Category Archives: Galveston County

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 in Galveston County

James Elmore Jr. appears in court during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

James Elmore Jr. Trial Set for Aug. 31 as Judge Signals No Continuance

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

James Elmore Jr. remains on track for an Aug. 31 trial in Galveston County.

Elmore pleaded not guilty as his case moves toward a jury. He faces several criminal cases connected to the deaths linked to the area known as the Texas Killing Fields.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller was also present in the courtroom.

Texas EquuSearch founder Tim Miller sits in the courtroom during James Elmore Jr.’s pretrial hearing ahead of the Aug. 31 trial.

During a pretrial discussion, the judge made one point especially clear. The court intends to try the case as scheduled.

“Unless there’s some medical emergency … no continuance.”

The judge told attorneys to make sure everyone understands that the case has a firm trial setting.

James Elmore Jr. Manslaughter Case Will Go First

Watch the full James Elmore Jr. pretrial hearing above, including discussion of the Aug. 31 trial date, jury selection, discovery and the other pending cases.

Elmore currently has five pending cases, according to statements made in court.

The prosecution told the judge that it plans to try the manslaughter case first on Aug. 31.

The state said it no longer plans to first try newer cases involving allegations of possession of child pornography.

The court also discussed Elmore’s other pending cases.

Prosecutors said the tampering cases could become relevant during the manslaughter trial. They argued that some of that evidence may provide context involving the victim.

If a jury finds Elmore guilty of manslaughter, prosecutors could also introduce evidence from the other pending cases during the punishment phase.

The judge explained that process in court.

If jurors find Elmore not guilty, the remaining cases would still remain pending.

Attorneys Say Discovery Is Nearly Complete

James Elmore Jr. and attorneys appear before the judge during a pretrial hearing ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

Both sides told the judge that no major discovery issues remain.

Prosecutors said they still need to handle several smaller matters. Those include redactions to statements and identifying specific jail calls.

The state also has images stored on a hard drive.

Defense attorneys can review those materials at the prosecutor’s office.

Elmore’s attorney told the judge that he plans to review the material while preparing for trial.

The court also discussed a discovery compliance form. Defense counsel said he would have Elmore review and sign it.

Court Could Call More Than 200 Potential Jurors

Jury selection could become one of the biggest challenges in the James Elmore Jr. trial.

The case has received extensive media coverage.

The judge and attorneys discussed calling more than 200 prospective jurors because of the attention surrounding the case.

The court could use a larger courtroom to accommodate the panel.

Attorneys also discussed whether to use a written jury questionnaire.

A questionnaire could help identify people who already know details about the case. However, it could also delay jury selection by a day.

The judge raised another concern.

Questions asked in front of the entire panel could influence other potential jurors. The court may instead question some people individually.

The goal will be to find jurors who can decide the case based only on evidence presented in court.

Judge Expects Trial to Last About One Week

James Elmore Jr. stands with attorneys during a pretrial hearing in Galveston County ahead of his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.
James Elmore Jr. appears with attorneys during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 trial.

The attorneys told the judge they expect the manslaughter trial to last about one week.

The court discussed beginning jury selection on the afternoon of Aug. 31.

Opening statements and testimony could begin the following day.

If the court uses a jury questionnaire, the trial could run slightly longer.

The court also expects to select alternate jurors.

Other James Elmore Cases Could Follow Quickly

Booking photo of James Elmore Jr. displayed on an inmate detail card related to his criminal case.
James Elmore Jr. booking photo. His trial is currently scheduled to begin Aug. 31, 2026, in Galveston County.

Prosecutors are already looking beyond the Aug. 31 trial.

The state told the judge it wants to return to court quickly for another Elmore case.

An October trial setting came up during the discussion.

The court discussed Oct. 5 as a possible next docket setting. Attorneys also mentioned Oct. 12 as another possibility.

Those dates could change depending on how long the manslaughter trial lasts and how quickly attorneys receive the court record.

Judge Warns Elmore Against Speaking

James Elmore Jr. stands beside his attorney and a courtroom deputy during a Galveston County pretrial hearing.
James Elmore Jr. stands with his attorney during a pretrial hearing as the court prepares for his Aug. 31 manslaughter trial.

