Wednesday’s ruling only determines which judge will decide that request.

Karmelo Anthony Seeks New Trial as Judge Recusal Hearing Approaches

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Karmelo Anthony is heading back to a Collin County courtroom just months after a jury convicted him of murder.

New court records show two major hearings scheduled for next week.

First, a judge will hear Anthony’s request to remove the judge who oversaw his murder trial.

Then, the court will take up Anthony’s request for a new trial.

The hearings come after a jury sentenced Anthony to 35 years in prison for the killing of 17-year-old Austin Metcalf.

Karmelo Anthony Recusal Hearing Set for August 19

Karmelo Anthony booking photo shown in an article about his upcoming recusal hearing in Collin County.
 Karmelo Anthony. Collin County court records show a hearing on his motion to recuse is set for August 19, 2026, at 9 a.m.

Collin County court records show a hearing on Anthony’s motion to recuse is set for August 19, 2026, at 9 a.m.

The hearing will take place in the 494th District Courtroom at the Collin County Courthouse.

Court records list Judge Harle as the presiding judge for the hearing.

Anthony’s murder case originally went before Judge John R. Roach Jr. in the 296th District Court.

The defense now wants Roach removed from the post-trial proceedings.

The court will consider that request before it addresses Anthony’s bid for a new trial.

Motion for New Trial Hearing Set for August 20

The next major hearing is scheduled for August 20, 2026, at 9 a.m.

That hearing will focus on Anthony’s motion for a new trial.

Court records currently list the judge and courtroom as pending.

The two hearings could play a major role in what happens next.

Anthony’s attorneys want the court to overturn his conviction and give him another trial.

Anthony Convicted in Austin Metcalf Killing

Austin Metcalf pictured in his Memorial High School football uniform with a “Justice for Austin” memorial frame.
Austin Metcalf is remembered by family, friends and the community as the Karmelo Anthony murder case continues through the Collin County court system.

The case began after a confrontation at a high school track meet in Frisco on April 2, 2025.

Anthony was 17 at the time.

Prosecutors accused him of fatally stabbing Austin Metcalf, 17, during the confrontation.

Anthony admitted that he stabbed Metcalf but argued that he acted in self-defense.

The case later went before a Collin County jury.

On June 9, 2026, jurors found Anthony guilty of murder.

The jury then sentenced him to 35 years in prison.

Court Records Show Case Is Under Appeal

The Collin County court system now lists Anthony’s case status as “Appealed.”

The case number is 296-83565-2025.

The online docket contains more than 300 case events.

Recent entries include an August 10 subpoena and the two upcoming hearings.

The appeal and new-trial effort mean the legal fight is far from over.

Why the Recusal Hearing Matters

The August 19 hearing comes first for a reason.

Anthony’s attorneys want another judge to handle the next stage of the case.

A ruling on that request could determine who hears the motion for a new trial.

That makes the recusal hearing an important step before the court considers whether Anthony should receive another trial.

Media Access Planned for August 19 Hearing

Collin County expects significant media and public interest in the hearings.

The county says only nine credentialed media seats will be available inside the courtroom for the August 19 hearing.

However, officials also plan to provide an overflow room with a video feed from the courtroom.

The county expects to release additional information about the August 20 hearing after the recusal hearing ends.

What Happens Next in the Karmelo Anthony Case?

The next two dates will be important.

August 19: Hearing on the motion to recuse.

August 20: Hearing on the motion for a new trial.

If the defense succeeds in its effort for a new trial, the case could return to a courtroom before another jury.

If the court rejects the request, Anthony can continue challenging his conviction through the appeals process.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue reviewing the court record as new filings and orders become available.

Source

Collin County District Court records and the Collin County Public Information Office.

Plan Your Texas Stay

Heading to North Texas? Compare nearby hotels and travel options through my Hotels.com link.

Travel Essentials I Use

From portable chargers to comfortable travel gear, you can shop my Amazon picks through the link below.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. I may also earn a commission from qualifying hotel bookings.