Tag Archives: Investigative Journalism

Juan Martinez Disciplinary Hearing: My Story as a Key Witness

This story is long overdue. I am speaking publicly because I was a key witness in the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing. My decision to come forward helped expose misconduct that ultimately ended his career as a prosecutor.

How I Discovered the Misconduct

Flying in SkyEye 13!
Journalist Tammy Rose

Covering the Jodi Arias Sentencing Retrial

 I was covering the Jodi Arias case when I noticed troubling behavior by then‑prosecutor Juan Martinez. It crossed ethical lines.

One of the most disturbing revelations was the leak of Juror 17’s identity to the public. The information did not come from the court; it came from within the prosecution itself, passed via a media intermediary.

When a juror’s identity becomes public, it puts them at serious risk. In this case, that juror later received threats to their safety.

That moment marked a turning point for me. What began as reporting became a matter of public responsibility. I realized I needed to document and report what I had uncovered.

I provided investigators with records and testimony about how the leak happened, knowing it could affect my career and reputation. Still, I chose to act ethically and tell the truth.

The investigation confirmed that protected information had been improperly shared and that this conduct was part of a broader pattern of ethical violations.

Prosecutor Juan Martinez walking into court with a key witness during Jodi Arias' sentencing retrial

My Role in the Disciplinary Hearing

I gave testimony and submitted evidence detailing the leaks and unethical conduct. My goal was never to attack individuals unnecessarily, but to ensure accountability and integrity in the justice system.

I acted independently and ethically, aware that speaking out could impact my professional life. But truth and public safety were my priority.

Journalist Tammy Rose traveling to court for the Jodi Arias resentencing, connected to the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing
Journalist Tammy Rose traveling to court for the Jodi Arias resentencing trial, connected to the Juan Martinez disciplinary hearing

What Happened After the Investigation

After reviewing the evidence, the investigation confirmed a pattern of ethical violations, including:

• Improper communications with media members

• Leaks of protected juror information

• Conduct prejudicial to justice

As a result, Juan Martinez was terminated and later disbarred. His ability to practice law was permanently revoked.

Proseuctor Juan Martinez during the Jodi Arias resentencing trial, observed by journalist Tammy Rose

Why This Story Still Matters

Prosecutors hold immense power. When that power is abused, the entire justice system is at risk. I came forward because journalists are not above the law — and neither are prosecutors.

This story reminds us that accountability matters.

More Investigative Journalism by Tammy Rose

This story is part of my work covering the justice system and holding powerful figures accountable. You can read more of my investigative reporting here.

Could the Jodi Arias case be blown wide open in 2026?

Jodi Arias sitting in court during her murder trial in Phoenix, Arizona

Why the Jodi Arias Case Is Back in the Spotlight

Is there a real possibility the infamous Jodi Arias case could be retried due to missing evidence and alleged misconduct?

For the first time in years, Jodi Arias is publicly addressing that question herself.

Arias was convicted of murdering her ex-boyfriend, Travis Alexander, in 2008 after stabbing and shooting him in the shower. She is currently serving a life sentence. Now, more than a decade later, Arias has begun writing about her case again — and this time, her focus is not prison life, but the integrity of the investigation and prosecution that put her behind bars.

Investigative reporter Tammy Rose inside a news helicopter during coverage of the Jodi Arias case, which she reported on both from the air and on the ground.

Why a Retrial in 2026 Is Unlikely But Possible

Through her attorneys, Arias has filed a post-conviction relief request. From inside Perryville Prison, she responded to investigative reporter Tammy Rose regarding the possibility of an interview related to that filing.

What New Evidence Could Change

Until now, Arias’ “Just Jodi” prison blog has largely avoided the details of her criminal case, focusing instead on daily life behind bars.

But a new post titled “Hello, 2026” marks a significant shift. In it, Arias makes serious allegations, claims misconduct, and states she is seeking new legal counsel to pursue them.

In the post, Arias accuses investigators and prosecutors of withholding, losing, or destroying exculpatory evidence. She specifically names former lead detective Steve Flores, now retired, and former prosecutor Juan Martinez.

“Important, exculpatory evidence in my case has been lost or destroyed,” Arias writes. “Where is my proof? I’m working on that.”

She also alleges her current legal representation has dismissed her concerns, claiming her attorneys minimize her claims while continuing to bill the county.

Adding to the controversy, both attorneys from Arias’ original trial were later disbarred. Former prosecutor Juan Martinez was disbarred for misconduct following the trial , and Arias’ defense attorney, Kirk Nurmi, was also disbarred after writing a book about his client while her case was still active — a move widely criticized as unethical.

“As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases”

Book cover of "Trapped with Ms. Arias" by L. Kirk Nurmi, featuring gold handcuffs on a black background.
Defense attorney Kirk Nurmi wrote a book about his client. #ad

Court documents also reference requests for information regarding a book Martinez allegedly began writing during Arias’ first trial, raising additional concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

Book cover of "Conviction: The Untold Story of Putting Jodi Arias Behind Bars" by Juan Martinez.
Prosecutor Juan Martinez also allegedly worked on a book related to the case during the first trial. #ad

What This Means for True Crime Watchers where should that go

So the question remains: do these claims — combined with documented misconduct surrounding key figures in the case— give Jodi Arias a legitimate path toward a new trial?

For now, the courts will decide whether her allegations warrant further review. But for the first time in years, Jodi Arias is no longer avoiding the case – she’s confronting it head-on.

For more true crime stories, click here.