The judge also addressed Elmore directly.

He told Elmore that he did not have to speak in court. The judge warned that anything Elmore said could become evidence against him.

Instead, the judge encouraged Elmore to communicate with his attorney about anything he wants addressed before trial.

The judge said the court would hear necessary motions, even if attorneys file them shortly before trial.

Aug. 31 Trial Remains Firm

For now, the most important development is simple.

James Elmore Jr. remains scheduled for trial Aug. 31.

The prosecution says it will begin with the manslaughter case.

The court expects a large jury pool because of the publicity surrounding the case.

And the judge made clear that he does not expect to grant another delay without a serious emergency.

Tim Miller’s presence in the courtroom also underscored the attention surrounding the case as it moves closer to trial.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue following the James Elmore Jr. case and any developments before jury selection begins.

Traveling to Texas for the James Elmore Jr. Trial?

Hotel swimming pool in Galveston, Texas, for travelers visiting Galveston County.
Travelers heading to Galveston County can compare hotel options near the courthouse and surrounding area.

If you are traveling to Galveston County to follow the James Elmore Jr. trial, you can compare hotel options through Hotels.com. Look for rooms near Galveston, League City or the surrounding area, depending on your travel plans and court schedule.

What to Pack for a Court Trip

Long court days can mean a lot of waiting. I recommend bringing a portable phone charger, reusable water bottle and a lightweight bag for your essentials. You can find travel gear and courtroom-day basics on Amazon.

As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

New Records Raise Questions in Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw Case

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, two teenagers who disappeared after traveling to Galveston on August 4, 1971
Rhonda Renee Johnson, left, and Sharon Lynn Shaw disappeared after leaving Webster for a trip to Galveston on August 4, 1971. Public-domain image via Wikimedia Commons.

New Records Raise Questions About Unidentified Remains in Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw Investigation

By Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose

More than five decades after the murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, newly reviewed records are raising questions about additional human remains found in the area. The records also raise the possibility that investigators once considered whether another person played a role in the case.

Rhonda Johnson, 14, and Sharon Shaw, 13, disappeared from Galveston County in August 1971. Authorities later recovered their skeletal remains in and around Clear Lake along Galveston Bay.

The investigation continued for decades as detectives worked to identify remains, examine evidence and determine whether the discoveries connected to the two girls.

The records do not prove that another victim or another killer was connected to the murders. However, they show how much uncertainty investigators faced during the early stages of the case.

Remains of Sharon Shaw and Rhonda Johnson Identified

On January 3, 1972, two boys fishing in Clear Lake discovered a human skull floating in the water.

Authorities later identified the skull through dental records as belonging to Sharon Shaw. Investigators also reportedly found a crucifix around the jawbone that Sharon’s mother identified as her daughter’s.

About six weeks later, searchers recovered additional skeletal remains in a marsh near Clear Lake. Authorities identified one set of those remains as belonging to Rhonda Johnson.

The discoveries confirmed that both girls had died, but investigators could not determine their exact causes of death from the remains.

The identification resolved the girls’ missing-person cases, but other remains recovered during that period created additional questions.

Michael Lloyd Self Was Convicted

Investigators eventually focused on Michael Lloyd Self, who worked as a gas station attendant in the Webster/Clear Lake area. Authorities charged Self in connection with the murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw

A jury convicted Self of murdering Sharon Shaw and sentenced him to life in prison. The court record confirms that his conviction involved Sharon’s murder; he was not convicted of Rhonda Johnson’s murder. 

Self later said police had threatened and physically abused him until he confessed. Questions about whether investigators obtained a false or coerced confession followed the case for decades. A federal judge once recommended relief based on the confession issue, although a later appeals court decision allowed the conviction to stand. 

Edward Harold Bell Became an Alternate Suspect

Michael Lloyd Self in a Pasadena Police Department mugshot.
Michael Lloyd Self was convicted in Sharon Shaw’s murder, though questions later emerged about his confession and whether he was responsible.

In 1998, convicted killer Edward Harold Bell claimed responsibility for the murders of several young women and girls in the Galveston-area region. His statements included two girls from Webster who disappeared in August 1971, which investigators associated with Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw.

