Category Archives: Texas News

Brazoria County seeks to withhold records tied to 2026 Rebecca Beard investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Rebecca Beard pictured before her disappearance in Texas in 1986.
Texas Department of Public Safety missing person bulletin for Rebecca “Becky” Beard, who disappeared in 1986.

Brazoria County seeks to withhold Rebecca Beard records

Brazoria County prosecutors are asking the Texas Attorney General for permission to withhold records connected to the renewed investigation into the 1986 disappearance and murder of Rebecca “Becky” Beard.

The August 25 filing also reveals new details about the investigation.

Prosecutors confirmed investigators examined information involving possible additional suspects in Beard’s murder. They also confirmed investigators recently presented their findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The grand jury took no action.

Records request targeted 2026 investigation

I submitted a Texas Public Information Act request on August 10 seeking records related to the 2026 investigation.

The request focused on information provided by Cherie Starr, also known as “Rio.”

I requested interviews, statements, reports, recordings, photographs, maps and investigative notes connected to Starr’s information.

I also sought records concerning any location Starr identified as a possible site for Beard’s remains or other evidence.

The request included records involving a possible search, excavation or dig.

I also requested communications between the Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office, Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office, Texas Rangers and other law enforcement agencies.

Importantly, the request did not seek secret grand jury testimony, deliberations, voting records or juror identities.

Brazoria County confirms responsive records exist

The District Attorney’s Office confirmed it holds records that respond to the request.

However, prosecutors want to withhold those records in their entirety.

In its August 25 letter to the Texas Attorney General, the DA’s Office cited the law-enforcement exception under Section 552.108 of the Texas Government Code.

Prosecutors argue that Beard’s murder investigation remains open because her body has never been recovered.

They contend releasing the requested records could interfere with that continuing investigation.

Filing reveals investigation of possible additional suspects

The filing provides an important glimpse into what happened during the renewed investigation.

Prosecutors wrote that their office had recently investigated “other possible actors/defendants” in Beard’s murder.

According to the filing, investigators presented those findings to a Brazoria County grand jury.

The DA’s Office said the grand jury took no action because investigators did not develop other credible suspects.

That disclosure provides new information about the scope of the 2026 investigation.

It shows investigators did more than simply review an old case file. They examined whether other people may have played a role in Beard’s murder and brought those findings before a grand jury.

Paul Taylor was convicted, but Becky remains missing

John Paul Taylor Jr. pleaded guilty in 1995 to murdering Beard.

Beard was 22 when she disappeared in March 1986.

Her body has never been recovered.

The DA’s filing cites that fact as one reason the murder investigation remains open. Prosecutors argue law enforcement must remain able to investigate credible new leads if they emerge.

Prosecutors also claim attorney work-product protection

The District Attorney’s Office makes another argument for withholding the records.

Prosecutors say the requested investigative notes and materials contain attorney work product.

According to the filing, a DA investigator prepared the records while working at the direction of an appointed special prosecutor.

The DA argues the documents contain investigative strategy, mental impressions and legal reasoning connected to potential criminal litigation.

For those reasons, prosecutors asked the Attorney General to allow them to withhold all of the responsive records.

The Attorney General will decide

The August 25 filing is not a final ruling on my records request.

It is Brazoria County’s argument for why the records should remain confidential.

The Texas Attorney General’s Office will now review the arguments and determine whether state law allows Brazoria County to withhold the requested material.

The decision could allow the county to withhold the records, require the release of some information, or require additional responsive material to be released.

I will continue following the records dispute and the investigation into what happened to Rebecca Beard.

The public records request and Brazoria County District Attorney’s Office filing to the Texas Attorney General are attached below.

Planning a trip to Brazoria County?

If you are traveling to Brazoria County to follow developments in the Rebecca Beard case, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Angleton, Lake Jackson, Freeport or the surrounding area, depending on your plans.

I may earn a commission from qualifying Hotels.com bookings made through my link, at no additional cost to you.

What to bring for a long reporting day

Court records, interviews and long hours on the road can mean a lot of waiting. A portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and lightweight bag can make the day easier. You can find travel gear and everyday reporting essentials on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 in Galveston County

James Elmore Jr. appears in court during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 as Judge Signals No Continuance

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

James Elmore Jr. remains on track for an Aug. 31 trial in Galveston County.

Elmore pleaded not guilty as his case moves toward a jury. He faces several criminal cases connected to the deaths linked to the area known as the Texas Killing Fields.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller was also present in the courtroom.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller sits in the courtroom during James Elmore Jr.’s pretrial hearing ahead of the Aug. 31 trial.

During a pretrial discussion, the judge made one point especially clear. The court intends to try the case as scheduled.

“Unless there’s some medical emergency … no continuance.”

The judge told attorneys to make sure everyone understands that the case has a firm trial setting.

James Elmore Jr. Manslaughter Case Will Go First

Watch the full James Elmore Jr. pretrial hearing above, including discussion of the Aug. 31 trial date, jury selection, discovery and the other pending cases.

Elmore currently has five pending cases, according to statements made in court.

The prosecution told the judge that it plans to try the manslaughter case first on Aug. 31.

The state said it no longer plans to first try newer cases involving allegations of possession of child pornography.

The court also discussed Elmore’s other pending cases.

Prosecutors said the tampering cases could become relevant during the manslaughter trial. They argued that some of that evidence may provide context involving the victim.

If a jury finds Elmore guilty of manslaughter, prosecutors could also introduce evidence from the other pending cases during the punishment phase.

The judge explained that process in court.

If jurors find Elmore not guilty, the remaining cases would still remain pending.

Attorneys Say Discovery Is Nearly Complete

James Elmore Jr. and attorneys appear before the judge during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

Both sides told the judge that no major discovery issues remain.

Prosecutors said they still need to handle several smaller matters. Those include redactions to statements and identifying specific jail calls.

The state also has images stored on a hard drive.

Defense attorneys can review those materials at the prosecutor’s office.

Elmore’s attorney told the judge that he plans to review the material while preparing for trial.

The court also discussed a discovery compliance form. Defense counsel said he would have Elmore review and sign it.

Court Could Call More Than 200 Potential Jurors

Jury selection could become one of the biggest challenges in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

The case has received extensive media coverage.

The judge and attorneys discussed calling more than 200 prospective jurors because of the attention surrounding the case.

The court could use a larger courtroom to accommodate the panel.

Attorneys also discussed whether to use a written jury questionnaire.

A questionnaire could help identify people who already know details about the case. However, it could also delay jury selection by a day.

The judge raised another concern.

Questions asked in front of the entire panel could influence other potential jurors. The court may instead question some people individually.

The goal will be to find jurors who can decide the case based only on evidence presented in court.

Judge Expects Trial to Last About One Week

James Elmore Jr. stands with attorneys during a pretrial hearing in Galveston County ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears with attorneys during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 trial.

The attorneys told the judge they expect the manslaughter trial to last about one week.

The court discussed beginning jury selection on the afternoon of Aug. 31.

Opening statements and testimony could begin the following day.

If the court uses a jury questionnaire, the trial could run slightly longer.

The court also expects to select alternate jurors.

Other James Elmore Cases Could Follow Quickly

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Prosecutors are already looking beyond the Aug. 31 trial.

The state told the judge it wants to return to court quickly for another Elmore case.

An October trial setting came up during the discussion.

The court discussed Oct. 5 as a possible next docket setting. Attorneys also mentioned Oct. 12 as another possibility.

Those dates could change depending on how long the manslaughter trial lasts and how quickly attorneys receive the court record.

Judge Warns Elmore Against Speaking

James Elmore Jr. stands beside his attorney and a courtroom deputy during a Galveston County pretrial hearing.
James Elmore Jr. stands with his attorney during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

The judge also addressed Elmore directly.

He told Elmore that he did not have to speak in court. The judge warned that anything Elmore said could become evidence against him.

Instead, the judge encouraged Elmore to communicate with his attorney about anything he wants addressed before trial.

The judge said the court would hear necessary motions, even if attorneys file them shortly before trial.

Aug. 31 Trial Remains Firm

For now, the most important development is simple.

James Elmore Jr. remains scheduled for trial Aug. 31.

The prosecution says it will begin with the manslaughter case.

The court expects a large jury pool because of the publicity surrounding the case.

And the judge made clear that he does not expect to grant another delay without a serious emergency.

Tim Miller’s presence in the courtroom also underscored the attention surrounding the case as it moves closer to trial.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the James Elmore Jr. case and any developments before jury selection begins.

Traveling to Texas for the James Elmore Jr. Trial?

Hotel swimming pool in Galveston, Texas, for travelers visiting Galveston County.
Travelers heading to Galveston County can compare hotel options near the courthouse and surrounding area.

If you are traveling to Galveston County to follow the James Elmore Jr. trial, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Galveston, League City or the surrounding area, depending on your travel plans and court schedule.