Bell became an alternate suspect in their murders, but authorities never charged him in the case. Investigators reportedly lacked physical or biological evidence that conclusively connected Bell to the girls’ deaths. 

Bell’s claims increased doubts about Self’s conviction, but they did not officially resolve who killed Rhonda and Sharon.

Questions Surrounding Other Remains

Records reviewed by Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose indicate authorities recovered an unidentified torso in September 1971.

Investigators reportedly found clothing or personal items with or near the remains that they believed belonged to Phillip Manning. Those items initially led authorities to consider whether the torso might be Manning’s.

Authorities later located Manning alive in Louisiana. That confirmed the torso was not his.

The discovery still raised questions about the unidentified victim’s identity and whether another victim—or possibly another killer—may have been connected to the investigation. However, the records reviewed so far do not establish that the torso was connected to the murders of Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw.

Records Detail Manning’s Background

The records also include criminal-history and case information connected to Phillip Manning. That material may help explain why investigators examined his possible connection to the case.

However, the records do not establish that Manning killed Rhonda Johnson, Sharon Shaw or anyone else. The information surrounding him remained circumstantial, and the records reviewed so far do not show that authorities filed a case against him in connection with the girls’ murders.

Investigators Faced Difficult Conditions

Galveston’s shoreline at sunset. Severe weather and shifting Gulf waters may have complicated recovery efforts and the early investigation in 1971.
Galveston shoreline and Gulf waters at sunset

The discoveries occurred during a period when severe weather affected portions of the Texas Gulf Coast.

Tropical storms Edith and Fern moved through the region in September 1971, potentially complicating searches, recovery efforts and investigators’ ability to determine where remains had originally entered the water.

Water movement, weather conditions and the passage of time may have made it more difficult to connect separate remains to specific locations or victims.

Investigators in 1971 also did not have access to the DNA testing and modern forensic databases available today.

Identifications often depended heavily on dental comparisons, physical characteristics and other available medical evidence.

Was Another Killer Suspected?

The records raise an important question: Did investigators believe the additional remains pointed to another victim—or possibly another offender operating in the area?

The documents reviewed so far do not provide a definitive answer.

They instead show that authorities were dealing with several discoveries, uncertain identifications and incomplete information during the earliest stages of the investigation.

Any suggestion that another killer was involved should be treated as a theory unless additional police reports, forensic findings or official statements support it.

Questions That Still Need Answers

Several important questions remain:

Who exactly was Phillip Manning?

Why did investigators connect his name to the torso?

Was the torso ever conclusively identified?

Did Manning have any documented connection to Rhonda Johnson or Sharon Shaw?

What did investigators believe before the girls’ remains were fully identified?

Are additional reports or forensic records still available?

Those questions may be important in understanding not only what investigators knew, but also how the case evolved during its earliest months.

Investigation Continues to Draw Interest

Galveston beach where Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled before disappearing in August 1971
Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw traveled from Webster to Galveston on August 4, 1971, before they disappeared.

The murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw remain among the most discussed cases connected to the Texas Gulf Coast.

Decades later, old reports, forensic findings and previously overlooked names continue to generate new questions.

The records do not yet prove that another killer was involved. But they show that the investigation may have been more complex than the public understood—and that parts of the story may still be missing.

Investigative Reporter Tammy Rose will continue reviewing available records and seeking documentation that could clarify the identity of the additional remains and Phillip Manning’s possible connection to the investigation.

Related Products

Waterproof Document Organizer

When reviewing decades-old police reports, newspaper clippings and case files, a waterproof document organizer can help protect important records from spills, moisture and damage.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Portable Document Scanner

A portable scanner can make it easier to digitize old reports, photographs and handwritten notes while researching historical cases.

Planning a Trip to Galveston?

Visitors researching Galveston County history or spending time along the Texas Gulf Coast can compare hotels and available accommodations through Hotels.com.

Disclosure: I may earn a commission from eligible bookings at no additional cost to you.

Related Coverage

Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw: 55 Years Later

A closer look at the disappearance and murders of Rhonda Johnson and Sharon Shaw, the recovery of their remains and the questions that continue decades later.

Texas Killing Fields: James Elmore Jr. Trial Approaches

James Elmore Jr. is scheduled to face trial as investigators continue examining cases connected to the Texas Killing Fields.