What to Pack for a Court Trip

Long court days can mean a lot of waiting. I recommend bringing a portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and a lightweight bag for your essentials. You can find travel gear and courtroom-day basics on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Kevin Tippit trial set for 2027 in John Mendoza shooting case

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

Brazoria County court records show a Feb. 1, 2027 trial date in the criminal case against former deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit. Mugshot photo credit: Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

Kevin Tippit trial date set in Brazoria County

Court records show prosecutors filed the case against Tippit on Aug. 6, 2026, in Brazoria County’s 239th District Court.

The docket lists several hearings before the scheduled trial:

Sept. 29, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. — Status hearing

Oct. 28, 2026 at 9 a.m. — Pretrial hearing

Jan. 21, 2027 at 9 a.m. — Announcement hearing

Feb. 1, 2027 at 9 a.m. — Trial

The court entered an Order for Pretrial Hearing and Setting Case for Trial on Aug. 12.

The February date remains the current trial setting. Court schedules can change as the case moves forward.

Former deputy released on bond

Texas Rangers arrested Tippit on Aug. 11.

Brazoria County court records show the judge set his bond at $250,000. Tippit later posted bond and was released from jail.

The court docket lists defense attorneys Guy L. Womack and Geoff L. Womack.

John Mendoza died after June police pursuit

John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. pictured in a Brazoswood High School football uniform.
John Gabriel Mendoza Jr., 18, was a Texas State University student who died following the June 1, 2026 shooting involving former Brazoria County deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit.

The criminal case stems from the June 1, 2026 shooting of John Gabriel Mendoza Jr.

Mendoza was 18 and attended Texas State University.

The incident began with a pursuit in Lake Jackson. The chase ended when Mendoza reached his home and pulled into the garage.

Tippit fired through the driver’s side window.

Radio traffic following the shooting captured Tippit reporting an “accidental discharge.”

Mendoza later died.

The Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office fired Tippit days after the shooting.

The Texas Rangers later investigated the case.

Grand jury indicted Kevin Tippit

Mugshot of former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit.
Former Brazoria County Sheriff’s Deputy Kevin Daniel Tippit faces a charge of aggravated assault by a public servant in connection with the June 1, 2026 shooting of John Gabriel Mendoza Jr. Photo credit: Brazoria County Sheriff’s Office.

A Brazoria County grand jury indicted Tippit on the charge of aggravated assault by a public servant.

Court records identify the charge under Texas Penal Code 22.02(b)(2)(A) and classify it as a first-degree felony.

The case number is 106968-CR.

The next hearing is currently scheduled for Sept. 29.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the case and any changes to the trial schedule.

Traveling to Brazoria County?

If you’re traveling to Brazoria County for a court hearing, trial or visit, you can compare nearby hotel options through Hotels.com. Staying close to Angleton can make early court mornings a little easier.

Beach house rental in Brazoria County, Texas, with palm trees and a raised coastal-style home.
Traveling to Brazoria County? Visitors can find hotels and vacation rentals near Angleton, Lake Jackson and the surrounding Gulf Coast area.

Hotels.com:

Disclosure: I may earn a commission if you book through this link, at no extra cost to you.

Amazon travel picks

If you’re heading to Brazoria County, a few simple travel essentials can make the trip easier. I also share useful travel gear through my Amazon affiliate links.

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Texas school corporal punishment: Port Arthur case raises questions

News graphic about Port Arthur ISD’s response to a reported corporal punishment incident involving a Memorial High School student.
Port Arthur ISD says it is reviewing a reported corporal punishment incident involving a Memorial High School student and will also revisit its corporal punishment policy.

Texas schools can still paddle students — and one Port Arthur mother’s allegations raise questions

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

A Texas mother says a football coach paddled her teenage son three times at school. Photos shared online appear to show significant bruising afterward.

The allegation may shock many parents.

However, Texas school corporal punishment remains legal in 2026.

Texas law allows public school districts to adopt policies that permit paddling and other physical punishment. Parents can prohibit the punishment, but they generally must give the district written notice.

The Port Arthur case now raises a larger question.

Where does school discipline end and physical injury begin?

Mother says football coach paddled her son

Grizzy’s Hood News reported the allegations Sunday after speaking with the student’s mother.

The mother said her son attends Memorial High School in Port Arthur.

According to the post, the teenager missed football practice Friday. His mother said she had recently suffered injuries in a serious car crash and could not provide transportation.

She said her son explained the situation to his coaches.

The mother alleges several adults later stood inside an office while her son bent over a table. She says a football coach then struck him three times.

She also alleges coaches cited other issues. Those included communication problems and wearing the wrong color football pants.

The mother says her son did not know someone planned to strike him.

A photograph published with the report shows dark discoloration and bruising on the student’s body.

Grizzy’s Hood News reported that the mother contacted police and filed a report.

The coach and Port Arthur Independent School District had not provided their accounts when the story appeared. No criminal charges had been announced.

The allegations have not yet received independent confirmation.

Texas law still allows corporal punishment in schools

This is the part that may surprise Texas parents.

State law specifically allows school districts to authorize corporal punishment.

The Texas Education Code defines corporal punishment as deliberately causing physical pain through actions such as hitting, paddling, spanking or slapping for discipline.

However, a school cannot simply decide on its own to start paddling students.

The district’s board of trustees must adopt a policy allowing corporal punishment.

Parents also have the right to stop a district from using corporal punishment on their child.

But Texas uses what amounts to an opt-out system.

A parent or guardian can submit a signed written statement prohibiting corporal punishment. The prohibition applies during that school year unless the parent later revokes it.

That distinction matters in the Port Arthur case.

The mother’s claim that she never signed a consent form does not automatically prove the school violated Texas law.

The bigger question involves Port Arthur ISD’s own policy.

What does Port Arthur ISD allow?

Memorial High School belongs to Port Arthur Independent School District. It serves as the district’s high school.

The district directs students and parents to a Student Code of Conduct for discipline rules. Memorial’s school pages also explain that the code follows Chapter 37 of the Texas Education Code. (Memorial 9th Grade Academy)

What if a parent caused the same bruising?

The case also highlights an uncomfortable comparison.

Texas allows parents to use reasonable physical force to discipline their children.

Texas Penal Code Section 9.61 says a parent, stepparent or person acting in the role of a parent may use non-deadly force when that person reasonably believes the force is necessary to discipline the child or protect the child’s welfare.

That does not give parents unlimited authority to hurt a child.

Police can investigate physical discipline when officers believe the force may have crossed the line into criminal conduct.

Bruising alone does not automatically prove a crime. The child’s age, amount of force, circumstances and extent of any injury can all matter.

The same basic question should matter when an adult at a school uses physical punishment.

How much force is too much?

Paddling remains controversial in Texas

Texas has debated ending corporal punishment in public schools for years.

A Texas Tribune investigation previously found that nearly 13,000 Texas students received corporal punishment during the 2017-18 school year. The report also found that Black students and students with disabilities received corporal punishment at disproportionate rates.

Lawmakers have introduced proposals to restrict or eliminate the practice.

Still, Texas law continues to allow school boards to authorize it.

That means a practice many parents associate with another generation can still happen inside a Texas public school today.

Port Arthur ISD responds to corporal punishment controversy

Port Arthur ISD statement dated August 18, 2026, addressing concerns over reported corporal punishment involving a Memorial High School student and announcing a district review.
Port Arthur ISD released this statement on August 18, 2026, responding to concerns about reported corporal punishment involving a Memorial High School student.

Port Arthur ISD responded to the controversy on Aug. 18, saying the district is reviewing the reported use of corporal punishment involving a Memorial High School student.

The district said corporal punishment is currently an authorized discipline technique under its Board-approved policy and Student Code of Conduct.

Under that policy, PAISD said parents do not have to give written permission before corporal punishment can be used. Instead, a parent who does not want corporal punishment used on their child must submit a signed written statement to the campus principal prohibiting it for that school year.

PAISD said it is reviewing the reported incident to determine what happened and whether district policies and procedures were followed.

The district also acknowledged concerns surrounding corporal punishment and said the Board of Trustees will revisit the policy to determine whether changes or additional procedures are appropriate.

Superintendent Dr. Mark Porterie said the district remains committed to student safety and to ensuring discipline is administered fairly and consistently.

The district’s statement did not announce any disciplinary action against the coach or any criminal charges related to the reported incident.

Should hitting students with a paddle still have a place in Texas public schools in 2026?

Planning a trip to Houston?

If you’re traveling to Houston for court, business or a weekend visit, you can compare hotels near downtown, the Harris County Criminal Justice Center and other Houston attractions through Hotels.com.

Gear I use for reporting and travel

 Court records, breaking news and long reporting days mean I spend plenty of time working from my phone and laptop. I keep a few travel and reporting essentials with me, including portable chargers, phone accessories and compact gear that fits easily in my bag.

VIEW ON AMAZON

GoPro action camera used for travel and reporting
GoPro camera I use for travel, field reporting and capturing video on the go.

Shop my travel and reporting picks on Amazon:

Disclosure: This post may contain affiliate links, including Amazon and Hotels.com. I may earn a commission if you make a purchase or booking through these links, at no additional cost to you.